RFK Jr. Exposes Joe Biden’s Racist Past in Viral Black History Month Post
The viral tweet brought to the forefront Biden’s role in the 1994 crime bill, "you ain't black" comments, his past positions on school busing and segregation, and much more.
The post reads:
Joe Biden is campaigning in South Carolina right now. Tomorrow is the first day of Black History Month. Let’s reminisce on everything he’s done for Black Americans:
– Authored the 1994 crime bill which led to the mass incarceration of black people
– Said if you don’t vote for him, “then you ain’t black”
– Extended penalties for people under 21 charged with selling marijuana
– Endorsed segregationist senators
– Opposed busing because he didn’t want his kids to grow up in a “racial jungle”
Let’s delve deeper into an analysis of how Biden’s actions have impacted Black Americans, as outlined by @RobertKennedyJr's 𝕏 post.
Share this post and keep scrolling below ⬇️
#2 - The 1994 Crime Bill
The 1994 crime bill, formally known as the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, has been a point of contention in discussions about systemic racism and its impact on the Black community. RFK Jr.’s tweet suggests that this legislation, which Joe Biden played a key role in authoring, contributed significantly to the mass incarceration of Black Americans.
The bill included the “three strikes” rule and other stringent measures that led to increased prison sentences for many offenders. Critics argue that these policies disproportionately affected Black individuals, exacerbating racial disparities within the criminal justice system. The conversation around this bill remains a critical part of the broader dialogue on reforming criminal justice to address its impact on minority communities.
#3 - You Ain’t Black
Joe Biden’s comment during a radio interview in which he stated, “If you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black,” sparked widespread criticism.
RFK Jr.’s mention of this remark in his tweet underscores the controversy it stirred. This statement was perceived by many as a presumptive and dismissive assessment of Black Americans’ political agency, raising concerns about racial insensitivity and the complexities of voter allegiance within the Black community.
Biden later apologized for this comment, acknowledging that it was a mistake to take the Black vote for granted.
#4 - Weed, Really Joe?
Joe Biden has faced criticism for past legislative actions, such as the extension of penalties for those under 21 charged with selling marijuana. RFK Jr. points to this as a policy that has been scrutinized for its role in the broader issue of criminal justice reform, especially concerning its impact on younger individuals within the Black community.
Critics argue that such measures have contributed to long-term legal and social consequences for a generation, affecting their opportunities and exacerbating the cycle of criminalization among youth, particularly in minority populations.
#5 - Senators of Segregation
Joe Biden’s historical political relationships, particularly his past endorsements of segregationist senators, such as Senators James Eastland and Herman Talmadge, have been brought to light by RFK Jr.
These endorsements have raised questions about Biden’s commitment to racial justice and equality. The scrutiny of such endorsements is part of a larger conversation about the evolving political views and alliances within American politics, and how these historical associations are viewed through the lens of current societal values.
#6 - No Bussing Biden
Joe Biden’s past opposition to busing initiatives, crucial for school desegregation, has come under severe criticism. RFK Jr.’s tweet highlights this stance with a quote where Biden expressed his concern about his children growing up in a “racial jungle,” a term now widely condemned for its insensitive implications.
This comment reflects a historical resistance to integration efforts that were designed to dismantle the pervasive segregation of the time. Biden’s position on busing is viewed by many critics as a stark example of resistance to the progress of civil rights and racial equality, illustrating a controversial pattern of racial prejudice during his career.
#7 - Conclusion
The revelations put forth by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. regarding Joe Biden’s past have ignited a reexamination of the President’s positions on critical race issues.
As the nation reflects on its leaders’ roles in shaping policy and societal norms, this scrutiny underscores the importance of accountability and the evolving understanding of racial justice.
The claims made by RFK Jr. challenge us to confront the clear pattern of prejudice in Joe Biden’s political career and to demand continuous progress towards equality, reflecting the imperative for leaders to not only evolve but to actively rectify the repercussions of past actions.
Thank you for making it all the way to the end!
This post was originally an article written by @VigilantNews writer Dallas Ludlum (@dcludlum), which was then adapted into a thread.
Dallas does amazing work. You can follow him on 𝕏 here:
--> @dcludlum
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For decades, vaccines were recognized to cause brain injury and mental retardation.
