Saul Sadka Profile picture
Aug 6 7 tweets 3 min read Read on X
People ask: Why does the UK's Sky News seem to hate Israel, even more than Al Jazeera?

The story begins in 2005, when two things happened:

1. Israel withdrew from Gaza, allowing Hamas, supported by Qatari money, to start a 19 year process of turning the Strip into the most complex battlefield in history.

2. Qatar started sponsoring Sky News, via the hourly weather forecast, to start a 19 year process of capturing the UK news narrative.

Incredibly, Sky News and Hamas are just two Qatar funded operations. No wonder they seem to get along.

(1/6)Image
While reminding potential tourists about your country in the context of "weather" when you have the most appalling climate on the planet, might seem odd (they need to cool pools otherwise they would be giant hot tubs), Qatar's goal wasn't tourism, but influence.

Sky News is a loss making venture, and by becoming its most consistent and lucrative sponsor, the tiny petro-kleptocracy slave-state of Qatar can buy easy influence for a pittance. (2/6)Image
It is how, for example, Kay Burley made Eylon Levy very very famous with that "Eyebrows moment."

The hidden premise of her question was basically, "Since, as we know, Juice are evil..."

It took 19 years of Qatari patronage, and new ownership—from Murdoch's News Corp to Comcast—to become Al Jazeera+. (3/6)
The cost for Qatar of Al Jazeera, their Muslim Brotherhood propaganda and soft power operation, has been tens of billions. But they played the long game, and for a tiny fraction of that they purchased the editorial line of a major UK news channel. (4/6) Image
So now their permanent representative in the Middle East, who covers everything that matters to Qatar and their allies Turkey and Iran, is Alex Crawford, somebody with a deep antipathy towards Jews. She revels in trolling Jews with tropes, knowing she is safe in her job. (5/6) Image
She can tell her audience that Ismail Haniyeh, a man responsible for the death of 1,000s of Jews, leader of a movement openly bent on their annihilation, was "very moderate."

And of course, even though she is based in Turkey, where 20% of the people are Kurds, persecuted by the despotic Muslim Brotherhood regime, she has had nothing to say about their plight for 5 years.

The plight of other minorities, whose suffering can be leveraged for Muslim Brotherhood propaganda (Palestinians) and inciting violence against has not been ignored... as you might imagine.

So that's what happened to Sky News, and why their Middle East reporting is now somewhere between Al Jazeera and Der Sturmer.

Money Talks, and 19 years of money talks absolutely.

(6/6)Image
To clarify when I said Crawford has said nothing about the Kurds, I meant based on her very extensive X history that is searchable.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Saul Sadka

Saul Sadka Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Saul_Sadka

Aug 4
How is Israel able to act in Iran, assassinating scientists and terror chiefs at will?

How fragile is Iran? (tldr: very.)

One map and one chart explain this and more:

Iran is a patchwork of ethnicities, with 52% of its population being non-Persian. Each of the other groups would rather be self governing, or even part of other states. (1/6)Image
Conveniently for these ethnic groups, there are effectively open borders that link them with their ethnic kin.

The loyalties of Kurds, Arabs, Azeris, Balochs, Pashtuns and a dozen others, are to their clan and ethnicity much more than they are to any Persian religious fanatics who have brought them to ruinous poverty.

The Azeris border their homeland of Azerbaijan, an Israeli ally, and are 30% of the population. They have oil, and want to be free; and Israeli-ally Azerbaijan (which unlike Iran, has a real military) is surely waiting for the opportunity to help them. (2/6)Image
Look at this chart: Fully 45% are openly secular, irreligious, atheist or agnostic. Another 8% are Zoroastrians, the original Persian religion that pre-dates the Islamic conquest.

Only 32% profess the same Shiite religion of the oppressive, millenarian cult, that has ruined the lives of 3 generations now. And certainly a large portion of them are Shiites, but have no interest in the loopy theology of the Mullahs. (3/6)Image
Read 8 tweets
Jul 31
For 2,000 years Jews were pillaged and slaughtered, they couldn't do much. They packed up what remained and moved on to the next place. But this is a new world now, with new rules.

When Ismail Haniyeh grinned as he watched the gore of the Oct 7 pogrom that he orchestrated from Qatar, he didn't imagine his days were numbered, but they were—299 days to be precise.
Condolences are due to many many people in the West, not least his dear friend, the former MP George Galloway, who has been losing a lot of friends lately.

All Haniyeh wanted was the genocide of all Juice, is that so unreasonable?

Here they are in happier times:Image
Here is Israel's current progress through the top of it's "playing cards list": Here are the face cards. Khaled Mashal probably wants to find a nice loose fitting Burqa and try to get back to Qatar... Image
Read 6 tweets
Jul 9
Look at these shocking images of the deliberate military destruction of Rafah. Mile after mile of rubble. Total systematic carnage. But the military that razed Rafah wasn't the IDF... which is why you probably never knew about it...

