🇺🇸 Freedom Piper 🇺🇸 Profile picture
Apr 20, 2024 16 tweets 6 min read Read on X
🚨🚨🚨 BREAKING: In a landmark 9-0 ruling on Wednesday that you will never hear about in the media, the US Supreme Court has undercut all DEI-based discrimination, sending the Marxists into a tizzy.

The US Supreme Court's ruling that a St. Louis police sergeant can sue over a job transfer she claims was discriminatory lays the foundation for legal action against employers who push discrimination against white people in job hiring, work assignment and promotion. That’s right, those “diversity-preferred” job postings, the practice of passing over whites for promotions, discriminatory job transfers, pushing unfair diversity trainings, etc…all of these are now legally actionable.

The ruling was championed by human rights groups as "an enormous win for workers,” but has lawyers for companies like Disney warning that it could have a chilling effect on employers' diversity initiatives.

Disney’s "Pale and Male is Stale" policy is a prime example. Disney has allegedly used it to drive out white animators by giving them the worst assignments, even though they them have the most experience, skill, and seniority, in order to make the job humiliating enough that they quit…which many of them have done.

The same companies argue that there is ‘good discrimination’ and “bad discrimination’, that white people should be purposely disadvantaged to pave the way for diversity. The lawyers stated that the decision will ‘complicate’ DEI programs and limit their ability to discriminate against white men.

The Supreme Court torpedoed these claims, re-asserting that everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. Further, the court has established a relatively ‘low standard’ for bringing discrimination cases. The victim need not suffer ‘actual harm’. An employee only must show "some harm" under the terms of their employment, AND that harm need not be "material," "substantial" or "serious." The decision makes it much easier for workers to sue over discriminatory practices.

This is a big win for equality!Image
Read the decision on the Supreme Court site:
supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf…
Here is one of the sources used to corroborate the impacts:

acecomments.mu.nu/?post=409307
Justice Kavanaugh wrote a concurring opinion, and even stated the “some harm” requirement, though a much lower barrier to litigation, was in his opinion not required. His biew is that no harm need be proven, simply the ACT of discrimination on basis of race, color, etc is itself ‘harm’.

The road is paved for equality to once agin be restored to our struggling Marxist-controlled Republic.Image
Image
Image
Please keep this circulating to get the word out. I must turn my attention now to the next developing story. 🇺🇸💪
Patriot Roy Rogue has posted the prior decision from the appeals court, which SCOTUS has overturned. In particular, the assertion that any “materially significant harm” must be proven. By lowering the standard of proof, SCOTUS has now opened the door. 💪🇺🇸
More analysis of the decision from Dykema, specifically on how the lower standard of “some harm” was considered by the justices.

dykema.com/news-insights/…
The ruling is spreading, now published in law journals and sites. Here is analysis from Gibson Dunn.

gibsondunn.com/supreme-court-…
Another update, indicating that the ruling is expected to be applied to other federal anti-discrimination statutes.
I hope you found this report useful. I work tirelessly daily to bring news and stories that the mainstream media buries or ignores, and to include analysis and insights to help you digest it all…sometimes with the utmost seriousness, and other times with satire and humor.

I am believe DEI and Woke policies are destroying our country, the rule of law has been compromised, and a clear vision and plan for America is sorely needed. It is my conviction to stand up to tyranny and help shine a light down the road we must travel to secure our future. Thank you for your attention and support. 🙏

I am the Freedom Piper, and I work for YOU.Image
Would anyone like to co-host a Space on this topic, perhaps on Tuesday or Wednesday?
I’ll add another post, since there are some questions in comments about potential impact on universities. I would expect it could make passing state legislation like this example in Iowa easier.

Hosted a Space on this topic yesterday. Here is the agenda that was covered and the recording link should wirk if interested.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 🇺🇸 Freedom Piper 🇺🇸

🇺🇸 Freedom Piper 🇺🇸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FreeThinkerInc

Sep 16, 2024
🚨🚨🚨 The United Nations 2030 Agenda Is Greatest Threat to Personal Freedoms In History. The UN General Assembly will vote on its foundation, the "Pact for the Future", in New York on Sept. 22-23.

World leaders are turning their attention to the United Nations' Project 2030, officially known as "Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development." This initiative, led by UN Secretary-General António Guterres, is framed as a response to urgent global challenges, but beneath its surface lies a clear threat to national sovereignty and personal freedoms.