So “retarded” was banned, the injuries were relabeled as autism, and autism’s ambiguity was used to hide it all.
Lived experiences were turned into word games. But the paper trail shows it was never an accident.
In this report, @MidwesternDoc exposes the games that have been played to hide vaccine injuries for generations... 🧵
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. midwesterndoctor.com/p/erasing-ence…
Propaganda works. In fact, it’s one of the most powerful invisible forces in modern society.
Professional PR firms create narratives that most people believe, even when they very obviously go against our self-interest. And most people never notice it’s happening.
The COVID vaccine roll out was the largest PR campaign of our lifetime.
First, they scammed you on skin cancer when the sun is good for you.
Now, they're scamming you again on cholesterol to sell you a lifetime medication.
This entire narrative of cholesterol being the villain in heart disease was built on a lie.
What doctors fail to tell you is that the sugar industry bribed scientists to shift the blame for heart disease from sugar to cholesterol. This has been revealed by internal documents that have surfaced.
The result? A massive push for statins, now taken by 35% of Americans over 40, with devastating consequences.
Studies now show that after five years of daily use, the average person gains only three to four extra days of life—just a few days for a lifetime of potential harm.
Even more alarming, 20% of statin users suffer serious injuries like muscle deterioration, liver damage, and nerve dysfunction.
Statins are well known for having a high percentage of patients discontinue the drugs due to side effects. Two separate studies have found nearly half of people stop taking statins within a year.
The evidence is clear: statins are not the life-saving drugs we’ve been told they are.
Still don’t believe it? Watch Jimmy Dore break down this article by @MidwesternDoc—and prepare to become livid at what you learn.
Over 40 million Americans are on statins. It’s time they learned what these drugs are really doing. 🧵
Over a trillion dollars.
That’s how much has been spent pushing cholesterol-lowering statins as the solution to heart disease.
We were told they save lives.
We were told cholesterol clogs arteries like grease in a drain pipe.
We were told lowering it was non-negotiable.
But what if that premise is fundamentally flawed?
And what if the drugs built on it are quietly injuring millions?
And what if most of modern medicine knew, but hid the truth?
It turns out that statins provide what amount to minuscule benefits.
At best, taking them for years may extend life by only a few days.
A few days.
In exchange, these drugs are among the most common causes of pharmaceutical injury.
Joe Rogan fell into stunned silence as Dr. Casey Means rattled off one disturbing health stat after another.
“We are getting destroyed, and it’s very recent, and it’s accelerating,” she warned.
• “74% of Americans are overweight or obese.”
• “Young adult cancers are going up 79% in the last 10 years.”
• “25% of men now under 40 have erectile dysfunction.”
• “50%, now, of American adults have type 2 diabetes or prediabetes. These were diseases where there was 1% of Americans in 1950 had type 2 diabetes. Now it’s 50% of Americans have prediabetes or type 2 diabetes.”
• “Alzheimer’s, dementia are going through the roof.”
• “Young adult dementias have increased, like, three times since 2012. So early onset dementias.”
• “One in two Americans are expected to have cancer in their lifetime now, one in two.”
• “One in [31] children has autism now, in the United States. That was one in 150 in the year 2000.”
• “In California, where I live, [Autism rates are] one in 22. One in 22 with a lifetime neurodevelopmental disorder.”
• “Infertility going up 1% per year.”
• “77% of young Americans can’t serve in the military because of obesity or drug abuse.”
• “Autoimmune diseases. Some studies are saying they’re going up 13% per year.”
• “Heart disease, which is almost totally preventable, is the leading cause of death in the United States, killing around 800,000 people per year.”
“It’s basically like all of us are a little bit dead while we’re alive,” Dr. Means said.
These aren’t unrelated crises. They share the same biological pattern — a body stuck in survival mode.
And once you understand what’s keeping your body there, the path to real healing finally makes sense. 🧵
What if what triggers chronic disease isn’t actually a malfunction?
Cells aren’t dead.
Or mutated.
Or broken beyond repair.
They’re just shut down.
What if our cells do that because they’re just trying to survive?
That single shift in perspective changes everything.
