1) Twitter Files: Democrats & media claimed Twitter 1.0 was a “private company” that made its own decisions, despite Biden Administration pressure to censor.
But new emails show Twitter hired a lobby shop staffed w/ Biden loyalists & then coordinated w/ Biden State Dept.
2) “This is John Hughes from Albright Stonebridge Group, the commercial diplomacy firm founded by former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright,” wrote Twitter’s lobbyist to a senior official at State.
Twitter was seeking “advice” and help.
3) Politico reported around this same time that 10 of Biden’s top foreign policy crowd came from Albright Stonebridge.
“The Blob”
4) Albright Stonebridge’s chair was Madeleine Albright who also sat on the board of the Atlantic Council.
@mtaibbi reported that The Atlantic Council was also pressuring Twitter to censor, and had a State Dept grant.
5) So State was pressuring Twitter to censor, but Twitter partnered w/ State to deal with censorship in India.
Does the make Twitter appear a “private company” free to make its own decisions? Or one reliant on State Dept approval?
6) Twitter VP: “Would you have time to meet us again for an update ….on government action against Twitter in India?”
State: “We are trying to get in touch w/ our colleagues in the Embassy as well as get more details.”
7) In a hearing on #TwitterFiles Congresswoman Sally Plaskett said that “real evidence shows there wasn’t coordination between Twitter and the federal government…”
This is laughable.
8) Twitter to State: “Happy to brief you before you speak to your colleagues at the Embassy, who have been briefed by my colleague, Shagutta, in Delhi.”
Seems Twitter was coordinating w/ State, no?
How was Twitter “independent” at that time?
9) A State Dept official then asked Twitter to send around a calendar invite to all fed officials on the email, noting that both Deputy Assistant Laura Stone and another Deputy Assistant would attend Twitter briefing.
10) How could Twitter claim to be "independent" of the Biden Administration while coordinating w/ Biden's State Department on India? substack-proxy.glitch.me/articles/disin…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) After I wrote a @bmj_latest investigation on virologists conspiring to label critics "conspiracy theorists" my reporting became a focus of NIH officials and researchers they funded.
"Really disappointed they gave space to this scheister," wrote Peter Daszak of my BMJ piece.
2) Daszak and other researchers were irritated because I exposed their game to manipulate the media.
Emails showed that Daszak and allied virologists had planted pieces in The Lancet, Emerging Microbes and Infections, and Nature Medicine to label their critics as conspiracists.
3) Daszak emailed that I had been "trolling the internet darkweb." I have no clue what this means. I only remember posting stuff here on X.
1) EXCLUSIVE: Although cited for US deportation, documents show Center for Countering Digital Hate's censorship work is weaved throughout the Starmer government. Days after Labour's 2024 victory, Ahmed set up meeting with MP Josh Simons.
Simons has not responded
2) In legal filings, @SecRubio stated that Ahmed is being deported based on documents leaked to me by a Center for Countering Digital Hate whistleblower showing Ahmed's aims were to "Kill Musk's Twitter"
3) One document leaked to me shows that Ahmed hosted a private conference in Washington for liberal groups attacking Musk. One person cited to attend: British foreign officer Annabel Graham previously Home Office’s engagement with the U.S. and Five Eyes partners.
1. My investigation of Trump reforms to NIH overhead charges by universities is now out. 60 years ago, universities could only charge 15% overhead, what Trump proposes today.
Since 1966 universities have negotiated these rates and Congress has tried and failed to reform.
2. Unis charge Gates a mere 10% and Rockefeller 15% for indirect costs, they charge the NIH much higher rates – 69% for Harvard, 67.5% for Yale, and 63.7% for Johns Hopkins.
@sciencemagazine found it's b/c university lobbyists have run a game on Congress since 1966.
3. In 1986, UCLA professor published a piece in Science calling for a return to NIH caps so that less money went to university administrators and more to bench scientists.
But university lobbyists have too much powers in Washington. They defeat every attempt at reform.
1) Imran Ahmed has broken US laws and resides in NE DC, yet Justice Department has not investigated him. Center for Countering Digital Hate has lied to Congress, lied to the IRS and is funded by Soros and dark money.
Prosecute then deport. Here's the documents.
2) CCDH sent Congressman Jordan an August 2023 letter claiming that “CCDH is entirely funded by private donors.”
3) When applying for tax exempt status with the IRS, CCDH claimed they were already operating as a nonprofit in the UK. That statement to the IRS is false.
They made a false allegation to speed up their approval.
1) Stephen Shapiro now runs EcoHealth Alliance. He's a Jeffrey Epstein-like character, who made millions in real estate while advising Zelensky and NATO generals.
Also, I found Peter Daszak's new dark money funder.
2) Stephen Shapiro now runs EcoHealth Alliance and is a Senior Advisor to the @AtlanticCouncil, long known for CIA ties. Shapiro has no background in science or medicine and got rich of real estate.
1) I'm republishing a piece I wrote on GlaxoSmithKline's corrupt Study 329, co-authored by Senator @StanKutcher to sell Paxil to little kids. The study hid suicides in children and is one of the most documented examples of corrupt biomedical research.
Read more
@theresaboyle
2) Stan Kutcher's corrupt Study 329 was outed by the BBC years ago. Kutcher still pretends he did nothing wrong and even claims he's an expert on children's mental health. Plenty of reports on this fraud disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/do-antidepre…
3) Kutcher even pretended to be an expert on "misinformation in science" by partnering with "fact checker" Timothy Caulfield.
That's right. Arsons pretend to be firemen.
Unfortunately, the documents are public, and everyone knows Kutcher's study was a fraud.