Jonathan Zachreson Profile picture
Jun 13 13 tweets 5 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
“Many [transgender] children are not safe in their own homes because of a non-affirming caretaker.”

Author of #AB957 said at the bill’s hearing today. This bill would require a parent affirm their child’s “gender identity” or else risk losing custody of their child.
“If both parents are accepting of the child’s gender identity, this issue will not be the thing that tips the scale towards any parent.”
A witness in favor of the bill says affirming a child’s gender identity is the only acceptable approach, including surgery if the child wants it.

This bill is absent on if male, female, or non-binary identities are the limit. Neo-pronouns and an infinite number of gender… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
“My daughter was murdered by gender ideology.”

This witness in opposition shares her heartbreaking story of how her daughter was taken from her, encouraged to medically transition by her school & peers, and used as a prop to raise money. She ultimately died by suicide at 19.
Many Democrat committee members said they would advance the bill, but would oppose it on the senate floor unless the bill is modified.

Here is Senator Allen’s comments.
Senator Niello raises concerns how treating gender dysphoria via “affirmation” is relatively new and anything but settled science.
“If you love your children, flee California!”

Senator Wilk says we need to start protecting parents. He’s fed up with the assault on families in California and says he plans on “moving to America” when he retires.
Great catch and analysis here. This bill is very intentional in what the authors want - to coerce parents into one way to handle a child who might be confused.
Woah! Assemblymember Wilson makes her intent of the bill crystal clear in her closing statements - and that is to remove judicial discretion and make affirming the child’s gender ideology the only option (if you want to keep custody).
The hearing wouldn’t be complete without gaslighting from Senator Wiener.

He suggests opposing this bill that would force parents affirm every aspect of a child’s gender identity else risk losing custody is “also an attack on gay and lesbian kids.”
In the end, AB 957 passes out of committee 8-1, with some members absent. Based on comments and concerns from several Democrat Senators today, I’m hopeful it dies on the Senate floor.
Also worth noting hundreds spoke out in opposition. Those opposing in person seemed to last forever and the committee chair limited phone opposition to only 15 minutes.
Final vote count in the Senate Judiciary Committee was 8-2-1. The two Republicans on the committee voted no.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jonathan Zachreson

Jonathan Zachreson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JZachreson

Sep 30, 2022
Mind blowing statement from @GavinNewsom on SB 107, considering all of his medical mandates on kids.

“Parents know what's best for their kids, and they should be able to make decisions around the health of their children without fear. We must take a stand for parental choice.”
Here is a link to the statement: gov.ca.gov/wp-content/upl…
Note, SB 107 actually strips away parental rights in some cases, allowing some out-of-state teens to run away from home and get CA taxpayer paid “gender affirming care.”
Read 4 tweets
Aug 25, 2022
Since 2017, @LASchools has been illegally paying their board members over $100k in excess the statutory limit of $24k/yr.

SB 913 (sponsored by LAUSD & introduced by @SenBobHertzberg) changes this & gives LAUSD exemptions not available to other districts.

leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billText…
The bill passed its last legislative hurdle on Wed and went quietly undetected throughout the legislative process. (I accidentally came across it looking for another bill.) It now awaits the governor’s signature.

As previously noted, LAUSD’s board compensation is/was illegal.
SB 913 now makes it legal to pay @LASchools board members any amount (currently $125k/yr).

The next largest district, @sdschools, is capped at $18k/yr by state law.

Most school districts are capped at paying their board members between $2,880 - $4,800/yr. How is this fair?
Read 5 tweets
Apr 19, 2022
“Hey! Check it out! I need everybody to follow the f***ing rules!” yells @AsmMarcBerman at the Assembly Business & Professions Committee hearing.

He was upset after a handful of witnesses opposing #AB2098 said a few extra words at the end of their testimony.
“Speaking personally as a life-long Democrat and a civil rights attorney, I am dismayed that Democrats are bringing forward bills that undermine civil liberties.”

Great #AB2098 opposition testimony from @ca4governance! 👏
Read 4 tweets
Apr 6, 2022
The Senate Health bill analysis is out for #SB1464, a bill introduced by @DrPanMD that would defund local law enforcement unless they do exactly what public health agencies tell them to do.

It has almost no support, but tons of opposition.

🧵/ 1
leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnal…
First, what is in #SB1464? Here is part of it.

Even LA County’s sheriff’s department would have lost funding had this been law last year.

Who would have received that funding instead? County health departments.

/ 2
Only two groups and just two individuals expressed support for #SB1464. Two!

Over 40 groups and over 1,600 individuals oppose the bill. Tons!

But who are those two groups in support?

/ 3 Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(