This story has taken a bizarre turn in that a twitter account linked to @microbiomdigest and the #muttoncrew is claiming to have been involved in the takedown of Gino and is now getting sued...
@MicrobiomDigest And assuming anybody linked to Elisabeth Bik is also funded by pharma, it seems very fishy that they have admitted to using @PubPeer to enforce a politically motivated retraction of a literal opinion piece of @SabinehazanMD from @FrontiersIn
Not even a scientist?
#poogate
@MicrobiomDigest @PubPeer @SabinehazanMD @FrontiersIn And given this glowing self appraisal I would hope that Leif, Joe and Uri support my campaign for absolute transparency in drug approval processes and drug trials.
And will disavow the constant threats to accounts like mine who ask probing questions of pharma advocates
Just a reminder that Sam Neill had exactly the same "rare" T-cell lymphoma that Michel Goldman developed after his COVID vaccines.
Goldman published his own case report. After the backlash he was forced to falsely claim that the vaccines "had saved millions" - yet he stopped taking the COVID vaccines that gave him lymphoma and he is still alive.
Sam Neill's death is being weaponised by vested interests to claim that the experimental CAR-T gene therapy that was used for him "worked".
If you see someone claiming that CAR-T therapy "works" remember to ask them whether they have vested interests in it. Most media accounts that are pushing it do. It is a high risk gene therapy that has no proven and verified success in the treatment of cancers.
Meanwhile it is also important to remember that these very lymphomas were predicted to be a consequence of spike producing vaccines - because independent research showed it. But that research was quashed by the @NIH. People died as a consequence and are still dying.
The only journalist who was prepared to cover this story is @BrokenTruthTV
He is still waiting for the @NIH to release the 490 pages of emails that they refused to release that contained information on the suppression of this scandal.
I was taught for years that @DrAndyWakefield had committed fraud - it was not true.
His prior paper - written with @PeterDaszak - showed that measles virus was a contributor to Crohn's.
The Lancet paper showed that bowel disease was a feature of severe disability after vaccination.
Wakefield had to be destroyed to protect the vaccine industry or it would have collapsed in 1998.
That is how the pharma industry works, but they can't do it alone.
In the case of the Wakefield saga, they were aided by the @bmj_latest who commissioned Brian Deer to fabricate a fake story about "fraud" because they were being paid by GSK and Merck - the very vaccine makers who stood to be eviscerated by the truth about their product's safety.
All this is documented (thread below).
The children in the paper were permanently disabled by the MMR vaccine and never, ever, got recognition. They are on track to die without ever having their vaccine disability recognised.
This is the worst travesty of the medical industry ever committed - because it was done for money.
Teenage pregnancies are a surrogate for underage sexual activity (which drives cervical cancer rates in the under 25s). In the UK they fell off a cliff in 2007 - the year the iphone came out and the HPV vaccine rollout started.
The "Swiss patient" sequence you provided not only has 2% dissimilarity from any known hanta sequence but BLASTing into the patent database gets us here.
"No name" virus.
Really?
The people running the @DeptofWar need to start going to jail.
You were lied to about the Merck measles vaccine develop in the 60s. When injected into babies it caused fevers, rashes, diarrhoea and febrile convulsions.
Why?
I'm going to show you.
@SecKennedy @RetsefL @MaryanneDemasi @DrJulieSladden @RWMaloneMD
Merck claimed that the "measles vaccine" was an "attenuated version of measles" giving the impression that it was a virus that was made safe.
That was a lie.
It was just measles, passaged in cells in a lab.
We injected our babies with actual measles.
How do I know?
Recently released Australian Road Deaths data confirm that the @epiphare study claiming that COVID vaccination reduced road deaths by 32% was, as suspected, a complete fake.
Here are the actual road deaths data plotted from the Australian BITRE data repository using a trendline for 2000-2019 (excluding 2020 as it was a quiet year)
The pink area shows the inflection and increase in road deaths over the predicted number.
Note that road deaths have a downward trend despite an increase in population (due to safety measures and slowing of traffic).
So the question becomes...
"what is the probability that - if the @epiphare study was real (showing a 32% reduction in road deaths after vaccination) - the Australian road deaths (where nearly 100% of the adult population was vaccinated) would increase by 36%"?