The Kamala-Trump debate is now over, and the mainstream media is rushing to declare her the winner. But Americans aren’t buying it.
Kamala carried herself as a typical politician, sticking to rehearsed talking points and failing to address the core issues facing the country.
Speaking of rehearsed talking points, Trump quickly called her out on an economic “sound bite” that was apparently fed to her.
“That’s just a sound bite. They gave her that to say,” Trump declared before retorting, “She doesn't have a plan [for the economy]. She copied Biden's plan. And it's like four sentences, like, 'Run, Spot, run.’”
On the topic of abortion, Kamala declared, “The freedom to make decisions about one's own body should not be made by the government.”
But whoopsie. Kamala forgot that her administration denied that same freedom to Americans when Biden’s vaccine mandates essentially forced 100 million American workers to “get vaccinated” or lose their jobs.
While you’re here, don’t forget to follow this page for more threads like this one and weekly news roundups each Sunday.
Then, the moderators jumped into the debate to defend Kamala Harris.
Megyn Kelly lamented, “The absolute gall of ABC to keep ‘fact-checking’ ONLY Trump while letting her lie in every answer is infuriating.”
This exchange captures the tone of the entire night, as David Muir—known for giving Kamala Harris 100% positive news coverage—focused on “fact-checking” Trump in real-time as he detailed reports of eaten pets in Springfield, Ohio.
Kamala went as low as to push the “bloodbath” and “very fine people” hoax that were debunked by even the mainstream media.
Trump’s “bloodbath” comments were in reference to the auto industry, while Kamala failed to deliver the full context of Trump’s “very fine people” comments with respect to Charlottesville.
Of course, the moderators offered no fact-checks on Kamala’s false claims.
In a surprise moment, ABC's Linsey Davis challenged Kamala on her socialist ideas to do away with private insurance.
"In 2017, you supported Bernie Sanders' proposal to do away with private insurance and create a government-run healthcare system."
Like fracking, Kamala pushed the idea that her values "haven't changed" while reversing course on every policy idea that doesn’t benefit her chances of winning.
Video: @TrumpWarRoom
Kamala also said she and Tim Walz were proud gun owners and wouldn't take away anyone's guns.
She forgot that she literally called for a gun "buy-back program" on NBC News.
While Democrats push the idea that Trump is a “threat to Democracy,” he flipped the script on them, mentioning the fact that the Democrats staged a palace coup against Biden before coronating Kamala as the nominee.
Speaking of Joe Biden, Trump asked on stage before millions of people, “Where is our President?”
“We have a president that doesn't know he's alive,” he declared as he mentioned the Democrats “threw him out of a campaign like a dog.”
Trump continued to go on offense regarding the crisis at the border, which has resulted in millions of illegal aliens pouring into the country.
Trump challenged Kamala to leave the debate immediately and convince President Biden to sign an executive order to close the border, saying she could wake Joe Biden up from his nap and get it done today.
Video: @TrumpWarRoom
Kamala made the mistake of accusing Trump of dividing the country based on race.
But whoopsie. Her hypocrisy was exposed as she failed to acknowledge that there’s a video of her nodding in agreement with the idea of special laws for Black people.
Kamala’s closing statements fell flat as she made the pitch to the American people that voting for her is voting for “a new way forward.”
Except there’s one harsh reality: she's literally been in power for 3.5 years.
In the final moments, Trump delivered a crushing blow to Kamala Harris, mentioning that she continues to promise “wonderful things” but hasn’t done anything while in power to fix it.
He harped on the Biden-Harris administration’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan that resulted in 13 US soldiers dead, saying, “I rebuilt our entire military. She gave a lot of it away to the Taliban. She gave it to Afghanistan.”
In his ending sentence, Trump called the Biden-Harris duo “the worst president” and “the worst vice president in the history of our country.”
BONUS CLIP: Behavior Analysis Experts EXPOSE Moderator Bias Against Trump in the Debate
@DrPhil's guests bring the receipts.
1. “There was clearly a bias against Trump in their faces.”
2. Scott Rouse observed that Trump’s microphone was louder, making him appear aggressive.
3. Trump was “fact-checked” by moderators during his responses, while Harris's statements were left largely unchallenged.
