BREAKING: New detailed report from the Times of London admits there is no evidence for the "mass rape" hoax fabricated and spread by the NYT, BBC, Guardian, AP and Reuters, and notes that Patten's own UN report confirms this and reiterates her call for an actual UN investigation
some important facts to highlight from this new report. The main claim of rape on October 7 which the NYT heavily relied on is from a deranged fantasy "testimony" by "Sapir", including cut off breasts and severed heads. The Times now confirms from Israeli police that she lied:
this piece by The Times is the first one I have seen in prestige Western media that accurately states both the highly limited nature, scope and content of Pramila Patten's UN report, which every other outlet keeps lying about, falsely saying it "confirms Hamas mass rape", and "found evidence of sexual violence/rape" by the evidentiary standard of an actual full legal investigation, both of which Patten herself confirms again are lies and falsehoods but the NYT, BBC, Reuters and AP keep repeating to launder their own "mass rape" hoax (see and ).
The AP just did this again recently in its report exposing the two Zaka hoaxers by constantly, over and over again, repeating these blatant lies about Patten's UN report "confirming Hamas mass rape" and "sexual violence/rape on October 7."
But now the Times confirms that Patten's report was not full, legal or investigative in nature, that she explicitly does not attribute any sexual violence/rape to Hamas, and that any case of sexual violence she says might have happened on October 7 is based on a low evidentiary threshold that does not meet the standard of an actual full legal investigation, and relies entirely on Israeli information and "eyewitnesses" like the aforementioned Sapir.
That is why she keeps calling for an actual investigation, which as the Times notes the Israeli regime keeps blocking.
I have been saying all this for months now (see ), and finally it has penetrated a mainstream prestige Western media outlet, confirming that all the others in the Western media and political class including the NYT, BBC and Guardian are blatant propagandist liars.
another important fact to highlight from the Times report is Israeli feminists admitting the Israeli regime has and continues to cynically weaponize the fabricated mass rape hoax to launder the ongoing Gaza genocide, and slogans like "Believe Israeli Women" are pure propaganda:
this is also the first time any prestige Western media outlet has admitted the blatantly racist nature of the mass rape hoax, although it only touches it lightly and does not go into the long history of its usage by settler-colonial powers against those they occupy and genocide:
another fact destroying the "mass rape" hoax as fabricated and laundered by the BBC in particular, in an article that remains the first result when you search for "Hamas rape". The Times now reports the person the BBC cites as a credible source, Cochav Elkayam-Levy, is a hoaxer:
again, all of this was already exposed by outlets like Mondoweiss, Electronic Intifada, Grayzone and people like myself, as we are smeared by Zionist propagandists who fabricated and spread the "mass rape" hoax. Now prestige media is starting to admit it
this is the typical cycle of genocidal atrocity propaganda by the Western media class. It's part of the propaganda system. They fabricate hoax lies, use it to justify and launder mass murder, beheadings and actual rape, then go "ok it was all bullshit":
there are countless examples of this, including with the "mass rape" atrocity propaganda hoax. The same Western media and political class scum who fabricated and spread it to launder the ongoing Gaza genocide als utilized it to destroy Libya:
The Times also confirms after themselves hiring an Israeli company to do their own investigation that there is no physical, video or photo evidence for rape on October 7. Both the German Foreign Minister and Chancellor have repeated this lie in recent days
who else made the blatantly false claim, now also debunked by The Times alongside Haaretz and the UN, that video footage of rape exists, in an article that remains published on the @guardian site to this day with no corrections? Bethan McKernan:
in line with the UN and every human rights org The Times also rejects the forced tortured "confessions" the Israeli regime put out, which Sheryl Sandberg, the Guardian's Bethan McKernan and others keep citing as "evidence" for the "mass rape" hoax:
this is also very important: The Times investigation does not mention two other crucially important facts that we know from a recent Haaretz investigation, namely that there is zero physical evidence of sexual violence/rape on any of the October 7 bodies that were brought to the Shura base for investigation by forensic pathologists, and also those found at the Nova festival.
