It's a two-box day at #SCOTUS, meaning we're expecting 3 or 4 opinions, unless they're both really long.
Subscribe to Law Dork now for all my reporting: lawdork.com
The first decision is in Health and Hospital Association of Marion County v. Talevski. Jackson has the 7-2 opinion for the court, finding there *is* a 1983 cause of action under the Federal Nursing Home Reform Act. Thomas and Alito dissent. supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf…
Second decision is in the Jack Daniels dog toy case. The dog toy loses. Kagan has the opinion for the unanimous court. Sotomayor and Gorsuch both wrote concurring opinions. supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf…
Third, and not last, decision today is in Dubin v. US. Sotomayor has the opinion of the court, vacating the 5th Circuit's decision. Gorsuch concurs in judgment. supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf…
BREAKING: In a surprise ruling, the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, AFFIRMS a lower court ruling that found Alabama violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act by diluting Black people's votes with the state's redistricting plan.
Chief Justice John Roberts has the opinion for the court. He is joined by Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson in whole and Kavanaugh in part. Kavanaugh wrote a concurrence in part. Thomas and Alito wrote dissents, Gorsuch and Barrett joined in dissent. supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf…
This is the final #SCOTUS decision for the day, meaning 23 cases remain. Thanks for following. More to come ...
Subscribe to Law Dork now. Consider a paid subscription to support my independent legal journalism, both here and at Law Dork itself. lawdork.com
Boxes containing classified documents were kept in "a bathroom and shower," per the indictment.
The indictment alleges two times when Trump shared classified documents, one being the ghost writers discussion that we have heard audio of and the other being "a representative of his [PAC]."
BREAKING: Parties AGREE to a partial stay pending appeal in the ACA preventative care case, subject to court approval, meaning O’Connor’s ruling ending coverage requirements nationwide will almost certainly not go into effect during appeal. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
This surprising development, which is a significant back-down from Jonathan Mitchell, followed unusually tough arguments for him at the Fifth Circuit, which I covered at Law Dork: lawdork.com/p/fifth-circui…
OK, all! I am so appreciative of the support that you have shown me in launching Law Dork. Now, in the last 15 days of my first year, I need your help. lawdork.com
My original goal when launching was 10,000 total subscribers in the first year, and 1,000 paid subscribers. The total subscribers is well above the goal — headed toward 15,000! lawdork.com
But, as you can see, I still need 100 more paid subscribers before June 21 to meet that goal. If you've been reading my work and are able to afford it, please consider a paid subscription today. It's just $6/mo or $60/year. Thank you! lawdork.com/subscribe
BREAKING: Federal judge rules Florida bans on gender-affirming care for minors is likely unconstitutional, issues injunction halting enforcement of the bans against the plaintiffs who challenged the regulatory and statutory bans. More to come at Law Dork: lawdork.com
"Wait, I wasn't supposed to drain the pool *into* the server room?! Oops!"
This is actually the perfect Trump story: 1. People were investigating. 2. Something was done that could harm the investigation. 3. Unclear if the act was intentional or incompetence. 4. Suspicious act didn't ultimately harm the investigation. 5. It did cause more investigation.
What's most revealing about this is that this is the first time in the history of the @nytimes that it has not taken credit for its "impact" journalism.
In any other situation, that's all we'd be hearing about: How the NYT's reporting led to action. Here, the reporter acts like this is happening in a vacuum. Reporting isn't mentioned. This is "a Republican movement to regulate the lives of transgender youth."
It's sickening to see the failure of accountability at the @nytimes. No, they're not alone. No, they're not the worst. But, as I've said before, you don't get to say you're "the paper of record" & claim how powerful your reporting is at every moment except when you empower hate.