Russia's aggression against Ukraine continues, and calls for a ceasefire between Moscow and Kiev are once again multiplying from "pacifists" or "pragmatists. " They include not only prominent political outsiders from Sahra Wagenknecht
2/11
on the far left to Donald Trump on the far right.
Established social scientists and political analysts are also pushing for negotiations. They all do not want to acknowledge or discuss some fundamental realities of this war.
The domestic political circumstance, for
3/11
example, faced by both Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodimir Selensky seem either unknown or uninteresting to them.
As a result, their calls for a quick settlement between Moscow and Kiev are not useful at all,
4/11
but irresponsible interventions in the debate over how to proceed with the war.
The prospects for a positive outcome of hypothetical peace negotiations between Moscow and Kiev are vanishingly small - at least as long as the current Russian regime remains intact and the
5/11
military situation on the ground does not fundamentally change.
Statements to this effect - especially when they are repeatedly made and thus amplified in the echo chambers of influential media - raise false expectations about ongoing diplomatic efforts to contain
6/11
the war.
By stoking hopes for a quickly achievable and lasting negotiated peace, they create discursive impasses in the public debate over current and future Western support for Ukraine.
They also oppose national interests of Western states and principles of
7/11
international law that apply worldwide.
The mirage of an imminent peaceful resolution of the conflict is capable of delaying, reducing or even preventing determined Western assistance to Kyiv.
With the active or passive destruction of the Kakhovka dam, Russia has once
8/11
again upped the ante. This new war crime is close to the use of a weapon of mass destruction.
An additional protocol to the Geneva Convention of 1949, which came into force in 1977, prohibits attacks on dams, among other things, because of the high risks to the civilian
9/11
population.
Not only the future of agriculture in the affected areas is called into question, but also the supply of fresh water to large parts of Ukraine as well as Crimea.
Once again, it has been shown that the Kremlin is concerned with retaliation and destruction and
10/11
not at all with the interests of the people in the occupied territories.
Western politicians, scholars, and journalists would do well to keep all these factors in mind before calling for negotiations on border demarcations and touting an impractical "peace for land" deal.
11/11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
to the end of the Cossack power and the 20th and 21st centuries, Moscow's plans for Kyiv continue to this day.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022 shocked many people around the world.
But anyone who has paid attention to Ukrainian history would have seen
(2/9)
it coming.
Russian President Vladimir Putin made several excuses for the invasion. One was to kill all the alleged "Nazis" in Ukraine. Another was to eliminate the alleged military threat to Russia from Ukraine.
The real reason, however, was the illegal annexation of
is based on a literal interpretation of the legend of the past years and some linguistic studies and says that the founders of the state of Rus were Varangians, who, led by their princes.
Ukrainian historiography rejects the decisive role of the Normans in the foundation
(2/6)
of Rus, but does not deny their influence on the formation of the state.
Soviet historiography firmly rejected the Norman theory, considering it unscientific and "bourgeois.
" In various modifications, however, it still finds respectable supporters in Western academia.
unproductive provinces did not even receive such concessions from the government, and local authorities began to act at their own risk.
Under pressure from local authorities, Rakovsky proposed to the Ukrainian Economic Council to consider the issue of state aid to
(2/6)
unproductive provinces of the Ukrainian SSR.
Instead of the 90 wagons of promised bread, only 44 wagons were transferred. This was due to the fact that Soviet Russia and the Donbas were in the first place on the minds of the rulers.
For more information and the full report, victories in the blog
in Nazi custody. On July 5, 1941, he was arrested by the Gestapo to force him to withdraw the June 30 Law on the Restoration of the Ukrainian State.
But the nationalist leader persevered, and in January 1942 Bandera was transferred from a Berlin prison to the special
(2/4)
Zellenbau block of Sachsenhausen concentration camp.
The Nazis wanted to unite the anti-communists from the former Soviet countries under the leadership of former Soviet general Andrei Vlasov, who was sponsored by SS Reichsführer Heinrich Himmler.