Andrew Rillera Profile picture
Aug 15 16 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
If I say "*all* have sinned & are being justified as a gift by God's grace" you'd know I'm clearly a universalist, but if I point out that Paul said this in Rom 3:23–24, then it's suddenly "underdetermined/ambiguous."🧵
If I say, "one man’s act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all" you'd know I'm clearly a universalist, but if I point out Paul said this in Rom 5:18, then it's suddenly "underdetermined/ambiguous."
If I say, "God has shut up all in disobedience so that He may show mercy to all," you'd know I'm clearly a universalist, but if I point out Paul said this in Rom 11:32, then it's suddenly "underdetermined/ambiguous."
If I say, "as all die in Adam, so all will be made alive in Christ," you'd know I'm clearly a universalist, but if I point out Paul said this in 1 Cor 15:22, then it's suddenly "underdetermined/ambiguous."
If I say, "I'm convinced that one has died for all; therefore all have died. And Jesus died for all" you'd know I'm clearly a universalist, but if I point out Paul said this in 2 Cor 5:14–15, then it's suddenly "underdetermined/ambiguous."
If I say, "in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them" you'd know I'm clearly a universalist, but if I point out Paul said this in 2 Cor 5:19, then it's suddenly "underdetermined/ambiguous."
If I say "at the name of Jesus every knee will bow, in heaven & on earth & under the earth, & every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord" & "if u confess w your mouth Jesus as Lord...u will be saved" you'd know I'm clearly a universalist,+
but if I point out Paul said this in Phil 2:10–11 & Rom 10:9, then it's suddenly "underdetermined/ambiguous."
If I say, "God was pleased to reconcile to himself all things, whether on earth or in heaven, by making peace through the blood of his cross" you'd know I'm clearly a universalist, but if I point out "Paul" said this in Col 1:20, then it's suddenly "underdetermined/ambiguous."
If I say, "Christ is all, and in all" you'd know I'm clearly a universalist, but if I point out "Paul" said this in Col 3:11, then it's suddenly "underdetermined/ambiguous."
If I say, "desires everyone to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth" & "Christ Jesus, gave himself as a ransom for all" & "God is the Savior of all people, especially of those who believe," you'd know I'm clearly a universalist, but if I point out "Paul" said this+
in 1 Tim 2:4, 6 & 4:10, then it's suddenly "underdetermined/ambiguous."
If I say, "the grace of God has appeared, bringing salvation to all human beings," you'd know I'm clearly a universalist, but if I point out "Paul" said this in Titus 2:11, then it's suddenly "underdetermined/ambiguous."
And on and on. E.g., Col 1:27

And even with these non-Pauline texts:
1 John 2:2
John 1:5
John 3:17
John 12:32
Acts 3:21
Heb 2:9
1 Pet 3:19; 4:2–6
2 Pet 3:9, 15
Rev 5:13
Rev 15:4
One of the greatest miscommunications of all time would be that none of these folks meant what they wrote. How stupid of folks like Origen & Gregory of Nyssa to take these statements as "clear"? What morons!
Let's add some OT passages:
Lam 2:2 w 3:3:21–26, 31–33
Ps 103:8–10
Ps 30:5
Ezek 16:53–55
Ezek 37 (see QT)
Egypt & Assyria in Isaiah 19:19–25
Egypt, Babylon, Philistia, in Ps 87:4
Moab & Ammon in Zeph 2:9; 3:8–11 & Jer 48:1–47 (Moab) & 49:1–6 (Ammon)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Rillera

Andrew Rillera Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AndrewRillera

Jun 29
Y'all know I'm a big fan of @bibleproject @timmackie & although "The City E7" & series r great, this episode (see QT) misses a significant point re Joseph.

