Retail chocolate prices are rising (and will increase much further, while shrinkflation will reduce sizes) after wholesale cocoa prices surged to an unthinkable all-time high of ***$10,000 a ton*** on Tuesday.
1/15 @Opinion
First, the magnitude of the rally:
In nominal terms, cocoa prices have surged to >$10,000 – up from ~$2,500 a year ago, and ~$650 a decade ago.
To put things into perspective: the previous record, which only fell in February after 46 years unbroken, was ~$5,500.
2/15 @Opinion
Of course, that’s in nominal terms.
In real terms, adjusted by the cumulative impact of inflation, cocoa is still trading well below the peak set in the 1970s.
The record high established 46 years ago equals to ~$27,000 a ton in today’s money.
3/15 @Opinion
To understand the crisis, one has look at its genesis: years of underinvestment in cocoa farming in West Africa, home to ~75% of the world’s supply. Bad weather and diseases added to the problem.
In West Africa, cocoa is still grown overwhelmingly by poor smallholders. Just making enough to subsist, most lack the means to re-invest in their plots — either by planting new trees or investing in fertiliser and pesticides.
5/15 @Opinion
Finally, the decades of underinvestment have caught up with growing chocolate demand. Old cocoa trees mean two problems: lower yields, and plants particularly vulnerable to bad weather and disease. Both factors are at play this year.
6/15 @Opinion
The upshot is a brutal gap between supply and demand. Even when accounting for the damping impact of high prices on consumption, the market is heading for a deficit of 300,000-to-500,000 tons. If confirmed, that would be the largest shortfall in at least 65 years.
7/15 @Opinion
It isn’t just supply. The current shortfall would be a smaller problem if global cocoa demand hadn’t double over the last 30 years, as the rise of the middle class creates more consumers. And more is coming, as per-capita demand is still low in places like China.
8/15 @Opinion
Global chocolate consumption (per capita annually), selected countries:
🇨🇭 Switzerland: ~12 kg
🇺🇸 USA: ~9 kg
🇩🇪 Germany: ~6 kg
🇧🇷 Brazil: 1.5 kg
🇮🇳 India: 1.0 kg
🇨🇳 China: 0.2 kg
9/15 @Opinion
Supply-and-demand fundamentals were at the genesis of the cocoa price rally. Now, financials factors are accelerating it. And fast.
FREE-TO-READ my latest column (published March 26) to understand the cocoa's financial market plumbing.
"Once prices become untethered from fundamentals, a bull market is almost impossible to stop — until something breaks. Brace for the current surge in cocoa to have wider ramifications than inflating the cost of your Easter egg."
11/15 @Opinion
"Disorderly markets can lead to trading firms struggling, and even collapsing. That’s what happened in the European electricity and natural-gas markets in 2022 [...] It also happened in the cotton market in 2008 and again in 2011"
12/15 @Opinion
A sign of trouble is the decline in liquidity in the financial cocoa market since January:
The aggregate number of outstanding contracts, known as the open interest, in the New York and London cocoa futures market has fallen by ~35% over the last three months.
13/15 @Opinion
What’s happening is starting to be felt in supermarkets around the world: rising retail prices and shrinkflation. And more – a lot more– is coming.
Listen to Michele Buck, the boss of Hershey. “We will be using every tool in our toolbox, including pricing.”
14/15 @Opinion
This thread is an updated version of another one I published in Feb., which ended with a few photos of my cocoa reporting trips over the years.
Chocolate prices are about to rise — and bars and boxes will shrink too — after wholesale cocoa prices jumped beyond their 46-year old peak, setting a record high.
To understand the crisis, one has to travel to West Africa, home to ~75% of the worlds production. The king of cocoa is Ivory Coast, which accounts for 2 million tons of bean output, compared to global consumption of about 5 million tons.
2/10 @Opinion
In West Africa, cocoa is still grown overwhelmingly by poor smallholders. Just making enough to subsist, most lack the means to re-invest in their plots — either by planting new trees or investing in fertiliser and pesticides.
1) At the heart, OPEC is fighting about who pumps how much. Nigeria and Angola, which have struggled to meet their quota, refuse an official lower level for 2024. Leaving OPEC is real, but remote, possibility for Angola; but no for Nigeria | 1/7
2) The dispute, while important inside OPEC, may mean little for global supply-and-demand early next year. Saudi Arabia and Russia appear certain to keep their unilateral cuts in place to avoid a price drop in 1Q. Still, there's a non-zero chance the OPEC+ deal implodes | 2/7
3) In exchange, Saudi Arabia -- and to a lesser extent Russia -- wants everyone else to chip in. For starters, with strong compliance with (2024 new) quotas. But nothing in the last 48 hours suggests Riyadh is about to abandon its (de facto) policy of aiming for $80-to-$100 | 3/7
Teck’s shareholders are voting until Apr 26 on the company’s split in the middle of Glencore's $23bn hostile approach. By the weekend, Teck would have a good idea of where the vote is going. It needs 2/3 support of the voting B-shares.
Teck has tabled a plan to split the company in two (one mining base metals and another mining coal) – but keeping a financial link between them for years to come. You can read my take on the split – and why it amounts to greenwashing – below | 2/12 bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
Typically, the Keevil family, thanks to its super-voting A-shares, controls Teck (despite owning just ~1% of the miner's equity). But because this is a company split, Canadian law gives the B-shareholders a chance to get their voice heard at par with the Keevils | 3/12
The full letter from Teck rejecting the unsolicited approach by Glencore is here: teck.com/media/Letter-A…
Teck also confirms our reporting on talks with Glencore:
"As you know, our respective teams engaged in conceptual discussions in 2020 regarding a similarly structured transaction and, following a careful review by our Board, we determined at the time not to proceed further"
I have written only one story about fusion energy. For my university's newspaper 25 years ago. Thankfully, it isn't online.
Since then, I'm skeptical of surprisingly well-timed announcements by budget-starved laboratories about breakthroughs for technologies decades away |🧵1/10
But first, the FT story (confirmed now by others, including Bloomberg) about the US Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory near San Francisco set to announce that a fusion experiment released more energy than the lasers used in the experiment emitted 2/10 ft.com/content/4b6f0f…
There's a caveat to the story. The same laboratory announced a slightly different breakthrough nearly a decade ago (by Nature), announcing it achieved a net energy output vs the energy **absorbed** by the fuel. The new breakthrough is superior | 3/10 nature.com/articles/natur…
Saudi Arabia has priced its oil in US dollars since 1974 and channeled the surpluses into the US Treasury market (aka, the petro-dollar recycling).
For a history of oil and the petro-dollar, read this good paper from the Journal of Energy History: energyhistory.eu/en/special-iss… 2/7
Historically, Riyadh has been reluctant to even consider shifting oil pricing away from the dollar.
In 2007, for example, a top Saudi official said the dollar could "collapse" if OPEC just talked about it. ft.com/content/33a4f7… (@Ed_Crooks surely remembers this one) 3/7