RFK Jr. Exposes Joe Biden’s Racist Past in Viral Black History Month Post
The viral tweet brought to the forefront Biden’s role in the 1994 crime bill, "you ain't black" comments, his past positions on school busing and segregation, and much more.
The post reads:
Joe Biden is campaigning in South Carolina right now. Tomorrow is the first day of Black History Month. Let’s reminisce on everything he’s done for Black Americans:
– Authored the 1994 crime bill which led to the mass incarceration of black people
– Said if you don’t vote for him, “then you ain’t black”
– Extended penalties for people under 21 charged with selling marijuana
– Endorsed segregationist senators
– Opposed busing because he didn’t want his kids to grow up in a “racial jungle”
Let’s delve deeper into an analysis of how Biden’s actions have impacted Black Americans, as outlined by @RobertKennedyJr's 𝕏 post.
Share this post and keep scrolling below ⬇️
#2 - The 1994 Crime Bill
The 1994 crime bill, formally known as the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, has been a point of contention in discussions about systemic racism and its impact on the Black community. RFK Jr.’s tweet suggests that this legislation, which Joe Biden played a key role in authoring, contributed significantly to the mass incarceration of Black Americans.
The bill included the “three strikes” rule and other stringent measures that led to increased prison sentences for many offenders. Critics argue that these policies disproportionately affected Black individuals, exacerbating racial disparities within the criminal justice system. The conversation around this bill remains a critical part of the broader dialogue on reforming criminal justice to address its impact on minority communities.
#3 - You Ain’t Black
Joe Biden’s comment during a radio interview in which he stated, “If you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black,” sparked widespread criticism.
RFK Jr.’s mention of this remark in his tweet underscores the controversy it stirred. This statement was perceived by many as a presumptive and dismissive assessment of Black Americans’ political agency, raising concerns about racial insensitivity and the complexities of voter allegiance within the Black community.
Biden later apologized for this comment, acknowledging that it was a mistake to take the Black vote for granted.
#4 - Weed, Really Joe?
Joe Biden has faced criticism for past legislative actions, such as the extension of penalties for those under 21 charged with selling marijuana. RFK Jr. points to this as a policy that has been scrutinized for its role in the broader issue of criminal justice reform, especially concerning its impact on younger individuals within the Black community.
Critics argue that such measures have contributed to long-term legal and social consequences for a generation, affecting their opportunities and exacerbating the cycle of criminalization among youth, particularly in minority populations.
#5 - Senators of Segregation
Joe Biden’s historical political relationships, particularly his past endorsements of segregationist senators, such as Senators James Eastland and Herman Talmadge, have been brought to light by RFK Jr.
These endorsements have raised questions about Biden’s commitment to racial justice and equality. The scrutiny of such endorsements is part of a larger conversation about the evolving political views and alliances within American politics, and how these historical associations are viewed through the lens of current societal values.
#6 - No Bussing Biden
Joe Biden’s past opposition to busing initiatives, crucial for school desegregation, has come under severe criticism. RFK Jr.’s tweet highlights this stance with a quote where Biden expressed his concern about his children growing up in a “racial jungle,” a term now widely condemned for its insensitive implications.
This comment reflects a historical resistance to integration efforts that were designed to dismantle the pervasive segregation of the time. Biden’s position on busing is viewed by many critics as a stark example of resistance to the progress of civil rights and racial equality, illustrating a controversial pattern of racial prejudice during his career.
#7 - Conclusion
The revelations put forth by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. regarding Joe Biden’s past have ignited a reexamination of the President’s positions on critical race issues.
As the nation reflects on its leaders’ roles in shaping policy and societal norms, this scrutiny underscores the importance of accountability and the evolving understanding of racial justice.
The claims made by RFK Jr. challenge us to confront the clear pattern of prejudice in Joe Biden’s political career and to demand continuous progress towards equality, reflecting the imperative for leaders to not only evolve but to actively rectify the repercussions of past actions.
Thank you for making it all the way to the end!
This post was originally an article written by @VigilantNews writer Dallas Ludlum (@dcludlum), which was then adapted into a thread.
Dallas does amazing work. You can follow him on 𝕏 here:
--> @dcludlum
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
They showed up with guns—because she refused the COVID shot.
Dr. Margaret Aranda was stripped of her medical license at gunpoint. But what she revealed next exposes a betrayal far darker than most people can imagine.
