Lazarus Long Profile picture
May 26, 2024 28 tweets 13 min read Read on X
⚠️ PFAs from 3M ⚠️

🤬N95, N100, PAPR.🤬

Just found this, so giving you a heads up. Source at end.

On a personal note, I know some of you have some of these, and I am both sorry and livid for you.

P100s have PFAs.
( I have a rack of these.)

/1 Image
PAPR - Versaflo, Powerflow. Read for details.

/2 The 3M™ Versaflo™ TR-300+, TR-600, TR-800, and Powerflow™ PAPR motor  blowers contain PFAS in certain blower housing components to help manage heat and  seal the circuit board, as well as lubricate the motor. This motor blower is sold by itself,  as well as in kits where it is paired with multiple breathing tube and headgear options.  Some products utilize lithium batteries which may also contain PFAS.  The 3M™ Versaflo™ Breathing Tubes BT-20S, BT-20L, BT-30, and BT-40 which are  used in certain powered and supplied air system configurations to connect the headgear  to the air source, use a...
JFC. 3Ms R, P, and HE filters.

@3M. P100, you greedy jerks?

@NIOSH_TWH @NIOSH - you realize we are going to FOIA you, right? I know you guys read my tweets, so let's get this fixed?

/3 Image
3M’s 7800, 7800B, FF-400, and FF-800.

(I huffed PFAs with P100s, and dodged the bullet on this one so far, as I have the 6800.) In addition, 3M’s 7800, 7800B, FF-400, and FF-800 Full Facepiece Reusable Respirators contain a speaking diaphragm that is used to help provide easy communication for the wearer to those around them. This speaking diaphragm contains PFAS. The FF-400 and FF-800 respirators also have a coating that is applied to the facepieces’ polycarbonate lens to allow for improved paint and stain resistance for easier cleaning. This coating contains PFAS.
@3M - it's the science of poison, not fluorochemistries.

Did you come up with the PR campaign for @DuPont_News's Teflon, the Happy Pan, as well?

Greedy bastards.

pfas.3m.com/pfas_uses

Image
Image
Source for all of this. I almost skipped this because I knew the firefighting gear was contaminated. But thought it was a little long for just one product.

multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/2303…
Back in 2021, Sean Lynch of @3M said that surgical respirators did NOT contain PFAs.

Which sounds like a lie as they are EXACTLY what would work good with PFAs to repel blood, etc

But he DID say that some models of their STANDARD N95s may contain some PFAs in the headbands. Image
So, at least the PFAs is not in the filtration? But it is concerning that only 3 years later, their PFA document does not mention N95 headbands.

Did they get rid of the PFAs so quickly? When they are not required to until 2025 (and only piecemeal).

eenews.net/articles/face-…
And, of course, this was in 2021 and 2023, long after 3M supposedly began to phase out PFAs in 2000.

Which was touched on in their testimony declaring minimal health effects.👀

I have been a fan of 3M products, and now am a tad shocked.
pfas.3m.com/3M-to-share-re…
Image
And the trust is gone.

Anyone have the ability to test Filtrete 1900 for PFAs? 👀 Image
Want to help light a fire under 3M?

Hit their chat up on Monday and ask about your favorite 3M respirator to see if it has PFAs in it.

See what doc they provide you. Let's compare notes

Live agent specialists’ chat
Monday – Friday
8:00 AM – 4:30 PM CST

3m.com/3M/en_US/compa…
And absolutely great point about all of the respirator companies.

Please reply back here what you hear, try to get some sort of formal document.

Also great point.

But my stance is that I want to avoid them as much as possible.

Just like Covid.

There was a study on the #corsirosenthalbox that showed reduction of PFAs through using the box.

Went back and reread it.


The box in question used Jim's TexAir filters.

Here is a link to his filters:
pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.10…
texairfilters.com/filters-for-bo…
Image
Here is the article that covers the PFA study that will be easier to read for most.

To clarify- we don't know if 3M filters, Filtrete 1900, have PFAs or not. But are pushing to get them tested.

I personally have 8 of them where I am living, and I am not
brown.edu/news/2022-12-2…
tossing them until someone does test them.

