1) Twitter Files: Democrats & media claimed Twitter 1.0 was a “private company” that made its own decisions, despite Biden Administration pressure to censor.
But new emails show Twitter hired a lobby shop staffed w/ Biden loyalists & then coordinated w/ Biden State Dept.
2) “This is John Hughes from Albright Stonebridge Group, the commercial diplomacy firm founded by former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright,” wrote Twitter’s lobbyist to a senior official at State.
Twitter was seeking “advice” and help.
3) Politico reported around this same time that 10 of Biden’s top foreign policy crowd came from Albright Stonebridge.
“The Blob”
4) Albright Stonebridge’s chair was Madeleine Albright who also sat on the board of the Atlantic Council.
@mtaibbi reported that The Atlantic Council was also pressuring Twitter to censor, and had a State Dept grant.
5) So State was pressuring Twitter to censor, but Twitter partnered w/ State to deal with censorship in India.
Does the make Twitter appear a “private company” free to make its own decisions? Or one reliant on State Dept approval?
6) Twitter VP: “Would you have time to meet us again for an update ….on government action against Twitter in India?”
State: “We are trying to get in touch w/ our colleagues in the Embassy as well as get more details.”
7) In a hearing on #TwitterFiles Congresswoman Sally Plaskett said that “real evidence shows there wasn’t coordination between Twitter and the federal government…”
This is laughable.
8) Twitter to State: “Happy to brief you before you speak to your colleagues at the Embassy, who have been briefed by my colleague, Shagutta, in Delhi.”
Seems Twitter was coordinating w/ State, no?
How was Twitter “independent” at that time?
9) A State Dept official then asked Twitter to send around a calendar invite to all fed officials on the email, noting that both Deputy Assistant Laura Stone and another Deputy Assistant would attend Twitter briefing.
10) How could Twitter claim to be "independent" of the Biden Administration while coordinating w/ Biden's State Department on India? substack-proxy.glitch.me/articles/disin…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. NY Governor @KathyHochul is now promoting "off label" prescribing for COVID vax. Even though the vast majority of doctors in NY don't get the boosters, and don't get COVID jab for their own kids.
NY DOCTOR: "I have never worked in healthcare like this."
1) I'm on vacay and have gotten several calls from Hill staff and Trump officials about this @emilyakopp "exclusive" that repeats old stories--some OTHERS broke.
One IC official told me, "There's nothing new. This is just sleazy."
Emily has done this numerous times before; let's review
@Dylan_Housman
@_EricLieberman_
@VinceCoglianese
@JohnCFLoftus1
@DailyCaller
@SenJoniErnst
@tuckercarlson
@robbysoave
@RisingTheHill
@CarlHigbie
@lizlyons47
@ianmSC
@paulsperry_
#KOPPyKAT
2) EXAMPLE 1
Emily Kopp "exclusive" first reported by @SharriMarkson
#KOPPyKAT
3) EXAMPLE 1
Sharri Markson broke this story a few months back in 2021.
1) NIH Director released new priorities for national research. I was leaked a copy of document. Follow along.
"To rebuild public trust, NIH is enhancing oversight of funded research abroad and reinforcing its commitment to responsible stewardship of taxpayer dollars."
2) DEI and affirmative action are out and replication in research is in.
3) A strategic plan on AI is coming.
Lots more nutrition research, it appears, with focus on long term studies to ID good and bad diets, starting before birth.
Max Koslov and the #sciomm writers at @Nature continue putting out fake news and propaganda. Koslov's publisher Springer Nature won't say if they got a DOJ letter from @EagleEdMartin, but I published that letter to Springer Nature a month ago.
Koslov just can't do journalism.
2) Here's the letter DOJ sent to Springer Nature's journal Nature Medicine, which published the corrupt "Proximal Origin" paper.
1) Trump administration has pivoted to investigate the much ballyhooed "Proximal Origin" paper by @scrippsresearch Kristian Andersen.
Read DOJ's letter to @NatureMedicine. Trump officials believe the paper was a quid pro quo for a Fauci grant. tinyurl.com/ykr7vxpv
2) Suspicions have long dogged this study, as emails have found the authors ran it past funders Tony Fauci and Francis Collins at the NIH, as well as @JeremyFarrar when he was at the Wellcome Trust.
In one email, Kristian Andersen praised them for "advice and leadership."
3) When Nature Medicine published the paper, editor in chief Joaa Monteiro claimed the paper “put conspiracy theories” about the pandemic’s possible lab origin to rest.
Is labelling an alternative hypothesis a "conspiracy theory" normal in science?