🧵: We looked into the TIPP/American Greatness poll of PA that has been making the rounds on here. If you’re not familiar, you can find the poll here: amgreatness.com/2024/10/10/tru…
The poll got our attention because, while its registered-voter version included 124 RVs from Philadelphia, 116 of whom said they were “very” or “somewhat” likely to vote, the LV version had only 12 LVs from there.
We thought this might be an error, so we reached out to TIPP & American Greatness. The president of TIPP responded and said it wasn’t an error: This poll’s LV model assigns a vote probability to each respondent based on their demographics & vote history, and…
… a disproportionate # of their Philly respondents had factors that made them unlikely to vote: they were young, not a college graduate, and/or nonwhite. So a ton of them happened to fall beneath the threshold to count as a likely voter.
(He also said that respondents’ answer to the “how likely are you to vote” question was a factor in this poll’s LV model as well, but only a small one. He also confirmed that TIPP alone, and not American Greatness, determined the LV model.)
Now, this is a different LV model than some past TIPP polls have used. For example, their September polls of AZ and NC counted everyone as a likely voter if they reported that they were “very” or “somewhat” likely to vote. (But, notably, more recent GA and NV polls did not.)
When I asked about this, he said that TIPP actually has 5 different LV models. While he would not tell me how they decide which LV model to use on which poll, he did say that they have decided to use the PA model on all polls going forward.
What’s the bottom line here? I’m personally not putting a lot of weight on the PA poll. It seems like it ran into a bad sample that the LV screen made worse. IMO, ideally you’d weight the LV sample by region, but he told me they only weight the RV sample.
But at 538, we don’t police pollsters’ LV screens. (As a reminder, appearing on our polls page is not a guarantor of quality, just of existence.) The poll meets all standards in our policy (), so we include it.abcnews.go.com/538/538s-polls…
If you’re worried about it affecting our models, don’t be. We weight polls by quality and account for “house effects,” a.k.a. bias. To give you a sense, this poll moved our PA average all of 0.1 percentage points, from Harris+0.7 to Harris+0.6.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
New from me: Six Republicans have said they won't vote for Kevin McCarthy for speaker. 222 - 6 = less than 218. fivethirtyeight.com/features/house…
Five of these names have been widely reported, but national media seems to have missed that Rep.-elect Mike Collins (#GA10) promised not to vote for McCarthy at his campaign kickoff last year. gpb.org/news/2021/09/1…
The anti-McCarthy Republicans all have very conservative and very anti-establishment voting records. Using DW-NOMINATE, I identified 7 other Republicans who fit the same profile. fivethirtyeight.com/features/house…
Interesting to see some people convinced this means Sinema IS running for reelection and some convinced it means she ISN’T.
FWIW, my first instinct was that this means she’s retiring. But I really have no idea.
Maybe she’s daring Democrats to just not run a candidate against her, lest they throw the election to the GOP? But I think there’s very little chance of that happening.
Meanwhile, FL's ballot deadline is the same as AZ's: Election Day.
The difference is FL closes dropboxes at the end of early voting. Whereas Arizonans can drop off their ballot at several locations on E-Day, Floridians have to go to the elections office.
Rep.-elect Anthony D'Esposito (#NY04) is supporting Kevin McCarthy for speaker, a spokesperson tells FiveThirtyEight.
Rep.-elect Nick LaLota (#NY01) also supports McCarthy, his campaign tells me.
Rep.-elect Anna Paulina Luna on the speaker vote: "I will vote on January 3rd for whoever allows me to best represent my constituents… I do not like to publicly disclose my private conversations with my colleagues."
There were 11 districts that Republicans flipped thanks to redistricting alone (including #FL04, #TN05, etc.), vs. 5 that Democrats did. (Chart by @elena___mejia!) That's a net gain of +6 for the GOP. BUT… fivethirtyeight.com/features/redis…
…there were 9 districts Democrats *kept* only because of redistricting, vs. only 3 for Republicans. So it was a wash! fivethirtyeight.com/features/redis…
TIL Democrats have adopted the controversial strategy of bullet voting in the Arizona state House this year: azcentral.com/story/news/pol…
Each AZ House district elects two representatives, but each person only gets one vote. So a party can greatly increase its odds of winning one seat if it nominates just one candidate (bc no vote-splitting)—but of course, you give up your shot at winning two.
That's exactly what Democrats have done in 4 of the 5 competitive Arizona House districts this year. That should easily get them to 28 seats in the 60-seat chamber. Then, if both their candidates win in the 5th seat—quite possible, as it was Biden+6—they can force a tied chamber.