364 Fully Sourced Examples of dehumanising/pro-genocidal/ethnic cleansing statements and actions made against Palestinians.
LIST UPDATED 4 January 2024 - This now includes all relevant examples from South Africa ICJ Submission (20 Examples) + 22 Other New Examples + An exciting new long term project with details
PDF Here (with links to sourcing):
This is a threaded list divided into several categories based on Mann (Explaining Ethnic Cleansing, 2005)
Part 1 Photos: "Radical Elites with Command Responsibility"
Part 2 Photos: "Radical Elites without Command Responsibility"
Part 3 Photos: "Militants"
Part 4 Photos: "Core Constituencies"
Part 5: Announcing a new long-term project with a slightly different focus.
Part 6: Further Resources and how you can help
Everyone please give a special thank you (and follow) to @forresttdweller for editing this document. It isn't easy!
___
Part 1A Photos: "Radical Elites with Command Responsibility"
These are statements and actions by those who lead Israeli society and as defined by Additional Protocol I (Article 86(2)) to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 can be perceived as having ‘command responsibility’. This responsibility can either be policy, strategic, operational or tactical. As such it includes Israeli Ministers; other senior politicians; as well as senior soldiers.1drv.ms/b/s!AqADv8mRg0… zionism.observer
Part 1B Photos: "Radical Elites with Command Responsibility"
Part 2A: The photos in this tweet are by: "Radical Elites without command responsibility"
____
The following statements and actions have been carried out by influential elites who are pro-Zionist. They include non-ministerial politicians (both within the Knesset and including places such as the US). They also include people who can have their opinions published in leading newspapers (both as journalists or thought leaders) and can be invited to voice their opinions in media. As such they have power and influence and can often operate in a grey area between formal and informal modes of power. There are also several inclusions of singers on this list as they meet the afore mentioned criterion of being in the public eye. Opinions published here are generally radicalising and may be perceived as either dehumanising; pro-ethnic cleansing; or of genocidal intent.
Part 2B: The photos in this tweet are by: "Radical Elites without command responsibility"
Part 3A: The photos in this tweet are by: "Militants"
_____
Militants in Mann’s phraseology are those who carry out dehumanising, genocidal or ethnic cleansing actions. As such this following list consists of a large number of both statements and actions. The focus is not on regular acts of war, but of statements and actions that represent intent beyond regular warfare. These statements and actions would not be tolerated in modern militaries adhering to the rule of law and as such represent extremities in dehumanisation, genocidal intent and ethnic cleansing. There are some extreme cases in this list. Some cannot be verified due to Gaza being an active war zone. Yet others have video evidence. Members on this list especially include IDF soldiers and police.
Part 3B: The photos in this tweet are by: "Militants"
Part 4A: The photos in this tweet are by: "Core Constituencies"
_____
In Mann’s phraseology, core constituencies create an atmosphere that provides both tacit and explicit support for dehumanisation, genocidal intent, and ethnic cleansing. This can be through normalising such language and opinions. It will also include popularising and the sharing of hateful thoughts and in the modern era, memes and figures of speech. It is vital that genocidal intent is not merely understood as a top-down phenomenon. If that were the case, there would be no popular support or impetus for it. Rather the three groups interact with one another in complex ways and can erupt into extremes in the right circumstances. In this list, examples which indicate a febrile atmosphere that could be conducive to ethnic cleansing, genocidal intent, and dehumanisation are provided.
Part 4B: The photos in this tweet are by: "Core Constituencies"
Part 5: A new long-term project: Zionism Observer
(Twitter handle: )
Modern Zionism is considered to have started in 1897. The history of Zionism is filled with racist, dehumanising, pro-ethnic cleansing and pro-genocidal rhetoric. Parts 1-4 of the PDF focuses mainly on a tiny part of this conflict - Statements and actions in Gaza since October 2023. This PDF will continue to be updated as long as necessary.
Zionism Observer will have a different and larger focus, eventually encompassing the entirety of Zionism's history from 1897 onwards.
This is a massive work but it is designed to help everyone research and explore the rhetoric surrounding Zionism and what led us to our situation today. We will only focus on direct quotes and other direct pieces of evidence. This site will always aim to be 100% factual and we will try to maintain that consistency always.
