The Kamala-Trump debate is now over, and the mainstream media is rushing to declare her the winner. But Americans aren’t buying it.
Kamala carried herself as a typical politician, sticking to rehearsed talking points and failing to address the core issues facing the country.
Speaking of rehearsed talking points, Trump quickly called her out on an economic “sound bite” that was apparently fed to her.
“That’s just a sound bite. They gave her that to say,” Trump declared before retorting, “She doesn't have a plan [for the economy]. She copied Biden's plan. And it's like four sentences, like, 'Run, Spot, run.’”
On the topic of abortion, Kamala declared, “The freedom to make decisions about one's own body should not be made by the government.”
But whoopsie. Kamala forgot that her administration denied that same freedom to Americans when Biden’s vaccine mandates essentially forced 100 million American workers to “get vaccinated” or lose their jobs.
While you’re here, don’t forget to follow this page for more threads like this one and weekly news roundups each Sunday.
Then, the moderators jumped into the debate to defend Kamala Harris.
Megyn Kelly lamented, “The absolute gall of ABC to keep ‘fact-checking’ ONLY Trump while letting her lie in every answer is infuriating.”
This exchange captures the tone of the entire night, as David Muir—known for giving Kamala Harris 100% positive news coverage—focused on “fact-checking” Trump in real-time as he detailed reports of eaten pets in Springfield, Ohio.
Kamala went as low as to push the “bloodbath” and “very fine people” hoax that were debunked by even the mainstream media.
Trump’s “bloodbath” comments were in reference to the auto industry, while Kamala failed to deliver the full context of Trump’s “very fine people” comments with respect to Charlottesville.
Of course, the moderators offered no fact-checks on Kamala’s false claims.
In a surprise moment, ABC's Linsey Davis challenged Kamala on her socialist ideas to do away with private insurance.
"In 2017, you supported Bernie Sanders' proposal to do away with private insurance and create a government-run healthcare system."
Like fracking, Kamala pushed the idea that her values "haven't changed" while reversing course on every policy idea that doesn’t benefit her chances of winning.
Video: @TrumpWarRoom
Kamala also said she and Tim Walz were proud gun owners and wouldn't take away anyone's guns.
She forgot that she literally called for a gun "buy-back program" on NBC News.
While Democrats push the idea that Trump is a “threat to Democracy,” he flipped the script on them, mentioning the fact that the Democrats staged a palace coup against Biden before coronating Kamala as the nominee.
Speaking of Joe Biden, Trump asked on stage before millions of people, “Where is our President?”
“We have a president that doesn't know he's alive,” he declared as he mentioned the Democrats “threw him out of a campaign like a dog.”
Trump continued to go on offense regarding the crisis at the border, which has resulted in millions of illegal aliens pouring into the country.
Trump challenged Kamala to leave the debate immediately and convince President Biden to sign an executive order to close the border, saying she could wake Joe Biden up from his nap and get it done today.
Video: @TrumpWarRoom
Kamala made the mistake of accusing Trump of dividing the country based on race.
But whoopsie. Her hypocrisy was exposed as she failed to acknowledge that there’s a video of her nodding in agreement with the idea of special laws for Black people.
Kamala’s closing statements fell flat as she made the pitch to the American people that voting for her is voting for “a new way forward.”
Except there’s one harsh reality: she's literally been in power for 3.5 years.
In the final moments, Trump delivered a crushing blow to Kamala Harris, mentioning that she continues to promise “wonderful things” but hasn’t done anything while in power to fix it.
He harped on the Biden-Harris administration’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan that resulted in 13 US soldiers dead, saying, “I rebuilt our entire military. She gave a lot of it away to the Taliban. She gave it to Afghanistan.”
In his ending sentence, Trump called the Biden-Harris duo “the worst president” and “the worst vice president in the history of our country.”
BONUS CLIP: Behavior Analysis Experts EXPOSE Moderator Bias Against Trump in the Debate
@DrPhil's guests bring the receipts.
1. “There was clearly a bias against Trump in their faces.”
2. Scott Rouse observed that Trump’s microphone was louder, making him appear aggressive.
3. Trump was “fact-checked” by moderators during his responses, while Harris's statements were left largely unchallenged.
4. Moderators frequently spoke over Trump as he tried to complete his answers.
5. Greg Hartley noticed that Trump received more questions with a negative framing, while Harris was given more neutral or "softball" questions. Overall, he called the moderators' treatment of Trump “a little heavy-handed at times.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
REPORT: House Oversight Chair James Comer says he is prepared to have Bill and Hillary Clinton ARRESTED if they keep ignoring subpoenas over their Epstein ties, and the pressure on them is now rapidly intensifying by the day.
