In an Insta post, UN Women claims that “anti-rights movements” – its deceptive label for sex-based rights campaigners – are on the rise
UN Women claims campaigners are putting “the lives of LGBTIQ+ people at risk” – a dangerous and irresponsible statement that has been refuted time after time
UN Women also says women’s-rights campaigners use “hateful propaganda and disinformation to target LGBTIQ+ people”....
… and that opponents of gender-identity ideology “falsely portray” the rights of LGBTIQ+ people as competing with women’s rights
UN Women absurdly denies that “trans women” – men who ID as women – can pose a threat to the rights, spaces and safety of “cisgender” women
UN Women signposts followers to an “explainer” that is full of gender-identity propaganda and misinformation:
“Trans rights” – men’s demands to ID as women – are obviously incompatible with women’s rights. To conceal this, UN Women conflates the absurd claim that people can change sex with rights for LGB people
It is outrageous to call women’s-rights campaigners opposing a global tidal wave of gender-identity ideology an “anti-rights movement”. UN Women does NOT stand up for women
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Show your support for the brave journalists who covered the subject before Cass made it less risky to do so, and the editors who stood up against ideological capture
- Promote human rights where they relate to biological sex
- Advance education about sex and the law
- Promote the sound administration of the law in relation to sex and equality in the law.
On Monday, I went to an event at University College London, together with Shelley Charlesworth from Transgender Trend. Professor Davina Cooper was presenting on the findings of the Future of Legal Gender research project…
…which received £750,000 in public funding from the Economic and Social Research Council.
Cooper talked about how the project had set out with big ambitions to influence government policy to “decertify” sex and gender, but by the time it ended she was framing it somewhat despondently in terms of envisioning “utopias”.
Now @DHSCgovuk claims '@NHSEngland moved away from WPATH guidelines more than 5 years ago"
@NHSEngland said: "While we are aware of WPATH standards... these do not determine NHS policy."
Scottish Government says @NHSScotland do not have a working relationship with WPATH
WPATH’s influence is all over the NHS
- 2013 govt guide to gender dysphoria services informed by WPATH SOC
- Bernadette Wren, Director at the Tavi told parliament treatment protocols are based on WPATH "almost universally observed in Europe.”
- NHS’s Contract for GIDS repeatedly refers to WPATH SOC up to 2024
- Sandyford clinic in Scotland tells adult patients: “Your treatment will be monitored & run in accordance w WPATH SOC ”
- @gmcuk @TheBMA @rcpsych informed by WPATH standards
-Gendered Intelligence, Mermaids, Stonewall and GIRES promote WPATH as the only acceptable approach.