For all his scientific accomplishments, Schrödinger was a sexual predator who wrote in his journal about infatuations with girls as young as 12. He groomed a 14 year, and abandoned another girl he impregnated. He argued that he had a right to do this, because of his genius.
Saying "He was also a complex and controversial person who had unconventional views" is a weak cop out. When he was 53 he set his sights on a *12 year old*. The girl's family had to have a priest intervene.
It's not clear when Schrödinger began his sexual relationship with Ithi Junger; it may have been when she was as young as 14. But by his own admission she became pregnant with his child at age 17. He lost interest after that, ant terminating the pregnancy left her sterile.
There's nothing wrong with having an interest in his scientific accomplishments; they're foundational. But don't valorize the guy and then sweep the dark stuff under the rug. He was a monster.
People are often surprised to learn this. Here’s a recent article that references stuff discussed by biographers, and an Irish Times piece.
Again, there is absolutely nothing wrong with being interested in the guy’s work. How could you not be, if you’re interested in physics! It’s just disappointing to see him put on a pedestal with a little “he also had some controversial views” disclaimer tacked on.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Gather round, friends, and let me tell you an equally horrifying story.
Back in the 2000s I was renting a little kit house in south Austin. It was my last year of grad school. My rent wouldn’t even get you a closet there anymore, but that’s not the terrifying part. (1/n)
Let me explain one reason why this is a potentially serious problem.
First, you should know that when I search google from an incognito window it gives me the right answer: just shy of 14 billion years, the current scientific consensus among cosmologists and astronomers.
This means Google is using tracking info – what it thinks it knows about me – to decide which answer it should serve to a question *where there is clear scientific consensus on the answer*.
You can see the problem here.
If, based on your browsing, google decides you are anti-vaccine, and you do a search about how to protect your kids from measles, how will it respond?
Will it present the medical consensus, or point you to a "study" that hasn't been around long enough for serious review?
Mathematician Emmy Noether was born #OTD in 1882. She made groundbreaking advances in abstract algebra, and her eponymous theorems articulated the deep connection between symmetries and conserved quantities in physics.
Image: Public domain, photographer unknown
Emmy Noether began university at a time when women studying mathematics were only allowed to sit in on lectures. Even then, the professor’s permission was required.
She spent her first two years at Erlangen, then a year at Göttingen where she attended lectures by Hilbert, Klein, Minkowski, and Schwarzschild. Noether returned to Erlangen, where she began her doctorate in 1904. Three years later she was done, summa cum laude.
A comic strip titled "Be Scientific with Ol' Doc Dabble" appeared in the Los Angeles Times #OTD in 1934, quoting the predictions by Fritz Zwicky and Walter Baade of neutron stars, supernova, and the origin of cosmic rays.
Image: Associated Press, @latimes
Zwicky and Baade submitted their papers "On Super-Novae" and "Cosmic Rays from Super-Novae" in March of that year. The papers weren't published until May, so this comic strip was published beat the papers to print by a full four months.
Baade had been using the term "super-novae" in his lectures at Caltech since the early 1930s, and he and Zwicky talked about their work (and used that term) at an APS meeting in 1933. So word had gotten out. There was enough awareness of their work to prompt a comic strip!
Entertainer, childhood literacy advocate, and scientific philanthropist Dolly Parton was born #OTD IN 1946. Mostly known for her singing and songwriting, her Imagination Library program has distributed over 100 million free books to kids around the world. dollyparton.com/imagination-li…
And Dolly's contributions to Vanderbilt University Medical Center's research efforts in the early days of the pandemic helped support the development of Moderna's Covid-19 vaccine. cnn.com/2020/11/18/ent…
Normally I do #OTD posts for scientists and mathematicians, or important discoveries. But @DollyParton has probably done as much as any living person to promote childhood literacy so I am proud to put her on the list.
Physicist Yoichiro Nambu (南部 陽一郎) was born #OTD in 1921. He developed a theory of spontaneous symmetry breaking to explain superconductivity, paving the way for electroweak symmetry breaking via the Higgs mechanism in the Standard Model.
Image: AIP Emilio Segre Archives
Nambu gave a lovely explanation of spontaneous symmetry breaking. Folks in a crowd might be looking in all different directions with no direction preferred. Occasionally, one person's choice propagates through the crowd. Soon everyone is looking in the same direction. That's SSB.
In physics we try to formulate theories (the rules for a physical system) in a way that makes symmetries manifest (obvious to anyone reading the rules). For instance, compatibility with special relativity means the rules should take the same form in any inertial reference frame.