🧵on y I think Joseph's famine response (Gn 41:33–56, 47:13–26) is an example of exactly what *not* to do per the Torah.1/
Whereas TBP says the Joseph story shows how "a city...can become a source of life under the leadership of a wise human image of God" Joseph creates the economic-land structure in Gen 47 God hates. Joseph is an example of unwise rule that brings *slavery* (Gn Gen 47:19, 25).2/
According to Gen, Joseph is responsible for creating the conditions necessary for his family’s enslavement (& the enslavement of the Egyptians themselves). Joseph didn’t simply go along w Egyptian societal structure. He created the very structure that God saves Israel from! 3/
Read 25 tweets
Mar 20
Denny Burk's essay arguing for Eternal Conscious Torment in _Four Views on Hell_ is embarrassingly bad. I can't even believe it was published. I would have solicited another contributor. I would give it a D only bc the grammar is fine.
The only upside is that it might be a nec corollary to the untenable nature of ETC itself. Just letting people read it & then the responses from the other contributors is more than enough for readers to go: OK, ETC is obviously a load of crap. Let's consider the other views now.
I'm reading John Stackhouse's essay for Terminal Punishment (AKA Annihilationism/Condidtional Immortality) now & although I ultimately disagree, it's well argued & I agree w a lot it (I just see diff implications of what we agree on).
Read 11 tweets
Mar 16
As a follow up to this 🧵& my other ones on Paul, the keen reader of Paul's letters will wonder about the judgment schema in Rom 2:5-11, which quite clearly expresses a principle of soteriological meritocracy (salvation on the basis of good works). Lets get into it below.
I conclude in my diss that this is the v schema Paul is directly opposing in Romans. This is the view of the person Paul addresses & corrects in Rom 2:1, 3, &17ff. *But even if u don't agree w that*, I want to show how Rom 2 is fundamentally incompatible w the rest of the letter.
So either Rom 2:5-11 represents the view of Paul's interlocutor, or Paul is fundamentally incoherent & contradictory in the same letter. Scholars like John Barclay & NT Wright center Rom 2, while scholars like Douglas Campbell, Chris Tilling, & myself center Rom 3ff.
Read 38 tweets
Mar 15
Paul: A *pornos*, one who practices *porneia* (sexual immorality), “will not inherit the kingdom” (1 Cor 6:9–10; cf. Gal 5:19–21).

So that unrepentant Corinthian pornos is a goner (5:1)?

P: Well, his flesh will be destroyed, but he'll be "saved in the day [of judgment]" (5:5).
???

P: Well, he'll go thru the purifying & purgative flames of divine judgment (3:12–15; see “the Day” 3:13 w 5:5) just like anyone else: “If anyone’s works/deeds are burned up, they will suffer loss; but they themselves will be saved, but in this way: as through fire” (3:15).
So you're saying everyone is judged according to their deeds, but the outcome of this judgment ultimately results in salvation even if all their deeds r like wood, hay, & straw?

P: YES! The judgment is the final means God uses to purify us, making us fit for eschatological life.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 13
Y'all, as I said "what God has joined together [worship/filled w the Spirit & social justice] let no revival separate."

💥Even John the Baptizer was suspicious of the popularity of his "revival" & pleaded for the "crowds" coming to "bear fruits worthy of repentance."~Lk 3:7–14
JBap's ministry teaches us that esp when something becomes a popular "movement" we need to make explicit that w/e we do the telos must be abt conforming ourselves/our communities to the justice of God, which is always abt exalting the material conditions of the poor & oppressed.
I pray & trust there r JBaps at Asbury holding each other accountable to the fruits God seeks from the people: personal & societal righteousness & justice (Isa 5:7). If u think any1 w this message is poo pooing the gathering *itself* then it's a little 2 "only a hit dog hollars."
Read 9 tweets
Feb 11
Sorry to be biblicist & therefore a curmudgeon, but only time will tell if this Asbury "revival" is actually worthy of the name or if it is just futile navel gazing. If/when they start pleading the cause of the afflicted & needy w one voice, then I'll believe they "know" God.+
Getting caught up in a rapture of music & prayer can v well happen when communing w a demon. If this is truly reviving the community's communion w the Xian God, then an explosion of "social justice" is about to happen (!!). Jeremiah 9:24; 22:15–16; Matt 25:31–46. May it be so.
Since more r finding this, I’ll add Acts 2:41–47 & 4:31–35 for the #asburyrevival. The 1st 2 episodes of the Spirit filling the church lead immediately to meeting the material needs of others. This is instructive. What God has joined together let no “revival” separate.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(