This site is brand-new and is still under development. But we believe in openness and accessibility, so it is already live and available for everyone to use.
We will shortly have a form for submissions and we would encourage everyone to submit reports you have come across. The site already contains an easy search functionality to find quotes and leading personas. As our database grows this will only add to its use.zionism.observer x.com/receipts_lol?s…
Part 6A: Further Resources
To learn more about the legal definitions of genocide and how it applies to Gaza, please see here: palepedia.org/wiki/Genocide_…
Part 6B: Further Resources
Please see Iyad El-Baghdadi's vital linked thread on why he believes Israel is indeed committing genocide in Gaza
Part 6C: Further Resources
Please see South Africa's invocation of the Genocide Convention here. Relevant examples from this report have already been added to our PDF. However this is an incredible submission with a different scope to ours. It merits reading by everyone. icj-cij.org/sites/default/…
Part 6D: All sourcing is verified as much as possible. Due to possible tweet deletions, a localised evidence packet has been made. This can be made available upon request.
Part 6E: How you can help!
- Moving forward, there are a lot of ways that people can help - 1) Submit reports directly to me or to 2) For tech-savvy users. We need 4+ volunteers. This isn't trivial work but it would be hugely helpful. If people can volunteer to go through each quote and upload it to the Internet Archive, it will ensure that all links are preserved for posterity. Each volunteer can go through a different section of the report. If you'd like to help, please message me. This volunteering opportunity is especially good for people who already know how to use internet archive! 3) Please share this report widely so we can get the message out to as many people as possible. 4) More requests for help will follow next time!
Since this post is going viral. She said this in a Times of Israel interview in 2023 upon playing notorious ethnic cleanser Golda Meir who also said things like 👇🏾
She wants dowry i.e. the land, and wants someone else to take the people i.e the bride. Courtesy of @receipts_lol
And here's the TOI interview note many people have played Hitler, but they are always at pains to dissociate themselves from him. Does Helen Mirren dissociate herself from Meir or does she echo her words in the interview?timesofisrael.com/helen-mirren-i…
This will be a long thread. But it’s an important one. So please bookmark this to save it. There will be some light theory but I will keep it minimal and try to keep the thread as accessible as possible. There’s also a vital ‘call to action’ at the end of the thread. If you’ve been wondering how you can help but feel helpless, have a look at that call to action and see what parts you can do.
So what is an Axiom? (Light theory part)
See this sign =? Basic right? in Maths it’s a common notion that both sides of that equation equal out. So X = Y. That is so self-evident that we have generally agreed that we don’t need to keep investigating what the = sign is. In Maths and the hard sciences, axioms are pivotal to build complex theories that reveal the nature of the world.
For us, without realising it, we build these common frames all the time. These become our own axioms that help us inform the world. Here is one. I am a human, you are a human. That means, our lives both have equal value. Hypothetically, if I were a rat or a cockroach say, you might decide, hang on a minute, maybe I don’t have the same value as you. But let’s get to that a bit later.
Logic
There are many theories of logic, but the one I feel most useful to us in this context is by Quine (1908-2000). He wrote about how all of our axioms, our assumptions about the world form a web of belief. The totality of this knowledge forms a web (each node being one of our beliefs).
Changes to this web, even the outermost parts, impact our core sets of assumptions. But being the people that we are, we don’t tend to change wholesale our opinions every time new facts come to life. Our webs, retract and regenerate.
So for example, if you discover a country is ‘bad’, you naturally won’t assume all countries are bad. But also in addition, you may decide to narrow your reconfiguration down so it’s just a state, a government, or even just a person. This way, your core beliefs don’t really have to change. You don’t have to re-evaluate everything and you continue on with your day.
Sometimes, our core set of beliefs is challenged so profoundly, that we undergo a conversion, a paradigm shift. And everything starts anew. You can sometimes see these revolutions in people. In fact, as an aside, this is why religious converts can be so vulnerable. Because they choose to cut all ties to the previous truths they knew, they start to create new webs and are hungry for axioms to help inform themselves and can be less critical than they later are when they are exposed to new sets of beliefs.
If you’ve read this far, let’s get to the meat of the thread.