4. Moderators frequently spoke over Trump as he tried to complete his answers.
5. Greg Hartley noticed that Trump received more questions with a negative framing, while Harris was given more neutral or "softball" questions. Overall, he called the moderators' treatment of Trump “a little heavy-handed at times.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It’s been about a month since more than 3 million Epstein files were released, and what they exposed makes one thing painfully clear: we’ve been living under an illusion of government and politics for years, if not decades.
Anyone who has spent time in the conspiracy world already understands that the real power structure stretches far beyond the political theater fed to us on TV.
So who is actually at the top? Who is really pulling the strings? And what is their ultimate goal?
One person who has spent years trying to answer those exact questions is @Jay_D007, and he joins us today to dig into what feels like a real-life “Eyes Wide Shut” conspiracy. 🧵
Jay Dyer began by dismantling the idea that Jeffrey Epstein was merely a well-connected criminal who happened to brush shoulders with the powerful.
In his view, that narrative doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.
He reminded viewers that Epstein openly admitted being recruited into the Trilateral Commission by “the Kissinger circles and David Rockefeller,” and even referred to himself as Rockefeller’s “legate.” That’s not the résumé of a random trafficker. It suggests proximity to “the top of the pyramid.”
From there, he linked the Epstein files to the broader power structure long discussed in alternative circles: the Rothschilds, Rockefeller interests, Bilderberg, Chatham House, British intelligence. The emails, he argued, reveal an “untouchable class” shielded by agencies including Mossad, the CIA, and British intelligence.
For Jay, this wasn’t partisan theater. This was evidence of a steering committee operating above governments, quietly shaping outcomes behind the curtain.
And when he cited emails referencing “hunting people,” he suggested it exposed something even more revealing: a belief in total immunity. They behaved as though nothing could touch them.
As @Jay_D007 put it, “You’re not David Rockefeller’s legate if you’re just some random criminal.”
#ad: The digital ID financial nightmare isn’t coming someday. It’s already here.
Get your free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide right now at GoldandFreedom.com, before digital ID becomes the default and your options disappear.
Once a single identity becomes the gateway to your money, your work, and your ability to participate in everyday life, compliance is no longer a choice.
That’s why Genesis Gold Group created the free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide.
It breaks down the real risks of digital ID and explains how physical gold and silver allow you to operate outside the system.
Digital dollars leave you exposed. Gold and silver can’t be frozen, tracked, or turned off.
DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.
*Data based on how often children visited the doctor for each condition*
Instead of investigating the findings, the Oregon Medical Board suspended Dr. Thomas’s license—just days after the study was published. Months later, the study was retracted.
Dr. Paul Thomas isn’t the only one who faced swift punishment for publishing inconvenient science.
Other doctors have faced similar consequences for exposing the same pattern.
The question is: Why are doctors being punished simply for comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated kids? 🧵
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
For all the sources and details, read the full 20,000-word report below.
Things are heating up fast in the Texas Governor’s race—and what happened over the weekend is raising eyebrows.
Turning Point USA publicly endorsed Governor Greg Abbott. Yes, that Greg Abbott—the one critics say failed to close the border under Joe Biden despite having the authority to do so, and in some cases may have even hindered efforts to secure it.
This is also the governor accused of signing off on legislation that would have created a de facto Digital ID in Texas by January 1st, 2026, had a law firm not successfully challenged it as unconstitutional. And despite that ruling, we’re now hearing the decision is being appealed—raising concerns that Abbott is still determined to push Digital ID forward.
But it gets worse.
Tyler Bowyer of Turning Point USA publicly dismissed what many see as the most viable challenger in the race: @DocPeteChambers. The backlash was immediate and intense. So intense that “Tyler Bowyer’s dismissal fuels support for Texas outsider Doc Chambers” began trending on X.
Then things escalated.
Over the same weekend, Doc Pete Chambers’ social media pages were suddenly attacked. Supporters couldn’t see where he would be speaking. Event locations disappeared. Voters had no idea where to show up.
In the middle of a heated primary, cutting off a candidate’s communication with the public isn’t insignificant.
Some would call it tampering. Others would call it something even more serious.
If this were happening in any other high-profile race, every major outlet would be covering it.
@DocPete4Texas joins us now to break down exactly what happened... 🧵
Maria set the tone immediately. She said they “basically called an emergency interview” after @DocPete4Texas's campaign was hit with what she described as serious attacks. The urgency was clear from the first sentence.
