SagasofBharat Profile picture
Nov 10, 2023 10 tweets 5 min read Read on X
PYTHAGORAS & BRAHMINISM

When they ask you what has Brahmans given to this world tell them the Tale of Pythagoras- a greek philosopher who not only created a theorem based on the studies of brahminical sutras but also followed the principles of brahminism all his life.

(THREAD) Image
Image
1. Clement of Alexandria, a Christian theologian and philosopher, in his book Stromata quoted Megasthenes:

“All that was said about nature by the ancients is said also by those who philosophise beyond Greece: some things by the BRAHMINS among the Indians, and others by those called Jews in Syria”
Image
Clement also goes on to say Pythagoras was a hearer of the Brahmins crediting Brahmins for influencing his Philosophy.
Image
Image
2. As per Eusebius of Caesarea, a greek or palestinian historian of Christianity, in his Evangelicae Praeparationis mentions how Pythagoras have studied under Brahmanas of Bharat & gathered knowledge of arithmetic, geometry, music etc. Image
3. In the Works of Apuleius, Florida, he writes that it was the Brahmins who taught Pythagoras the greater part of his philosophy. The Brahmins also taught him about the function of body & faculties of soul which goes on to oater become Pythagorean Philosophy & religion. Image
4. Now here’s a direct proof of how Pythagorean theorem Is a direct copy of Brahmins

As per G.Thibaut, an anglo sanskrit professor of Benaras college, in his work, The Sulvasutras mentioned that the geometrical proposition that has been ascribed to Pythagoras were already known to the acharyas of Bharat and the hardwork of the priests were contained in Paribhasa Sutras of Sulvasutras.
Image
He also shows how Pythagoras Theorem is the same thing that Indian Brahmin Baudhayana & Apastamba had already mentioned in their work and Pythagoras just took it from them
Image
Image
5. But Pythagoras wasnt limited to Indian mathematics.

In his book The crest of the peacock, George Gheverghese Joseph writes Pythagoras Traveled to India in search of knowledge which is why Pythagorean Philosophy & religion resembles Indian Philosophy specifically Hindu Upanishads.

Image
Image
6. “The life of apollonius” shows not only did Pythagoras visited india to learn from Brahman but Neo-pythagorean philosophy is exactly what Brahmans practices like vegetarianism, rejecting wine, not wearing shoes, n definitely not wearing anything made from animal skin.
Image
Image
When Apollonius a follower of Pythagorean discipline visited India & met the Hindu King he explained the king that his own wisdom & is derived from Pythagoras who worshipped Gods the way Hindus did & followed vegetarianism like Hindu Brahmins. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with SagasofBharat

SagasofBharat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SagasofBharat

Sep 8
Momedan terrorists attacked National emblem at Hazratbal, calling it blasphemy.

Do you know what this shrine is famed for?

A hair- Prophet's hair

If damaging Ashok Emblem shocks u here's a story how they once had unleashed nationwide riots & Hindu Genocide over this hair. Image
Image
Syed Abdullah Madani, a supposed descendant of Mohd, brought a Hair to India & claimed that it was Islamic Prophet Mohd's hair- Moi-e-Muqqaddas

That hair is worshipped at Hazratbal Dargah.

So much for "Idol worship is against our religious beliefs" Image
Image
In 1963, this hair went missing from the dargah & what followed was a riot all over Kashmir & a horror show for Hindus even in Bangladesh.

If you are shocked at the vandalism of Ashoka emblem, imagine the scene when thousands of Mussalmans poured onto the streets of Kashmir to show their anger at the disappearance of a hair.

And we Hindus are sitting silently at the vandalism of 1000s of our temples fighting court cases.Image
Image
Read 17 tweets
Sep 3
Do you know why the West - from the British Raj to Navarro today - keeps targetting Brahmins?

Reason- Brahmins led revolts, guarded knowledge, and were the biggest impediment to conversions.

