Kevin Bonham Profile picture
Jun 12 8 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
This was on track to happen next month but we're here already. #ResolvePM is the first Voice poll to have the Yes vote below 50% forced choice. (49-51, down 4).
There is also a 42-40 lead for Yes with undecided allowed (which I suggest the forced choice Q shows to be meaningless).
Don't agree with this wording (doubt it makes much difference): Voting yes/no is not compulsory (at least not enforceably); participation is. As previously noted informal vote has been negligible in referendums in recent decades but cannot be sure it will be so this time. Image
Note that the state figures are an amalgamation of two months' data in which the average forced-choice Yes vote would have been around 51. So Resolve also has a merged sample with Yes ahead overall but losing 3 states (however most polls have had SA ahead of nat avge).
State samples in all specific polls should be treated with high caution, especially when combined sample sizes are modest. For this, aggregation across multiple pollsters is necessary for serious commentary.
All (non-rejected) polls graph (2-answer preferred with forced choice prioritised) is now again looking like accelerating decline. However Resolve which seems to be the worst poll for Yes has most recent reading and Essential which seems the best lacks recent data. Image
So while that graph is suggesting Yes at only 52.5 I think a model that assumed there could be house differences between pollsters would have it slightly higher.
This. Unprecedented things can happen (several did in 2022 federal election) but if Yes wins it will revolutionise understanding of how referendums pass (and probably how to poll them), while if No wins history will have seen it all before.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kevin Bonham

Kevin Bonham Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kevinbonham

Jun 11
#taschess news yours truly loses two classical games in one day for the first time in SEVENTEEN AND A HALF YEARS!
This was in the 2023 Tasmanian Open, the winner(s) of which will be decided in the final round tomorrow. The top final pairings are:

Will Rumley (4.5) - Zach Lim (4.5)
Fabian Ivancic (4) - James Briant (4)
Carl Gorka (4) - Ian Rout (3.5)
Will and Zach both beat me (current state #2) and drew with Carl (current #1) today so good luck to them for tomorrow.

Carl has had several very long games and would have played about 12 hours of chess today!
Read 5 tweets
Jun 4
#Newspoll 55-45 to ALP
#Newspoll ALP 38 L-NP 34 Greens 12 ON 6 others 10, virtually unchanged from previous,
#Newspoll Albanese satisfied 55% (-2)
Dutton 36% (-)
Don't have dissatisfied yet.

Better PM (skews to incumbents but not this much) Albanese leads 55-28.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 4
#Newspoll Voice to Parliament

Yes 46
No 43
Undecided 11

That is the worst result for Yes on a two-answer basis (c. 51.6) so far.
Note that question method has changed since previous Voice Newspoll, with actual referendum question now used.
'But it's only Morgan and Resolve dragging the trend down and the good polls still have Yes way ahead.'

Not anymore. Image
Read 6 tweets
Jun 3
Utting Research ALP leads 61-39 with a primary of 52% but there are headlines hyping this as suggesting hope for the WA Liberals. Hope that in an election held now they might win as many seats as the Nationals?
Cook net +16 (42-26)
Mettam net -2 (31-33)
Cook leads as better Premier (skews to incumbents but less so when a leader is new) 50-24

Haven't seen full article but Utting are usually robopolls and sample size is modest (800).
Would be interested to see results from other pollsters perhaps a few months down the track when the McGowan goodwill factor fades but 39-61 is not in any way encouraging for the opposition parties even if it is +9 on 2021.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 2
It's not clear to me whether the 4 seats referred to are meant to be the 4 Labor won on primaries or the 4 that finished Labor vs Green with Labor winning but either way it's an exceptionally deceptive claim and should be deleted. #springst
One could say that all Labor winners where the Greens were excluded received Greens preferences in the 2PP count but that ignores many where Labor had crossed the line if not on primaries but at least before the Greens were excluded.
There are also others where it was not mathematically possible for Greens prefs to decide the result.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 2
It saddens me to inform the house that on May 26 something claiming to be a newspaper published something claiming to be analysis by somebody claiming (probably correctly) to be John Black.
So we are supposed to believe that in for instance Kingston (ALP 49.2 Lib 25.85) the outcome was determined by the primary votes for minors and indies and the way "they allocated" [sic] their preferences. Image
In Kingston Labor needed less than 3% of preferences to win. There is no minor party or IND whose voters' preferences flow 97% to L-NP even if the minor party or IND tells its voters to vote that way.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(