RFK Jr. Exposes Joe Biden’s Racist Past in Viral Black History Month Post
The viral tweet brought to the forefront Biden’s role in the 1994 crime bill, "you ain't black" comments, his past positions on school busing and segregation, and much more.
The post reads:
Joe Biden is campaigning in South Carolina right now. Tomorrow is the first day of Black History Month. Let’s reminisce on everything he’s done for Black Americans:
– Authored the 1994 crime bill which led to the mass incarceration of black people
– Said if you don’t vote for him, “then you ain’t black”
– Extended penalties for people under 21 charged with selling marijuana
– Endorsed segregationist senators
– Opposed busing because he didn’t want his kids to grow up in a “racial jungle”
Let’s delve deeper into an analysis of how Biden’s actions have impacted Black Americans, as outlined by @RobertKennedyJr's 𝕏 post.
Share this post and keep scrolling below ⬇️
#2 - The 1994 Crime Bill
The 1994 crime bill, formally known as the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, has been a point of contention in discussions about systemic racism and its impact on the Black community. RFK Jr.’s tweet suggests that this legislation, which Joe Biden played a key role in authoring, contributed significantly to the mass incarceration of Black Americans.
The bill included the “three strikes” rule and other stringent measures that led to increased prison sentences for many offenders. Critics argue that these policies disproportionately affected Black individuals, exacerbating racial disparities within the criminal justice system. The conversation around this bill remains a critical part of the broader dialogue on reforming criminal justice to address its impact on minority communities.
#3 - You Ain’t Black
Joe Biden’s comment during a radio interview in which he stated, “If you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black,” sparked widespread criticism.
RFK Jr.’s mention of this remark in his tweet underscores the controversy it stirred. This statement was perceived by many as a presumptive and dismissive assessment of Black Americans’ political agency, raising concerns about racial insensitivity and the complexities of voter allegiance within the Black community.
Biden later apologized for this comment, acknowledging that it was a mistake to take the Black vote for granted.
#4 - Weed, Really Joe?
Joe Biden has faced criticism for past legislative actions, such as the extension of penalties for those under 21 charged with selling marijuana. RFK Jr. points to this as a policy that has been scrutinized for its role in the broader issue of criminal justice reform, especially concerning its impact on younger individuals within the Black community.
Critics argue that such measures have contributed to long-term legal and social consequences for a generation, affecting their opportunities and exacerbating the cycle of criminalization among youth, particularly in minority populations.
#5 - Senators of Segregation
Joe Biden’s historical political relationships, particularly his past endorsements of segregationist senators, such as Senators James Eastland and Herman Talmadge, have been brought to light by RFK Jr.
These endorsements have raised questions about Biden’s commitment to racial justice and equality. The scrutiny of such endorsements is part of a larger conversation about the evolving political views and alliances within American politics, and how these historical associations are viewed through the lens of current societal values.
#6 - No Bussing Biden
Joe Biden’s past opposition to busing initiatives, crucial for school desegregation, has come under severe criticism. RFK Jr.’s tweet highlights this stance with a quote where Biden expressed his concern about his children growing up in a “racial jungle,” a term now widely condemned for its insensitive implications.
This comment reflects a historical resistance to integration efforts that were designed to dismantle the pervasive segregation of the time. Biden’s position on busing is viewed by many critics as a stark example of resistance to the progress of civil rights and racial equality, illustrating a controversial pattern of racial prejudice during his career.
#7 - Conclusion
The revelations put forth by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. regarding Joe Biden’s past have ignited a reexamination of the President’s positions on critical race issues.
As the nation reflects on its leaders’ roles in shaping policy and societal norms, this scrutiny underscores the importance of accountability and the evolving understanding of racial justice.
The claims made by RFK Jr. challenge us to confront the clear pattern of prejudice in Joe Biden’s political career and to demand continuous progress towards equality, reflecting the imperative for leaders to not only evolve but to actively rectify the repercussions of past actions.
Thank you for making it all the way to the end!
This post was originally an article written by @VigilantNews writer Dallas Ludlum (@dcludlum), which was then adapted into a thread.
Dallas does amazing work. You can follow him on 𝕏 here:
--> @dcludlum
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Trump’s gain-of-function ban sounded like a huge win.
Many, including myself, celebrated.
Then we read the fine print—and discovered a massive red flag:
The US banned GOF research abroad—while quietly protecting it at home.
One key Trump ally is linked to Pfizer—and she’s actually helping block a major COVID whistleblower case.
Attorney Tom Renz breaks down all the details—and calls out who he sees as an obvious fraud inside Trump’s cabinet.
🧵 THREAD
The Trump administration’s gain-of-function announcement sounded like a big move, but it wasn’t the whole story.
Instead of shutting down dangerous research, the policy may actually be laying the groundwork to expand it.
Attorney and medical freedom hero Tom Renz (@RenzTom) broke everything down in our exclusive interview.
According to him, the new policy doesn’t end gain-of-function, it essentially “codifies it.”
In plain terms, the US says it won’t fund gain-of-function research in adversarial countries. But domestically? That same restriction doesn’t apply.
“They’re going to allow it under new regulations,” Renz said. “And by doing that, they’re essentially saying, ‘We’re fine with gain-of-function as long as it follows the current rules.’
“So in that way, they’re actually legitimizing gain-of-function work in this country, which is absolutely mind-blowing to me,” he added.
Victor Davis Hanson just shattered the media’s favorite lie about Trump.
For years, they’ve used fake polls to manipulate public opinion and crush his momentum.
