Thread by @AKaszon

@Fixtor The hasty withdrawal from Afghanistan should make you think, as it shows exactly how the Democrats are setting their priorities and that the Biden administration considers US geopolitical goals to be more important than promoting democracy.

@Fixtor The uncontrolled withdrawal from Kabul has paved the way for further conflict. Mr. Trump was also in favor of withdrawing troops, but not at any price. The man sought a balance of interests.

@Fixtor So a government in which the Taliban participate and not sole rule by the Taliban.

@Fixtor I'm so fair that I don't want to accuse Mr. Biden of anything. Especially if I can't prove something clearly, but the chaotic withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan could have been a tactical maneuver as part of a China strategy.

@Fixtor Some think tanks and private intelligence agencies such as Stratfor have, on the one hand, warned against fueling the conflict in Kashmir,

@Fixtor but on the other hand, they see fueling the conflict as one of several ways in which the USA could thwart the Chinese in their Silk Road project and that would be extremely dangerous!

@Fixtor In the Kashmir conflict, India always asserted itself against Pakistan, but if Pakistan no longer feels inferior with the help of the Taliban, this could lead to a longer-lasting conflict in this region!

@Fixtor The Chinese have already met with the Taliban and are adapting their project to the current political circumstances.

@Fixtor If the USA wants to thwart the Chinese's plans, they would have to destabilize Afghanistan again after inflaming the conflict in Kashmir and find an excuse to bomb the infrastructure in Afghanistan again.

@Fixtor The West could only legitimize this under the pretext of reforming groups like Al-Qaeda.

@Fixtor I hope I'm wrong, but in the chess game of global interests, human rights usually play a subordinate role.

@Fixtor The think tanks' various China strategies caught my attention and the hasty withdrawal from Afghanistan and the refusal to impose sanctions on Pakistan caught my attention.

@Fixtor Pakistan was the main supplier of weapons to Afghanistan. Why weren't sanctions imposed by Mr. Biden?

@Fixtor Why did the Americans leave the Taliban an air force? The planes could have been destroyed before the withdrawal. I see this as a hidden supply of weapons that the whole world would have openly criticized.

@Fixtor Mr. Biden is responsible for many serious mistakes.

@Fixtor By the way, we are already supplying the weapons for the coming crises.
faz.net/aktuell/politi…

@Fixtor But now to Ukraine. What might be the strategic interests there ? During the course of the counteroffensive, we were able to clearly observe which areas the offensive was focused on and 5 of the gas fields have already been secured.

@Fixtor Often the defense of human rights is just a pretext for achieving strategic goals. Mr. Friedman said it then. A strategic interest of the think tanks was to end relations between Germany and Russia.

@Fixtor The pipelines between Germany and Russia are history and all evidence points to the Ukrainians as perpetrators and to the US being complicit.

https://twitter.com/AKaszon/status/1666346034996342784

@Fixtor According to the so-called Discord Leaks, President Zelensky suggested bombing a pipeline that transports Russian oil to Hungary, a NATO member. He had expressed a private desire for long-range missiles,

@Fixtor to hit targets within Russian borders, as the Washington Post reported, citing US secret documents. washingtonpost.com/discord-leaks/

@Fixtor The New York Times published an article saying that the attack on the Northstream pipelines was a Ukrainian state operation and that General Valeriy Zalushnyy was informed about it. themoscowtimes.com/2023/11/11/sen…

@Fixtor Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Ms. Nuland's activities highlighted exactly what the Biden Administration is interested in in Ukraine. Maybe some people still remember the woman's choice of words at the time. Fuck the EU and their interests.

@Fixtor Most of the US strategic goals have been achieved and US interests are currently focused on the Indo-Pacific and no longer on Europe.

@Fixtor At first I wanted to make a video, but then I found this one in which the gentleman summarized the change of course quite well.

@Fixtor I don't judge politicians by what they say, but solely by what decisions are made, and if i do that, it's hard for me to imagine that a crushing victory for the Ukrainians over the Russians was ever the goal.

@Fixtor Then completely different decisions would have been made. Then the 5,000 decommissioned armored vehicles currently stored in US depots would have been delivered to Ukraine at the scrap metal price and recorded at the new price, instead of having them gradually scrapped.

@Fixtor To me that sounds like. Our strategic goals have been achieved, 5 gas fields have been secured and now the war must be ended as quickly as possible.

@Fixtor In my opinion, Ukraine was not supplied with a single weapon more than necessary for the capture of the gas fields and the subsequent defense of the front sectors.

@Fixtor All in the hope that a stalemate would then lead to quick peace negotiations, since the war will continue forever if one of the two parties thinks that the momentum would be on their side, but Mr. Biden was unable to do even that. Now the momentum is on the Russian side.

@Fixtor Previously, all the media ruled out a compromise and spoke of a dictated peace. Now suddenly all the media are promoting negotiations because the war cannot be won. Negotiations are already underway behind closed doors.
morgenpost.de/politik/articl…

@Fixtor I share the prediction of Peter R Neumann from the german conservative party CDU.

https://twitter.com/PeterRNeumann/status/1768601939309211896

@Fixtor "My prediction: The chance of negotiations by November 5th is zero. If Trump wins, a "deal" will happen in 2025. If Biden does, there will be a ceasefire and "freezing" of the conflict a few months later."

@Fixtor Things are now being said that politicians in the USA would never have said publicly some time ago. The CIA chief said that the ammunition would not be enough for Ukraine and a possible conflict in the Indo-Pacific.

@Fixtor Political advisers to former presidents say the war is already lost.

@Fixtor Mr. Trump wanted to promote his own raw materials instead of destabilizing other countries and securing their raw materials in the chaos for false promises, as had happened in many previous conflicts.

@Fixtor Mr. Zelensky has already announced that he feels betrayed by the West. Taiwan no longer believes that the USA can keep its promises of protection. German politicians are angry about the destruction of the pipeline and Ukraine is at the end of its rope.

@Fixtor We stupid Europeans are now smashing our heads while the Chinese are rubbing their hands.

@Fixtor Politics had to react somehow to the war of aggression, but the measures that were decided massively weakened the hegemony of the West instead of strengthening it!

@Fixtor How and why the reactions to the war in Ukraine endanger the entire western hegemony. threadreaderapp.com/thread/1622116…

@Fixtor There was a time when Ukraine could have repelled the Russians with full support and won the war, but that time has already passed.

@Fixtor I believe Mr. Trump's statement that war would have been either delayed or even averted under his presidency. The negotiations in Turkey would never have been torpedoed.

https://twitter.com/AKaszon/status/1766324011603005826

@Fixtor In this article you can read why I believe that Ukraine can no longer win this war and how the situation got to that point.
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1766324…

@Fixtor @threadreaderapp unroll