Once, Rafah straddled the border with Egypt. There was an Egyptian Rafah and a Gazan Rafah.

I say "was" because, between 2015 and 2020 Egypt systematically and totally razed its half of Gaza, destroyed over 8,000 buildings, homes, shops, mosques, shut down all its farms, and sealed what had once been a thriving town behind fences.

But Jews—I mean Zionists—weren't doing it, so nobody cared. Nobody protested in European capitals, as Egypt committed this crime against humanity.

Not one celebrity shed one measly tear for Egyptian Rafah. Why?Image
Image
Image
Image
Did anyone call for a boycott of Catapillar because their D9 bulldozers were used to completely ethnically cleanse 8000 buildings in Egyptian Rafah?

Does anyone know?
As you can see from the picture, not one stone was left unturned (really, not figuratively) in the Egyptian relish to raze Gaza.
Read 6 tweets
Jun 9
I read this appalling article in The Times yesterday slack jawed. All decent people should cancel their subscriptions.

It is a masterpiece in modern yellow journalism, with quotes from activists (who have now come out swinging at the writers) woven together with anecdotes and baseless aspersions to present a subtextual "narrative" to the reader that no person could ever say out loud:

Don't believe these hysterical liars, they are just exaggerating and whining as usual so they can justify their slaughtering.

Yes, that is actually the message it wants the reader to take away—in The Times.

While the article itself is sickening just in terms of the Soviet style mendacity (and should end the careers of the journalists and editors involved), the headline and banner image used are simply beyond belief.

To print a headline with a question, "Does the evidence of r*pe add up?" (remember, the writers want you do go away with the message "No, it doesn't") above a photo of Amit Soussana, who bravely and heroically told her story of how she was chained in a dark room for weeks and sexually assaulted her at gunpoint, is so depraved that it should take anyone's breath away.

The Haredi heroes of Zaka and United Hatzalah who risked their lives to save others and identify bodies are cast as primitive, uneducated yokels (they are trained medics) incapable of identifying the female anatomy, since they only know their wives...

In the end, it hardly makes a difference. Would a pogrom (calling it a pogrom is just more Jewish propaganda as the article snidely hints) with 1,200 murders and 250 hostages but only "marginal" sexual violence be much better? Does throwing shade on r*pe victims really make Hamas look better?

Murder is just fine for the far-left and Islamists alike. Both groups have spent centuries advancing their causes by piling up the bodies by the tens of millions, what's another 1,200 on the pile?

But rape? How to argue that rape helps the cause? Just murder the kulak oppressor/colonialist occupier devils and take their land, it shouldn't be fun.

It's awkward, so must be denied, "Believe All Women" be damned.Image
And yes, @thetimes, you probably do want to do an "Investigation."
Dolev Yehud was one of those @UnitedHatzalah volunteers that the article arrays half-quotes and anecdotes to smear as "unreliable."

We will never know what happened to him. His paltry ashen remains had been overlooked in a field until last week. The evidence was burnt. Image
Read 6 tweets
May 23
Why is the UN a swamp? A moral abomination where October 7 can't be officially condemned but the death of a genocidal medieval murderer inspires paroxysms of ostentatious mourning? Flags at half mast, minutes of silence?

The UN is a swamp because the world is a swamp: (1/9)Image
At the UN, deranged oppressive dictatorships like Eritrea and North Korea are held up as moral equals to Greece or South Korea.

You can hold millions as slaves in concentration camps making toys, as China does, or invade neighbors in wars of conquest, as Russia does, and still hold a veto. (2/9)Image
You can execute rape victims, as Iran does, and still pontificate piously about the gender pay gap in Sweden.

You can mismanage your nation so badly that half flee as refugees, but stand at the UN and lecture European nations about the quality of the accommodation those refugees are afforded. (3/9)Image
Read 9 tweets
May 13
Watch this timelapse of Rafah carefully and you might notice something that almost nobody, even Middle East experts like Gary Lineker, never knew about.

Rafah straddled the border with Egypt. There was an Egyptian Rafah and a Gazan Rafah.

I say "was" because, between 2015 and 2020 Egypt systematically and totally razed its half of Gaza, destroyed over 8,000 buildings, homes, shops, mosques, shut down all its farms, and sealed what had once been a thriving town behind fences.

But Jews—I mean Zionists—weren't doing it, so nobody cared. Nobody protested in European capitals, as Egypt (which has now ironically joined in the ICC claim for Israel's much less damaging, and much more justified, attack on Gazan Rafah) committed this crime against humanity.

Not one celebrity shed one measly tear for Egyptian Rafah. Why?
The timeplace is from Ggl Earth and goes from 1984 to 2023
I should also note that the US President Barack Obama at point told the Egyptians "Don't attack Rafah". Not once did the US threaten to cut off the 4 billion aid Egypt receives annually if they did.

How strange.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(