It's because they've been hijacked by "Activist Scholars" who use them to spread woke ideology.
These political activists are using universities as vehicles to indoctrinate students into far left ideology
Here are the receipts:🧵
2/ Let's get something clear first.
The problem is NOT merely that some professors have blind-spots that can be corrected by other professors with different views. That's not what I am talking about here....
Activists Scholars are an entirely different problem.
3/
It used to be that University professors would try to teach about ideas as evenhandedly as is possible. Of course everyone has biases, but the idea was that professors would at least TRY to put their biases aside and teach the material in a balanced, fair, evenhanded way...
4/ This is no longer the case.
"Activist Scholars" think education is ALWAYS political. because we choose what to teach children, and in doing so we are teaching certain values, and that's political.
So, they think choosing to teach kids that 2+2=4 is a political act.
so...
5/ Because the Scholar activists see their job as a political, in accordance with woke politics they use university classrooms to indoctrinate students into their politics
This Paper by Kia M. Q. Hall is about activities for training Black Lives Matter activists in the… https://t.co/mtqBssF76etwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
6/ You see, the Scholar Activist does not even attempt to teach from neutral ground. They have an ideology, and use their classroom to train students to become activists on behalf of that ideology.
Here Deborah Lowry suggests a way to teach that "supports student-activists":
7/ And this is where we can see this leading to rot in the Universities.
Because the goal of "Scholar Activists" is to spread their political ideology, not to find truth, they end up adopting bad academic methods because those methods help them with their political goals.
8/ They explicitly state that they don't want theories that lead to truth, they want theories that help them gain political power. Here, Kelly Oliver says explicitly that feminist theories do NOT have to be true...they have to be STRATEGIC, because the goal is power, not truth.
9/ This is not just one paper that says this either. I could bring receipts all day.
IE: Joan Scott tells us that they seek a theory that will be relevant for political practice, and transgender Sociologist Raewyn Connell seeks a theory of Gender that takes politics into account
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ The woke have taken over education, and it's worse then you think.
This teacher, who doesn't know when America was founded, says she teaches students about Protesting and Black Lives Matter, but won't teach the official curriculum
The woke education take over explained: A🧵
2/ Isaac Gottesman (an advocate of Critical Social Justice/wokeness) wrote the book "The Critical Turn in Education," and explains how the 1960's radical leftist brought Marxism into universities - in the 1970's, and took over the field of education in the 70's and 80's.
3/ Gottesman also explains that in the 70's and 80's the marxists actually pushed the original Marxist ideas past where Marx took them amking them even more radical. He also freely admits that the marxists "radicalized" the field of education.
2/ As I explain in the QT below, Wokeness is deeply postmodern.
For reasons I will briefly explain in the next tweet, postmodern philosophers think it is impossible for us to actually get a grasp on objective, absolute, universal, timeless truths.
-we only have our own perspective
-our thinking is warped by our biases, prejudices, and self-interest
-we are socially conditioned to have certain beleifs
That claims we say are "true" aren't actually, absolute, universal, timeless, and objective.
1/ Radical left-wing activists who opposed liberalism and the enlightenment (and who were high on neo-marxist "Critical Theory" and postmodernism) hijacked western universities,and in doing so hijacked the training ground for staffing all of our sense making institutions...
2/ This is a very tricky problem to deal with because universities are very intricate machines, and fixing universities without breaking them is really hard.
I see a *LOT* of right wing commentray which says "the regime/liberalism/postwar-consensus led to woke!!!"
And.....
3/ They also claim "liberalism could not stop woke, so we need to try Sam Francis, or Carl Schmidt, or Joseph DeMaistre, or other illibefal and non-liberal writers," even though those writers never stopped woke either.
Leftists are *NEVER* going to make a show of calling Marx and other lefty theorissts racist, or to "center" their racism, even though what they say is as bad or worse then anything Jefferson ever wrote.
This must be always met with the good faith test: " they must be asked "are Marx, Engles, and Guevera vitrolic racist,and is that racism baked into the meaning and structure of their moral and political ideology?"
Make them show their cards...
The game is always "this guys was racist therefore his ideas are racist amd bad."
Ok, then do Marx, Engles, Guevara, Foucault, and all the other guys that the lefty social theorists adore.
But they won't, because the goal is to sink Jefferson and his ideals...
1/ They woke attack Merit the way they attack everything else: attacking the MEANING by claiming the social situation in which a thing occurs make that thing racist/sexist/etc.
Merit is "embedded" in "the ideology of whiteness" therefore all the standards of merit are racist.
2/ The next move is to claim the thing they're attackong maintains, reinforces, reproduces, perpetuates, empowers, enables, or otherwise "upholds" a an oppresive social "structure"
This usually is done by claiming the standards and principles in play are racist/sexist/etc.
3/ This is about merit in university applications.
Merit is about "can you do the work according to rigorous objective standards."
The woke attack the standards in the way I described in order to be able to remove them and replace them with their own woke standards.
2/ In 2021 the National Education Association, the largest teacher union in the United States, explicitly endorsed bringing CRT into education (Pic 1)
There'a also a ton of books about CRT in education (Pics 2+3) exactly because CRT is *deeply* embedded in education studies.
3/ In January of 2005, Michael Jennings and Marvin Lynn published an article that explained that they were inventing "Critical Race Pedagogy" (pic 1) by blending Critical Race Theory and Critical Pedagogy (pics 2 + 3)
These people are very explicit about what they are doing.