I just released the first episode of my new show—Straight Down the Middle—where I take a look at the Trump Verdict and what it REALLY means from a constitutional perspective.
Straight Down the Middle — The Trump Verdict —Ep. 1
The Trump hush-money criminal trial verdict is in—and it's guilty. What does it mean? And what's next?
Professor of law at @YaleLawSch, one-time federal prosecutor, and constitutional law scholar.
-
@YaleLawSch For this who prefer to watch on 𝕏
Spend 23 minutes learning from Yale Law Professor @Jed_Rubenfeld to understand the basics of the Trump verdict, its flaws, the constitutional Issues, and the next steps.
ArtJonak/status/1798207491970675036
-
@YaleLawSch @Jed_Rubenfeld The case is mentioned at approximately 11 minutes intro the video.
U.S. v. Pirro
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. August Term, 1999
May 5, 2000
212 F.3d 86 (2d Cir. 2000)
@YaleLawSch @Jed_Rubenfeld Thank you for having me on, Michael!
Check-out my discussion with Michael Smerconish on his podcast where we discuss the Trump verdict and what it could mean going forward.
Jed_Rubenfeld/status/1798068445835350480
-
@YaleLawSch @Jed_Rubenfeld "It's A Dangerous Precedent." Michael was intrigued by a take on #Trump's #guilty #verdict that many may disagree with, so he took one last look at the #case with Yale #Law Professor @Jed_Rubenfeld.
smerconish/status/1798065346576032086
-
@YaleLawSch @Jed_Rubenfeld "It's A Dangerous Precedent": One last look at the Trump verdict with Yale Law Professor Jed Rubenfeld
@YaleLawSch @Jed_Rubenfeld Yale Law Prof @Jed_Rubenfeld breaks down Trump's guilty verdict, raising big issues: unclear charges, selective prosecution, and a non-unanimous verdict. Targeting your political opponents this way is a dangerous precedent to set.
RandPaul/status/1798381738718347348
-
@YaleLawSch @Jed_Rubenfeld I highly recommend watching Yale Law Professor analysis of @realDonaldTrump Guilty Verdict: 'There are some serious constitutional problems with this case'
GovMikeHuckabee/status/1798360646146506817
-
@YaleLawSch @Jed_Rubenfeld @realDonaldTrump Trump Guilty Verdict: “There are some serious constitutional problems with this case”
Yale Law Professor Jed Rubenfeld lays out the basics and problems of the verdict: “What exactly was Trump just found guilty of?”
@YaleLawSch @Jed_Rubenfeld @realDonaldTrump Surprisingly crisp analysis from a Yale Law professor of constitutional law
JTLonsdale/status/1798102583061410157
He is the husband of based Tiger Mom and buddy of @VivekGRamaswamy so no surprise he writes sense.
sorianojohnd/status/1798107146405765280
0
@YaleLawSch @Jed_Rubenfeld @realDonaldTrump @VivekGRamaswamy The remarkable part about the first-ever conviction of a former U.S. President is that the jurors were told they didn’t even have to agree on what the crime was. Beautifully explained by my friend
VivekGRamaswamy/status/1797690905664852220
-
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Title 18-CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I-CRIMES
CHAPTER 115-TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES
§2387. Activities affecting armed forces generally
This is really bad, and Dangerous to our Country. Their words cannot be allowed to stand.
SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR FROM TRAITORS!!! LOCK THEM UP??? President DJT
- Donald J. Trump
-
We want to speak directly to members of the Military and the Intelligence Community.
The American people need you to stand up for our laws and our Constitution.
Don’t give up the ship.
- Sen. Elissa Slotkin Michigan (D)
NOTE from me
The Democratic veterans in Congress who call out the service members to disobey orders will not be penalized for free speech.
The service members who disobey orders will face consequences and penalties.
Rapper Nicki Minaj thanks President Trump for standing up for persecuted Christians in Nigeria, declares that "faith is under attack in way too many places."
Minaj delivered the speech at the United Nations.
"For the rest of my life, I will care if anyone anywhere is being persecuted for their beliefs."
- Collin Rugg
-
Tuesday at 1:30pm ET — I’m welcoming @NICKIMINAJ
to the U.S. Mission for a special event moderated by Harris Faulkner @FAULKNERFOCUS
on President Trump’s priority to combat religious violence and the killing of Christians in Nigeria.
Oversight Dems have received new emails from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate that raise serious questions about Donald Trump and his knowledge of Epstein’s horrific crimes.
- Oversight Dems
-
The images from Oversight Dems post above 🔼
Democrats intentionally redacted the name of the "victim" in the Epstein emails they released.
The unreacted version shows that it was Virginia Guiffre.
@CynicalPublius Yes, Google is misinterpreting the rules
“. . . information must be approved for public release by an appropriate authorizing official before it is released, even if it is unclassified."
This quote was fed into google.
-
I fed in the longer, complete quote
“. . . information must be approved for public release by an appropriate authorizing official before it is released by any military member, DoW civilian employee or contract employee, even if it is unclassified.”
- still misinterpreted
-
@CynicalPublius I believe that Google interprets this from an authoritative perspective. The authority is the mainstream press.
The press is using Google, and Google is parroting their thinking in answer.