Since that paper was published, my reading of the situation just got more cynical. To me, the pandemic opened a new chapter in the story of post-truth propaganda. In many jurisdictions, such as #BC or Sweden, public health officials became agents of disinformation. A thread…
There is a textbook approach to fighting against scientific evidence in the political and media spheres. The script was written by the tobacco industry and then refined by the oil and gas industries. It revolves around creating doubt and the mass-spreading of counter narratives.
In the past decade, some think-tanks (funded by climate-change denying interests) masterfully harnessed anti-science alternative media outlets and social-network algorithms to build the most powerful propaganda machine humankind ever witnessed.
Among the new elements in this propaganda machine is the framing of organized discourses and rhetorical spins pushed simultaneously by different groups such as elected officials, fringe-opinion scientists and alternative media outlets across the globe.
What blew my mind was to see that, in many places, public health administrations were absorbed as integral parts of that propaganda machine. The talking points of big-business-backed disinformation outlets is now indistinguishable from public health messaging.
The same Koch-family-funded think-tanks that supported the tobacco industry and oil and gas climate-change disinformation have somehow managed to coax their old foes from public health to become voluntary spoke persons. Let that sink in…
In terms of large-scale policy-level successes, the field of Public Health has one single success to report: It brought the tobacco industry down. Not a small feat. And given how much it loves bragging about it, no one in public health is likely to forget.
So there is something incredibly ironic to witnessing public health side with the same interests it once fought against. But it also shows that big business think-tanks have found ways not only to defang public health but to flip-it as a tool for their own purposes.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Recently, @GeorgeNDP, a @bcndp hack, went into a full Twitter-tantrum because @SoniaFurstenau appropriately and soundly criticized the nonsense Dr. Henry and the @CDCofBC have been spouting on Covid prevention. So here’s a thread on public health and science.
All top positions in governmental public health agencies are occupied by MDs with a specialization in public health. And while MDs sure are doctors, they aren’t the kind of doctors trained to do science. They are the kind of doctors trained to do medicine.
Public health MDs spend only a fraction of their training years learning research-relevant skills and often none at all doing research. By opposition, someone with a Ph.D. will have spent 5 to 8 years exclusively learning research skills.
A #LongCovid thread. I (likely) had Covid early in 2020. Now, almost two years later I’m stuck with some annoying (and scary) long Covid symptoms. I thought I would share in case it helps others. @brish_ti
On Jan 25, 2020, before there were supposed to be cases in #BC, my wife got real sick. Very high fever, severe muscle pain, coughing. We thought it was the flu. She was bed bound for 3 days. But she had a funny symptom: she lost the sense of smell.
We thought nothing of if because nobody knew anything about #Covid-19 at that point. A few days later I felt somewhat under the weather. Not really sick. Just not great. But no real symptoms. And that was it. We thought it was all over.
My PhD is in public health. So I went through all the disciplinary blah on equity blah blah transparency blah no victim blaming blah patient centredness blah…
But now I realize I have been fooled. In real life, public health’s motto is “You don’t need to know, shut up and obey”
Public health, as a discipline, is a crossbreed between a state bureaucracy and medicine.
Both origins share a deeply engrained respect for hierarchy and discipline. With a healthy dose of paternalism inherited from medicine and a love for procedural logic from bureaucracy.
In its actions, public health thus tends to be a slow-moving, highly conservative and somewhat toxic practice whose self-perception is deeply at-odds with the reality of what it does and how it does it.