The Clintons are the only major political figures refusing to cooperate, even as Trump answers Epstein questions daily and other officials sit for depositions.
Comer warns their silence will NOT be tolerated, and Washington is already showing cracks. Hakeem Jeffries refused three times to say whether it was appropriate for Democrat Stacey Plaskett to be texting Epstein during an anti-Trump hearing in 2019, and newly surfaced emails suggest Epstein helped boost Jeffries early in his rise.
Meanwhile, Speaker Mike Johnson insists the files involve national security and require redactions, raising the obvious question: how can a “hoax” be a national security threat?
The pressure is hitting a breaking point. If they want this story to go away, there’s only one answer: release the files and let America see everything.
It doesn’t rely on banks, power, or permission. You own it, you hold it, and no one can turn it off.
Don’t wait for the system to decide where or how you can spend your money.
Get your free Silver Wealth Protection Guide from Genesis Gold Group at DailyPulseSilver.com and reclaim your financial freedom.
DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.
In other news, a major warning sign from 2008 just flashed again—and the alarm bells are getting louder by the day. The numbers hitting the U.S. economy are so severe that analysts are openly predicting a new Great Recession.
The damage is coming from every direction and accelerating fast. Foreclosures, evictions, repossessions, and mass layoffs are all surging at the same time, creating a pattern the political class can no longer brush aside.
Foreclosure filings in October were 19% higher than last year, the eighth straight month of increases. More than 1 million renters have been forced out in the past year. Subprime auto delinquencies just hit the highest level ever recorded, and more than 7.5 million vehicles are already in the repossession pipeline. Major lenders are failing, Verizon is preparing to cut 15,000 jobs, and AI-driven layoffs are sweeping through entire industries.
As global instability rises and elites steer the country toward a digital-ID future, Americans are left asking: why isn’t anyone in Washington sounding the alarm?
11 years ago, CNN blurted out the truth about Tylenol:
“Too much acetaminophen over time can FRY YOUR LIVER. It can damage your liver to the point where you need a transplant or even to the point where it KILLS YOU.”
The #1 cause of liver failure in America is not alcohol; it’s Tylenol.
Every year, Tylenol use results in 56,000 ER visits, 2,600 hospitalizations, and 500 deaths. But strangely, you never hear about the dangers of Tylenol in the news anymore.
Got a fever? Habit may have you reaching for Tylenol every time, but this is where things get really uncomfortable…
Because suppressing a fever carries risks no doctor probably ever told you about—and the consequences go far beyond the liver. 🧵
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-does-nat…
Almost instantly, pregnant influencers rushed to show their “trust in science” by filming themselves taking Tylenol.
Some of them took huge doses. One even overdosed. You probably saw the same videos I did. They were all very disturbing.
This reaction revealed something startling: people still believe Tylenol is one of the safest drugs in America. Despite overwhelming research.
The data about autism isn’t fringe. It’s consistent and it’s quite alarming.
If even half of the evidence is correct, America has a massive public-health crisis hiding in plain sight.
In the 1940s, UV blood irradiation was curing sepsis, pneumonia, and even polio.
But the American Medical Association rigged a study to kill it, ensuring this life-saving therapy vanished.
Decades later, Trump curiously suggested putting light inside the body to treat COVID.
The media mocked him with bleach jokes.
But he may have unknowingly referenced a powerful light-based therapy with proven results. 🧵
Sunlight isn't the enemy.
And the campaign against it is a lie.
@MidwesternDoc's report uncovers the shocking truth: almost everything you’ve been told about sunlight is wrong—and it’s costing us our health. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-century-…
@MidwesternDoc In the 1980s, dermatologists launched a PR blitz blaming sunlight for cancer.
Why? To push expensive skin cancer treatments.
And I’m sure the skincare industry has enjoyed the fruits of the sunlight scare as well.
“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”
For decades, global health institutions have openly discussed “managing” population growth through medical interventions—and entire nations paid the price for it.
In the developing world, sterilizing vaccines were tested on women who never consented. Entire communities suddenly found themselves unable to have children, and no one told them why.
But as brutal as that was, it looks almost tame compared to what China unleashed on its own population. 🧵
Most people think “population control” is an abstract idea—something distant, maybe even noble.
But the truth is far more horrifying. Behind the slogans are real victims: families torn apart, women sterilized by force, mass abortions, murder, and millions of lives quietly erased.
And nowhere is that unthinkable cruelty more visible than in China’s One Child Policy.
