Stephen Barlow Profile picture
Apr 10, 2024 13 tweets 3 min read Read on X
I have been repeatedly warning for decades that the climate and ecological crisis, could create major food shortages and threaten our civilization far earlier than predictions imply.

1/🧵theguardian.com/environment/20…
As I spelled out in this thread only 2 days ago, if extreme weather events line up around the world in any given year. Extreme rainfall in some areas, lack of rainfall in others, extreme heat in others, hurricanes, - it'd cause global food shortages.

2/threadreaderapp.com/thread/1777396…
We have already seen many regional agricultural impacts, which can be compensated, by surpluses elsewhere. But what happens, if there's a perfect storm and various impacts, cause shortages across the globe?
3/
As climate change progresses, this is made more and more likely. We are already seeing a huge variety of climate impacts around the globe, from wildfires, flooding, drought, intensified tropical storms, etc. What I say, is not hypothetical, it's happening now.
4/
There is the very real possibility, that if this extreme weather lined up in a certain way, it could massively impact global food production in a given year. Before accusing me of raising hypotheticals, let me point to what is already happening.
5/
As I make clear in my thread 2 days ago, this risk starts this year, with the El Nino effects, causing warming in excess of 1.5C. I am not saying it is going to happen this year, simply that there is a quantifiable risk of it occurring.
6/
That we have sleep walked into a potential avoidable catastrophe, by taking no meaningful action in the last 30 years, and making no proper preparations for this eventuality.

As I make clear, food shortages don't have to be absolute to have major societal impacts.
7/
In a free market economy, restricted supplies of food commodities, will cause hyperinflation, making food unaffordable to many, with massive potential societal political, and geo-political implications. The free market system, itself is a major liability.
8/
The free market system, may drive prices down in times of surplus, but conversely, it also drives up prices in times of restricted supply. We are now facing the realistic prospects of restricted food supplies, due to climate change. It is a dangerous combination.
9/
I agree with the wonderful @vanessa_vash's wisdom here. Potential climate related food shortages, are no longer just an African problem, and the world should never have seen it like this. Climate Justice and equity, are important dynamics.

10/
Once again, I am not trying to spread alarm. I am just pleading for realistic thinking and analysis.

That we are now planning to survive on luck, just hoping that extreme, climate change driven weather, doesn't combine in an unfortunate way, is dangerous and reckless.
11/
None of this danger is inevitable, and it is avoidable, if we come together, to solve this crisis cooperatively. This is the danger of the artificial competition, in the current neoliberal system, in that it inhibits cooperation, by design. We need joined up thinking.
12/
@threadreaderapp unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Barlow

Stephen Barlow Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SteB777

Mar 23
I'm baffled by our media, not fit for purpose. They are still trying to spin this Trump/Netanyahu shit show, and normalize it, by pretending that their goals are somehow achievable. Probably to bolster the financial markets.
1/5
How are these propagandists, going to spin it in a few months time, when Trump/Netanyahu, have achieved nothing, and the world is plunged into chaos? They should have been holding these 2 lunatics to account, to pressure them into ceasing and desisting.
2/5
An even bigger enemy to humankind than lunatics like Trump/Netanyahu, is the media, who stopped reporting the news ages ago, and at the behest of their oligarch owners, turned into propagandists, gaslighting the public.
3/5
Read 6 tweets
Mar 4
A huge thanks to @ZackPolanski and the rest of the @TheGreenParty for restoring sanity and humanity, to British politics, and ignoring the received wisdom, that no politician or party can say positive things, or it is political suicide.
1/🧵
As we can see now, and @ZackPolanski has exposed Keir Starmer for the fraud he is, in claiming that his nasty authoritarian, anti-people policy, was a political necessity. No it was a choice of Starmer, and the regressive forces he represents.
2/
@ZackPolanski has done a marvellous job in interviews on mainstream TV of being level-headed, in answering the attempts to trip him up, in an intelligent and persuasive way. I think the attacks and smears are backfiring, because people do not see what they are being told.
3/
Read 10 tweets
Mar 1
I am hoping @ChrisGPackham will understand this as a naturalist, and he has some understanding of ecology and biodiversity, because my important points about this assessment are being ignored.

My central point is these redacted parts are of little use to us.
1/🧵
I completely agree with @GreenRupertRead that these parts should never have been redacted. However, the idea that the full unredacted report, would help us better understand these threats, is profoundly mistaken, and the ITN report is misleading.
2/
I have been making the same warnings for decades, and they were actually based on the same science and references, as this assessment used.

My point, is we don't know enough about the way our human systems rely on natural systems, to confidently make such projections.
3/
Read 21 tweets
Mar 1
I will have to make a subsidiary thread, because the general knowledge of biodiversity and ecology is so poor, that the vast majority of people don't realize I am making profound, expert points.
1/🧵
I'll start with my point about species. Most are not familiar with this, as they have zero education about it, so they probably think I'm just trying to be controversial. There is no single definition of a species, and all break down at some point.

2/nhm.ac.uk/discover/what-…
"There’s no exact figure for how many species live on Earth. As of 2024, more than 2.1 million species have been scientifically described and named, but this is likely to be nowhere near the true number living on the planet."

3/nhm.ac.uk/discover/what-…
Read 7 tweets
Mar 1
I want to explain, why hardly anyone understands what biodiversity is.

1) The number of species on Earth, is completely unknown. Their ecological interactions, even more unknown.

2) There is no satisfactory definition of what a species is.
1/🧵
In other words, it is almost impossible for a layperson to understand biodiversity intellectually, when they have fundamental misconceptions about the core concepts of biodiversity. Ecology, the interactions of these species, is even less understood.
2/
What is known about the most complex field of knowledge known to humanity, is a tiny fraction of what could be known, and most of it is probably unknowable on a level of complexity, impossible for us to comprehend.
3/
Read 21 tweets
Mar 1
A long time ago, and repeatedly over many decades, I said if @TheGreenParty had an electoral breakthrough, the establishment, the media and political mainstream, would viciously turn on them. It was not hard to foresee, when you know the tawdry reality of the establishment.
1/3
The established order, isn't a group of people working together for the public good and the country. It is a tawdry, corrupt, powerful and wealth clique, in which the powerful and rich, cooperate to make themselves even richer and more powerful, at the cost of everyone else.
2/3
The first and most important rule of Rich and Power Club is that it exists only to further the aims of those in this clique. The second rule is that it doesn't exist, and the third is, if anyone breaks ranks or threatens the aims of this clique, then they must be crushed.
3/3
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(