Now this already completely destroyed the New York Times, BBC, CNN, Reuters and AP articles on the "mass rape" hoax as they all cited specifically targeted systematic sexual violence and rape on bodies which they claim they verified in photos and from witnesses at the Shura base (see and ).
They lied. They outright lied, and the AP in its recent piece debunking the two Zaka hoaxers also repeated this lie (see ).
This is why The Times piece is important, because the Haaretz piece despite including the aforementioned two important facts still desperately tries to defend the hoax by relying on falsehoods that the Times piece exposes and debunks, namely by citing the forced tortured "confessions" as evidence, by blatantly lying about the Patten report "confirming Hamas mass rape" and being a "full legal investigation" which again The Times just disproved, and also lying about both the number of "witnesses" and their credibility, including of the now exposed and debunked by The Times "Sapir".
Now all of this is of course intentional. In every piece admitting that a core element of the "mass rape" hoax was fake, they have to still cling on to another part of it. So it is up to people like me to read them all carefully and piece it together and show how despite their desperate attempts to salvage parts of the hoax, it's over. There is no thing to salvage. There is no evidence for any of it.
if the Israeli rape-army is going to try to force Greta Thunberg and the other hostages they kidnapped in their illegal raid on the Madleen freedom flotilla to watch their doctored genocidal atrocity propaganda hoax video, then Hamas should force the Israeli rape-soldier prisoners to watch the clips of all the babies, children, girls, boys, women and men their fellow genocidal Zionist rape-soldiers behead, burn alive, tear apart, rape and murder on a daily basis
just put all the clips of the mass beheadings and burning alive and killings of Palestinian babies, children, girls, women and men that come out every day in front of them and force them to watch it with a gun to their head. I mean that's the Israeli standard, so let's apply it
btw of course the entire Western media class, BBC, Guardian, AP, Reuters, Washington Post, they're all running with that line. OMG THATS SO EPIC AND CLEVER, OMG, THEYRE GOING TO FORCE GRETA THUNBERG AND THE OTHER HOSTAGES THEY KIDNAPPED TO WATCH THEIR ATROCITY PROPAGANDA HOAX VIDEO.
But when you apply that standard to the Israeli rape-soldier prisoners, they break down and start hysterically crying, OMG NO THATS PSYCHOLOGICAL AND EMOTIONAL TORTURE, OMG NO, NO THATS A WAR CRIME, OMG NO.
They're all depraved genocidal Zionist scum of the lowest kind.
Bernie Sanders and his wife went to Ireland recently and threw out anti-genocide protesters from their event because they asked him to accept what Amnesty, Human Rights Watch, the UN and every major human rights org have said: That it's an Israeli genocide, not "Netanyahu's war"
Bernie Sanders continues to angrily mock and smear those who recognize the genocide. In interviews he says "what, so now 8 people get killed and that's a genocide?!?" But he immediately accepted that Russia and China are doing genocide. He's a Zionist liar and genocide denier
to be absolutely clear: It is inconceivable that Bernie Sanders and his wife would dare deny a genocide recognized by Amnesty, Human Rights Watch and the UN in any other context. They would not dare. They only do it for their precious Israel.
Ihab Hassan just deleted his original post saying UNRWA warehouses are Hamas and reposted it keeping the genocidal Zionist propaganda that Hamas shot and killed people even though it was Israeli-armed death-squads. Even Grok fact-checked his lies. This is Owen Jones' fav account
Ihab Hassan knows that all those in his replies and all those promoting his genocidal Zionist propaganda are Israeli regime assets and propagandists. He's just doing his job. Owen Jones knows it too, and he has made at least a million pounds off of his "anti-genocide activism"
that post Ihab Hassan made with the genocidal Zionist hoax lie fabricated to launder the ongoing starvation and mass murder of Palestinian babies, children, girls, boys, women and men was immediately swarmed by all the big Zionist accounts. It will get over a million views by the end of the day.
Again, ask yourself this very simple question: Why did Owen Jones singlehandedly create Ihab Hassan's social media account into what it is today by constantly promoting him since October 7 and up to this very day even though he knows all this about that account and the role it plays in the Zionist propaganda ecosystem?