If I need to replace a set before they are tested or @3M replies? I will be buying Jim's filters based on that study.
And here we go.

@marigoldglitter showing the way by hitting the PPE company annual report.

PFAs in the majority of @DraegerNews products. So, Dragger....got PFAs in your respirators? If so, where?



Image
Image
Thank you @profahnhmc!

I've uploaded a copy to Google sheets. Anyone with this link can open it. NO write access granted.



Let's do an example - Aura. Pay attention, please, as I am not going to look up everyone's respirator.

docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d…
Click on 3 dots (the hamburger).
Click Find and Replace.
Type in aura OR the respirator number. To the right in tiny writing it shows 1/1.
If more then 1/2, click on little arrow to jump to each one.

Sorry, folks, we can see the 9211+ Aura is right there.

Scroll to the right


Image
Image
Image
Image
Columns D- F. Labels below.

Aura, 9211+ has "0.01 - 1%" as the "(#1) % PFAS Range"

F029-Flame retardant is the purpose.

Notice Column D?

That is "Date Product No Longer Contains Interntionally-Added PFAS (Reformulation/Discontinuation)".

The blank line means nothing
Image
Image
scheduled. I am sorry.

Not done yet.

Scroll to the right to column K, and check for another vendor, which is the second vendor involved.

Q is 3rd.
W is 4th.
AC is 5th
AI is 6th
AO is 7th

I presume that if there are multiple vendors, they fill in from the left. Image
Let's check for the Aura 9205.

After clicking on the down button, no 9205 is on this list by either Aura or 9205.

Neither is the 9200, the 8511, the Vflex 9105.

One caveat - it appears that 3M is in the process of discovery. The language used is careful to say they may add


Image
Image
Image
Image
more.

An script could be written to check on the most common respirators and alert if one is added. Just in case someone is feeling frisky.

Went to look for the 6000 series.
Tried 6000. Not clicking 2,070 times.

7000001934 is the MPN. It is NOT ON THE LIST.
Image
Image
So, does this work consistently?

I check the Secure Click FF-802. Yes.

So, if you get too many results look for the "MPN" on web sites. 3M calls it the "SAP Product Code", column B.
Image
Image
So NOT ON THE LIST
6800 elasto,
8511
9200
VFLEX 9105

ON THE LIST
Aura, 9211+

HF-800 secure click not on the list - but many of the filter cartridges are. ("Secure Click").
I WILL NOT BE LOOKING UP ANYBODY'S RESPIRATORS.

Please do not ask me. Please ask each other. Please help each other.

I have not eaten breakfast due to pounding on this, and it is 5 pm.

Waffles for dinner because why not.
@crwequine Just added to the thread how to check the 26K long list of products.
How the heck did @profahnhmc spot this?

Bravo!

(pfas.3m .com/ pfas_uses ) -shove those words together.


contains the sentence "To learn more about 3M products that use PFAS*, click here."

pfas.3m.com/pfas_uses


Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lazarus Long

Lazarus Long Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LazarusLong13

Jul 31
A TLDR of Dr. Fauci and Trump on masks, using the Fauci journal, and other sources.

BY January 28, 2020 (so could have been earlier), Trump knew COVID was airborne, deadly, spread 50% asymptomatically, and impacted children.

There were only 5

cnn.com/2020/09/09/pol…Image
Image
cases in America.

Make no mistake about that. The buck stops with Trump.

If he had shared that information, then thousands fewer would be dead. So much less LongCovid.

Anyway.....
On January 22, 2020 the last America-based mask manufacturer contacted the Trump administration letting them know he was selling out masks, but he could start up his moth-balled lines.

@RickABright fought the good fight, and paid the penalty

archive.is/gQMBiImage
Read 28 tweets
Jul 1
Danny Glover got his Alzheimer's diagnosis shortly after January 2022, and it just came out today.

While he has not directly said COVID caused it, this is a good opportunity to talk about a few studies and why you should N95 up to avoid #AirborneAlzheimers.

