Do you see how it works yet?
@UniofOxford make a mint pushing a failed and dangerous vaccine for a disease that they fraudulently promoted as lethal...
Whilst pretending to run studies that - if they could interfere with the gravy train - were never published.
(see next tweet)
Here is the clinical trials record for the Wellcome-sponsored COPCOV trial, which was the most likely to report a benefit of protection from #hydroxychloroquine.
Because the trial data was scrubbed.
Here is the ANZCTR record.
The trial website has gone, but previously existed.
https://t.co/cBh1xQw6iK https://t.co/iZRX49qvyvcovidshieldtrial.com.au anzctr.org.au/TrialSearch.as…
Did you catch it?
The smartest mice get the tastiest cheese.
Who has control of this trial?
Who registered the website?
Why our old friends @IQVIA_global of course.
The very people who procured the data for the "highly safe and effective"....
Astrazeneca COVID vaccine, for which they were the data collaborator (aka data maker)
And who were working in conjunction with @UniofOxford, home of our extremist #Vaxophile @trishgreenhalgh, to develop a vaccine... that killed untold numbers of people...
For a disease that was non-lethal in 99% of people and almost certainly treatable in the remainder, if the hydroxychloroquine (+ azithromycin) studies were allowed to have been published.
But @astrazeneca, @IQVIA and @UniofOxford made sure they weren't. Didn't they?
@AstraZeneca @IQVIA @UniofOxford And remember that this is the same IQVIA which has its tentacles in every EMR in every country, yet also ran the only lab in the world...
Where the PCR positive rate for COVID was 99.99%
I'm sure it was just a coincidence.
@MartinNeil9 @profnfenton
@AstraZeneca @IQVIA @UniofOxford @MartinNeil9 @profnfenton Once you realise the collusion between @UniofOxford, their pharma stooge @trishgreenhalgh, the corrupted PRINCIPLE trial and the lethal RECOVERY trial which were all run from the same place...
And remember the ironically-named RECOVERY trial which was also run out of Oxford using @bengoldacre's @HDR_UK pet project, supervised by Jeffrey Epstein's favourite Nicole Junkermann.
The "Swiss patient" sequence you provided not only has 2% dissimilarity from any known hanta sequence but BLASTing into the patent database gets us here.
"No name" virus.
Really?
The people running the @DeptofWar need to start going to jail.
You were lied to about the Merck measles vaccine develop in the 60s. When injected into babies it caused fevers, rashes, diarrhoea and febrile convulsions.
Why?
I'm going to show you.
@SecKennedy @RetsefL @MaryanneDemasi @DrJulieSladden @RWMaloneMD
Merck claimed that the "measles vaccine" was an "attenuated version of measles" giving the impression that it was a virus that was made safe.
That was a lie.
It was just measles, passaged in cells in a lab.
We injected our babies with actual measles.
How do I know?
Recently released Australian Road Deaths data confirm that the @epiphare study claiming that COVID vaccination reduced road deaths by 32% was, as suspected, a complete fake.
Here are the actual road deaths data plotted from the Australian BITRE data repository using a trendline for 2000-2019 (excluding 2020 as it was a quiet year)
The pink area shows the inflection and increase in road deaths over the predicted number.
Note that road deaths have a downward trend despite an increase in population (due to safety measures and slowing of traffic).
So the question becomes...
"what is the probability that - if the @epiphare study was real (showing a 32% reduction in road deaths after vaccination) - the Australian road deaths (where nearly 100% of the adult population was vaccinated) would increase by 36%"?
Debbie's tweet was about her case against @HHSGov when her son developed Type 1 Diabetes after a routine vaccine, when he had a negative glucose test prior.
So it was clearly vaccine linked, but her case was denied.
Not only was the case denied (despite clear evidence of a new diagnosis immediately after vaccination) but the case was used by the "judge" to essentially ban ANY further cases that alleged a link between new diabetes and a routine vaccine.
Here is the clip from the (decent) interview with Pelle Neroth Taylor of @RealTNTRadio.
In it Boyle is asked whether the mRNA vaccines are themselves biological weapons and he explains that because "in your system, it generates the COVID-19 cells" they would be.
But of course that's incorrect, because mRNA vaccines don't recreate the COVID virus (the biological weapon - assuming as we now know that it was synthetic not natural).
So his explanation was incorrect because he misunderstood that the mRNA only provides the spike protein and he would have been destroyed on this point in court.
Of course he never got to court. And never gave an affidavit for the Dutch court - confirmed here (8/3/25):