Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
@Jikkyleaks
Jul 22, 2023 • 17 tweets • 9 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
BAT BOOM EDDIE 💥💥💥💥

In the @COVIDSelect document released last week there were embedded images containing previously unreleased emails.

One of them blows this whole thing open, and it's from #BatBumEddie Holmes.

"Pressure from on high".
WHO THE HELL IS THAT? Image
@COVIDSelect It's not possible that Eddie Holmes (affiliated with EcoHealth, Fudan university and the CCP) could have anybody "on high" outside of this group.

They were literally the high priests of virology.
Fauci, Rambaut, Andersen, Bedford, Farrar.

There were no higher authorities. twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
@COVIDSelect The only "on high" that there could have been were:

Donald Trump
Xi Jinping
Boris Johnson
Scott Morrison

or

Peter Daszak, who was - according to @AGHuff - the virological ambassador of the CIA.

or
Somebody who REALLY matters.

So who the hell was it? twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
@COVIDSelect @AGHuff It doesn't matter of course. This single email tells you why @edwardcholmes refused multiple FOI requests to the University of Sydney and why he was instructed to retain his emails. He is the person running the show, on behalf of the "on high" priest.

Or priestess. Image
@COVIDSelect @AGHuff @edwardcholmes And when #BatBumEddie's cover story failed, his buddy #WuhanDom was brought in to continue the lie.

theconversation.com/i-was-the-aust…
@COVIDSelect @AGHuff @edwardcholmes Whoever on the @COVIDSelect it was that made the PDF forgot that Acrobat only performs a virtual crop of embedded images.

So the full images remained in the document.

In the following tweets I will be posting all the uncovered images.
@COVIDSelect @AGHuff @edwardcholmes p6-9


Image
Image
Image
Image
@COVIDSelect @AGHuff @edwardcholmes p11-18


Image
Image
Image
Image
@COVIDSelect @AGHuff @edwardcholmes p25-28


Image
Image
Image
Image
@COVIDSelect @AGHuff @edwardcholmes p32-38

Image
Image
Image
@COVIDSelect @AGHuff @edwardcholmes p41-43


Image
Image
Image
Image
@COVIDSelect @AGHuff @edwardcholmes p44-51


Image
Image
Image
Image
@COVIDSelect @AGHuff @edwardcholmes @Daoyu15 @TonyNikolic10 @carl_jurassic @chrismartenson @Fynnderella1

And of course the inevitable hashtag...
#BatBumGate
And if you need the original document it is hosted here.
t.me/jikkyleaks/883
UPDATE
Not on the authors list of a paper they clearly co-authored or (unduly) influenced:

▶Ron Fouchier
▶Trevor Bedford
▶Anthony Fauci
▶Jeremy Farrar
▶Marion Koopmans
▶Patrick Vallance
▶Francis Collins
▶Mike Ferguson

Why?
@CharlesRixey @COVIDSelect
#ProximalOrigins https://t.co/sBv6GNuBydtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Image
@CharlesRixey @COVIDSelect Not only did Holmes and Lipkin know that GOF research was going on, but they knew #ProximalOrigins was a lie to cover it up.

"We should add [Ian] as an author. Safety in numbers... he is involved in the GOF"

Lipkin was funded by the NIH.
@COVIDSelect https://t.co/lnqUGJ0wmDtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…


Image
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/05/18/fact-checking-senator-paul-dr-fauci-flap-over-wuhan-lab-funding/
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Nov 26
There are a lot of pharma agents celebrating on twitter recently because the now-conflicted @cochranecollab dropped their standards and published something on HPV vaccination they didn't understand.

To explain it you need to understand the difference between the two studies quoted.

The first (Bergman) analysed a bunch of real studies (including RCTs) and concluded that the effect on cancer couldn't be seen - despite nearly 20 years of follow up.

The second (Henschke) cherry picked a bunch of "real world data" studies and concluded that the vaccine prevented a gazillion cervical cancers, pretending that it analysed 132 million patient records. It did nothing of the sort. What it did was look at two studies, take out the bit where it showed that the vaccine increased the risk of cancer (Kjaer 2021, over 20s) - replicated in multiple country statistics, split them into three studies, ignore the other studies showing the opposite, and ignore the fact that none of this data is verifiable.

Notably, one of the major studies (Palmer 2024, which was found to be seriously flawed) has been excluded from the meta-analysis because it did not show a cancer benefit in the under 16 age group.

It is very difficult to "fix" a randomised controlled trial.
It is very easy to "fix" a meta-analysis of observational studies where the data is "not available".

