A leading psychology researcher, and Democrat, denounces Google's partisan Democrat bias
But the AI product Google shipped, Gemini, turned out to have a strong racial bias.
shellenberger/status/1762654930777886880
-
Gemini responded with misinformation when asked about this misrepresentation, claiming that it “aimed to provide a more accurate and inclusive representation of the historical context.”
-
Protect your vote against #BigTech.
Thanks to Our Watchdogs, so Far We've Captured...
77,375,530 [28FEB24 8:30AM EST]
...Pages Sent by Google, Facebook, YouTube and others to Manipulate People Like You!
techwatchorg/status/1762619601039602165
-
America's Digital Shield
"Ephemeral experiences" refer to those momentary encounters that we all experience daily when using search engines that briefly impact us before disappearing forever, leaving no paper trail.
- americasdigitalshield.com
Elon gets it.
See the research we're doing to hold #BigTech accountable
techwatchorg/status/1762166872626368517
-
TWP - Tech Watch Project
Pioneering Online Safety to Protect Your Freedom
Dedicated to making our digital world more safe and fair by providing a 24/7 monitoring system, revealing abusive digital intrusions.
Spotify listeners! Last Thursday, I had the opportunity to speak with @JoeRogan on his podcast. We talked #GoogleandtheGang, search suggestions, and many more.
DrREpstein/status/1486409216709775361
-
@joerogan #1768 - Dr. Robert Epstein
the power of Google and other Big Tech companies to censor dissenting opinions online and sway the outcome of elections.
Oversight Dems have received new emails from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate that raise serious questions about Donald Trump and his knowledge of Epstein’s horrific crimes.
- Oversight Dems
-
The images from Oversight Dems post above 🔼
Democrats intentionally redacted the name of the "victim" in the Epstein emails they released.
The unreacted version shows that it was Virginia Guiffre.
@CynicalPublius Yes, Google is misinterpreting the rules
“. . . information must be approved for public release by an appropriate authorizing official before it is released, even if it is unclassified."
This quote was fed into google.
-
I fed in the longer, complete quote
“. . . information must be approved for public release by an appropriate authorizing official before it is released by any military member, DoW civilian employee or contract employee, even if it is unclassified.”
- still misinterpreted
-
@CynicalPublius I believe that Google interprets this from an authoritative perspective. The authority is the mainstream press.
The press is using Google, and Google is parroting their thinking in answer.