Javier Blas Profile picture
Sep 26 3 tweets 1 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
CHART OF THE DAY: On its net-zero by 2050 normative pathway (not forecast), the IEA says that oil demand needs to plunge from >100m b/d currently to 77m b/d by 2030 and 24m b/d by 2050 (in 2021, it said 72m b/d by 2030). #OOTT Full report pdf: iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/7c02e77…
Image
The 2030 target is unreachable. Pure and simple. And I think everyone knows it, including nearly everyone a the IEA.

Not even at the height of the covid-19 pandemic, with billions at home under lockdown and global GDP in free fall, did oil demand drop as much.
And we know what the IEA really thinks about 2030, because they published this year their forecast of the most likely oil demand path to 2028, showing consumption rising to >105m b/d.

So please, what’s the point of its net-zero model if their best knowledge says it won’t happen?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Javier Blas

Javier Blas Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JavierBlas

Apr 21
TECK-GLENCORE M&A BATTLE:

Teck’s shareholders are voting until Apr 26 on the company’s split in the middle of Glencore's $23bn hostile approach. By the weekend, Teck would have a good idea of where the vote is going. It needs 2/3 support of the voting B-shares.

@opinion🧵1/12
Teck has tabled a plan to split the company in two (one mining base metals and another mining coal) – but keeping a financial link between them for years to come. You can read my take on the split – and why it amounts to greenwashing – below | 2/12 bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
Typically, the Keevil family, thanks to its super-voting A-shares, controls Teck (despite owning just ~1% of the miner's equity). But because this is a company split, Canadian law gives the B-shareholders a chance to get their voice heard at par with the Keevils | 3/12
Read 13 tweets
Apr 3
BREAKING: Canadian mining group Teck rejects unsolicited take-over proposal from Glencore (for about $23 billion, plus debt).

In February, I wrote this @Opinion about the M&A case for Glencore, and noted it already tried to buy Teck two years ago.

Link: bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
The full letter from Teck rejecting the unsolicited approach by Glencore is here: teck.com/media/Letter-A…
Teck also confirms our reporting on talks with Glencore:

"As you know, our respective teams engaged in conceptual discussions in 2020 regarding a similarly structured transaction and, following a careful review by our Board, we determined at the time not to proceed further"
Read 4 tweets
Dec 12, 2022
I have written only one story about fusion energy. For my university's newspaper 25 years ago. Thankfully, it isn't online.

Since then, I'm skeptical of surprisingly well-timed announcements by budget-starved laboratories about breakthroughs for technologies decades away |🧵1/10
But first, the FT story (confirmed now by others, including Bloomberg) about the US Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory near San Francisco set to announce that a fusion experiment released more energy than the lasers used in the experiment emitted 2/10 ft.com/content/4b6f0f…
There's a caveat to the story. The same laboratory announced a slightly different breakthrough nearly a decade ago (by Nature), announcing it achieved a net energy output vs the energy **absorbed** by the fuel. The new breakthrough is superior | 3/10 nature.com/articles/natur…
Read 10 tweets
Dec 9, 2022
For oil, what's more important in the Saudi-Chinese read-outs of President Xi's visit to the kingdom is what is **not** in them.

What's missing? The long rumored pricing of oil in yuan.

China read-out: english.news.cn/20221209/fad4b…
Saudi read-out: spa.gov.sa/viewfullstory.…
#OOTT 🧵 1/7
Saudi Arabia has priced its oil in US dollars since 1974 and channeled the surpluses into the US Treasury market (aka, the petro-dollar recycling).

For a history of oil and the petro-dollar, read this good paper from the Journal of Energy History: energyhistory.eu/en/special-iss… 2/7
Historically, Riyadh has been reluctant to even consider shifting oil pricing away from the dollar.

In 2007, for example, a top Saudi official said the dollar could "collapse" if OPEC just talked about it. ft.com/content/33a4f7… (@Ed_Crooks surely remembers this one) 3/7
Read 7 tweets
Dec 2, 2022
OPEC+ appears ready to become a "spectator" of the market (as one delegate put it to me) as the G7 oil price cap talks continue. As things stand, it's likely to keep its output unchanged when it meets virtually Dec 4, although a small cut isn't completely ruled out | #OOTT 1/4
OPEC+ remains concerned about the impact of a slowing global economy and China's covid-zero policy on global oil demand growth. So the cartel retains a decidedly output "cut" bias, and the group can call for an emergency meeting if needed at any point | #OOTT 2/4
But for now OPEC+ ministers take comfort that beyond a very shallow contango at the prompt, Brent remains backwardated further out. Oil demand growth is OK-ish and the SPR sales are winding down. Brent crude isn't too far from the $90-$100 range preferred by Riyadh | #OOTT 3/4
Read 4 tweets
Nov 26, 2022
OIL MARKET: Washington eases its oil sanctions on Venezuela, allowing Chevron (for the next 6 months) to pump crude in the Latin American nation and export it into the United States. A major shift in the White House policy | #OOTT #Venezuela $CVX 🇻🇪 ⛽️ 🇺🇸
The easing of the oil sanctions come as the Venezuelan government and the democratic opposition re-started talks, brokered by Norway and Mexico. The talks between the two sides are the first direct contact in a year | #OOTT
A bit of extra context: before the sanctions were imposed, the joint-ventures between Chevron and PdVSA, the Venezuelan state-owned oil company, pumped about 200,000 b/d. So that's probably as much extra crude as we can expect -- and that will require time, money and expertise
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(