The #muttoncrew's @dr_barrett, a self-proclaimed "paediatric haematologist" just accused @DrAseemMalhotra of making a false claim over the Jorja Halliday case.
Neil Barrett, who claims to be at @CHIatConnollym is a member of the #muttoncrew, the UK's famous "disinformation warriors" on twitter. He has a researchgate profile but that's where his trace ends.
He's a real doctor but no web presence.
Whether he is practising is unknown.
But now we have an interesting conundrum because Neil is claiming that Jorja Halliday's death was not vaccine related, even though she was certified as dying of "myocarditis" - "on the day she was due to receive her vaccine". news.sky.com/story/sister-oβ¦
Except the story doesn't fit because she supposedly died 4 days after testing positive for COVID.
Viral Myocarditis doesn't work like that, it appears later.
At worst this may produce cardiac failure down the track and in a young girl in a hospital without cardiac failure, there would be a myriad of options for support if she got it.
The story stinks.
@DrAseemMalhotra is a cardiologist and KNOWS how post-viral myocarditis works
So, where was Tracey Halliday?
Well Sky News portrayed Tracey as a single mother of 5 living in a council flat in the UK. The only time we see someone who could be her is in their photo.
In fact it's almost as if the media were trying to portray Tracey Halliday as the new Shannon Matthews bbc.com/news/uk-388814β¦
And any search for Tracey Halliday or Jorja Halliday prior to September 2021 is more or less a dead end. Apart from spurious findings of make-up artists working with the media.
Obviously @TraceyJSpencer is nothing to do with this.
Far too posh.
Talking of posh. If Tracey Halliday is a council house mother of 5 as portrayed by Sky, how has her sister managed to get such a refined accent?
Almost like an actress in this ITV interview, but without the emotion.
It's worth watching this clip. These days a lot of medical school and medical college exams use actresses, and it looks like this. No emotion. Read from a script.
Why would this interview be so emotionless?
And the call for vaccination seems out of place.
Scripted.
So there is something very fishy about the story of Jorja's death.
I suspect it has to do with her care at @icu_portsmouth.
I asked this question of the lead clinician there.
Let's see what happens.
In the meantime I would welcome any updates from @laurabundock who was given the scoop, despite being a Royal Correspondent.
It now becomes imperative that the truth about Jorja Halliday's death is told. Because on the face of it it looks like someone is hiding something.
And the story really reminds me of the death of Adriana Takara, that we know to be a cover up of a terrible mistake resulting from the imposition of fear to coerce an experimental RNA therapy.
You were lied to about the Merck measles vaccine develop in the 60s. When injected into babies it caused fevers, rashes, diarrhoea and febrile convulsions.
Why?
I'm going to show you.
@SecKennedy @RetsefL @MaryanneDemasi @DrJulieSladden @RWMaloneMD
Merck claimed that the "measles vaccine" was an "attenuated version of measles" giving the impression that it was a virus that was made safe.
That was a lie.
It was just measles, passaged in cells in a lab.
We injected our babies with actual measles.
How do I know?
Recently released Australian Road Deaths data confirm that the @epiphare study claiming that COVID vaccination reduced road deaths by 32% was, as suspected, a complete fake.
Here are the actual road deaths data plotted from the Australian BITRE data repository using a trendline for 2000-2019 (excluding 2020 as it was a quiet year)
The pink area shows the inflection and increase in road deaths over the predicted number.
Note that road deaths have a downward trend despite an increase in population (due to safety measures and slowing of traffic).
So the question becomes...
"what is the probability that - if the @epiphare study was real (showing a 32% reduction in road deaths after vaccination) - the Australian road deaths (where nearly 100% of the adult population was vaccinated) would increase by 36%"?
Debbie's tweet was about her case against @HHSGov when her son developed Type 1 Diabetes after a routine vaccine, when he had a negative glucose test prior.
So it was clearly vaccine linked, but her case was denied.
Not only was the case denied (despite clear evidence of a new diagnosis immediately after vaccination) but the case was used by the "judge" to essentially ban ANY further cases that alleged a link between new diabetes and a routine vaccine.
Here is the clip from the (decent) interview with Pelle Neroth Taylor of @RealTNTRadio.
In it Boyle is asked whether the mRNA vaccines are themselves biological weapons and he explains that because "in your system, it generates the COVID-19 cells" they would be.
But of course that's incorrect, because mRNA vaccines don't recreate the COVID virus (the biological weapon - assuming as we now know that it was synthetic not natural).
So his explanation was incorrect because he misunderstood that the mRNA only provides the spike protein and he would have been destroyed on this point in court.
Of course he never got to court. And never gave an affidavit for the Dutch court - confirmed here (8/3/25):
I'll say it again. The vaccine industry [KNOWINGLY] hijacked cell pathways that cause cancer in order to induce antibody responses so that they can claim that their product "worked" by demonstrating those antibodies - even if they offered zero protection.
To explain, when you induce an immune response you have an immune debt to pay. You can't just keep creating an immune response - or, as in the case of cancer, you will die.
A vaccine creates an artificial immune response...
Which might be fine if it was done every now and again. But what they didn't tell you was that the human body will not respond to an injected antigen alone. It will ignore it (thankfully) and the generic immune system will mop it up, no antibodies required.