CrowdStrike, the cybersecurity company behind the global tech outage that grounded flights and forced hospital systems and banks offline, appears to be engaged in alleged anti-white, anti-male discrimination.
We’ve filed a federal civil rights complaint:
/2 The cybersecurity technology company openly states that “diversity” includes “diversity of gender, race [and] ethnicity.”
Accordingly, CrowdStrike uses this definition of diversity to describe that it unlawfully considers gender, race, and ethnicity, among other factors, when evaluating nominees to its board of directors.
/3 In accordance with its DEI goals, CrowdStrike has nine employee resource groups to “provide” training on diversity topics filled with implicit bias and also serve as “networking opportunities.” Yet these employee resource groups are solely based on race, sex, and sexual orientation. A few examples include: Women of CrowdStrike, Pride Team (LGBTQ), Team BELIEVE (Black employees), Communidad (Latina and Hispanic), and Embracing Equity.
/4 Notably, CrowdStrike does not have a resource group for “Men of CrowdStrike” or one for white employees.
/5 CrowdStrike also mentions that it runs a program called the “Women of CrowdStrike Mentorship Program,” which appears to provide mentorship opportunities on the basis of sex. No such program appears to exist for the mentorship of male employees.
/6 CrowdStrike's public proxy statement includes a “Board Diversity Matrix” that tracks the sex, gender identity, race, and ethnicity of its current directors and is used for accepting future board members.
By openly hiring to “build a diverse workforce,” instituting race and sex-based development resource groups, and creating a “Board Diversity Matrix,” CrowdStrike’s actions patently violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
/7 CrowdStrike’s Chief Human Resources Officer, J.C. Herrera, said, “I believe a diverse and equitable organization is key to our success, and we have a deep commitment to listening and learning to become a stronger, more inclusive organization where our people feel a sense of belonging. In fact, innovating through inclusion is a big part of our lives at CrowdStrike.”
/8 These diversity-motivated initiatives are featured prominently on CrowdStrike’s website, specifically highlighting “CrowdStrike’s commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion.”
/9 Under the header “Building a balanced workforce,” the website states that CrowdStrike has a “commitment to building a diverse workforce” and also “champion[s] inclusive recruitment initiatives.”
These diversity-motivated initiatives include “employee resource groups, internal development programs, allyship training, speaker series, networking opportunities… to create a workplace that reflects the diverse communities around us.”
/10 The promotion of DEI practices in the workplace is a direct violation of Civil Rights law and AFL will do everything in its power to stop these discriminatory actions. aflegal.org/america-first-…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
/1🚨LITIGATION UPDATE — AFL just filed a major motion for summary judgment in our landmark lawsuit challenging the 2020 Census and demanding accurate congressional representation for all Americans.
/2 Earlier this week, AFL added Rep. @ByronDonalds as a plaintiff in our lawsuit — expanding our coalition demanding election integrity and accountability.
/3 Today’s motion marks a critical next step toward ensuring equal representation under the law, urging the court to grant judgment in favor of our clients.
/1🚨BREAKING — Rep. @ByronDonalds is now a plaintiff in AFL’s landmark lawsuit challenging the 2020 Census.
The Census SKEWED population counts and STOLE representation.
Every American deserves to be counted AND represented.
/2 AFL, in partnership with Weber, Crabb & Wein, P.A., has filed an amended complaint adding Representative Donalds to our lawsuit to hold the U.S. Census Bureau accountable and protect states from losing representation through unlawful statistical methods.
/3 In addition, AFL has filed a response opposing a motion to intervene by parties represented by the @EliasLawGroup, further underscoring the stakes of this fight.
/1🚨 BREAKING: AFL has filed federal civil rights complaints against THREE Virginia localities for race-based discrimination.
AFL is requesting @CivilRights investigate:
-City of Alexandria
-City of Richmond
-Arlington County
/2 Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits race-based discrimination by entities receiving federal funding.
Title VII prohibits discrimination in employment.
These jurisdictions appear to be violating both.
/3 AFL’s complaint highlights how the City of Alexandra passed a resolution, which Alexandria’s Office of Race and Social Equity (RASE) describes as motivating the city’s commitment to “embedding racial and social equity into all city policies, programs, decisions, and environments.”
/1🚨BREAKING—AFL has filed a complaint with the Dept. of Education, urging an immediate investigation into Illinois’ new law forcing annual mental health screenings on children without parental consent—a clear violation of federal law and shocking expansion of state power.
/2 Illinois’ Public Act 104-0032 orders schools to screen kids in grades 3–12 for mental health issues at least once a year, starting in 2027.
No consent. No parental notice. Just the State interrogating children about their private emotions, family life, and home environment—and recording their answers in a government database.
/3 Under the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment, schools must obtain affirmative written parental consent before subjecting any child to any “survey, analysis, or evaluation” about their mental health or psychological condition.
Illinois’ new law ignores that requirement entirely.
/1🚨PROTECT YOUR CHILDREN — America First Legal just released a template letter that parents can use to opt out of radical classroom instruction and woke school policies.
/2 AFL’s letter enables parents to exercise their rights after the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Mahmoud v. Taylor.
The Court held that a school district violated parents’ rights by failing to provide notice and an opportunity to opt out before exposing children to radical LGBTQ storybooks.
/3 AFL’s letter also helps parents exercise their rights under the PPRA — a federal law that requires schools to give parents notice and an opportunity to inspect classroom materials.
/1🔎NEW — AFL has expanded its investigation into the City of Portland and the Portland Police Bureau.
We’re examining the bureau’s involvement with anti-ICE groups and Antifa — and whether it let radical demonstrators disrupt ICE operations, assault reporters, or shield Antifa.
/2 AFL has requested records to uncover how Portland officials may have enabled lawlessness — including by assisting anti-ICE groups in acquiring office space.
/3 This expands AFL’s ongoing investigation into the City of Portland, which previously uncovered its explicit inclusion of race as a central component of the city’s policing practices to achieve “equitable outcomes.”