There is a huge difference between "real" studies and "real world data" studies because the latter are cherry picked or even fully synthetic, and the authors don't have access to the data. They are produced by vested interests groups to sell a narrative.

This was the most corrupted review that Cochrane have ever performed and this time they shot themselves in the foot by contradicting their own reviews.
cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.10…

@PGtzsche1 @MaryanneDemasi @SenatorAntic @DrJulieSladden @Fynnderella1 @missyTHX1138 @RWMaloneMD @RetsefL @BrokenTruthTV @RMConservativeImage
Image
"Scotland HPV vaccine study flawed" - explaining how the Scotland data on HPV was misrepresented to show an effect that wasn't real

blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/the-hpv-vacc…
How "real world data" papers claim to use electronic health records data but can't be verified and in many cases are not even real.

@ClareCraigPath
#Surgisphere #Penngate #EMRgate
arkmedic.info/p/pharma-hell-…
Read 4 tweets
Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Nov 24
Thank you @davidbahry...

your childish insults drew my attention to your lab's quite incredible paper confirming that chronic activation of cGAS-STING, as happens with plasmid-contaminated vaccines, causes cancer.

@Kevin_McKernan @MaryanneDemasi
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40463121/Image
Image
@DavidBahry @Kevin_McKernan @MaryanneDemasi @JesslovesMJK @Fynnderella1 @DJSpeicher @DrJulieSladden Paper here
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40463121/
@DavidBahry @Kevin_McKernan @MaryanneDemasi @JesslovesMJK @Fynnderella1 @DJSpeicher @DrJulieSladden Pro metastatic impact of chronic cGAS-STING activation
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10…
Read 5 tweets
Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Nov 22
WHOA!

Retraction Watch busted for collusion with Rolf Marschalek, who is not only part of BioNtech's Goethe university..
but - get this - their Corona fund was pump primed by the Quandt family - infamous for their role in Nazi Germany.

You just can't make this stuff up. Image
Image
Image
Image
Receipts - Quandt family values
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2…
More on the Quandts
medium.com/the-collector/…
Read 7 tweets
Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Nov 2
Can you see how this works?
I ask for rationality, and the Stew Peters brigade jump in.
Now I'm advocating genocide.
Apparently.

The people running these accounts have a LOT of money behind them. They target credible accounts for discrediting. That's their job.
The dude keeps going, but betrays that this is a copycat to a bunch of accounts linked to one dubbed "Penguin" that only appeared when I pointed out the Joe Sansone scam that is being coordinated by Sasha Latypova to derail legal cases.

Unhinged.
"DARVO bioterrorist agent". 🤦

This is the level of well poisoning that is part of the Sansone-Ruby-Latypova scam.

Good luck with this one in court.

@BlackTomThePyr8
Read 7 tweets
Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Oct 17
When "real world" data is this complete and the findings are too good to be true - contradicting those from the @CDCgov's own V-safe registry...

It's likely to be synthetic, until proven otherwise.

There is ZERO reason to restrict this data.
jamanetwork.com/journals/jaman… x.com/jsm2334/status…Image
BINGO.

In France in 2021 only 25% of women received a COVID vaccine during pregnancy and most of those were second trimester.

Therefore it's not possible that 25% of the French pregnancy registry received 1st trimester vaccination.

Image
Image
This is also strange.
The Quentin registry study shows a big jump in vaccination rate by age group but the Bernard study doesn't show the same.
This is more like what a synthetic data set might show based on assumed characteristics of the underlying data.

There are possible explanations for all of these anomalies, but this is the problem with secret registry data:
It's not credible when it conveniently matches a narrative and nobody is allowed to see it.

Bernard jamanetwork.com/journals/jaman…
Quentin registry
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
@franklin_reeder @chrismartensonImage
Read 7 tweets
Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Oct 15
I'm going to explain why this chart is so important and why @jsm2334 is being disingenuous by ignoring it - whilst making points that undermine the "real world vaccine data" industry.

It's a Kaplan-Meier curve and it obliterates Jeffrey's argument.

THREAD response🧵below Image
Just to go over it... the lines show what proportion of subjects (children) ended up without chronic disease up to 10 years after being studied.

It's called a survival analysis because it's used for cancer survival.

If the red line was a cancer drug it would be a blockbuster Image
It shows that by the end of the 10 year follow-up, of those that they could still follow up (who stayed in the study) 57% (100-43%) of vaccinated kids had chronic disease (e.g. asthma) and 17% (100-83%) of unvaccinated kids did.

A huge difference not explainable by chance. Image
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(