"You don't have to focus on the sex stuff. There's more evidence that Trump gave a seat in cabinet to a man for no good reason other than to thank him for the Epstein cover-up."
Arrant speculation. Also old news.
(cont'd)
"It's not arrant speculation that Trump's family falsified receipts to cheat the government out of hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes."
Old news.
"It'll feel like new news because you ignored it at the time."
We gave it a day.
(cont'd)
"Trump used the same trick - false records - in all his many civil frauds, and also in the hush-money case that got him convicted of 34 felony counts by a jury!"
Complicated technicalities, you're boring me.
(cont'd)
"You want simple? Someone bravely defied a non-disclosure agreement to go on the record that Trump used the most vicious racial slurs on the set of The Apprentice."
Doubtful source.
"The 'suckers and losers' quote comes from an impeccable source."
Old news.
"But Trump denied the 'suckers and losers' quote only last week during the nationally televised presidential debate. He lied to the whole country!"
Not our job to fact-check every word he says.
"But you personally know it to be a lie."
Maybe we do, maybe we don't.
(cont'd)
"Okay, look, let's do it your way. What does interest you?"
Indications of cognitive decline.
"We've got millions of examples of Trump obviously off his rocker."
Right - he says crazy things all the time. Not news.
(cont'd)
"Are you telling me that the more often a candidate for president says addled, senile, crazy things - the less newsy it is?"
Not exactly. We also need a lot of background quotes about how his party is worried. If the party is cool with his dementia, we're cool with it.
"These rules don't seem on the level."
We're not the Supreme Court.
"The Supreme Court isn't on the level either."
Oh, now you're undermining confidence in our most sacred institutions. How is that different from Trump?
"Oh for God's sake, the wives of two justices supported - and one conspired in - Trump's Big Lie. I don't understand why you sat on the story for two years.
Leave families out of it.
"Biden's family too?"
We have to cover that, Trump's made a campaign issue of it.
(cont'd)
"I give up. Talk to me like I'm eight years old. How the hell do you explain what you're doing?"
We have to report equal numbers of bad things about each side.
It's not a settlement: There was no valid litigation because (as the judge said) Trump was suing himself.
On what basis is this money leaving the Treasury?
One branch of the Executive is ordering another branch to pay $1.8 billion to the president's friends with no authorization by Congress or courts - with a side order that president and his family henceforward set their own tax obligation on a purely voluntary basis, no scrutiny.
It's pure misappropriation, as if the president drove his truck to Fort Knox, loaded it with gold bars, and drove away.
In case you've forgotten, here are some of the things learned from the Trump tax returns leaked by a government contractor in 2020:
In 10 of the 15 years before Trump won the presidency, Trump paid no federal income tax. In 2016 and 2017, he paid $750. nytimes.com/interactive/20…
When Trump told voters in 2016 that he was "under audit," the audit concerned a $72.9 million tax refund that the IRS litigated as illegitimate. That litigation came to an end after Trump won the presidency. nytimes.com/interactive/20…
Trump made much more money from TV shows and licensing deals than from his core businesses. "Ultimately, Mr. Trump has been more successful playing a business mogul than being one in real life." nytimes.com/interactive/20…
So many people quote the famous line from Thucydides - "The strong can do what they can, and the weak must suffer what they must" - and forget that the amoral imperialists who used that line in the end lost their war and their empire.
Thucydides does not offer the line, "The strong do what they can," as a neutral analysis of how international affairs operate. He offers it as an expression of the reckless arrogance that brought about the destruction of the Athenian Empire.
The lesson to take is that no power is strong enough to disregard justice and legitimacy. Arrogant and aggressive states, no matter how strong, conjure an even stronger coalition of enemies against them. See Charles V, Louis XIV, Napoleon, the Second Reich, the Third Reich.
1) It's the law. The Department of Defense and Secretary of Defense were so named by the National Security Act amendments of 1949. Only Congress has the power to change the name. nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/28655…
2) It's commonsense. Not all national security threats take the form of outright wars. EG the US is not at war with the Houthis of Yemen, but it does defend sea traffic against Houthi terrorism. (Or anyway it tries to, if only the SecDef would quit blabbing operational details.)
While I was on CNN at 1 pm predicting that the Trump administration would use the Charlie Kirk murder as an excuse to deploy government power against peaceful and legal political competition in 2026 ...
... Vice President Vance and other Trump officials were simultaneously on Charlie Kirk's podcast vowing to use the murder as an excuse to deploy government power against peaceful and legal political competition in 2026. nytimes.com/live/2025/09/1…
1) The Trump administration is corrupt on scale almost beyond comprehending. If they lose control of Congress in 2026, they face all kinds of legal jeopardy. nytimes.com/2025/09/15/us/…
Government taking control of private companies ...
Supply shortages and price increases due to government attacks on free commercial exchange;
The government imposing huge fines on media corporations for First Amendment protected speech that displeased the president ...
Enormous tax increases imposed on Americans without any vote by Congress;
Violent convicted criminals released onto the streets because they directed their violence against persons the president targeted as his personal enemies ...