There's a war going on now between @elonmusk and the @ADL, with people lining up on each side of the battle.
I don't know who's going to win, but I'm absolutely sure about who's going to lose...
It's the Jewish community.
Allow me to explain in this thread.
1/10
@twitter always had a problem with rabid Antisemitism, but they only dealt with clamping down on accounts emanating from the political Right. That's important but it did nothing to protect Jews from Farrakhan or the Ayatollah who openly called for the destruction of Israel.
2/10
When @elonmusk bought the platform, he promised to restore balance. He called for "freedom of speech, not freedom of reach." I applauded that notion because I believe that banning accounts should never be for partisan politics & neither should the fight against Antisemitism
3/10
The @ADL was quite vocal in their opposition to Musk's moves, especially the re-platforming of @realDonaldTrump. I opposed that position because I believe that calling to keep the former President off Twitter was a far greater threat to democracy than allowing him back on.
4/10
But the ADL didn't just voice opposition to @X, they actively worked to undermine the business. This economic pressure only made @elonmusk less likely to make reforms on the platform to limit the reach of Antisemitic voices. That's counterproductive.
5/10
I believe that for far too long, the ADL has abandoned their core mission, which is to defend Jews, in favor of a Left leaning political agenda that betrayed the mission. Normalizing Al Sharpton is just one of many examples of ADLs missteps, choosing politics over principle
6/10
Many Jews have expressed disappointment with the partisan direction taken by the @ADL, but that doesn't mean that there's no need for the important services the organization was designed for.
Especially now, with rising Antisemitism, we need an effective, nonpartisan ADL.
7/10
But the ADL's partisan political positions doesn’t excuse @elonmusk for ignoring Antisemitic content on @X, or even worse, for promoting rabid Antisemites like Keith Woods, who started the #BanTheADL campaign.
The enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend.
8/10
Judging by the comments, most of those who are pushing the #BanTheADL campaign have a problem with ALL Jews, not merely the organization that defends them. Their real target is Jews, and the @ADL is just a proxy for their dangerous Antisemitic obsession.
9/10
@elonmusk claims he's not an Antisemite and I believe that. But I also believe that he is enabling and encouraging Antisemitism on his platform by turning a blind eye to hate for Jews and Israel, and by working with Antisemites to destroy @ADL
This war needs to stop now.
10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The @nytimes claims they spoke with hundreds of people in order to report on yeshivas. I was one of those contacted.
The reporter used our financial information without the necessary context on how those funds were required to be used, just to push their biased narrative. 1/8 🧵
I explained to the Times reporter that textbook funds pay publishers for secular texts, transportation funds pay for bus contractors, special ed & remedial programs pay salaries & benefits of public school staff to work with eligible Yeshiva students.
None of that mattered.
2/8
The Times reporter only cared about one thing; how much taxpayer money he could report is being *used* by Yeshivas. To do that, he literally ignored the Federal law which requires a formula for ALL school districts to provide equitable services to non public school students.
3/8
The assault on traditional values is all around us. That's why a @nytimes investigation into Hasidic yeshivas has been so rejected by most Orthodox & Hasidic Jews. It wasn't an attempt to improve education, it was designed to shut yeshivas down & shun all people who support them.
There's no other reason why the Times chose pre COVID-19 data for an analysis of test scores, yet includes the COVID stimulus funds in their calculations of what Yeshivas received from the government. It's even framed as *look how much $ ((they)) took from you, the REAL taxpayer
There's no other reason why the Times chose to include school lunch funds in the count of what Yeshivas received from the government, when the NY Times always supports the expansion of these programs for the poor & minority communities. It's only a problem when Hasidic kids eat?
I read with disappointment the many pundits & celebrities who condemned the SCOTUS ruling that allows Churches to safely remain open & warns elected officials to treat them with no less respect under the law than liquor stores & bike stores. Communal worship is essential. 1/5
My disappointment turned to anger when I saw so many posts from self-proclaimed Orthodox Jews that are condemning the SCOTUS ruling. How can religious liberty mean so little to the people who've supposedly committed their lives to religious practice? It's mindboggling to me. 2/5
In fighting this case in court, @AgudahNews left their comfort zone of working with elected leaders, in order to go to court to defend the rights of religious Jews to be able to safely gather in prayer. That's their mission. They did it well and the court recognized it. 3/5
I've developed a theory on how Americans are reacting to the Covid pandemic. I'm calling it *Coping with Loss: The 5 Stages of Covid Grief*, based on the famous 5 Stages of Grief by Elizabeth @KublerRoss (1969): 1. Denial 2. Anger 3. Bargaining 4. Depression 5. Acceptance 1/8
During this pandemic, we are grieving & trying to cope with financial losses, lost educational opportunities, strained personal relationships, missed routines & so much more. But as we emerge from lockdown, we are now recovering by using the Kubler-Ross Model IN REVERSE. 2/8
Stage 1. Acceptance:
We believed the doctors, scientists & politicians who convinced us to social distance, close non essential businesses & just #StayHome in order to #FlattenTheCurve & #SaveLives. We enthusiastically accepted the data and the science at face value. 3/8
Perhaps I can fill in a few blanks for the @NJHerald. In the 1960's, the Satmar community tried unsuccessfully to relocate to Mt Olive, NJ, Congers, NY & elsewhere, always meeting staunch opposition to their culture, and their desire for communal living. njherald.com/lifestyle/2020…
The #Satmar leadership in Brooklyn realized that the only way to settle in a new community would be to purchase land without using the name of the religious corporation as the purchaser. This kept the sales price reasonable & didn't signal any municipal opposition before closing.
After closing on large tracts in the Town of Monroe in Orange County NY in 1974, the first dozen families moved in from Brooklyn, but were soon met with opposition at Zoning Board meetings, as the community grew through in-migration and high birth rates. Litigation commenced.