#AirborneAlzheimers? Danny Glover speaks about his Alzheimer’s diagnosis
In a massive study of 6 million people, 6,245,282, "....people with COVID-19 were at significantly increased risk for new diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease within 360 days after the initial COVID-19 diagnosis.."

That is not causal, to be crystal clear.

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10…In this retrospective cohort study of 6,245,282 older adults (age ≥65 years) who had medical encounters between 2/2020–5/2021, we show that people with COVID-19 were at significantly increased risk for new diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease within 360 days after the initial COVID-19 diagnosis (hazard ratio or HR:1.69, 95% CI: 1.53–1.72), especially in people age ≥85 years and in women. Our findings call for research to understand the underlying mechanisms and for continuous surveillance of long-term impacts of COVID-19 on Alzheimer’s disease.
Do we even know if he ever caught Covid? No, but given the pressures of Hollywood, most likely he has.

Below are just a few pics from 2021, starting in March. He was unmasked quite often.

Public health failed him, because of politics (looking at Biden and Trump, both). Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 10 tweets
Jun 10
Please explain how a study measuring physical improvement in a Cognitive and Behavioral study can have unmeasured Graded Exercise Therapy - and be considered as well-controlled. Not confounded.

So, I emailed Dr. Ebell and asked how that was nitpicking. Image
Image
I also agreed with the comments at the bottom of the study, linked below.

If you change analysis protocols post hoc? That's not nitpicking in my book. But maybe that is nitpicking?

jamanetwork.com/journals/jaman…
Science is ALL about nitpicking. You ARE SUPPOSED to be very detailed, so you can be replicated, right? Alan is funny.

Anyway, amusing to spot the lobbying group for the Lightning Process on their advisory board.

Tch tch. Or is that nitpicking. ;) ? Image
Read 7 tweets
Jun 1
A thread on airborne Ebola - the rest is accurate.

Let me emphasize that I agree far more than disagree with her, in general.

Declaring a thing debunked without actually debunking it, with facts, is not debunking.

So, let me debunk this. Image
Dr. Kuppila has excellent credentials, and has earned her laurels.

If we accepted the debunking of airborne Ebola on the basis of credentials, we would have given into the fallacy of appeal to authority.

:) not today.

She worked in an Ebola Treatment Unit in Sierra Leone,
coming back in December 2014, and now resides in Dallas per her very interesting StatNews article:



She did not get infected. We could have survivorship bias here - fortunately.

This is a reference to possible surgical mask usage by her.

You see, the web.archive.org/web/2026052103…Image
Read 22 tweets
May 28
Ebola - it's not all about respiratory aerosols.

DYK that you, and me, and everybody are Pig Pen from Charlie Brown?

We shed our entire outer layer of skin every 2-4 weeks, about 500 million cells daily.

Your corneocytes (outermost cells) lift off of your body with the
gentlest of micro-air currents. Like a leaf picked up off the ground for the briefest of moments in fall.

They act like 12 micron aerosols in float time, but 25% of total skin flakes are sub 5 microns...and you know what that means. Deep deposition - or shallow as
sub 5 likes to also deposit in the nose.

It's funny...I embrace push-back in debate. Tightens up my game.

Imagine if those skin flakes now have Ebola on them?

Two studies show that Ebola literally oozes through the skin - both ways. In and out.

Not shown in vivo, but
Read 10 tweets
May 23
The WHO forbids contact tracers from masking or gloving up.

"Do not conduct home visits wearing personal protective equipment like masks, gloves, or
gowns."

It gets worse. Do not conduct home visits wearing personal protective equipment like masks, gloves, or  gowns.
They have a handy how to reduce risk of catching ebola at home.

It even has 5 masks listed on it.

But not for the other family members.

"7. If the patient has vomit, diarrhoea or bleeding, a mask or a dry towel wrapped around the face can be used to protect the nose and mouth Image
7. If the patient has vomit, diarrhoea or bleeding, a mask or a dry towel wrapped around the face can be used to protect the nose and mouth when touching the patient or items soiled with blood or body fluids. A waterproof gown, eye protection, gloves and rubber boots should also be worn in these circumstances.
Here are the 5 face masks. Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(