The train between Rome and the airport where the idea for this conference emerged is called Leonardo Express #brilliantideatrain
Second time I see @vestager live, first time was at the 2019 special advisors conference - thinking of Heike (met her on train back to the airport with her and discussed ecosystems)
"Casually call contestability" - not like economists define it, of course
This is the 6th non-compliance procedure - love the reference to compliance by design BTW
Also: first preliminary findings - due to Apple's non-compliance with the anti-steering rule - anything else 😉? Now we understand a bit better Friday's rather "desperate" announcent
Anything about 102 draft Guidelines?
No "compliance stamp" - if you comply with the DMA, you don't get a non-compliance decision
"I'm surprised that we have those non-compliance cases" @vestager - compliance should be a badge of honour also to gatekeepers
@vestager Second question about the alleged "reverse Brussels effects" - not really, says @Vestager - what happened with regard to AI might raise a big Q mark for the rest of the world
@vestager DMA Zeitgeist 😊
@vestager "We have no reservation to go to structural remedies"
@vestager "By sending preliminary findings, the Commission informs Apple of its preliminary view that the company is in breach of the DMA" ec.europa.eu/commission/pre…
@vestager "Beta testing" - testing compliance, but the Commission isn't the "developer" - not dictating how you do it
@vestager [Well, and this is me ;-) - Guidelines are also part of the DMA's toolkit]
@vestager The first two #DMAfans on Plenary I are the European @Spotify and @GetyourGuide [as an inspiring tourist guide when I retire, please the latter behave fairly also once you, as you wish, become a champion/gatekeeper]
Quite a lot of DMA groupies and deluded academics in the room today, as Cristina Caffarra would call us 😉
Chief @Meta policy person turned MEP enthusiastic about interoperability - great @1Br0wn
@vestager @Spotify @GetYourGuide [Oops - inspired by Italian/European heritage and aspiring to making it better known to tourists visiting us]
Google Travel is already dead because of the DMA [but the "wall"]
@vestager @Spotify @GetYourGuide Positive effect of the DMA - interoperability by design (at the AI service design phase, taking security into account) great @1Br0wn
And the wonders of real-time data portability of search data - underdiscussed great DMA provision - bravo Ian
Let's not buy into the argument that Big Tech isn't "able" to do it securely, 🙏@GetYourGuide (again, "compliance by design")
As DMA groupies, our vision for the future of digital is much more compelling than walled gardens (as @GetYourGuide put it) and Margrethe raises her head from the crochet work to look...
@GetYourGuide Cloud gatekeepers not yet designated - and Margrethe raises her head again...
Further pebble in Ian's shoe: iMessage.
Walled garden one level up and makes us pay for it, doubts whether this is clever from Google's side @GetYourGuide - investigated by the DMADreamTeam already
Tragic choice you have to make here among all promising breakout sessions 😱 - mine operating systems, and in good company
Quite liked the idea of an app store for public-use apps (i-vote in Estonia on desktop was 51% already, if I understood correctly)
Not talking about Apple, for once
Can Estonia negotiate with gatekeepers on security etc? Nope.
OS gatekeepers' house rules - and leading oftentimes to culs de sac - as the French say
...house rules also restraining innovation? Well, yes (not making it into the pitch, as @vestager would put it)
@vestager Apple guy in the room asked what he thought - but said not allowed to comment - which is fair.
@vestager Open door policy by the Estonian NCA - formally invited if you've something to tell them and other Baltic NCAs too - wow the European NCA South is also well represented by the @CNMC_ES
@vestager @CNMC_ES Alternative OSs - yes, let's discuss it (contestability ++). What do we need for it? Standards?
@vestager @CNMC_ES [Killing that type of OS competition was exactly the purpose of Android's anti-forking provision, if you remember girls and boys]
Art. 5(7) DMA-need to develop standards ro comply with it? Similar discussion we had with regard to what became Art. 7 (I wonder what is been right now said in the parallel breakout session)
Great audience of seasoned technologists - standards are difficult, don't rely on the industry's good will if you want to see them
"So far, this is exactly what we wanted" @AutoriteitCM agreed! Only the penne al pesto were a bit disappointing 😊
Slide for your classes
Temu qualitatively designated/incipient gatekeeper (there's a DMA provision also for the latter - unfinished paper somewhere - network effects) 🤔?
