Core PCE inflation came in above the Fed's target for the 4th straight month. But it moderated from Q1 and the elevation was entirely due to imputed portfolio fees resulting from the strong stock market.
About one-sixth of the PCE is imputed items, one notable one is portfolio fees which are treated as rising in price when the value of assets rise. Statistically market-based core PCE works better.
Before I go any further, here are all the numbers.
The elevation in inflation is not all housing. If you exclude housing core PCE is still well above 2% at every horizon--notably up at a 2.7% annual rate over the last six months.
(This also runs a little lower than PCE generally so that is more like 2.9% PCE growth.)
Moreover if you subtract housing and used cars it's a bit worse.
Here is core services excluding housing.
Overall I've been of the view that underlying inflation is in the 2.5 to 3% range. Nothing in these numbers would be inconsistent with that view. It is nice to see some improvement but when even the "good" months are a bit high & the "bad" months are way too high it's a problem.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On the surface a strong jobs report (130K jobs & unemployment falls to 4.3%).
And just about every detail makes it even stronger: participation up, involuntary part-time down, hours up, wages up.
The mystery of strong GDP and weak jobs is being resolved in the direction of GDP.
The job growth happened despite further cuts in federal jobs. Private employment was up an impressive 172K.
Note, breakeven job growth is currently about 25-50K because of reduced net immigration & also more fully recovered participation. So job growth has slowed but the unemployment rate now seems to have stabilized after slowly and steadily increasing since mid-2023.
I will be enthusiastically supporting faculty legislation to cap the number of A's at Harvard at 20% (plus a bit). The collective action problem that has driven grades higher & higher over time is increasingly problematic. I hope other institutions consider similar steps.
I've talked to numerous colleagues & students about grade inflation. Almost all of them see it as a a problem. I've also heard about as many different ideas for solutions as I've had conversations. I would tweak this proposal in various ways. But would support it over nothing.
One place the current system fails--and it's not the only place--is honors. I'm on the Committee to recommend honors in the economics department. It's increasingly hard to distinguish excellence with so many A's. I believe that now even two A-'s makes you ineligible for Summa.
Depending on how you look at it growth in Q3 was very very strong or very strong or just possibly merely strong. Annual rates:
GDP: 4.3%
Real final sales to domestic purchasers: 2.9%
Average of GDP & GDI: 3.4%
GDI: 2.4%
A big part of the story was consumer spending up at a 3.5% annual rate. Started the year looking weak but new data and revisions have made consumers very strong.
Business fixed investment a bit weaker but also very heterogenous. Equipment investment and IPP up but non-residential structures down for the seventh straight quarter.