Chambers then laid out what happened. As his team was posting daily campaign locations, they were suddenly locked out of Facebook. They couldn’t log in. Supporters couldn’t see where he would be speaking. Voters wouldn’t know where to show up.
Then came the detail that shifted everything: another statewide campaign experienced the exact same issue at the exact same time.
At that point, it no longer felt like a glitch.
He said he activated what he called a military “net call,” switching to an alternate communications plan so supporters could manually spread event details and “stop the bleed.” In the middle of a heated primary, shutting down a candidate’s ability to reach voters doesn’t look random.
Next, Maria dismantled the claim that @DocPeteChambers “has no shot” at winning because he lacks establishment funding. She wasn’t buying it.
She pointed to the floods. When Texans were stranded, Chambers didn’t wait for institutional backing or campaign cash. He stepped in, organized rescue efforts, and coordinated resources with limited funds. He explained that relief money flowed straight to victims, including $1 million brought in by a supporter from North Carolina after Chambers had previously helped there.
That’s when he sharpened the argument. Nine other candidates are in the race against Abbott, yet only one is facing coordinated dismissal and public attacks.
He said they’re running “the most efficient campaign in the history of Texas,” and after the backlash, fundraising didn’t weaken. It exploded.
If he truly had “no shot,” none of this would be necessary.
Which is why his question lands the way it does: “Why are they not being attacked?”
The hundreds of millions of people with autoimmune disease may get more clarity in this 80-second video than they’ve gotten from years of doctor visits.
Gary Brecka flipped the narrative and asked: “What if God didn’t make a mistake?”
“What if the immune system is actually acting properly,” and it’s attacking the body for a reason, but you just have to figure it out?
He argues that, in most cases, you can trace the root cause of autoimmune disease back to four broad categories:
• mold and mycotoxins
• heavy metals
• viruses
• and parasites.
According to Brecka, if you systematically eliminate those four drivers, you’ll discover that your autoimmune disease begins to resolve because the immune system no longer has a reason to attack.
Like Brecka, @MidwesternDoc has spent years uncovering what’s really driving autoimmune disease.
If you or someone you love is suffering, don’t skip this 5-minute read. It goes deeper into what Brecka just laid out. 🧵
Autoimmune disease has become one of the most common and stubborn health crises of our time.
Millions are told that their immune system is “attacking” them.
It’s random.
It’s lifelong.
They’ll need powerful drugs forever.
And those drugs?
Often toxic. Often suppressive. Often life-altering.
But what if that entire framework itself is incomplete?
Conventional rheumatology largely treats autoimmune illness as a malfunctioning immune system.
In that case, the solution becomes straightforward: Suppress it.
Steroids.
NSAIDs.
Immunosuppressants.
Symptoms decrease, but the underlying process is frequently untouched.
When medicine focuses only on shutting down inflammation, something deeper is usually missed.
Behind the slogan, a new federal bill is quietly gaining bipartisan support, and almost no one is asking what it actually builds.
Hidden beneath the headline: mandatory ID checks, permanent audit trails, and infrastructure built to erase anonymity.
We’ve seen this before. Remember the Patriot Act? The emergency fades. But the system stays.
Digital ID first.
Then, money.
Today it’s ID for the internet. Tomorrow it’s ID to touch your own money?
Pastor Allen joins us to explain how gold protects freedom before the rules change... 🧵
Pastor Allen opened the conversation with a warning that set the tone for everything that followed. In his view, the system never moves forward without a pretext.
He said there’s always a moment of panic, a headline, a crisis that justifies the next expansion of control. As he put it, “there’s always a crisis” used to move the needle forward. Whether it was 1971 and the break from gold, 9/11 and the Patriot Act, or COVID and emergency powers, he argued that the script never really changes. Fear comes first. Control comes second.
He reminded viewers that “there’s nothing so permanent as a temporary government program,” urging people not to make life-altering decisions in a state of panic. And when officials claim something is for your “safety,” he warned, you can “bet your bottom dollar it’s for their pocketbook.”
Pastor Allen posed a question that bluntly put everything in perspective: “So you want to convince me that an elitist group of satanic pedophiles has my children’s best interest at heart when it comes to online regulation?”
He compared government oversight to strangers knocking on your door and asking to watch your kids.
Pastor Allen made it clear that protecting children is a parent’s responsibility, not a bureaucrat’s. Handing over more authority under the banner of protection isn’t wisdom but “madness,” he argues.