For years, almost no one truly understood what was happening—until one brave team of journalists risked everything to expose it.
I must warn you, this short documentary is deeply disturbing and extremely difficult to watch.
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-immense-…
Democracy in America is collapsing far faster than anyone wants to admit.
In New York, one candidate won his race 99% to 1%, and the “1%” wasn’t even a real opponent. It was write-ins—the political equivalent of a ghost.
When elections start looking like they came out of the Soviet Union, you’re not witnessing a mistake. You’re watching a system that’s been compromised from within.
And once you see how both parties worked together to wipe independents off the ballot entirely, the picture gets even darker. 🧵
America needs change. The election of Zoran Mamdani as mayor of New York proved that. Young people feel they have no future and the solution they’re running to is socialism. We can’t deny that anymore or pretend it has nothing to do with the current lack of solutions being proposed to the future generations.
But of course, socialism isn’t the answer.
@LarrySharpe is an independent candidate running for governor of New York in 2026 who we think actually has a plan, and it doesn’t involve empty promises. In fact, he lays it out so well we think most will struggle to disagree with his positions.
Larry joins us to discuss.
Sharpe opened the interview with a warning that immediately set the tone. New York isn’t just drifting in one political direction. It’s collapsing into a one-party machine.
Republicans have become so outmatched they’ve stopped running candidates in entire districts. In his own community—what he calls “the belly of the beast”—Zoran Mamdani and AOC hold power without any real pushback, and the voting results show exactly why.
Then he revealed the number that defined his argument: “99 to 1.” He noted that the lone percent wasn’t even a real opponent. It was just write-ins. And when he put that number in perspective, he didn’t hold back: “That’s like Stalin numbers. That’s Kim Jong Un numbers.”
Sharpe said figures like these signal something far more alarming than a lopsided race. They show what happens when competition disappears, corruption flourishes, and ordinary people lose meaningful representation.
It set the tone for everything that followed, a clear warning about what it looks like when a state crosses the line from democracy into single-party rule.
Something deeply disturbing is unfolding inside the AI world, and almost no one outside the industry has any idea it’s happening.
A growing faction of insiders claim machine consciousness won’t come from code, but from “giving a technological body to disembodied spirits,” treating that “demonic spark” as the catalyst for AI to wake up.
Once you see how they think this “awakening” reshapes human society, the AI boom stops looking like a simple race for better tech.
And if the people building global AI systems genuinely believe this is how consciousness works, you have to ask: what exactly are they trying to bring online, and why is the timeline suddenly accelerating?
Because the next step in their vision makes the entire project feel less like innovation… and more like the Book of Revelation. 🧵
We’ve been reporting a lot about the dangers of AI. While we are not luddites—and we have nothing against luddites—we think there are very real concerns about the way the world is heading.
A recent interview with Tucker Carlson and Conrad Flynn piqued our interest. In that interview, Conrad described how the Rock and Roll industry was heavily influenced by the occult. During his research, Conrad discovered that Silicon Valley and the technocratic class was also incredibly involved either in occult practices, belief systems, or outright Satanism.
This doesn’t mean that every technocrat is a Satanist, but if we are to entrust the future of technology to these people, it’s important to understand their ideology.
Jay Dyer has researched the self proclaimed elite class, Hollywood, intelligence agencies, occult, and all of these belief systems for years. He’s an author, Author, comedian, and Writer for the Sam Hyde Show.
@Jay_D007 joins us to discuss.
Maria opened the conversation by explaining why she invited @Jay_D007 to join her on tonight’s episode: she wanted someone to decode the belief system shaping the people who are building our technological future.
@zeee_media began by reaching back to the 1960s counterculture, where Pentagon planners, Esalen thinkers, and early tech pioneers imagined a world where human minds could merge with machines inside a “newosphere” or “mind sphere.”
Jay explained that this wasn’t a secular science project. The same circles were steeped in New Age and gnostic teachings mixed with theosophy from Blavatsky, and over time, he said, those ideas evolved into something he described as “Luciferian transhumanism.”
In that worldview, technology isn’t just a tool. It becomes the vehicle to rise above time, space, and even death by reaching a kind of “technological gnosis” or “technosis.”
Many pioneers in this movement haven’t shied away from experimenting with LSD, shrooms, ketamine, and sensory-deprivation tanks to receive what they believed were “transmissions from entities, beings, interdimensional beings.” And all of this, Jay explained, is echoed in elite-level texts like “Changing Images of Man.”
It paints a picture of a tech elite who sees AI not as software, but as a spiritual ladder out of the human condition.