CEO of Murena, talked about the need for standards also our breakout session - I still remember @vestager pronouncing the work "forking" during the Google Android press conference (I was moved)
What do people want? Consumers' perspective, but in a rigged environment, where they have been trained/conditioned/patronized not to choose ("walled gardens") it's difficult to say, TBH
Not a business user representative, Vanessa @beuc (and also a podcast)
"We have seen choice screens before" @mozilla - learning from the mistakes of the past - but also the importance of friction...
@mozilla The "taxi driver to the conference" anecdote: how many rides do you need before you have the right one ;-)?
@mozilla Vanessa - make consumer choices count (and the scandal of dark patterns, aren't they already broadly prohibited BTW?)
@mozilla Of course, if interoperability and other DMA provisions work as they should, we would see many more alternatives consumers can choose from (also emerging from private/public partnerships, possibly 🤔 ?)
@mozilla Educational role by public authorities, reaching out to consumers, says Vanessa. Indeed, gatekeepers agree! Not a taxi driver anedcote, but a "motor bike in Rome on my way to the Colosseum": seeing daily a huge billboard telling me that walled gardens are a safe, green paradise
@mozilla Love the surprise appearance by @Andreas_Schwab
Wrong, Cristina 😱 - We've not been on a trance, but working and researching - and this event should finally convince you otherwise. Now let's finally tackle also Art. 102! competitionwave.blogspot.com/2024/06/heike-…
Online advertising services breakout session next - of course, one question at this point would be whether we need ad hoc regulation for the whole sector (not a popular opinion, I know)
Advantages in terms of transparency? It's complicated.
Google and Meta not "very cooperative" (cough) - data not coming in a way which is useful to recipients
[At some point, standards mentioned here as well]
Also, beta testing of compliance by Meta and Google - as mentioned by @Vestager I think - not happening
@vestager Breaking up v. transparency. What could work better, was the question.
@vestager Fun fact, investor to one of the Panelists asking a question.
@vestager And in the end, yes, big changes ahead because of how search is actually changing due to GenAI & Co. (how did the parallel breakout session go, BTW?)
@vestager Interestingly, my Dutch relatives use tomtom as a verb - now keynote by the CEO
@vestager [IMHO: This keynote embodying the Dutch spirit has been a juwel - we don't like dealing with regulators, we enjoy a good competitive fight, BUT
- EU is falling behind in tech, we need to step forward and make noise
- national politicians don't seem to be much concerned]
Plug and play/combine services, is the DMA enough asks @alissacooper ?
Federation of business users interested in DMA compliance mentioned (even Adam Smith would agree with it, I guess) but also of Civil Society organisations, if I may - this came a bit short, we need another conference for that ;-)
Final on FSM presenting a EU big public spending/industrial policy plan in digital as a (not very palatable) alternative (CC's caricaturised "vision"?) - well, many shades of grey there (strategically, private/public partnerships, frameworks, etc.)
Ciao/heading for a 🍻
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"The move to establish minimum standards builds on efforts in recent decades to write minimum security standards, especially in the energy industry, and Thursday’s document makes clear that similar measures are coming for other critical infrastructure sectors"
"Shape Market Forces to Drive Security and Resilience" – We will place responsibility on those within our digital ecosystem that are best positioned to reduce risk and shift the consequences of poor cybersecurity away from the most vulnerable..."
Reading Schwab's compromise amendments (Amazon/Apple later, @SebastianLouven ) - an hidden pearl is that "The Commission may also ask one or more competent national authorities to support its market investigation" - also a DPA, of course 🙂
Missing comma between health tracking and financial services (intriguing Recital 64)
And how not to love the possibility of interim measures "where a risk of serious and immediate damage for business users or end-users of gatekeepers could result from new practices that may undermine contestability of core platform services"?