Hot off the press - new climate research 🚨🌍🔥
Will warming stop once we reach net zero CO2 emissions?
Open-access publication @FrontiersIn assessing what we know and don't know about whether warming will stop once net zero CO2 emissions are reached. /1 frontiersin.org/journals/scien…
With #NetZero targets established as key components of international and national climate policy, it becomes ever more pertinent to closely understand what reaching net-zero emissions will deliver and what it doesn't. /2
That's why we, with an international team of scientists, take a deep look at the 'zero emissions commitment' or ZEC. In other words, how much warming (or cooling) can be expected once global emissions are brought down to zero.
For various reasons, we focus our effort on CO2. /3
Physically, we understand why warming should roughly stop after net zero CO2 emissions: reductions in ocean heat uptake that would further see global warming, are balanced with reductions in atmospheric CO2 concentrations. /4
While warming is expected to stop, other parts of the Earth system, such as sea level rise, continue to change. /5
How sure are we that this best estimate of zero additional warming after #NetZero CO2 emissions is indeed true?
We look in detail into 26 levers of potential change and assess for each how they could change and affect warming after net zero. /6
For each lever we assess by which percentage they would increase or decrease warming after net zero, and this at different levels of confidence, from high (where we have much evidence and understanding) to low and even speculative (with limited evidence and understanding). /7
We look at if we can expect warming to increase or decrease decades, centuries or millennia after reaching #NetZero CO2.
This shows a mixed picture, with contributions that could either further warm or start to cool the planet after #NetZero CO2. /8
However, what it also shows is that there is a clear risk that we could see several tenths of a degree of additional warming after #NetZero CO2. /9
How different is this insight from the latest @IPCC_CH assessment published in 2021?
IPCC assessed ZEC over 50 yrs to be with greater than 66% probability ('likely' in IPCC talk) less than 0.3C after an initial 2C of warming. That still leaves a 1-in-6 chance of warming >0.3C /10
Our study doesn't change this, but helps understanding where this range comes from and how it could change in the future.
It guides the scientific community in focussing efforts on some of the processes whose contribution we understand least. /11
What are the policy implications of potential additional warming after #NetZero CO2?
First and foremost:
Additional warming does not equal unstoppable warming
[#NetZero CO2 emissions is still understood to stop warming, but maybe that could be at a higher level] /12
Second:
#NetZero becomes even more important as a climate milestone, but we need to plan to go beyond
[#NetZero remains a key step in halting climate change, but shouldn't be considered the end point of the mitigation journey] /13
Third:
Peak warming could be higher, with additional impacts, damages, and challenges
[This increases the urgency and therefore importance of near-term emissions cut to limit cumulative emissions until net zero] /14
Fourth:
To counteract potential continued warming over centuries to millennia, our global society should prepare for CO2 management and continued CO2 removal from the atmosphere. /15
This paper was an incredible team effort, led by Sofia Palazzo-Corner, and an international team of experts (see 👇).
And finally, huge congrats to lead author Sofia Palazzo-Corner, who has delivered a whopping first #PhD paper!! /end
With accompanying viewpoint contributions by
@damon_matthews:
The Advisory Board recommends the EU to take up a 2040 emissions reduction target of 90–95% compared to 1990 to keep the EU’s GHG budget to within 11 to 14 Gt CO2e between 2030 and 2050. #2040ClimateTarget#GreenhouseGasEmissionsBudget
Where do these numbers come from?
2/n
To arrive at this #2040ClimateTarget advice, the @esabcc_eu implemented its earlier recommendation to the @EU_Commission to follow an approach that is systematic, transparent and guided by EU values, when preparing its EU 2040 climate target proposal. 4/n
In 2021, the European Climate Law created the European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change @esabcc_eu and tasked it to inform the EU’s #2040ClimateTarget and 2030-2050 greenhouse gas (GHG) budget.
Today, @esabcc_eu published its advice.
Here’s the short version 🧵1/n
The Advisory Board recommends the @EU_Commission to take up:
a 2040 emissions reduction target of 90–95% compared to 1990
to keep the EU’s GHG budget to within 11 to 14 Gt CO2e between 2030 and 2050.
2/n
This advice is based on an assessment of what would be both a fair and a feasible emissions reduction contribution of the EU to the global challenge of keeping warming to 1.5°C. 3/n
Countries’ new and updated pledges (NDCs) submitted since COP26 reduce projected global GHG emissions in 2030 by only 0.5 gigatons of CO2 equivalent (GtCO2e) compared with projections based on pledges at the time of COP26.
Some pledges result in even higher emissions /2
Countries are off track to achieve even the globally highly insufficient NDCs. Global GHG emissions in 2030 based on current policies are estimated at 58 GtCO2e. The implementation gap in 2030 between policies and NDCs is about 3 to 6 GtCO2e. /3
Excellent conversation going on about how media messaging following the @IPCC_CH 1.5 report sating we have "12 years left" until [your favorite climate pandemonium term] has been a disservice to science communication, and is damaging to date 👇
(1/n) @guardian@Fridays4future
As one of the coordinating authors of the report I can only wholeheartedly agree with @bobkopp@PFriedling@theresphysics and others that this is a dangerous misrepresentation of the report's assessment and messages.
Let me explain why
(2/n)
Ironically, the "12 year left until climate catastrophe" message (with years being reduced as time passes) is wrong and damaging in two opposite ways:
misrepresentation through exaggeration and driving complacency through inaccurate messaging
(3/n)
Two years ago - we published a new scenario logic to avoid risky and unfair climate change scenarios in @Nature.
Yesterday, two new studies in @NatureClimate apply this logic and find that avoiding overshoot is the right thing to do both to reduce risks and overall costs.
/1
Our initial @Nature study highlighted that focussing on a target in 2100 and not caring about what happens until then results in scenarios that suggest the best way to meet a target is to plan to first miss it.
#COP26 is concluding after two years of work with some important decisions.
Some highlights of those areas I have followed most closely: 1) science 2) increased ambition 3) the Paris Rulebook
Some quick reflections (1/n)
1) science
For the first time ever, scientific evidence is included as a key framing of the various COP decisions. This is historic and includes strong messages on the scientific requirements as identified by @IPCC_CH to keep warming to 1.5C.
(2/n)
It includes required emissions reductions of -45% by 2030, and the need of reaching net zero.
The one bitter pill here is the last minute change from a "phase-out" to a "phase-down" of unabated coal power - very uncool and irresponsible
(3/n)