What are Israel’s axioms?
The heart is “Israel is like other countries”.
What does this mean? At it’s core, that it is Normal, Secular, Liberal and Democratic.
Before we get really into the weeds. Think about what each one of those means to you. Those are your frames of reference. Conversely, if it is shown that Israel does not have these four pillars, then the foundational axioms of Israel are destroyed and it would be considered an illegitimate state unworthy of western support.
Each axiom then, has multiple subsidiary supports that inform it and build a web. Cut away one support, and it weakens the structure but the whole is resilient. It is a mistake to either approach this solely from a top-down perspective, or a bottom up (without regards to the overarching objective. The web must be dismantled piece by piece. If we talk about dismantling Israel, this is what we really mean.
This post has been made for all voters considering voting Democrat on Nov 5 2024.
Many have made the argument, that 'both sides are bad' but essentially Kamala Harris is the 'lesser evil'. So let's examine this in detail. A 🧵
First we need to engage in a bit of logic. 'Lesser Evil' is a logical statement. We may disagree with the concept, but it IS a logically consistent statement.
'Lesser evil' implies there are 3 types of evil.
1) Lesser Evil 2) Acceptable Evil 3) Greater Evil
But of course, one of those statements can be crossed out. The Harris-Walz administration would be a direct continuation of the Biden-Harris administration. Harris has repeatedly suggested there would be 'no change' in emphasis.
This is a threaded list divided into several categories primarily based on Mann (Explaining Ethnic Cleansing, 2005)
Part 0: What is Dehumanisation and why does it matter? (Attached Tweet Pic)
Part 1 Photos: "Radical Elites with Command Responsibility"
Part 2 Photos: "Radical Elites without Command Responsibility"
Part 3 Photos: "Militants"
Part 4 Photos: "Core Constituencies"
Part 5: Zionism Observer - A Project For the Long Term
Part 6: Further Resources and how you can help
Part 1A: "Radical Elites with Command Responsibility"
These are statements and actions by those who lead Israeli society and as defined by Additional Protocol I (Article 86(2)) to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 can be perceived as having ‘command responsibility’. This responsibility can either be policy, strategic, operational or tactical. As such it includes Israeli Ministers; other senior politicians; as well as senior soldiers.
322 Fully Sourced Examples of dehumanising/pro-genocidal/ethnic cleansing statements and actions made against Palestinians.
LIST UPDATED 30 DEC 2023 + 57 New Examples - Due to the intensity of the war increasing, this is our largest update yet. This further indicates the urgency of stopping the genocide in #Gaza
PDF Here (with links to sourcing):
This is a threaded list divided into several categories based on Mann (Explaining Ethnic Cleansing, 2005)
Part 1 Photos: "Radical Elites with Command Responsibility"
Part 2 Photos: "Radical Elites without Command Responsibility"
Part 3 Photos: "Militants"
Part 4 Photos: "Core Constituencies"
Part 5: Discusses what dehumanisation is and why this list is broader than others.
Part 6: Further Resources
Everyone please give a special thank you (and follow) to @forresttdweller for editing this document. It isn't easy!
___
Part 1 Photos: "Radical Elites with Command Responsibility"
These are statements and actions by those who lead Israeli society and as defined by Additional Protocol I (Article 86(2)) to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 can be perceived as having ‘command responsibility’. This responsibility can either be policy, strategic, operational or tactical. As such it includes Israeli Ministers; other senior politicians; as well as senior soldiers.1drv.ms/b/s!AqADv8mRg0…
Part 2A: The photos in this tweet are by: "Radical Elites without command responsibility"
____
The following statements and actions have been carried out by influential elites who are pro-Zionist. They include non-ministerial politicians (both within the Knesset and including places such as the US). They also include people who can have their opinions published in leading newspapers (both as journalists or thought leaders) and can be invited to voice their opinions in media. As such they have power and influence and can often operate in a grey area between formal and informal modes of power. There are also several inclusions of singers on this list as they meet the afore mentioned criterion of being in the public eye. Opinions published here are generally radicalising and may be perceived as either dehumanising; pro-ethnic cleansing; or of genocidal intent.
Part 2B: The photos in this tweet are by: "Radical Elites without command responsibility"