How I wrote #BelisariusAndAntonina Part 20: If people are familiar with Belisarius, they know about the triumphant first portion of his career. The ending of his career is rather less known. Today, Belisarius’ last stint as General of the East. 🧵 #History#Book#Byzantine
During his first stint as General of the East (529-531), Belisarius fought the Persians in Mesopotamia. During his second stint (532?-542), he overran North Africa and Italy. But, surprise, he also had a third stint as General of the East, which began in 549.
In Spring 549, Belisarius returned to Constantinople after his disappointing second campaign in Italy. Procopius records the surprise appointment that came next: Justinian “appointed him commander of the imperial guards in his capacity as General of the East.”
Because we have no evidence that Belisarius actually left Constantinople at this point, much less that he fought any battles, some historians have assumed that this third appointment as General of the East was purely honorary, a reward for his many years of loyal service.
But there is some evidence to suggest that Justinian had a pointed reason for this appointment beyond honoring Belisarius. At this time, the Romans and Persians were fighting in Lazica (modern Georgia), but not in Mesopotamia (the domain of the General of the East).
However, probably in 548, the Persians made an attempt to seize the Roman stronghold of Dara in Mesopotamia. The attempt was foiled, but it might have caused Justinian to worry that conflict with the Persians might spill over into Mesopotamia.
Not long after this, Belisarius was appointed General of the East. I think it likely that Justinian asked his long-serving friend to resume his old position one last time, as insurance against potential Persian aggression in Mesopotamia.
But in 551, Justinian signed a truce with the Persians, which eliminated all concern that war would break out in Mesopotamia. So around this time, it was safe for Belisarius to retire again, for good. We know he had done so by February 552 at the very latest.
This last stint of Belisarius as General of the East was relatively brief and uneventful, and so can go unnoticed and unappreciated. But I think it is important because it demonstrates that Belisarius & Justinian continued to have a positive relationship even at this late stage.
Next week: We go back to the process of turning all these ideas into a book, including wrapping up the initial writing, arranging the elements of the book, deciding how to do the notes, and more.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
How I wrote #BelisariusAndAntonina Part 19: The most damaging allegation made against Antonina is that she had a sexual affair with her adopted son. This would make her a practitioner of adultery, incest, and maybe also pedophilia. Is it true?? 🧵 #History#Book#Byzantine
In the Secret History, Procopius alleges that Antonina was “smitten with desire and driven by erotic passion” for her adopted son, Theodosios, who was perhaps a young teenager at the time he was adopted.
According to the story, Antonina first seduced Theodosios in Carthage in late 533 or early 534, and carried on an on-and-off affair with him for years until the young man’s untimely death ca. 542.
How I wrote #BelisariusAndAntonina Part 18: No surviving source records the date of the wedding of Belisarius and Antonina, but it kind of matters for a book about their marriage! Today I discuss how I calculated their wedding year. 🧵 #History#Book#Byzantine
We start with the one solid date we have: Procopius first attests that Belisarius and Antonina were husband and wife in the context of their departure from Constantinople to North Africa in June 533. This provides a terminus ante quem (limit before which) for their wedding.
However, I believe Belisarius and Antonina married well before 533. For me, the key evidence is the likely ages of their children Photios and Ioannina.
How I wrote #BelisariusAndAntonina Part 8: In Rome in February 2020, I walked the circuit of the city’s Aurelian walls, as much as was possible, and photographed the gates. In doing so, I was striding in the footsteps of Belisarius. 🧵 #History#Book#AcademicTwitter
Between March 537 and March 538, Belisarius and the Roman army were besieged in the city of Rome by the Ostrogothic king Vittigis and his army. For a year straight, few things were of more importance to the general than the state of the walls and gates of Rome.
Because this siege was of such importance in Belisarius’ first campaign against the Ostrogoths, 535-540 (as a bonus, Rome and its defenses were also of central during his second campaign in Italy, 545-549), I felt it was imperative to get a sense of the physical space.
How I wrote #BelisariusAndAntonina Part 7: My research travel in Rome began on February 16, 2020. After years of daydreaming about this, I finally had a research sabbatical with an extended stay in Rome to kick off the book project. Excitement! 🧵 #History#Book#AcademicTwitter
My plan was to live in Rome for a month. During that month, I would visit the city’s Aurelian walls and its gates, which were critical during Belisarius’ stays in the city. More on that tomorrow. When not doing that, I planned to do research and writing at the Vatican Library.
Today I would like to take you through my experiences in the Vatican Library. It is an inspiring place to work, but did you know that even a university professor cannot just get in automatically? I had to bring a letter of certification of my credentials from my department chair!
How I wrote #BelisariusAndAntonina Part 6: Funding a book project. As a tenured professor, research is part of my job requirements, and yet there were still aspects of the process of writing my book that required institutional support. 🧵 #History#Book#Publishing
Before talking about my specific situation, I want to acknowledge that academic historians have *wildly* different support for their research programs, something that non-academic followers of mine may not realize.
Tenured professors at elite research universities might teach few classes and have research assistants, allowing them to pump out publications. At the other extreme, many untenured early career researchers are often paid by the class and have essentially zero research support.
There is a lot going on in this thread. But I will just focus on two issues here. 1) Belisarius' armies during his conquests were actually NOT all that small. 2) The ravages of the plague and a climate event, not Belisarius' brilliance, damaged long-term prospects.
On the first issue, let's take a look at the size of Belisarius' armies. Against the Vandals in 533, Belisarius had an army of 18,000 soldiers not counting his personal guards, who numbered at least another several hundred.
It is true that Belisarius started the war against the Ostrogoths in 535 with a smaller force (7,500 soldiers not counting his personal guards). But reinforcements over the next few years brought this number up to around 19,000 by the time he was ready to march on Ravenna in 540.