In a recently published paper, researchers use “an LCA approach to calculate the Long-Lasting #CarbonSequestration (LLCS) of #seaweed, which can be understood as the difference between #CarbonFixation & released C throughout the life cycle of seaweed.”
🧵1/9
Using kelp (Laminaria japonica) as an example of seaweed, the present study “validates the procedure of calculating the LLCS of seaweed throughout its whole life cycle in Ailian Bay from nursery to processing into #biochar (fertilizer) as the final product.” 2/9
The results showed that “the #CarbonSequestration (full life cycle) of kelp in Ailian Bay was 97.73g C /m2/year.” 3/9
“#Biomass carbon accounts for approximately 86.15% of the total value (982.53 g C/m2/year) of carbon absorption source of #kelp in Ailian Bay, with the remaining 13.85% consisting of RDOC and sedimentary carbon.” 4/9
“The #CarbonFootprint of the kelp in Ailain Bay is -1146.8 tons of CO2 per year, and the negative value indicates that the #kelp in Ailian Bay can contribute 1146.8 tons of #CarbonSink per year.”
5/9
Moreover, scientists in this study calculated the amount of #biomass carbon that was #sequestrated by seaweed production in China from 2010 to 2020.
6/9
“If all seaweed #biomass carbon is permanently #sequestered the results of this study suggest that about 250,000 tons of CO2 could be fixed by Chinese seaweed
during this decade, which could reach 0.2% of China's peak carbon.”
7/9
Accordingly, the present research concludes that “the mass production of #seaweed can be utilized as an efficient method to #sequestrate carbon and a feasible method for evaluating the effect of kelp farms on climate change.”
8/9
🔗 Link to the paper entitled “Carbon sequestration assessment and analysis in the whole life cycle of seaweed” here ⬇️ iopscience.iop.org/article/10.108…
🚨 The Royal Society has published a new briefing today finding that techniques to reflect a small portion of sunlight back into space (#SRM) could help lower global temperatures if deployed worldwide, but cannot replace emissions cuts or fully address climate impacts.
🧵1/7
2/ ➝ The report reviews solar radiation modification (#SRM) approaches, including stratospheric aerosol injection (#SAI) and marine cloud brightening (#MCB), outlining their potential to temporarily reduce warming and associated risks.
3/ ➝ It notes that SRM would only mask the effects of GHG emissions and would not address issues such as ocean acidification.
🚨🌲 New research reveals that even intact boreal forests, some of the planet’s strongest natural carbon sinks, lose their ability to absorb CO₂ as they age.
Here’s what the scientists found & why it matters for our climate models🧵1/9 #CarbonSink #CarbonRemoval
2/ Boreal forests cover vast regions across Canada, Russia, and Scandinavia and store enormous amounts of carbon in trees and soil.
They’re often seen as stable, long-term carbon sinks, but this study challenges that assumption with new global-scale data.
3/ Using seven global Net Ecosystem Productivity (NEP) datasets and a high-resolution forest age map, researchers tracked how C uptake changes as forests grow older.
They used a space-for-time substitution method, comparing forests of different ages to infer long-term trends.
🚨A major 6-country survey (N=5,310) finds Europeans support -ve emissions to meet climate goals, but strongly prefer nature-based solutions like afforestation over engineered options like Direct Air Capture. Trust hinges on benefits for nature & future generations.
🧵1/10 #CDR
2/ When allocating how to tackle emissions, respondents clearly prioritized immediate mitigation:
🚨A new study warns that efforts to cool the planet through stratospheric aerosol injection (#SAI) could face far greater challenges than models predict, from unpredictable monsoon shifts to material shortages & engineering limits, every step adds new risks.
🧵1/8 #SRM
2/ The authors explore both micro-level (engineering) and macro-level (governance & supply) factors that could restrict feasible deployment.
Key finding: these constraints could drastically raise costs, risks, and uncertainty, especially for “solid” (non-sulfate) aerosols.
3/ Traditional SAI uses sulfate aerosols (like volcanoes).
But alternatives, CaCO₃, TiO₂, Al₂O₃, ZrO₂, even diamond, promise less ozone damage.
Yet producing, aerosolizing, and dispersing these solids in submicron form is technically daunting.