But Hanson didn’t just say the polls were wrong. He showed they were rigged—by design.
Polling is now just a weapon, used to suppress Trump’s base and supercharge Democrat fundraising.
And once you hear the evidence, you’ll never trust another mainstream poll again.
🧵 THREAD
Lately, the media’s been pushing a familiar narrative: Trump is tanking in the polls.
But Victor Davis Hanson says that story doesn’t hold up—and once you see what’s behind the numbers, it starts to look a lot more like propaganda than polling.
So where did it all come from?
“We've touched on polls before,” Hanson said, “but I don't think I've seen anything quite as egregious in pollsters' bias as recently when they... purportedly surveyed the first 100 days of Donald Trump and the public reaction.”
Headlines immediately screamed: Worst first 100 days in history.
Trump’s approval supposedly dropped from 52 to 41 percent.
But as Hanson pointed out, none of that lined up with reality.
“The economic news was pretty good,” he explained.
Trump has been racking up the wins:
“Job growth was just spectacular—over 170,000 jobs. Inflation was down. Energy prices were down. Corporate profits were up. There was a movement on the trade question. Ukraine, still—there was no bad news except the controversy and chaos of a counterrevolution.”
So why were the polls painting such a grim picture?
Hanson believes the goal wasn’t to reflect public opinion—it was to steer it.
“What were the pollsters trying to tell us,” he asked, “or were they trying to manipulate us? I think it’s the latter.”
He pointed to analysis from Larry Kudlow, who found that top polls—like those from The New York Times and The Washington Post—deliberately underrepresented Trump voters.
“They were deliberately not counting people who surveyed that they were Trump voters in 2024,” Hanson said.
“That was half the country.”
Even worse:
“They were only polling about a third,” he added.
“Think of that. A third of the people that said they voted for Trump, they polled—not half. So of course the results were going to be disputed or suspect.”
And this isn’t the first time.
Hanson reminded us that pollsters have repeatedly missed the mark—in 2016, 2020, and again in 2024.
“They said they had learned their lessons. And they were way off in 2024.”
🚨 RFK Jr. Just Blew the Lid Off Big Food’s Worst Scam
He pinpointed the exact moment in history that corporations captured the food industry—and started poisoning the public.
For decades, they’ve used one dirty loophole to flood our food with toxic additives, all while staying “FDA approved.”
🧵THREAD
📍Don’t forget to bookmark this post.
Kennedy just dropped truth bombs the mainstream media wouldn’t dare cover—and the fight for America’s health is finally shifting.
Let’s break it down.
It began with a story most people never heard—and a turning point most never noticed.
In the late 1980s and early ’90s, something strange started happening in America.
Chronic illness was on the rise. Obesity rates soared. Autoimmune diseases became more common.
It felt like the health of the nation was unraveling.
According to Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., that wasn’t a coincidence. It was the result of a corporate takeover.
“At that time, Greta, the tobacco industry took over the food industry,” he said.
“By the early 1990s, the two biggest food companies in the world were R.J. Reynolds and Philip Morris.”
The same companies that had perfected the art of chemical addiction through cigarettes were now running the food system. And Kennedy says they brought the same playbook with them.
“They began moving scientists from the endeavor of making tobacco more addictive to developing new lab ingredients that would make food addictive.”
That’s when everything changed.
What had once been real food—grown, cooked, and served—became something else entirely. A highly engineered product designed not to nourish, but to keep people hooked.
The health consequences were immediate. But behind it all, there was something even more insidious: the regulatory system meant to protect Americans had already been compromised.
“Those chemicals were largely untested because of the capture of the FDA by the food and drug industries,” Kennedy warned.
The public trusted the FDA. But the FDA, Kennedy says, had already been captured by the very industries it was supposed to regulate.
VP Vance spoke to the Munich Security Conference with a softer tone than in February but still the made the case for American populism.
Defend western values.
End the wars.
Rebalance trade.
But the media missed his warning about free speech last time, this time it cannot go ignored.
🧵THREAD
📍Remember to bookmark this post—you’ll want to revisit these examples of an American vice president actually standing up for the people he represents.
Let’s break it down.
When JD Vance stood before the Munich Security Conference in February, he didn’t play diplomat. He played truth-teller.
Facing a room filled with European elites, the Vice President called out a creeping authoritarianism that he said was threatening freedom on both sides of the Atlantic.
“I look to Brussels,” he said, “where EU Commission commissars warn citizens that they intend to shut down social media during times of civil unrest the moment they spot what they've judged to be quote, hateful content.”
He also pointed to examples closer to where he stood.
“Or to this very country where police have carried out raids against citizens suspected of posting anti feminist comments online as part of quote, combating misogyny on the internet, a day of action."
That speech turned heads—and stirred backlash—but Vance didn’t back down.
Today, he returned to a Munich Security Conference event, this time in Washington.
The message was more measured, but the core argument was unchanged: if the West wants to defend its values, it has to start living up to them.
That lie made Big Pharma billions—and wrecked millions of lives.
Too much acid? Try too little.
And the drugs they’re pushing to “treat” heartburn are actually turning your body into a cash cow.
• 1.8x increased risk of stomach cancer
• 33% greater risk of dementia
• 74% higher risk of severe kidney disease
• 28% more heart attacks
• 77% higher death risk from COVID
These are the risks you take when you take acid blockers like PPIs.
They don’t fix the problem. They just create new ones.
This report exposes Big Pharma’s heartburn scam—and the natural fixes that actually work. 🧵
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the eye-opening details on the Great Acid Blocker Scam, read the full 10,000-word article below.