Source for all of this. I almost skipped this because I knew the firefighting gear was contaminated. But thought it was a little long for just one product.
Click on 3 dots (the hamburger).
Click Find and Replace.
Type in aura OR the respirator number. To the right in tiny writing it shows 1/1.
If more then 1/2, click on little arrow to jump to each one.
Sorry, folks, we can see the 9211+ Aura is right there.
Scroll to the right
Columns D- F. Labels below.
Aura, 9211+ has "0.01 - 1%" as the "(#1) % PFAS Range"
F029-Flame retardant is the purpose.
Notice Column D?
That is "Date Product No Longer Contains Interntionally-Added PFAS (Reformulation/Discontinuation)".
The blank line means nothing
scheduled. I am sorry.
Not done yet.
Scroll to the right to column K, and check for another vendor, which is the second vendor involved.
Q is 3rd.
W is 4th.
AC is 5th
AI is 6th
AO is 7th
I presume that if there are multiple vendors, they fill in from the left.
Let's check for the Aura 9205.
After clicking on the down button, no 9205 is on this list by either Aura or 9205.
Neither is the 9200, the 8511, the Vflex 9105.
One caveat - it appears that 3M is in the process of discovery. The language used is careful to say they may add
more.
An script could be written to check on the most common respirators and alert if one is added. Just in case someone is feeling frisky.
Went to look for the 6000 series.
Tried 6000. Not clicking 2,070 times.
7000001934 is the MPN. It is NOT ON THE LIST.
So, does this work consistently?
I check the Secure Click FF-802. Yes.
So, if you get too many results look for the "MPN" on web sites. 3M calls it the "SAP Product Code", column B.
So NOT ON THE LIST
6800 elasto,
8511
9200
VFLEX 9105
ON THE LIST
Aura, 9211+
HF-800 secure click not on the list - but many of the filter cartridges are. ("Secure Click").
I WILL NOT BE LOOKING UP ANYBODY'S RESPIRATORS.
Please do not ask me. Please ask each other. Please help each other.
I have not eaten breakfast due to pounding on this, and it is 5 pm.
Waffles for dinner because why not.
@crwequine Just added to the thread how to check the 26K long list of products.
How the heck did @profahnhmc spot this?
Bravo!
(pfas.3m .com/ pfas_uses ) -shove those words together.
contains the sentence "To learn more about 3M products that use PFAS*, click here."
How NOT to Science. A time travel thread and magic.
This is Helmut Traindl - the engineer who devised the procedure behind Walach CO2 study that was retracted after 16 days: jamanetwork.com/journals/jamap…
I looked at your thread @moog77 . The reason that epidemiological didn't work (cases continued to go up)? Is the same reason the 2023 Cochrane fails, ironically, after you touted it as the "gold standard."
Not because clean air doesn't reduce cases. It empirically does. It
Got a "oops, outside air can get you" study. Coming out of Beijing University of Technology - taking airborne transmission seriously.
They rented 50 rooms of a building. Did some very cool CFD work - then, be still my heart,
followed it up with tracer gas experimentation.
See room 303 above? 403 and 503 got whatever came out of 303.
With studies like these, there are so many variables. But, if I lived in an apartment, I would set have at least a PC fan CR Box next to those open windows.
Or an HRV set up in that window. And for sure a PC fan CR box next to the front door for under the door airflow.