At the upcoming UN General Assembly meeting, the "Pact for the Future" will be a central topic. This pact proposes a significant overhaul of global governance structures, including the establishment of a UN “Global Digital Compact.” While marketed as a means to combat poverty, inequality, and climate change, critics argue it seeks to consolidate power to regulate free speech under a centralized authority, limiting dissent and alternative viewpoints.

One of the most alarming elements is the proposed “Emergency Platform,” which would grant the UN Secretary-General unchecked authority to declare global emergencies, thus enabling one individual to wield immense power during crises—real or imagined. Additionally, Guterres emphasizes the need for centralized control for managing emerging technologies like artificial intelligence.

The discussions at the upcoming summit are less about safeguarding freedom and more about a larger agenda to centralize global authority under the guise of collaboration and security. The rhetoric echoes the unsettling notion of a future where individuals "own nothing and are happy," reminiscent of the Great Reset.

The "Global Digital Compact" outlines principles for creating a "human-centered" digital future that ostensibly respects human rights while promoting Sustainable Development Goals. However, this framework contains the mechanics for undermining personal freedoms through digital identification systems and measures to combat "disinformation." The danger lies not in the stated goals but in the broad powers these proposals grant to governments and global organizations. Moreover, the UN's push for advanced vaccine technologies and potential global vaccine passports poses a direct threat to individual autonomy, overriding rights to refuse medical interventions in favor of global governance.

The initiatives surrounding Project 2030 represent a troubling power grab disguised as a call for international cooperation. By imposing digital frameworks and restrictions under the pretext of public good, these proposals aim to dictate the flow of information and monitoring individual behavior, overridingr personal freedom in an increasingly interconnected world.Image
Latest draft of the UN's "Pact or the Future". It includdes imposed DEI measures, restrictions for Climate Change, forced sustainability, legally binding climate courts, Mandated "culure and sport" equity programs, legislated speech and expression, centralization and oversight of global financial systems and institutions.

un-sotf.cdn.prismic.io/un-sotf/Zt8Z6h…Image
‼️House Republicans hold a press conference today to sound the alarm on the "Summit for the Future", due to the complete lack of media coverage. Must watch.

Read 5 tweets
Sep 15, 2024
Reading through the replies of Ryan Routh back to Feb 2020, he appears to be a narcissist who was mobilized to action out of the Leftist rhetoric from J6. He fancied himself important but was repeatedly ignored because he appears to be a loon. After years of stalking public officials unsuccessfully, he shipped off to Ukraine and started what looks to be a mercenary booking agency. From what I can tell, it never succeeded.
In April 2022, Ryan Routh says he flew to Ukraine to fight as a civilian in the conflict. His narcissism is again evident as he honestly expects Zelensky to see his post and call him to setup a tent city. He appears to be a deeply troubled person with delusions of grandeur.
Image
Image
By January 2023, still in Ukraine, Ryan Routh was attempting to recruit soldiers from Syria and Afghanistan to fight in Ukraine. He claimed to be able to "provide passage for thousands of afghan soldiers."

In March 2023 he appears to have made a connection in Afghanistan and was offering 10K afghan soldiers to Ukraine. He then proceeds to offer 20000, and additional soldiers after that in smaller groups "with passports". It appears he became an agent for Ukraine, recruiting foreign mercenaries from the Middle East.Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 8 tweets
Aug 24, 2024
‼️ The Foo Fighters seem to want forget all the licensing deals they have made and the rights they transferred when they made them. Trump does not need your permission because you already shipped your product to market, and his campaign purchased it. No take-backsies.

This is how the McCain objection was answered, as reported by the BBC in 2008:

Republican Brian Rogers said the campaign respects copyright. "Accordingly, this campaign has obtained and paid for licences from performing rights organisations, giving us permission to play millions of different songs, including My Hero."

I would suspect the same to be true now.
In 2012, both BMI and ASCAP started a new type of license for political events which allows artists to disallow use.

Depending on the type of license purchased for the Arizona special guest RFK Jr's entrance, the objection of the Foo Babies may prevent future use of it.

