1/ At least 2,500 scientists are reported to have left Russia since the start of the war in Ukraine in February 2022 and the number of published scientific papers has collapsed. This comes as the result of isolation due to sanctions, visa restrictions and state paranoia. ⬇️
2/ Novaya Gazeta Europe (NGE) reports on the outcome of a survey of the international ORCID database, which lists more than 20 million scientists globally. Registration in ORCID is mandatory for publishing employees of large Russian universities.
3/ The data indicates more than 130,000 scientists resident in Russia in October 2023. The share of these changing their residence from Russia to a foreign country was practically unchanged from 2012 to 2021, but jumped to 30% in 2022.
4/ NGE estimates that, based on the trendlines, around 2,500 scientists have emigrated since 2022. The number of foreign scientists choosing to come to Russia has also dropped by over two-thirds.
5/ Many of the emigrants are likely to be younger people, as older, more established scientists face more professional and personal difficulties from emigration. Younger men are also more likely to be subjected to mobilisation and have a bigger incentive to leave Russia.
6/ According to one university professional interviewed by NGE, "the best are trying to leave immediately after completing their bachelor’s, master’s and postgraduate studies." Unlike IT workers, scientists are not exempted from being mobilised to fight in Ukraine.
7/ While most emigrating Russian scientists left for the US, Germany and the UK before the war, since February 2023 other destinations have been prefered, in particular Uzbekistan, Armenia, Kyrgyzstan and the UAE with a 300% growth in Russian scientific immigration.
8/ The top three destinations are now Germany, the US and Israel – which has had a 175% increase. However, Russian scientific immigration to the UK, France and the US has fallen by more than 20%.
9/ The impact on Russian science is already visible, with a sharp fall in the number and quality of published papers. The share of global science attributed to Russia has fallen from 2-3% to only 1-2%. Russian participation in international scientific conferences has shrunk.
10/ The collapse has been particularly noticeable in the proportion of academic conference papers with a Russia-affiliated author. Around 35,000 had at least one Russia-based author in 2021 but this dropped to about 20,000 in 2022 and only about 11,000 in 2023.
11/ One publication, the UK-based Journal of Physics: Conference Series, illustrates this trend starkly: papers by Russian authors presented in the series fell from nearly 6,000 in 2021 to only 106 by November 2023, despite Russia traditionally being a leader in physics research.
12/ The reasons for this are not hard to find. Scientists are often physically unable to attend conferences due to visa restrictions and bans on direct flights between Russia and the West. Russian scientists were also removed from international collaborative programmes.
13/ Russian scientists report an growing atmosphere of fear and paranoia at home, as well as a shortage of equipment and scientific supplies due to sanctions. Contact and collaboration with foreigners is regarded with increasing suspicion by the authorities.
14/ In some instances, distinguished scientists working on hypersonics and quantum technology have been charged with treason and illegally sharing information in a number of high-profile cases, even though they are said to have had official permission to collaborate.
15/ The impact on Russian science is likely to last for decades. The losses are not all one way, however, as Russia's withdrawal from the global scientific community is likely to hinder collective efforts on issues such as climate change. /end
1/ Russia is systematically sending badly wounded men back into combat, often denying them medical treatment. Previously, men were allowed to recuperate or leave the army if seriously injured; now, death appears to be the only way out for many. ⬇️
2/ The independent Russian news outlet Okno Press reports that since November 2024, the Russian army has routinely been sending men with category D (unfit) fitness ratings back to Ukraine to fight in the front lines. The army has ignored court rulings to release them.
3/ Okno highlights a number of cases. One man from the Tver region, Ilya Kovalenko, was mobilised in September 2022. He was badly wounded by shrapnel in October 2023 and was taken to hospital. He is now only able to walk with crutches due to nerve damage.
1/ Only half of the artillery pieces in some Russian units are able to fire or hit targets, according to a Russian artilleryman, due to a combination of inexperienced soldiers being unable to maintain them, a lack of people to fire them, poor command and faulty ammunition. ⬇️
2/ The Russian 'Callsign OSETIN' Telegram channel passes on the comments of an artilleryman who is fighting on the Kherson front:
3/ "Once again the issue of the quality of training of specialists becomes relevant. It seems that all the necessary calculations are in place, commanders give instructions, but when it comes to the actual work, the problems begin.
1/ Reacting to videos of numerous destroyed Russian vehicles on the road to Pokrovsk, Russian warbloggers say that civilian vehicles are now used in preference to armour because commanders fear reprimands if armoured vehicles are lost. ⬇️
2/ 'Military Informant' writes: "The enemy publishes footage of destroyed Russian light vehicles in the Pokrovsk direction.
As can be seen, civilian cars were converted into buggies and are used for the rapid delivery of infantry, similar to motorcycles earlier."
3/ A soldier writes to the neo-Nazi group Rusich to explain why; it's not just about a shortage of armoured vehicles, but the personal consequences for commanders if they lose them. Men are expendable, but armour is not:
1/ Russian commanders are said to be faking successes in the war in Ukraine in order to earn cash bonuses and awards, an approach Russian sources call "taking on credit". This is being blamed for Ukraine's recent advances in the Kursk region. ⬇️
2/ Recent setbacks for the Russians, such as the breakthrough in the Kursk pocket on 7 February and the bloody battles for control of Novoiehorivka, are being blamed by Russian warbloggers on corrupt behaviour by commanders.
3/ Warblogger Roman Alekhine writes that Ukraine was able to break through Russian lines around Cherkasskaya Konopelka because of "the lies of the brigade command about the real situation [and extent of] controlled areas." The troops that were supposed to be there weren't.
1/ Ukraine's drone dominance has meant that Russia's front line logistics now depend on two new types of military specialist: 'stalkers' and 'hikers'. ⬇️
2/ As reported last week, Ukrainian drones have so successfully paralysed Russian vehicle movements that soldiers now have to walk tens of kilometers daily to bring supplies to the front lines.
1/ The Russian army is reportedly forcing mobilised soldiers to either sign permanent contracts or be sent to die in assaults. The reasons are unclear, but it may be intended to prevent them demobilising if a ceasefire deal is reached. ⬇️
2/ The Russian pro-war 'Philologist in ambush' Telegram channel reports that the ultimatum has been issued by the Dnepr grouping of forces and the Southern Military District. Commanders and political officers have been ordered to 'persuade' their men with threats.
3/ The channel says that the order has gone out to "organise agitation among servicemen called up by mobilisation, with the aim of increasing the staffing of formations and military units with servicemen serving under contract."