She said most doctors never take the Hippocratic Oath—and some rewrite it to justify harm.
After leaving the system behind, Dr. Aranda turned to natural healing. Her husband was battling bladder cancer, so she put him on a protocol based on apricot seeds and enzymes. He recovered. That experience led her deeper into a world the medical establishment doesn’t want you to see.
One of the clearest windows into that world is Laetrile Case Histories—a book documenting the clinical experience of Dr. John A. Richardson, MD, who treated cancer patients in the 1970s using metabolic and nutritional therapies centered around Laetrile.
Originally published in 1977, the book details 62 patient case studies—most of them people who came to the Richardson Clinic after exhausting every conventional option. Many had been given just days to live. Some went on to live for years—cancer-free.
In 2005, co-author Patricia Griffin, RN BS, revisited those patients, followed up with their families, and updated the records to preserve what the system tried to erase.
And now, joining us today to discuss what the establishment has fought to keep hidden about cancer for so long is John Richardson Jr. and Dr. Margaret Aranda (@TheRebelPatient).
🧵 THREAD
Dr. Aranda opened the interview with an alarming personal story.
She described the moment government agents showed up at her home carrying guns. Their mission? Strip her medical license because she refused the COVID vaccine.
Her time in conventional medicine was over—but her purpose was just beginning.
Instead, she turned to healing, starting with her own family. Her husband had been battling bladder cancer. After beginning a regimen of apricot seeds and pancreatic enzymes, he got better. Much better.
Now cancer-free, his recovery became the foundation for what she calls “Ed’s cancer protocol,” which she now shares publicly on Substack.
“I count it a badge of honor,” she said. “Medical agents came to my home wearing guns… My husband is cancer-free after starting on the apricot seeds.”
That experience lit a fire in her—and in John Richardson Jr.—to uncover the truth about one of the most demonized natural therapies out there: Laetrile.
Together, they tackled what they called the “cyanide lie.” Dr. Aranda dug into the medical literature and found just 13 human studies mentioning apricot seeds and cyanide—most of them either decades old or lacking basic data. A cluster of cases came from a single farming region in Turkey and likely involved a rare enzyme deficiency, not the seeds themselves.
Richardson was blunt: despite all the fear, “not a single person has died in the U.S. from apricot seeds in over 60 years.” Meanwhile, the number of lives lost to chemotherapy is never even tallied.
“All of this propaganda we’re told every single day about cyanide… and not a single death in the U.S. in the last 60 years.”
Cheryl Hines never understood why making vaccines safer made people so angry.
Then she had a conversation with Tucker Carlson, and suddenly it clicked.
People aren’t offended by the idea of safer vaccines because it’s extreme or “crazy.” They’re offended because vaccines are already “perfect,” and if you dare propose safer vaccines, you are denying that perfection.
Think about this for a moment.
RFK Jr. was once a darling of the left, celebrated as an environmental attorney fighting to clean up air and water. But once he began criticizing vaccines, he was effectively excommunicated.
The “belief” in vaccines is like a religion, and it has been for a very long time. Look up Diego Rivera’s vaccine mural from the 1930s. It depicts a child who looks strikingly similar to Baby Jesus being vaccinated while surrounded by “wise” scientists. Rivera was not a religious man. Ironically, “science” was his religion.
After decades of brainwashing, people are starting to realize that what they believed about vaccines their entire lives wasn’t grounded in science, but in a belief system.
And through that awakening, they’re finally able to see the vaccine and pharmaceutical industries for what they really are. 🧵
Those of us who have cared for years about the health of this country have come close to losing hope entirely, more than most people realize.
The medical establishment has grown more and more corrupt, Big Pharma's power has exploded, and public health policies have become increasingly detached from reality while much of the country cheered them on.
Watching it play out felt like being trapped in a straitjacket in a downward spiral with no exit. But it wasn’t COVID that created that feeling. COVID finally exposed it.
For the first time in decades, that never-ending spiral may finally find an end. That’s why the forces responsible for it are panicking.
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
Remember when Trump curiously suggested putting light inside the body to treat COVID?
The media mocked him with bleach jokes.
But Trump wasn’t crazy. It “actually works.”
And it’s a story that blew even Joe Rogan away.
Back in the 1940s, UV blood irradiation was used to treat sepsis, pneumonia, and even polio with remarkable success.