And it explains far more than modern medicine will ever admit.
It could even mean that modern medicine is going about healing all wrong.
When cells are exposed to overwhelming stress—things like toxins, infection, trauma, and immune overactivation—they do something deeply intelligent.
They conserve energy.
They reduce output.
They enter a low-function survival mode.
In the short term, this saves you.
But if your cells get stuck here, it becomes disease.
Because survival mode is not the same thing as health.
A new investigation has revealed that Jeffrey Epstein, alongside powerful people like Bill Gates, may have MASTERMINDED the COVID response before it hit.
Internal emails show that in 2017, Epstein was part of an email chain with Bill Gates discussing how “pandemics” could be treated as a PERMANENT funding bucket inside large donor-advised funds — positioned not as a one-time emergency, but as an ongoing area where capital could be organized and directed long term.
And oddly enough, that same year, a close associate in Epstein’s network told him she had been working on “pandemic-related insurance products” designed to automatically pay out when a pandemic is declared.
Coincidence? That’s only scratching the surface of what @sayerjigmi’s report uncovers:
As Kim Iversen put it, “The new investigation and the Epstein files show that this wasn’t about preparedness. This was about control.”
“‘We’ll have these plans in place so that at the opportune moment, we can trigger them and gain all of this power and control.’”
What you’re about to read lays out how this machine actually works, from lab funding and media hype to profit mechanisms that turn every new “threat” into a predictable payday.
Think this ended with COVID? The money didn’t disappear. It just moved to the next “outbreak.” 🧵
The information in this report comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
For all the sources and eye-opening details, read the full 15,000+ word article below.
REPORT: The NIH is now funding research into ivermectin as a cancer treatment.
Yes, the same drug they mocked as “horse paste” is now being seriously studied—for its ability to kill cancer cells.
On February 10, the NIH confirmed it’s funding preclinical trials on ivermectin’s anti-cancer properties. Dr. Anthony Letai, head of the National Cancer Institute, said there’s “enough interest” and “enough reports” to take it seriously. Studies are already underway, with results expected in just a few months.
This follows 2024 and 2025 reviews by U.S. scientists showing signs that ivermectin can inhibit tumors. The NIH is now backing that research, pointing to ivermectin’s Nobel Prize-winning legacy and its decades of safe, FDA-approved use in humans.
But instead of welcoming a promising, low-cost treatment, the media doubled down. Outlets like MedPage Today rushed to dismiss the story as “right-wing hype,” ignoring the science and smearing anyone who dared to ask questions.
Why attack a drug that could save lives—unless the real threat is to their bottom line?
If ivermectin works, it won’t just save lives. It’ll shatter the system built to suppress it.
👇 rumble.com/v75mnac-republ…
#ad: The digital ID financial nightmare isn’t coming someday. It’s already here.
Once a single identity becomes the gateway to your money, your work, and your ability to participate in everyday life, compliance is no longer a choice.
That’s why Genesis Gold Group created the free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide.
It breaks down the real risks of digital ID and explains how physical gold and silver allow you to operate outside the system.
Digital dollars leave you exposed. Gold and silver can’t be frozen, tracked, or turned off.
Get your free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide right now at GoldandFreedom.com, before digital ID becomes the default and your options disappear.
DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.
In other news, Republicans and Democrats are backing a bill that opens the door to mandatory Digital ID for every American.
It’s called the “Kids Off Social Media Act.” But it doesn’t just target kids. It targets you.
The bill bans anyone under 13 from having a social media account. Sounds reasonable—until you realize enforcement means scanning your face, checking your ID, or tracking your device… just to prove you’re old enough to speak online.
The bill doesn’t have to say “Digital ID.” The logic demands it. And once those systems are in place, they won’t stop at children. They’ll be used to control what you can say, see, and share.
Multiple states have already declared these laws unconstitutional. So why are Republicans still pushing them?
This is exactly how it started in the UK. Today, people are getting arrested for memes.
Watch @zeeemedia's report before they normalize this—and your freedom to speak anonymously disappears forever.
👇 rumble.com/v75mnac-republ…
Google why we no longer see crippled kids from polio. You’ll get one answer: vaccines.
