We landed a massive win against the Biden Administration yesterday for its blatant censorship of free speech on social media platforms.
Some notable quotes from the Court’s order ->
Here the Court notes that the feds engaged in a “broad pressure campaign designed to coerce social media companies into suppressing content disfavored by the government”
Here the Court points out that Joe Biden’s staff used the power of his Office to coerce media companies into censoring speech
The Court noted that the White House’s threats were both “explicit and subtle”
Couldn’t have said it better ourselves.
The White House violated the First Amendment. Repeatedly.
The Court notes that Joe Biden’s WH had “plans to punish” social media platforms if they refused to censor speech
The Court also explicitly called out the FBI for using its law enforcement authority to pressure content moderation and the change of social media policies
Remember, the FBI worked to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story during the 2020 election.
The Court notes that there has rarely ever been a “coordinated campaign of this magnitude orchestrated by federal officials that jeopardized a fundamental aspect of American life”
The Court agrees with Missouri that the feds “had the intended result of suppressing millions of protected free speech postings by American citizens.”
Which is why, the Court found, this injunction extends beyond just those who brought the suit; it benefits all social media users.
Our team will continue to construct this wall of separation between tech and state.
Yesterday’s ruling was one more brick laid in that foundation.
Your First Amendment rights are not up for debate.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨BREAKING: The Fifth Circuit has upheld the district court’s order in our free speech case, Missouri v. Biden, enjoining the White House, Surgeon General, CDC, & FBI from violating the First Amendment rights of millions of Americans.
The First Amendment remains intact.
The first brick was laid in the wall of separation between tech and state on July 4th, and this ruling is yet another brick.
My office just put @saintlouismayor on notice that her proposed legislation would violate Missourians’ constitutional right to keep and bear arms.
Let me be clear – I will zealously perform my constitutional duty to defend the rights of each law-abiding citizen to keep and bear arms in defense of their home, person, family and property, which is the promise made to them by the Missouri Constitution.
Not only would the proposed legislation be unconstitutional, it wouldn't work. Even @saintlouismayor admits stricter gun laws don't deter gun violence, as evidenced by her texts.
Our first day in court standing against child mutilation went well.
Here are the highlights:
We got the leftist activists to admit that the leading health studies “supporting” gender transition interventions for children were based on weak science.
Their expert also admitted that they didn’t know that the Swedish health authorities assert that the harms to gender transition interventions outweigh the benefits.
Today's oral argument in Missouri v. Biden proved what we've known all along: the Biden Administration has shamelessly and relentlessly coerced and colluded with social media platforms to censor free speech,
Some highlights from the hearing:
Biden’s lawyer seriously insinuated COVID caused a lot in the world to change, and thus, government censorship is permissible.
Biden's lawyer also said that Americans have not been harmed by the vast censorship enterprise emanating from the Biden White House.
Every American who has had a post removed or deplatformed would beg to differ.
I will always fight for Missouri consumers when their rights are being violated.
To that end, I filed suit against H&R Block, Taxslayer LLC, and TaxAct, Inc. for illegally sharing the sensitive data of Missouri taxpayers with Meta, Google and other Big Tech companies.
These companies violated state law when they shared sensitive personal and financial information with the Big Tech companies, which use the data for diverse advertising purposes, without customers’ consent.
If there’s anything we’ve discovered in our federal censorship lawsuit, it’s that these Big Tech companies do not have Americans’ best interests at heart.
Yesterday, we obtained an order to HALT what the court described as the Biden administration’s "massive attack against free speech” unseen before in United States history.
Some notable points from the judge’s order in our landmark free speech case, Missouri v. Biden:
The judge noted the censorship emanating from the federal government looks a lot like George Orwell’s “1984,” that “the evidence produced thus far depicts an almost dystopian scenario” and that the feds appear to have “assumed a role similar to an Orwellian ‘Ministry of Truth.”
The Court points out that the 20,000+ pages of evidence my office uncovered display the frightening coercion and collusion occurring between the feds and social media companies.