But the American Medical Association rigged a study to kill it, ensuring this life-saving therapy vanished.
Trump was on to something. And that’s exactly why he was smeared. We weren’t supposed to know this treatment option existed.
It turns out, many of the diseases we are told are “incurable” aren’t incurable at all. 🧵
And it’s not just what people say that gets twisted and smeared. Sunlight itself—yes, the light from the sun—has been smeared as dangerous for decades.
But the dermatology-led UV fear campaign of the 1980s ignored something crucial: the deadliest skin cancer is most common in people who avoid the sun.
Let that sink in.
A 20-year study of 29,518 Swedish women found sunlight avoiders were a staggering 130% more likely to die.
The truth is simple: sunlight protects us. Modern life blocks our access to it.
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. midwesterndoctor.com/p/ultraviolet-…
A medical substance most people have never heard of is treating autoimmune disease, nerve injury, and even conditions doctors say are “untreatable.”
Better yet, it’s “very safe.”
That substance is DMSO.
Dr. James Miller says it works so well for so many things that it “seems unbelievable.”
Here’s what it’s helping patients recover from:
• Autoimmune disorders
• Chronic nerve inflammation
• Diabetic neuropathy
• Stroke-related disability
• Debilitating arthritis
• Vaccine injuries
• Chronic pain
• Cancer
• And even gastrointestinal disease, which affects over 20 million Americans.
What’s shocking is how consistently DMSO restores damaged gut tissue in conditions most doctors consider lifelong.
And if gut issues are part of your life, what DMSO can do to help deserves your full attention. 🧵
Living with a gastrointestinal disease isn’t just an inconvenience—it’s a nonstop battle.
Flare ups strike without warning. Plans get cancelled. Pain, urgency, fatigue, and fear take over daily life with a moment’s notice.
Hospital stays become routine. Toxic medications and the resulting bills pile up. Poor nutrient absorption leads to additional struggles over time.
It’s a hidden burden millions of people carry, but the medical system barely acknowledges it. They just throw medicine at it and never bother getting to the root cause.
Even as cases of inflammatory bowel disorder (IBD) continue to rise, the medical machine keeps repeating the same line: “We don’t know what causes it.”
That ongoing “mystery” happens to be very profitable.
Is the cause of IBD really such a mystery, or is it more profitable to kick the can down the road than it is to find the true cause and then the cure?
The answer is as easy as it is tragic. When the cause remains unknown, patients stay on expensive drugs—forever. Big Pharma wins. We lose. We’ve heard this story before.
EXCLUSIVE: You’re About to Wake Up in a Very Different Country | Daily Pulse
What’s coming won’t feel like a war.
But when it lands, you’ll realize everything familiar is gone.
A leaked draft of the new AI executive order reveals a sweeping plan to override state laws—using the DOJ to sue any state that dares to resist.
That includes laws protecting children, banning deepfakes, or blocking digital ID systems.
You’re already living inside the digital prison.
Most just haven’t noticed the walls going up.
AI is replacing judges, teachers, and even parents—while tracking everything you do. And now, they’re preparing to use federal funding to crush any state that pushes back.
This isn’t progress. It’s the infrastructure of obedience—and it’s quietly locking into place.
🧵 THREAD
Technology is moving at the speed of light, and laws to make sure nothing impedes its development are being proposed on the daily, it seems. AI is disruptive technology. No one would deny that. But how disruptive it becomes, in our view, is about how much people are able to protect themselves against the disruptive elements.
Right now, the US is awaiting an executive order which could prevent any protections offered to humans—their jobs, their livelihoods, their communities, perhaps even their very lives. And perhaps what is less known is just how many people are opposed to the federal government engaging in federal preemption.
Joining us to discuss today is @JOEBOTxyz. This is his area of expertise, and we couldn’t think of a better person to speak to this issue than him.
Joe Allen kicked things off by exposing what the new AI executive order really is: not a fresh idea, but a rebranded push for “AI Amnesty”—a scheme Congress already rejected.
Only this time, it’s even more extreme.
Tucked inside the draft, he revealed, is language that would give the DOJ the power to sue any state that passes laws interfering with the federal AI agenda. That includes child protection laws, deepfake regulations, or transparency rules targeting Big Tech.
“It’s become even more aggressive, more combative,” he said. This isn’t a hypothetical threat to state sovereignty anymore—it’s right there in the fine print.
And if it passes, the consequences could be irreversible.