Why did a person who turned his entire persona about being anti-genocide and how you need to hold every person in media accountable and you must name and shame, NAME AND SHAME!!!, why did he create and keeps promoting and building one of the largest Zionist media propaganda genocide-laundering machines online?
If you ask that question, you will know who and what Owen Jones really is.
how is Zionist propaganda laundering the ongoing genocide fabricated, disseminated and laundered, and how does Owen Jones play a key role in that process? Here is case study from just the past hour.
Ihab Hassan is now one of the most prominent Israeli regime Zionist genocide-launderers, and he does it by hiding it behind Palestinian-face. Here he is spreading the Zionist propaganda line that UNRWA warehouses are actually Hamas and Israeli armed and backed criminal gangs are also Hamas, thereby justifying the starvation and attacks on them and ensuring that the genocidal starvation policy will continue.
Owen Jones has been promoting Ihab Hassan since the genocide began, as he sees him as the "good Palestinian", the good gusano slave boy who "condemns Hamas" and supports a two-state solution and loves the UAE and Saudi Arabia and is paid by them. He's a good little boy, well-behaved, the kind of "Palestinian" Owen Jones doesn't block like he has done with countless, but the one he constantly promotes, to this very day, even though he knows that Israeli regime officials use him as one of their main propaganda assets to launder their genocidal lies.
Why? Why would Owen Jones, who has made it his public persona over the past year or so that he's this epic based radical anti-genocide activist, singlehandedly create a Zionist propaganda asset that is daily laundering the genocide?
I'll leave it up to you to decide why someone can be such an odious depraved scumbag.
If you ask me, it's pretty simple. Owen Jones knew full well that anti-genocide sentiments were not only the standard position on the left, but among the broad public, and if he went against that it would be the end of the his career, based as it was on a pseudo-radical persona who launders the Guardian's genocidal propaganda by giving it a radical sheen and allowing them to get away with it, as David Graeber pointed out: x.com/zei_squirrel/s…
Owen Jones has never said a single word about the genocidal propaganda fabricated and spread by his Guardian colleagues like Bethan McKernan, who produced the most deranged version of the genocidal atrocity propaganda rape hoax.
He did not defend his Guardian colleague Steve Bell when he was fired for a cartoon of Netanyahu. He did not defend another one of his Guardian colleagues who had his article deleted because it humanized Palestinians too much.
Why? Because if Owen Jones does that, his lucrative Guardian sinecure is ended, and he can't have that.
No, he wants to keep his Guardian money, and he wants to continue to play the role of the genocide-launderer in chief for them.
That's his sole purpose in life, it's his entire social being's function: I play the radical on TV and on social media, then I write columns for the Guardian and I launder your genocidal Zionist propaganda as actually being legitimate and important "Serious Journalism", because hey, they have Owen Jones writing for them, and he's a real radical!
Owen Jones has always been one of the most odious cunt scumbags alive, and I will never stop pointing this out as he thinks he's hiding in plain sight promoting odious genocidal Zionist propaganda assets like Ihab Hassan to this very day.
Owen Jones blocked me when I exposed him for being a huckster liar spreading genocidal Zionist propaganda and it is instructive to read the entire thread to see the depravities he's desperate to hide so he can keep creating Zionist assets like Ihab Hassan:
Piers Morgan is one of the most depraved genocidal Zionist propagandists, and in that he is the perfect reflection of the entire Western media and political class, from the NYT to the BBC, AP and Guardian. Here he is being exposed for spreading the 40 beheaded babies hoax:
Piers Morgan is also a gleeful genocidal Zionist rape hoaxer, and he is so shameless that he spreads the hoax while defending actual Zionist pedophile rapist Alan Dershowitz as he calls him his very good friend. Morgan himself was associated with Epstein's pedo ring:
everything being done by the Trump admin now to push the "turn on Israel/Netanyahu" line is pure misdirection aimed at re-establishing the element of surprise ahead of the imminent attack on Iran, which requires both a sustained air bombardment and a ground operation at the nuclear sites.
For the attack to have at least some chance of success, it is essential for the element of surprise to be re-established. The fake "negotiations" in Oman with the Iranians, the demotion of Watlz, the whining about "neo-cons" like in the Saudi Arabia speech, the fake "defeat" against the Houthis and all the fake "leaks" about how Trump is really very angry and feels betrayed by Netanyahu, are all intentionally designed to create a feeling of passivity among the Iranians and the belief that the attack may not actually happen.
