CrowdStrike, the cybersecurity company behind the global tech outage that grounded flights and forced hospital systems and banks offline, appears to be engaged in alleged anti-white, anti-male discrimination.
We’ve filed a federal civil rights complaint:
/2 The cybersecurity technology company openly states that “diversity” includes “diversity of gender, race [and] ethnicity.”
Accordingly, CrowdStrike uses this definition of diversity to describe that it unlawfully considers gender, race, and ethnicity, among other factors, when evaluating nominees to its board of directors.
/3 In accordance with its DEI goals, CrowdStrike has nine employee resource groups to “provide” training on diversity topics filled with implicit bias and also serve as “networking opportunities.” Yet these employee resource groups are solely based on race, sex, and sexual orientation. A few examples include: Women of CrowdStrike, Pride Team (LGBTQ), Team BELIEVE (Black employees), Communidad (Latina and Hispanic), and Embracing Equity.
/4 Notably, CrowdStrike does not have a resource group for “Men of CrowdStrike” or one for white employees.
/5 CrowdStrike also mentions that it runs a program called the “Women of CrowdStrike Mentorship Program,” which appears to provide mentorship opportunities on the basis of sex. No such program appears to exist for the mentorship of male employees.
/6 CrowdStrike's public proxy statement includes a “Board Diversity Matrix” that tracks the sex, gender identity, race, and ethnicity of its current directors and is used for accepting future board members.
By openly hiring to “build a diverse workforce,” instituting race and sex-based development resource groups, and creating a “Board Diversity Matrix,” CrowdStrike’s actions patently violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
/7 CrowdStrike’s Chief Human Resources Officer, J.C. Herrera, said, “I believe a diverse and equitable organization is key to our success, and we have a deep commitment to listening and learning to become a stronger, more inclusive organization where our people feel a sense of belonging. In fact, innovating through inclusion is a big part of our lives at CrowdStrike.”
/8 These diversity-motivated initiatives are featured prominently on CrowdStrike’s website, specifically highlighting “CrowdStrike’s commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion.”
/9 Under the header “Building a balanced workforce,” the website states that CrowdStrike has a “commitment to building a diverse workforce” and also “champion[s] inclusive recruitment initiatives.”
These diversity-motivated initiatives include “employee resource groups, internal development programs, allyship training, speaker series, networking opportunities… to create a workplace that reflects the diverse communities around us.”
/10 The promotion of DEI practices in the workplace is a direct violation of Civil Rights law and AFL will do everything in its power to stop these discriminatory actions. aflegal.org/america-first-…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
/1🚨BREAKING — Our investigation has revealed that Senate staff appear to have shared sensitive FBI background investigation reports on nominees for Senate confirmation in beach of security protocols.
The background investigation process is broken and corrupted:
/2 Based on newly obtained documents from an investigation into the DOJ, we released a report for the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate concerning explosive new discoveries about the FBI’s flawed and unlawful background investigation (BI) process for nominees to positions that require Senate confirmation.
/3‼️Today’s investigative report reveals that Senate Judiciary Committee staff appear to have shared FBI background reports and personal financial information in breach of Senate security protocols. Worse, the Department of Justice appears to have shared encrypted information electronically, breaching privacy protections subject to its agreement with the White House.
/1🚨BREAKING — Following a report from @EdWorkforceCmte, we sued multiple Biden-Harris Admin agencies, including:
✔️DOJ
✔️DHS
✔️State Department
+ more regarding their failure to stop pro-Hamas chaos and violence on U.S. campuses and streets.
Read…
/2 In the wake of bombshell findings by the @EdWorkforceCmte after its year-long investigation into pro-Hamas incitement and lawlessness on U.S. college campuses, we have filed a series of lawsuits…
/3🚨Against the DOJ and Attorney General Merrick Garland alleging that the Biden-Harris Administration has unlawfully failed to enforce the Foreign Agents Registration Act against Students for Justice in Palestine, American Muslims for Palestine, and other agents of Hamas.
/1🚨🗣️UK-based "Center for Countering Digital Hate" is leveraging its connections to the Biden-Harris Admin to illegally engage in an influence campaign to stop free speech in the U.S.
They've targeted @RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk + more
🧵We filed a new complaint with the DOJ:
/2 Based on new evidence explained in the following thread, we have formally requested that the DOJ investigate whether CCDH’s U.S. operation and leadership are “agents of a foreign principal” that must comply with the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA).
/3 CCDH is a nonprofit organization established and predominantly staffed in the U.K. that has promoted unconstitutional censorship on social media platforms for years.
Following a report from @SenateCommerce @SenTedCruz, we launched multiple investigations and filed a lawsuit against the National Science Foundation regarding the misuse of billions of dollars in federal research funds by Biden-Harris to promote illegal DEI:
/2 Immediately upon taking power, the Biden-Harris White House created a task force on “scientific integrity” to provide “a review of the impact on [the] scientific integrity of diversity, equity, and inclusion practices” at all science-related agencies.
/3 Later, the White House and NSF ordered agencies to “[i]ncorporate DEIA [Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility] considerations into all aspects of science planning, execution, and communication.”
Our investigation uncovered new docs revealing Jay Bratt’s central role within DOJ’s National Security Division in covering up Biden’s classified documents scandal before he joined Special Counsel Jack Smith’s Office to persecute President Trump.🧵
/2 Prior to the Mar-A-Lago raid, FBI officials were reportedly concerned about Bratt’s history of donating to Democrats and his “overly aggressive” tactics. The Biden-Harris DOJ dismissed claims that Bratt was biased against Trump and said Bratt pursued all cases aggressively.
/3 But Bratt did not aggressively pursue the case against Biden. NARA released these records in response to FOIA requests filed by AFL and other organizations upon learning that classified documents had been discovered at the Penn Biden Center.
We just filed a bar complaint against the Director of “The 65 Project,” Michael Teter, for abusing the attorney grievance process to target and intimidate lawyers affiliated with President Trump.
DETAILS IN THREAD…
/2 Our complaint, filed on behalf of Stefan Passantino, outlines the following reasons for the Utah State Bar to open an investigation:
🚨Apparent Violation of Rule 8.4 — Mr. Teter’s conduct appears to have violated Rule 8.4 of the Utah Rules of Professional Conduct by, among other things, engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice by seeking to punish lawyers associated with a single client.
🚨Apparent Violation of Rule 301 of the Rules Governing the Utah State Bar — Mr. Teter’s conduct appears to have violated Rule 301 of the Rules Governing the Utah State Bar by, among other things, abusing the attorney grievance process to create a “culture of deterrence” and ascribing class-wide misconduct against anyone who seeks to represent President Donald J. Trump, and by seeking sanctions for an improper purpose–namely, based on their representation or affiliation with President Trump.
🚨Conduct that appears to be contrary to the standards of professionalism and civility envisioned by the Rules of Professional Conduct — Mr. Teter’s boilerplate complaints reflect a view that people should be punished for representing certain clients and causes.
/3 The 65 Project was formed for the express purpose of “disbarring Trump-aligned attorneys” and “Trump’s legal allies.”
At the time it was formed, Mr. Teter told CNN that “[c]reating a system of deterrence requires that people know these complaints have been filed.”