Nobody sacked him. He resigned rather than face a by-election.
This isn't about cake. It's about him lying to parliament, which isn't allowed.
He isn't banned for life. He *might* be barred from standing again cos he's shown contempt of parliament.
It wasn't a Kangaroo Court. It was a long standing committee, with members elected by MPs, a majority of Brexiteer Tory members, and overseen by a retired high court judge. And he was represented by one of the countries top KCs at a cost (to taxpayers) of £225,000
The committee didn't Undemocratically Decide His Fate. The committee will merely make recommendations to MPs, who will vote to suspend him (at worst), and then voters can decide if he remains their MP. He ran away rather than face that.
Starmer didn't do the same thing. Seven (7!!) inquiries found no evidence he'd broken laws, and literally years of digging by the Tory press couldn't uncover any evidence of illegality.
He didn't Get Brexit Done. His Oven Ready Deal went right in the toilet.
He didn't Get All The Big Decisions Right during Covid. We ended up with the worst economy in the OECD and one of the highest mortality rates worldwide.
He isn't offering unique leadership on Ukraine. He just went there a lot to avoid troubles at home.
The Westminster Blob didn't plot to remove him. 41% of his own MPs voted against him in a vote of confidence, and then 173 ministers resigned on one day to drive him from office because his lies and incompetence were a disaster for the country. Previous record: 9 in one day.
He isn't uniquely popular. He left office the most unpopular PM for a century, and when he tried to return after Truss resigned, he couldn't find enough MPs to support his candidacy - Penny Mordaunt got more - so he gave up.
He isn't The New Churchill. He's a notoriously idle and selfish man who has been sacked for lying from every job he's ever had, including twice by the Tory party.
If, after years of watching him, all of this still isn't clear to you, the problem is not us. The problem is you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Watched this yesterday, and what struck me is how static the camera is throughout. Most shots are long and steady. I hadn't realised before, but I think it's this that gives it a timeless, classic quality.
Modern movies are a blizzard of cuts and fancy camera moves. Not this.
In the famous scene where Indy shoots the truck, and it flips over and explodes "killing" Marion, there's no attempt to show the bang from multiple directions, extending the action. Just one long, steady, 10 second shot of Indy reacting. It lets the audience experience it.
Today a director would have 93 cameras, zooming and panning, spiralling around the action, flash-cutting from the blast being triggered, to Indy's face, to burning metal, fleeing locals, flying glass, birds-eye view, etc.
I don't see how that produces better results than this.
It wouldn't occur to him to endanger staff? You reckon?
Documented examples:
They had to arrange a "puppy gate" on his flat when he got Covid, to prevent him wandering around Downing St dispensing infectious spume on everybody in sight.
Later the same day SAGE warned against handshakes - this was pre vaccine - he visited a hospital, and afterwards told journalists he had shaken hands with everybody he'd met, and would continue to do so.
He went on breakfast TV to say he wanted Britain to "take it on the chin" and let the virus "move through the population" unhindered.
He said "let the bodies pile high" rather then have a "fucking lockdown"
I keep seeing people claim the Privileges Committee organised some sort of stitch-up. So let's remind everyone of what happened, and how it all works.
First: the committee
1. It has 7 members
2. The members are chosen by MPs
3. Only 2 are Labour. 4 are Tories
4. It's overseen by a retired high court judge to ensure impartiality and fair process
5. It can only make recommendations, it can't "kick people out"
6. MPs vote on whether to implement recommendations
7. And Tories have a working majority of 68 MPs, so could have voted no
8. Johnson was invited 5 times to rebuff evidence if he thought it was wrong, and refused 5 times
9. Johnson was advised by a top legal team, costing taxpayers £225,000. He chose to sack them rather than listen to their advice or fight back (prob cos there's no defence)
It's easy to predict chaos. Much harder to describe the exact form that chaos will take.
Johnson just kickstarted chaos again. Undermining trust in parliament, undermining Sunak, emboldening the Braverman / Badenoch wing who are already plotting their takeover of the party.
His seemingly casual comment that he's "leaving politics... for now" is a clear signal that he's ready to throw his lot in with an even more right wing, English Nationalist party (Reform? Reclaim? A new party?), take it over, and seek vengeance on the Tories.
Dorries has quit, so Johnson might stand in her seat. He might also attempt to tempt a few Tories to his banner - those with little to lose, cos their majority is slim. Or who feel the problem is that the Tories, the most economically right wing party on earth, are too left wing
Last week I was away, so this is technically slightly more than #TheWeekInTory. That’s my way of apologising for it being fucking massive.
Remember to tap "more replies" if they don't immediately show.
It's Friday. My advice: it's best to do this drunk.
Here we go...🧵
1. Let’s start with PartyGate, and joyless claymation ethics droid Rishi Sunak decided to sue his own inquiry for having the temerity to ask to see the things he always said it could see
2. He said he wouldn’t hand over WhatsApp messages that are “unambiguously irrelevant”
3. The Inquiry said only they could just what’s relevant
4. The govt said they’d already judged, and the Inquiry could trust them, honestly
5. The Inquiry “said no way, dude, hand them over”
6. So the govt said, “what messages? We haven’t even seen them, guv”
Let's leave aside the moralities. Forget that we're dehumanising real people, belittling the millions who live and work here, and applauding policies that increase the risk of death at sea. Put all that aside, and just look at the economics.
How do we fix this shit?
You can argue "we should train our own XYZ".
Sure. But they don't exist. They haven't been born. If we all procreate tonight, it'll be 20 years before those kids are working.
And we've cut £7bn from education. Ended the nursing bursary. Put limits on medical training.