Netanyahu's trips to DC was where they decided to adopt this strategy, and then immediately thereafter it was launched and the "Trump turn on Israel" propaganda began in full swing. The entire media class is of course playing along with it, with their "anonymous sources" giving them "leaks" that establish and launder the narrative.
Trump's trip to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf puppet regime is aimed at shoring up support among the US-NATO-Israeli empire's "Arab shield", and consolidate the inclusion of Syria's Erdogan-Jolani fascist puppets into it ahead of the attack.
As they have been desperately trying to re-establish the element of surprise with bullshit meaningless rhetoric, these are the actual material things that are being done to set up the preparations for the attack.
Trump's Zionist enforces have been heavily involved in Lebanon, demanding they do more and more to destroy Hezbollah and prevent its ability from being a deterrent against an attack. Again, Syria plays a crucial role in this, which is why they have now formally integrated it into the US-NATO-Israeli empire. This is not only to eliminate the land corridor between Iran and Hezbollah, but also to have the ISIS-fascist proxies serve as an attack force against them in the case they get involved, with an invasion of Lebanon from the East being threatened.
Similar moves are being made in Iraq, with Trump's Zionist enforcers demanding the state crack down on paramilitary forces that are not beholden to the US-NATO-Israeli empire but instead aligned with the Axis of Resistance.
What about the Houthis? The Trump Zionist regime realized that the bombing campaign by itself would not be sufficient to destroy them, and they needed to make preparations for a ground invasion with the aid of its Gulf proxies, the UAE and Saudis chief among them. To help establish the misdirection narrative of the "Trump turn on Netanyahu", they decided to come out with the fake leaks about how what was always intended to be a temporary withdrawal was actually part of the "distancing" between the US and Israel.
They will re-launch that campaign with the ground invasion in concert with the attack on Iran, or perhaps even earlier.
The Trump regime already made the decision before it came into office that the "Axis of Resistance", meaning the only material force in the region that withstands genocidal Zionist Israeli and broader US-NATO imperial hegemony, has to be destroyed by military means and that now is the perfect time to do it because, so the propaganda line goes, Hezbollah and Hamas have both been defeated and so are no longer deterrents, and Iran has shown itself to be a paper tiger that talks a tough game with red lines and operation true promises, but then never follows through so is fundamentally risk-avert and unwilling to retaliate with the required force which it certainly possesses.
This btw is another propaganda line they keep repeating, which is totally deranged and pure Mossad-CIA propaganda: The claim that Israel actually managed to destroy most if not all of Iran's air defenses and rocket building capacities in its pathetic irrelevant attack that in reality had zero effect on anything.
Yet if you read the NYT (Ronen Bergman the Mossad asset), BBC, Washington Post, CNN, AP, Reuters, Guardian, it is now accepted truth that Israel has already destroyed Israel's defenses, and so any attack on Iran will be easy, involves very little risk, and they'll be too weak to respond.
This btw is how the CIA-Mossad approached Trump with their war plan and got him to accept it.
This is of course the irony: To successfully establish deterrence, you have to show that you are willing to go to war. If you instead impose red lines and they keep being broken and you don't even follow through with what you said were the appropriate responses even below the level of an all-out war, like the bombing of Tel Aviv in exchange for the bombing of Beirut, then you have lost all deterrent value. You have convinced the other side that you are weak.
Iran's fundamental mistake was that they kept seeing their red lines being violated, and then they didn't follow through on what they themselves had said would be the response. The same with Hezbollah.
