Paul D. Thacker Profile picture
Dec 22 9 tweets 3 min read Read on X
1) It’s become a pandemic truism that academic researchers and their pet science writers eventually get caught dissembling

Let's look at that #scicomm! tinyurl.com/2hw85f3s
Image
2) @USRightToKnow released documents showing virologists & Wuhan researchers attempted to mislead on a DARPA grant--they hid that they would do some dangerous virus research in Wuhan.

Right where the pandemic started. Image
3) Science Magazine's @sciencecohen tried to knock down speculation about Wuhan research when veteran reporter Nicholas Wade testified in Congress.

Who did Cohen quote? The authors of the proposal--Peter Daszak!

Q: Is this journalism? Image
4) Cohen's sloppy reporting got a signal boost from #scicomm doyenne @Laurie_Garrett Image
5) Virologist @stgoldst got it wrong several times as well, both in @theintercept & in the @TheAtlantic

Hi, @danengber Image
6) And lest, we forget (why would we?!) here's @ScienceMagazine magazine's Holden Thorpe--the editor-in-chief.

BTW, Thorpe used to run UNC where Ralph Baric works, but was run out b/c of widespread academic fraud.

Looked like scientists were hiding something?Image
7) As the Wuhan Institute's most friendly reporter reminds you, "Please be rigorous." Image
8) Thanks for all the fish, Kristian Andersen. Image
9) Virologists planned dangerous virus studies in Wuhan, and lied about it to funders. And then they lied to us about their intentions, after the pandemic started in Wuhan.

And science writers amplified these lies to you.

HAPPY HOLIDAYS!Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul D. Thacker

Paul D. Thacker Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @thackerpd

Dec 15
1) Biden’s Ex-Pandemic Advisor Called A Wuhan Lab Accident Plausible, But Can Writers Still Say It's “Conspiracy Theory”?

A short look back at science writers promoting a conspiracy that never was. tinyurl.com/kbr6haaj
Image
2) By Feb 1, 2020, Fauci and virologists knew the COVID virus was possibly engineered and were concerned about dangerous research being conducted in Wuhan, a place Peter Daszak of EcoHealth was funding.

So why did these facts get labeled "conspiracy"? Image
3) Here's a few examples of this, looking back into history. It's important to understand what happened.

If nothing else, know who you can trust in the future.

Amy Maxmen tweeting a lab accident is a "conspiracy" then that virologists never it was important impossible. Image
Read 12 tweets
Dec 6
1) Disney's CEO @RobertIger is a Biden campaign donor who is running a squeeze play on @elonmusk w/ Democratic attack dogs Media Matters & Center for Countering Digital Hate tinyurl.com/yckh8czb
Image
2) If you think @Disney's Bob Iger is above political reproach, take a look at his bona fides.

He donated $250K to Biden's campaign and began angling for an administration job even before Biden had been sworn into office. Image
3) This last summer, Iger swore to stay out of America's "culture wars" before hiring a Biden press secretary to handle .... "culture war" messaging issues. Image
Read 14 tweets
Nov 3
1) I had to sit down with a documentary film maker and explain how Fauci and virologists covered-up the possibility that COVID-19 leaked from a lab.

Here's how they lied and deceived, and covered that up. disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/the-wuhan-co…
Image
2) A month after the pandemic started, NIH created talking points for Anthony Fauci: he funded Peter Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance "for coronavirus research in China for the past five years" and researchers: Ian Lipkin at Columbia and Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina Image
3) The following day, January 28, 2020, Jeremy Farrar started using a burner phone to hide his communications from subpoeanas. Farrar emailed Australian virologist Eddie Holmes to call him on his burner phone. Image
Read 13 tweets
Oct 2
1) My latest piece at @tabletmag dives into the money and possible motives behind @Imi_Ahmed the Labour Party political operative behind the Center for Countering Digital Hate, now being sued by @elonmusk

BTW, I found Ahmed's hidden money. Image
2) In their 990s, Ahmed doesn't list funders. CCDH also fails to report funders on their website. They took in $1.47 million in their first year in the US.

Where'd the money come from? Image
3) CCDH is running their money through Schwab Charitable Fund, that allow anonymous donors to give without leaving a paper trail. I found someone gave Ahmed $1.1 million in 2021, meaning 75% of their funding.

Ahmed won't respond to questions. Image
Read 10 tweets
Sep 28
1) TWITTER FILES: Yoel Roth’s private emails explain why free speech advocates target academics—they’re the censorship clergy.

Follow me to see Roth's emails discussing Stanford's Renee Diresta.
2) Emails show that Twitter rejected Renee DiResta as a "hobbyist, but Roth and other Twitter executives embraced her once Stanford University gave her an academic baptism. Image
3) When NY Times @sheeraf contacted Twitter, excited about doing a profile of her, a Twitter executive dismissed DiResta as a "hobbyist." Image
Read 25 tweets
Sep 19
1) Yoel Roth is throwing a tantrum in the NY Times, complaining he is the victim now that everyone is pissed off at him for attacking our Constitution and censoring people.

ROTH: "This isn’t a story I relish revisiting."

Get ready for some revisiting.
nytimes.com/2023/09/18/opi…
2) ROTH COMPLAINS: "Universities are cutting back on efforts to quantify abusive and misleading information spreading online."

Oh, really!? Guess who hired Roth? UC Berkeley. Image
3) ROTH COMPLAINS: "All the fanfare surrounding the initial release of the Twitter Files, in the end 'there was absolutely nothing of interest' in the documents, and what little there was had significant factual errors."

FACT CHECK, WRONG! Ahem, here you are talking about it...
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(