Sex Matters Profile picture
Jun 14, 2024 9 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Breaking: @UN_Women says gender-critical activists are an “anti-rights movement” 🧵

@DerryBanShee in @thetimes:

“It’s a sad day when UN Women lectures women’s rights campaigners on the need to include men with transgender identities in our work.”

thetimes.com/uk/society/art…
In an Insta post, UN Women claims that “anti-rights movements” – its deceptive label for sex-based rights campaigners – are on the rise Image
UN Women claims campaigners are putting “the lives of LGBTIQ+ people at risk” – a dangerous and irresponsible statement that has been refuted time after time Image
UN Women also says women’s-rights campaigners use “hateful propaganda and disinformation to target LGBTIQ+ people”.... Image
… and that opponents of gender-identity ideology “falsely portray” the rights of LGBTIQ+ people as competing with women’s rights Image
UN Women absurdly denies that “trans women” – men who ID as women – can pose a threat to the rights, spaces and safety of “cisgender” women Image
UN Women signposts followers to an “explainer” that is full of gender-identity propaganda and misinformation:

unwomen.org/en/news-storie…
“Trans rights” – men’s demands to ID as women – are obviously incompatible with women’s rights. To conceal this, UN Women conflates the absurd claim that people can change sex with rights for LGB people
It is outrageous to call women’s-rights campaigners opposing a global tidal wave of gender-identity ideology an “anti-rights movement”. UN Women does NOT stand up for women

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sex Matters

Sex Matters Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SexMattersOrg

Jul 31
The post-tribunal coverage is rolling in… 🧵

Another bundle exclusive, this time from @justinbowie1997 @thecourieruk on Sandie’s requests if she wins

thecourier.co.uk/fp/politics/52…
“The 10 most jaw-dropping moments in Sandie Peggie tribunal” reported by @_RebeccaMcCurdy in @heraldscotland

heraldscotland.com/news/25354001.…
“I don't have any bad feelings about trans people, I just don't believe they should be in the women's changing room”
@libby_brooks quotes Sandie Peggie in a report on the final days of the tribunal for @guardian
theguardian.com/society/2025/j…
Read 5 tweets
Jul 23
Bumper daily coverage of Sandie Peggie’s tribunal continues 🧵

Sandie Peggie’s daughter hits back at NHS Fife manager’s claim mum didn’t like her being gay @alasdair_clark @thecourieruk
thecourier.co.uk/fp/politics/52…
NHS medics accused of hiding email in Peggie tribunal @andrewlearmonth @heraldscotland
heraldscotland.com/news/25333743.…
NHS Fife bosses accused of 'deliberately withholding' key documents from Sandie Peggie tribunal @daview96 @ScotExpress scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/politics/…
Read 8 tweets
Jul 18
Update from Maya!

The tribunal of Sandie Peggie v NHS Fife resumed this week, and I am in Dundee to watch some of the hearing, with Sandie and her family, and with supporters from Scotland and beyond.Image
Many more have been following online, reading @tribunaltweets or watching the daily reports by Dr Michael Foran:
I first heard about Sandie’s case in January 2024, when @JNHanvey sent Sex Matters a message:

“Hi folks, I have a constituent who has been a staff nurse in our local A&E for over 20 years. She has been suspended for requesting privacy in the changing room. She’s premenopausal and found herself in a bit of a bind. A doctor who is a trans-identifying man refused to give her privacy and claimed her request was bullying. Many colleagues share her concerns, but are too frightened to say anything. Looks like her employer is misinformed of the law and her union RCN appears to be offering very weak support.”
Read 23 tweets
Jul 15
We have received a letter from @scotgov’s Director of People offering a meeting.

It has put its Trans and Non Binary Equality and Inclusion policy under “active review”.

The policy is clearly unlawful, and exposes female staff to harassment 🧵
sex-matters.org/posts/updates/…
The @EHRC has said that duty-bearers should not delay in acting following the Supreme Court’s clarification of the meaning of sex in law.

Despite this, the Scottish Government has written to us saying that it does not agree that it is “appropriate or straightforward to take immediate steps” to bring its policies in line with the law.
Extraordinarily, one of the reasons it gives for not acting swiftly is that the @GoodLawProject is bringing a legal challenge against the @EHRC for its interpretation of the workplace regulations.
Read 7 tweets
Jul 8
Our pressure on @scotgov is hitting the headlines 🧵

“It simply needs to confirm that it accepts the court’s ruling in practice, and to revoke its previous guidance... Nothing more needs to change — except the security and peace of mind for women using the facilities.”

@iainmacwhirter @thetimes on our second letter before action

thetimes.com/uk/scotland/ar…Image
Front pages of @TheScotsman and @heraldscotland

🔵 scotsman.com/news/politics/…
🔵 heraldscotland.com/news/25289100.… Image
Image
It was covered by Neil Pooran for PA Media so ran widely across national and regional newspapers not only in Scotland but the wider UK.
thenational.scot/news/national/…
Read 7 tweets
Jun 12
What @LawDisorderShow (with @HelenaKennedyKC @LordCFalconer and Nicholas Mostyn) got wrong about the FWS judgment 🧵

Naomi Cunningham (@legalfeminist) sets them right 👇 Image
Baroness Kennedy expresses surprise that the Supreme Court hasn’t grappled with the problem of discrimination by perception.

Falconer later explains how discrimination by perception works: a matter dealt with fully and lucidly in the judgment at paragraphs 249–250.
Mostyn says “the actual decision affects only a very small number of people,” and points out that only about 8,000 individuals hold a GRC.

This misses the point. The numbers don’t greatly matter: it only takes one man in a supposedly women-only space to render it mixed-sex.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(