The GOP has tried to do this for years. It never works.
Conservatives are supposed to be tough on crime. We should be hitting Kamala from the right—not the left.
We'll show you why. 🧵 (1/12)
A lot of conservative influencers are parroting the line that Kamala "locked up" too many criminals—originally a far-left attack on her in the 2020 Democratic primaries.
This is bad politics and bad policy. And it betrays our own base on one of our strongest issues. (2/12)
First of all, you can't mock left-wing "identity politics" and then complain about Kamala locking up "black men." As D.A., she prosecuted criminals of every race. Exclusively making it about black people plays into all kinds of bogus left-wing narratives about racism. (3/12)
But more to the point, being tough on crime—and specifically, being to the right of Democrats on crime—has long been one of the GOP's strong political issues.
Other than the economy, crime is where the GOP has the largest advantage. (Tied with immigration). (4/12)
What's more, voters are more pro-law and order than they've been in years. Why would Republicans want to sacrifice this issue?
Earlier this month, a @ManhattanInst report found that 57% of voters said the justice system isn't tough enough. Only 11% said it's "too tough." (5/12)
And the American majority is right.
The correct response to left-wing narratives about "mass incarceration" isn't to say the exact same thing with a Republican coat of paint.
It's to tell the truth. @TomCottonAR was right: We aren't locking up enough criminals. (6/12)
The good news is, with Kamala Harris, there's a lot of material for tough-on-crime Republicans to work with.
For example: During the 2020 George Floyd riots, she urged people to donate to the "Minnesota Freedom Fund"—which raises money to bust criminals out of jail. (7/12)
As @FreeBeacon reported this week, Kamala is still raising money for the fund.
"The vice president’s fundraising page for the group...is active and accepted a contribution from this reporter on Monday morning."
This is a lesson on how the media shapes our politics.
The press wanted Biden out. So they gave him the Trump treatment—burying him in an onslaught of negative news.
In a few weeks, he caved.
Now, the focus is changing once again. They've shifted back to the real enemy. (1/9)
For the brief period of time that the press was arrayed against Biden, everything seemed to suddenly come into place for Republicans. They were elated. The wind was in their sails. Victory seemed to be inevitable.
Biden was isolated—under siege. Trump had all the momentum. (2/9)
But many Republicans didn't fully realize why. Yes, Biden was a terrible candidate. Yes, Trump had just survived an attempt on his life.
But the through-line in all this was that the press was suddenly treating Trump better than they ever had before—or ever would again. (3/9)
If you think this view is fringe or unusual on the Left, you're wrong.
This is their view of the family. They don't believe that children belong to their parents.
Every once in a while, the mask slips—and they actually say it out loud. 🧵 (1/9)
The clip that @MikeBenzCyber posted is from a 2013 MSNBC commercial, in which one of their hosts blasted the idea that "your kid is yours, and totally your responsibility," and called for an end to "our kind of private idea that kids belong to their parents." (2/9)
But that's not the only time the Left has voiced this idea. This is a 2021 Washington Post piece, written by two education-policy elites.
"To turn over all decisions to parents," they write, "would risk inhibiting the ability of young people to think independently." (3/9)
The era of the pro-Wall Street Republican is over.
We need a conservatism that speaks for our nation and our people—not for the paychecks of rich CEOs.
The old conservatism failed. It failed our workers. It failed our families. And it failed our country.
Here's why. 🧵 (1/17)
For decades, the conservative movement's economic philosophy has been that "the business of America is business"—i.e., what's good for big business is good for America. (And vice versa).
This was never quite true. But it was much more true 50 years ago than it is today. (2/17)
The old conservative bumper-sticker slogans claimed that "Wall Street creates wealth."
But...wealth for who? Over the past 40 years, the growth rate of household income in the top quintile of earners has been 3-4X faster than in the middle class. (3/17)
The attack on Confederate symbols began decades ago. Even then, there were signs that this was about far more than just the Confederacy.
In 1992, New Orleans began stripping Confederate names from schools. By 1997, George Washington was being added to the chopping block. (2/15)
''Why should African-Americans want their kids to pay respect or pay homage to someone who enslaved their ancestors?'' asked one of the leaders of the New Orleans school-renaming campaign. "To African-Americans, George Washington has about as much meaning as David Duke.'' (3/15)
Posts like this tell us a lot more than their authors mean to.
Order, beauty, symmetry—the Left views these things as inherently authoritarian. If you put it that way, they'll scoff at you. But it really is what they believe, at a visceral level.
We saw this in 2020. 🧵 (1/9)
In 2020, Trump signed an executive order meant to promote the use of classical architecture in federal buildings.
It wasn't ideological. He wanted to build beautiful things again. His executive order called for architecture that would "uplift and beautify public spaces." (2/9)
On the left: The U.S. Capitol—a majestic example of classical architecture.
On the right: The FBI Headquarters—a soulless, brutalist concrete slab.
In a 2020 poll, an astounding 72% of Americans preferred the first style.
So everyone should have been on board, right? (3/9)