Do you see how it works yet?
@UniofOxford make a mint pushing a failed and dangerous vaccine for a disease that they fraudulently promoted as lethal...
Whilst pretending to run studies that - if they could interfere with the gravy train - were never published.
(see next tweet)
Here is the clinical trials record for the Wellcome-sponsored COPCOV trial, which was the most likely to report a benefit of protection from #hydroxychloroquine.
Because the trial data was scrubbed.
Here is the ANZCTR record.
The trial website has gone, but previously existed.
https://t.co/cBh1xQw6iK https://t.co/iZRX49qvyvcovidshieldtrial.com.au anzctr.org.au/TrialSearch.as…
Did you catch it?
The smartest mice get the tastiest cheese.
Who has control of this trial?
Who registered the website?
Why our old friends @IQVIA_global of course.
The very people who procured the data for the "highly safe and effective"....
Astrazeneca COVID vaccine, for which they were the data collaborator (aka data maker)
And who were working in conjunction with @UniofOxford, home of our extremist #Vaxophile @trishgreenhalgh, to develop a vaccine... that killed untold numbers of people...
For a disease that was non-lethal in 99% of people and almost certainly treatable in the remainder, if the hydroxychloroquine (+ azithromycin) studies were allowed to have been published.
But @astrazeneca, @IQVIA and @UniofOxford made sure they weren't. Didn't they?
@AstraZeneca @IQVIA @UniofOxford And remember that this is the same IQVIA which has its tentacles in every EMR in every country, yet also ran the only lab in the world...
Where the PCR positive rate for COVID was 99.99%
I'm sure it was just a coincidence.
@MartinNeil9 @profnfenton
@AstraZeneca @IQVIA @UniofOxford @MartinNeil9 @profnfenton Once you realise the collusion between @UniofOxford, their pharma stooge @trishgreenhalgh, the corrupted PRINCIPLE trial and the lethal RECOVERY trial which were all run from the same place...
And remember the ironically-named RECOVERY trial which was also run out of Oxford using @bengoldacre's @HDR_UK pet project, supervised by Jeffrey Epstein's favourite Nicole Junkermann.
Every vaccine scientist will try to convince you that the drop in u25 cancers was due to the vaccine when it was merely due to the change in screening.
But check out the HUGE RISE in 25+ cancers. This pattern is repeated in Scotland and Australia where similar changes to the screening age were made a few years after the introduction of coerced vaccination, obfuscating the figures to hide a scandalous rise in 25-29 age cervical cancers after the vaccine rollout.
For clarity most cancers in this age group are early and detected on screening before they become advanced. Moving the screening age meant that they were diagnosed later and therefore in an older age bracket.
The big red arrow is pointing to the preinvasive diagnoses which tend to mirror the actual cancers - the upper chart was too busy.
Here is the same from the OP with arrows showing both cancer (above) and precancer (below) which both rose significantly after the vaccine rollout
And here is the same data from Cancer Research UK (smoothed) showing a doubling of cancer rates in the over 25s for at least 5 years after the vaccine rollout. cancerresearchuk.org/health-profess…
@SECGov @Kevin_McKernan @SabinehazanMD Wow so this company is claiming influence with 11,000 scientists and multiple links lead back to pharma and the gene therapy corporations.
Broad institute. Who could have guessed?
#pubpeergate
@Yale could be up to their necks in the biggest HIPAA scandal since @UChicago
This is how the scam appears to have worked.
Harlan Krumholz owns a patent for managing health data through an app. "Hugo health" was the middle man providing the app to bait people claiming to be vaccine injured to join a study called LISTEN. But it was essentially being run on behalf of Pfizer/Janssen who paid him $3m in "research grants".
Thousands of injured signed up but only 241 patients were used in the "study" of which the publications were irrelevant and showed nothing other than "the vaccines saved millions of lives" bla bla. Nothing helpful for the vaccine injured at all.
But the bombshell - the data that they provided was able to be sold off to anyone they wanted to. It was in the consent form that most people didn't read. The data was held on hugo.health which has now gone. It was NOT HIPAA compliant.
How did we know that hugo.health's servers were not HIPAA compliant?
Yale told the participants in a email in July 2024 (attached).
So where did all that health data go?
Was it sold off to the highest bidder or used in a blackmail campaign against vulnerable people who were vaccine injured and couldn't work? (Like those that have targeted our accounts recently)
We don't know. But you can be damn sure that Yale knows, and took secret action to remedy the situation having already taken millions of dollars from pharma to run studies that undermined the vaccine injured.
That is why there is so much animosity suddenly being directed at the vaccine injured. They want to bury this story.
Yale could be in very big trouble.
They deserve a hashtag.
#YaleGate
@Yale @UChicago For those confused, please understand what a "limited hangout" is here. While you are rejoicing on the scraps of Daily Mail fodder, the pharma companies' new narrative is enshrined by those very articles.