Tim Hogan 浩勤 Profile picture
Jun 7 5 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
1. I think I have another possible explanation for why there's another Trump grand jury in South Florida. After I skimmed through the #TaylorBudowich Jan 6th Committee transcript where his role in the Save America Pac was addressed I thought perhaps he lived
2. in Florida but I don't think he does. I think they are building a case about the PACs as a grift along with other fund raising activities that were the reason #45 started to plan the attack on Congress. But the reason they are in Florida, if this pans out, will blow
3. what's left of Trump's mind. Trump used MAL to commit crimes. I think they may be planning to seize it. From the new DOJ manual: Image
4. Venue for an 'in rem' civil forfeiture is clearly in that district. And in a civil forfeiture they can seize it before he's convicted if the property was used to commit crimes. Just like a drug smuggler's plane or boat. Image
5. And now I'm going to watch for a grand jury in New Jersey. Isn't that where he waived a purloined classified document bagging to all present about it? Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tim Hogan 浩勤

Tim Hogan 浩勤 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TimInHonolulu

Jun 8
1. I've been pondering the #venue angst that I see being amplified by Trump's attorney, who claims to not represent him, #TimParlatore, who was selling it on @Lawrence. Weird coincidence that within 23 days from now #SCOTUS should hand down a case on whether criminal venue error
2. prevents retrial after defective venue ruling vacates a conviction. SCOTUS hasn't done a criminal venue case in a long time and they're doing one right now, passing drafts around & thinking about it while Parlatore does his MSNBC schtick. But I've concluded it's a red herring.
3. The US Code has flaws for the lazy. You might look at the name of a specific statute and think it actually describes the entire statute. The obstruction chapter has a few sleepers. I went back to refresh my memory regarding some of the key facts.
Read 14 tweets
Jun 7
1. Report that Steve Bannon received a grand jury subpoena has me puzzled. I understand that it's DOJ policy to not subpoena a target. So why would Bannon, who was reported to have been heavily involved in the seditious conspiracy, avoid target status? cnn.com/2021/09/23/pol… Image
2. It prompted me to look at his pardon issued on January 19, 2021, Trump's last full day as POTUS. The underlying crimes were money laundering. The rest of the listed crimes charged in SDNY have to do with attempt and conspiracy plus the forfeiture counts. Image
3. There is another more general grant of pardon for anything chargeable in that case under Chapter 95 of Title 18. Guess what that is? Image
Read 4 tweets
Jun 7
1. Justice Thomas delays disclosures after reports of travel, property sale. washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/…
2. If the Conservative justices who have been supplementing income, with so-called gifts from people with business before the court, have to disclose and thus expose the grift, they may decide they want the loot more than the black Mumu and quit.
3. And if they continue to take money from what appears to smell like bribes they should be subject to state laws that can be enacted to punish them if they don't recuse from cases involving the state or its citizens because, as Roberts points out, the Congress has not acted.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 7
1. If Meadows testified in a grand jury hearing testimony about BOTH Jan 6 and MAL documents investigations, I think it's likely Jack Smith is going to charge both cases in a single indictment. Otherwise why use the same grand jury? Also, everyone is talking about immunity
2. for Meadows as if it means he got a deal. That would be transactional immunity that makes him immune from prosecution. I expect Smith is playing hardball with him and granted limited use immunity that prohibits the use of his testimony against him. Because Meadows turned over
4. a ton of documents early in the investigation, and the phones of co-conspirators have been seized and imaged I expect they have enough to convict Meadows without his testimony. On Chris Christie, I always look at a person's background to try to understand what they know.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 6
1. Laws attacking people for their immutable characteristics are violations of Equal Protection. Being gay or trans is not a choice no more than being of a particular ethnic group or being disabled. What I perceive the far-right's attack on LGBTQ rights to mean is eventually
2. the laws will all be subject to strict scrutiny and be struck down. Any attempt to avoid it by claiming that they are addressing conduct and not a suspect class is likely to be overcome by the hatred and vitriol of the radical right that proves that the reason for enactment
3. is intentional invidious discrimination. I think the strategy is focusing a fire hose of hate that makes going to court and overturning the laws more challenging and allows the hate-based laws to avoid judicial scrutiny. @CivilRights Div may be overwhelmed by the scope of the
Read 5 tweets
Jun 6
IMO nature of PGA-LIV merger that involves a foreign state, likely makes resulting entity & possibly US resident players subject to FARA registration if a foreign entity has the power over advertising and content of permissible speech. This is a foolish idea. DOJ should block it.
And I know that there is ongoing litigation related to 911 victims but the fact is that Al-Qaeda targeted the Saudi royals. Some Saudis likely provided support as a way to appease Bin Laden. To equate Saudi royals with Al-Qaeda IMO evidences a fundamental lack of understanding.
And for the issues surrounding the murder of the US national Khashoggi in Istanbul, noteworthy, the official US position is that MBS is "responsible" for the killing. The term can mean a lot of things in the context of what could have transpired.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(