A thread that’ll prove that Periyar, founder of DMK in his own words in verifiable public records, was not just anti Brahmin but also anti Christian, Islam, Gandhi-Nehru, women & democracy So why would DMK target only Sanatan/Brahmins? We’ll tell you why in the end. Don't miss!
Periyar’s direct speech on Gandhi, Nehru & the constitution
This are his actual words on women in DK newspaper.
In this direct quote from Viduthalai (16 April 1950) on Scheduled castes
EVR called Silappadikaram a “Aryan propaganda in the following direct quote. Tamil language warriors would definitely want to know about this.
1971 speech in Mettupalayam while inaugurating the Rationalist Association, he said the following attacking ALL religions
The Vatican would surely want to know these words from his 1943 Trichy Speech
Periyar E.V. Ramasamy writing in his magazine Kudiyarasu, and he is being unusually mild here. (Naan Sonnal Unakku Yen Kopam Vara Vendum, vol. 4, p. 532, compiled by Pasu. Gowthaman).
Now comes the best part. He accused Ambedkar for selling himself to the Brahmins. (Periyar E.V.R. Chintanaikal, Anaimuthu, 1974, p. 1,860). No comments here.
Now some nice quotes directly from him for our dear democracy warriors. Periyar’s writings compiled by Pasu. Gowthaman, vol. 4, 2017, p. 432)
Some Muslims along with Darul Shah, a Muslim Tamil scholar, called Periyar ‘Islam’s enemy no. 1′. Sundara Sreenivasa offers a brief summary of Periyar’s criticism on Islam drawing from primary sources.
Periyar, in his very last speech made in December 1973, said the following. Mohabbat ki dukaan - anyone?
Some References for your perusal
Tamizhar Thalaivar Viduthalai (16 April 1950)
Kudiarasu (8 July 1947)
Viduthalai (22 September 1951)
Viduthalai (11 November 1957)
Senkoal (“Sceptre”, a Tamil magazine, 1 July 1951)
So why DMK only targets Brahmins Answer lies in shloka
अश्वं नैव गजं नैव व्याघ्रं नैव च नैव च |अजापुत्रं बलिं दद्याद्देवो दुर्बलघातकः ||
Not the horse, the elephant or the tiger either.Sacrifice the lamb, the meek.God kills the weak.
Brahmins are weak soft targets - that’s why
If you find our threads informative and want to know more about the history/culture/geography of the world then do subscribe to our Twitter & YouTube. Grow your knowledge by helping us grow.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Dire civilizational warning - if you read one thread today let it be this one. Your future is on the line & honestly it doesn’t look too bullish for Hindus in India.
Using a real life anecdote from today I’ll show you how situation is no different from elections of British India in 1937 & 1946
Save this tweet for 2029
A childhood friend who’s now a successful businessman was in town & we met for a quick 20 mins
He’s very involved with BJP & close to one candidate who had been given an MP ticket as he had a good track record of winning MLA seats. This particular MP constituency had approx 5 MLA constituencies with one M majority area.
Because of his track record BJP candidate assumed easy victory.
And surprise - He lost.
Why? In 4 areas he did get higher % of votes but in the 1 M area the % against him was so overwhelming that his gain in other 4 areas was fully erased.
Every Hindu who thinks you'll automatically survive forever just because your dharma is "sanatan" (timeless) should read this unmissable thread
A brief history of Parsis (Zoroastrians) who once held sway over an area almost as big as India but near extinct today
Learning lesson
1700 BCE: Origins - Zathurashtra (founder and prophet of Parsis) imparts the principles of Zoroastrianism in Central Asia, believed to have occurred between 1700 and 1000 BCE.
550 BCE: Expansion - Cyrus the Great establishes the Achaemenian Empire, promoting Zoroastrianism as its predominant faith, leading to its unprecedented growth and territorial expansion.
1/14 What's the fundamental difference in organized Abrahamic faiths vs Hinduism?
Why did Hindus lose 50% land & mind share but didn't die out?
Don't miss this thread that combines history, human psychology and philosophy to answer basic civilizational questions
2/14 Most influencers, handles or narratives present a unidimensional view of history and human interactions i.e. the group they identify with is all good and adversarial groups are all bad.
But in reality history is multi-layered & humans are multidimensional
3/14 Humans if left without a domineering framework will pursue self interest first
For example a lot of Hindus allied with Mughals. Sikhs on occasion have allied with British & Mughals have fought Afghans, Christian armies have fought genocidal wars etc.