But Dr. Suzanne Humphries says that’s not what the facts show—and when you dig into the history, the real story is jaw-dropping.
First off, polio never actually disappeared. “Polio is still here. Polio is still alive and well,” Humphries says.
What changed? The definition. Once the vaccine was introduced, the medical establishment redefined what counted as “polio.”
Humphries explains: “Polio is called different things today. Whereas back in the 1940s, 1950s, the criteria for diagnosing polio were completely different to the year that the vaccine was introduced. The playing field, the goalposts—everything was changed… they were able to show a complete cascading drop of paralytic polio simply because of the way they changed the definitions of what polio is and what could cause it.”
Suddenly, cases that would’ve been labeled polio were now called Guillain-Barré syndrome, coxsackievirus, echovirus—or simply chalked up to heavy metal poisoning. “They didn’t have virus, or they had coxsackievirus or echovirus, or they were lead poisoned or mercury poisoned, which was—the mercury and lead were the leading treatments of the day,” she said.
But it gets worse.
The rise of polio, she says, directly mirrored the use of toxic pesticides like DDT. “The tonnage of production of DDT absolutely mirrored the diagnosis for polio.” And even today, “the countries that still make DDT today is where we’re still seeing this paralytic polio situation happen.”
So what about the virus?
Polio virus, according to Humphries, is what’s known as a commensal—a normal virus that lives in most people without causing problems. In fact, “95 to 99% of all polio is asymptomatic.” She described a study of the Javante Indians where “98 to 99% of every person they tested… had evidence of immunity to all three strains of polio.”
When asked where all the paralyzed children were, she recalled: “They were like, ‘We don’t have any of that problem.’”
Humphries also points to a 1916 Rockefeller lab in Manhattan that, in her words, had “the specific stated goal… to try to create the most pathological, neuropathological strain of polio possible.” By injecting monkey brains and human spinal serum into monkeys, “there was a big problem with that, which was released into the public by accident. And the world experienced the worst polio epidemic on record. 25% mortality.”
Bottom line? According to Dr. Humphries, polio didn’t disappear because of vaccines. It disappeared behind a curtain of redefinitions, misdiagnoses, manmade disasters—and a whole lot of propaganda.
And if they went that far to deceive you about the polio vaccine, what else are they lying about? 🧵
Did you know the original smallpox vaccine caused serious injuries—and was often contaminated with pus, bacteria, and fungus?
We’ve been told it saved humanity from a deadly disease, but what if that’s a lie?
Dr. Suzanne Humphries explained to Joe Rogan what happened to children who received the vaccine. They developed large ulcers, high fevers, and widespread infections. With no antibiotics available, treatments were limited to mercury, arsenic, bloodletting, or isolation in dark rooms.
These severe reactions weren’t considered rare. In fact, they were referred to as “a good take.”
What made matters worse was how the vaccine was produced. According to Dr. Humphries, it was made by infecting animals and harvesting the resulting pus.
“They would take pus from other animals, scratch it into the belly of a cow, then take the pus off of the big pimples that would form,” she said. The material—called “pure lymph”—often came from cadavers, horses, or ulcerating cow udders, mixed with glycerin, and scratched into the surface of the skin.
Even decades later, contamination was an issue. “There was more bacteria and fungus in the smallpox vaccines than there was smallpox virus.” One widely used version, Dryvax, was eventually considered so problematic that health authorities ordered all remaining specimens destroyed around 2009.
Living conditions at the time were “a disaster.” Streets were filled with human and animal waste, there was no running water, and sanitation was nearly nonexistent. Poor hygiene and co-infections absolutely made smallpox far more deadly than it might have been otherwise.
Despite all this, the smallpox vaccine is still presented as a flawless triumph.
But for those who experienced the injuries firsthand, and for those who study its full history, the story isn’t so simple.
“This is the one vaccine that eliminated, eradicated a disease,” Dr. Humphries said sarcastically. “Can you believe that fairytale?”
We’ve all been taught that the smallpox vaccine was one of medicine’s greatest triumphs.
But when you read the actual clinical observations recorded by doctors who lived through its rollout, a far more unsettling picture emerges.
It’s not propaganda, and it’s not hindsight. It’s primary-source medicine.