When they ask you what has Brahmans given to this world tell them the Tale of Pythagoras- a greek philosopher who not only created a theorem based on the studies of brahminical sutras but also followed the principles of brahminism all his life.
(THREAD)
1. Clement of Alexandria, a Christian theologian and philosopher, in his book Stromata quoted Megasthenes:
“All that was said about nature by the ancients is said also by those who philosophise beyond Greece: some things by the BRAHMINS among the Indians, and others by those called Jews in Syria”
Clement also goes on to say Pythagoras was a hearer of the Brahmins crediting Brahmins for influencing his Philosophy.
2. As per Eusebius of Caesarea, a greek or palestinian historian of Christianity, in his Evangelicae Praeparationis mentions how Pythagoras have studied under Brahmanas of Bharat & gathered knowledge of arithmetic, geometry, music etc.
3. In the Works of Apuleius, Florida, he writes that it was the Brahmins who taught Pythagoras the greater part of his philosophy. The Brahmins also taught him about the function of body & faculties of soul which goes on to oater become Pythagorean Philosophy & religion.
4. Now here’s a direct proof of how Pythagorean theorem Is a direct copy of Brahmins
As per G.Thibaut, an anglo sanskrit professor of Benaras college, in his work, The Sulvasutras mentioned that the geometrical proposition that has been ascribed to Pythagoras were already known to the acharyas of Bharat and the hardwork of the priests were contained in Paribhasa Sutras of Sulvasutras.
He also shows how Pythagoras Theorem is the same thing that Indian Brahmin Baudhayana & Apastamba had already mentioned in their work and Pythagoras just took it from them
5. But Pythagoras wasnt limited to Indian mathematics.
In his book The crest of the peacock, George Gheverghese Joseph writes Pythagoras Traveled to India in search of knowledge which is why Pythagorean Philosophy & religion resembles Indian Philosophy specifically Hindu Upanishads.
6. “The life of apollonius” shows not only did Pythagoras visited india to learn from Brahman but Neo-pythagorean philosophy is exactly what Brahmans practices like vegetarianism, rejecting wine, not wearing shoes, n definitely not wearing anything made from animal skin.
When Apollonius a follower of Pythagorean discipline visited India & met the Hindu King he explained the king that his own wisdom & is derived from Pythagoras who worshipped Gods the way Hindus did & followed vegetarianism like Hindu Brahmins.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Columbus invading America wasn't an act of bravery He risked himself for greed.
The Capitulations of Santa Fe was a contract between Catholic Monarch & Columbus which promised him 10% share of everything he captures in his conquest.
Colonialism & savagery is getting repackaged here as some huge favour.
The truth is it was the colonialists who were savages and the lands they invaded were highly developed civilizations that had already built government, roads, farms, roads etc.
Momedan terrorists attacked National emblem at Hazratbal, calling it blasphemy.
Do you know what this shrine is famed for?
A hair- Prophet's hair
If damaging Ashok Emblem shocks u here's a story how they once had unleashed nationwide riots & Hindu Genocide over this hair.
Syed Abdullah Madani, a supposed descendant of Mohd, brought a Hair to India & claimed that it was Islamic Prophet Mohd's hair- Moi-e-Muqqaddas
That hair is worshipped at Hazratbal Dargah.
So much for "Idol worship is against our religious beliefs"
In 1963, this hair went missing from the dargah & what followed was a riot all over Kashmir & a horror show for Hindus even in Bangladesh.
If you are shocked at the vandalism of Ashoka emblem, imagine the scene when thousands of Mussalmans poured onto the streets of Kashmir to show their anger at the disappearance of a hair.
And we Hindus are sitting silently at the vandalism of 1000s of our temples fighting court cases.
Ruchika the historian with a PhD is asking for the source of 5000 inmates in Akbar's Harem.
It's literally Ain-i-Akbari written by his own court Historian Abul Fazl.
If that's not the first book you read on Akbar it's time to revoke your degree.
Here’s Abul Fazl in Ain-i-Akbari confirming Akbar had 5000 women in his harem.
Not all royal wives-some were freeborn while many were slaves married without consent.
But sure, Ruchika the "feminist" sees no problem in shielding such a man.
Akbar was a known sexual predator with an insatiable
sexual appetite. He used to send eunuchs to hunt for fresh women into the household of his own nobles & pick up their daughters at his whims. Women had no choice & were treated as mere pawns.
Imagine calling yourself a feminist after defending such a man.