But really, who cares...it was a single barrel buchshot with no need for a reload.Image
Read 5 tweets
Aug 14, 2024
WHO IS TOBY KESSLER? Toby Shane Kessler is a 39-year-old transient and career petty criminal from San Francisco. He has a history of crimes committed across the country and has been arrested in San Francisco, Florida, and Virginia for a variety of crimes. He a product of repeated failure to adequately prosecute and incarcerate, dating back to at least 2015:

7/19/2024 - Booked in Virgina for failure to appear on a felony charge
4/29/2024 - Booked in St Augustine Florida for loitering, fraud and impersonation
5/17/2019 - Booked in Cocoa Beach, Florida for loitering & prowling
5/15/2018 - Booked in San Francisso, CA for robbery, possession and felony while on bail
2/18/2018 - Booked in San Franciso, CA for a string of jewelry store burglaries totaling over $250K
2/16/2018 - Booked in San Francisco for battery, burglary, grand theft, resisting, etc
11/24/2017 - Booked in San Francisco for threats of violence, battery on transportation personnel, concealed weapon, vandalism...
7/31/2016 - Booked in San Framcisco for exhibiting a deadly weapon, threats of violence
7/27/2016 - Booked in San Francisco for assault, battery and battery on person
10/20/2015 - Booked in San Francisco for assault and battery
4/29/2015 - Booked in San Franciso for exhibiting a deadly weapon, threats of violence
4/28/2015 - Booked in San Francisco for contempt of court
3/25/2015 - Booked in San Francisco for contempt of court
3/12/2015 - Booked in San Franciso for assault, battery
3/10/2015 - Booked in Alameda County, CA for assault, battery
2/6/2015 - Booked in Berkeley, CA for threats of violence, possessing a weapon on school grounds, exhibiting a deadly weapon

The question is, how did he come to break into the Trump / RNC HQ in Virginia? Was he hired to do the job? Was he breaking into a random building and hoping to find valuables?

thesfnews.com/toby-kessler-a…Image
Image
Image
Image
More arrest records...
Image
Image
🚨🚨🚨 TOBY KESSLER WAS RELEASED FROM JAIL ON JULY 11TH. Toby Kessler served time in Florida for one count of loitering and one of fraud / impersonation, both committed April 24, 2024. He was released on July 11. 🤔 Image
Read 6 tweets
Jul 1, 2024
🚨🚨🚨 SUPREME COURT GIVES MIXED BAG IN TRUMP IMMUNITY RULING. In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court grappled with issues of presidential immunity and applied them to the acuusations against Trump. There is both good and bad news. Without going too deeply into the leaglese, here are the key takeaways.

First, the good news. On two counts the Court found Trump likely immune from procsecution:

➡️He has ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY from prosecution for the alleged conduct involving his communication with Justice Department officials. These charges must be dropped.

➡️He has "presumptive immunity" over his discussions and actions relating to Mike Pence, and that it is the Government’s burden to rebut the presumption of immunity in District Court.

Those two were clear cut, as they fall cleanly under Presidential Official Acts. But the remaining charges are not as cut and dry...and that brings me to the bad news...Trump is likey NOT immune from prosecution for his role in trying to change out electors, and may or may not be immune for his actions on Januray 6th:

➡️The Court was highly critical of the actions Trump took at the state level to change out electors, suggesting that these are likely PRIVATE ACTS and not official acts.

➡️The Court also addressed January 6th, criticizing the prosecution for not presenting the full context of tweets and communications.

Both of these topics were remanded to the District Court to determine which acts are official and which are not. The elector topic is the one most likely to blow up on Trump.

➡️A final topic the Court addressed is the argument Trump had made that the Impeachment Judgement Clause requires impeachment before a president may be indicted, but the Court rejected this argument.

The dissenting Justices (Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson) attempt to make the argument that former presidents should not have immunity, but they are unable to provide any "historical or textual support", instead emplying doomsday and sdistpian rhetoric to make theor points, as noted by Justice Roberts.

So, Trump has won some of the fight, but the likelihood that he is prosecuted for his role with the electors appears to be high.Image
Here is the full text of the ruling and dissents: supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf…
Important also to note that the Supreme Court also ruled that the immunity for offical acts extends and covers the entire Oval Office staff, not only the president.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 3, 2024
🚨🚨🚨 PATH TO APPEAL. Sixteen ‘reversible errors’ from the Trump fraud trial which form the basis for appeal or Supreme Court involvement. Share and repost!!! Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(