This is why Israel was emboldened enough to assassinate Nasrallah. They have admitted that they delayed it for a very long time because they were afraid of Hezbollah and Iran's response. Then they did the assassinations of Haniyeh, Fuad Shukr, and there was nothing. They did nothing. They just whined. They just posted videos of drone footage over Israeli military bases. And now Nasrallah is gone and they are tightening the noose around Lebanon and proceeding with its full integration into the US-NATO-Israeli empire.
take note that the entire Western media and political class, including all the pseudo-radicals, the "experts", the epic based "Israel critics", the Intercept and Drop Site writers, the Murtazas who btw is sincerely the dumbest motherfucker alive, are all going along with the "Trump turn on Israel" propaganda. They're either doing it because they're just as in the aforementioned case plainly stupid and always follow the herd (more on that here: x.com/zei_squirrel/s…), they believe whatever is published in the NYT and Washington Post and Guardian and always follow the State Department line as filtered through the liberal media class, or because they're intentionally part of the misdirection propaganda campaign, as is the case with Mossad asset Ronen Bergman at the New York Times (more on him here: x.com/zei_squirrel/s…).
These are the same people who went along with the "Trump turned on Netanyahu and got a real ceasefire!" bullshit in January. And of course when it predictably turned out to have been a misdirection ploy to get the "civilian" prisoners out and also try to identify the locations of the resistance through that process (both from debriefing the prisoners and the drones constantly hovering above), and they immediately went back to the genocide exactly as I said they would all along: x.com/zei_squirrel/s…
Now of course there are zero consequence for media class hacks when they go along with propaganda like this and they are all proven wrong because that's their function. They don't even admit they were wrong, they just pretend like their current participation in manufacturing consent is actually based on real deep insights and expertise and knowledge.
It's based on nothing other than being fucking hacks.
You'll see when the US launches its war all these people will again face zero consequences for having participated in the misdirection campaign, and start pontificating about the real meaning and significance of it as if they had known it would happen all along.
see also this recent thread where I made the same point: x.com/zei_squirrel/s…. Now what if my seeing through this blatantly obvious, just hilariously transparant bullshit fake "leaked" stories of "OMG LOOK AT US, WE ARE SO ANGRY AT NETANYAHU, OMG LOOK AT THIS EPIC LEAKED STORY IN WAPO AND WSJ AND NYT ABOUT HOW ANGRY WE REALLY ARE!" was actually incorrect and there is a real "Trump turn on Israel/Netanyahu"?
Well first of all, the standard for determining that is not the countless bullshit fake "leaks" you will see coming out in the next period that are nothing but empty words, rhetoric, meaningless whining, the purpose of which I have already explained.
The standard in actually determining that has happened is material action. Real, material action. And in this case, that means that there is an actual Iran deal that prevents a war, which will by necessity include a cessation of what is a war going on now by the US-NATO-Israeli Lebanese proxy "state" against Hezbollah and also the same in Iraq and Yemen, and also in Gaza with Hamas.
That will mean that an actual "permanent ceasefire" has been established between the US-NATO-Israeli empire and the Axis of Resistance, and there will be no war, at least not in the short-term, by which I mean by the end of this year.
Now if that happens, it means that the Zionist US-NATO-Israeli empire is actually much weaker than I had assumed it to be, as it had determined that it is incapable of fighting a war with Iran, and it was convinced that an attack on its nuclear sites would lead to a war given Iran's retaliation to it.
But so far I have only been wrong in the other direction, in overestimating the deterrent capacities of Iran and the Axis of Resistance, which has turned out to be much weaker than I had thought it to be, and that was based solely on the unwillingness of Iran to actually follow through on its own stated claims, not due to any lack in material capacities. Btw, the Mossad was definitely behind the killing of Iran's president too, and that entire list of deranged Israeli actions just went completely unanswered. They even participated in covering up the killing of their own president because they didn't want to have to be forced into actual retaliation by admitting it was Mossad.
Yeah, that's actually pretty shocking. I was wrong there, and I admitted I was wrong in the wake of Nasrallah's assassination which was the direct result of this.
And this only strengthens my view that the US-NATO-Israeli empire will definitely imminently attack Iran, and actually, I'm not even sure that Iran would follow through on its red line and do a real retaliation to it.
It's very possible they will just do another bullshit symbolic "True Promise" strike and leave it at that, in which case it's just over. To be fair, it was pretty much already over with the assassination of Nasrallah and the lack of any real response to that, but by that point you can just accept that there is no such thing as an "Axis of Resistance" and that Iran has been decisively defeated as a counter-force to US-NATO-Israeli Zionist hegemony in the region of any significance.