The fear that haunted the 1800s still drives the hate now - here's the history.Image
Image
Reason 1:

It was mostly Brahmins who revolted against the British. Image
Image
Image
Image
Queen Victoria felt Brahmins are those who incite people against British colonisation.

While Mohamedans are the real supporters of the colonial rule.

And why not? After all one invader will support another in occupying the land that doesn't belong to either of them.Image
Image
Read 17 tweets
Aug 31
Did you know?

The claim that India was richest under the Mughals is the biggest JNU-manufactured scam.

India was the world’s largest economy long before Mughals were born- they didn’t enrich us, they looted our wealth to fund Islamic empires abroad.

Let's debunk this myth. Image
Image
Here's Angus Maddison’s global GDP data that blow up the JNU myth.

India’s share of world GDP:

1 CE → 33%

1000 CE → 29%

1500 CE → 25%

The data shows India was already the world’s largest economy for 1500+ years before the Mughals even arrived. Image
1st-century Roman historian Pliny the Elder complained that India was draining Rome’s treasury

And this was 1500 years before the Mughals. Image
Image
Read 15 tweets
Jul 30
Gems of Akbar's Debauchery

Ruchika the historian with a PhD is asking for the source of 5000 inmates in Akbar's Harem.

It's literally Ain-i-Akbari written by his own court Historian Abul Fazl.

If that's not the first book you read on Akbar it's time to revoke your degree.Image
Image
Here’s Abul Fazl in Ain-i-Akbari confirming Akbar had 5000 women in his harem.

Not all royal wives-some were freeborn while many were slaves married without consent.

But sure, Ruchika the "feminist" sees no problem in shielding such a man. Image
Image
Akbar was a known sexual predator with an insatiable 

sexual appetite. He used to send eunuchs to hunt for fresh women into the household of his own nobles & pick up their daughters at his whims. Women had no choice & were treated as mere pawns.

Imagine calling yourself a feminist after defending such a man.Image
Image
Read 14 tweets
Jul 17
Ruchika asks NCERT where it is written that Jiziya is an incentive to convert.

The concept of jizya in Quran (9.29) targets those who refuse to convert. It is meant to humiliate non-Muslims.

Islamic commentator Al-Zamakhshari echoes the same - jizya should be made so heavy and degrading that people convert just to escape the shame and burden.”Image
Image
This was followed during the time of Mughals as well

-Non muslim taxpayer should himself come to pay the tax.

-Non muslim will stand while the muslim collector should be seated.

-the hands of the non Muslim should be below the Muslim to show their inferiority. Image
Alauddin Khilji sought advice from Qazi Mughsiuddin who advised him that while Collecting Kharaj the Muslim collector should spit inside the mouth of the Non Muslim.

Oh yes Thook jihad was openly practiced at that time. 🤮 Image
Read 5 tweets
Jul 6
I am surprised so many people didn't even read Ramayana?

Let me try & educate:

Myth 1: Ram never cared about surpanakha's appearance.

Reality: Shri Ram & Lakshman literally made fun of Surpanakha's appearance in Aranya Kanda sarga 18. Image
Image
Image
Myth 2: Sita was from Nepal & naturally brown skinned

Sita was from Mithila mentioned in Ramayana many times.

Shri Ram explicitly described Sita In Ramayana having smooth skin & complexion like rose apple.

(So She was Definitely not pimple faced like Sai pallavi.) Image
Image
Myth 3: There is no mention Surpanakha was ugly/ she initially went undetected by shape shifting.

Reality:
1. In Shurpanakha's 1st appearance in front of Shri Ram She is described as:
-facially unpleasant
-Pot bellied
-Coppery haired
-ugly featured
-brass voiced
-deplorably oldish
-crooked talker
-uncouth
-ill mannered
-abominable.

She appeared in the scene in her real ugly self & only mentioned she can shape shift. She didn't go undetected. She honestly mentioned who she wasImage
Image
Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(