WOW! Military whistleblower data shows that 64% of the 941 service members who died of/with COVID in military treatment facilities/other civilian facilities between March 2020 and March 2024 were "treated" with remdesivir. (1/5)
Brad Miller (@BradMiller1010), a former Battalion Commander in the U.S. Army, describes for Michael Nevradakis of Children's Health Defense (@ChildrensHD) some disturbing facts revealed by "The Remdesivir Papers"—a document assembled by an anonymous U.S. military whistleblower (known by the pseudonym Daniel LeMay) and investigative journalist J.M. Phelps (@JMPhelpsLC). The document divulges data derived from the Department of Defense Joint Trauma System (JTS) that's not otherwise not available to the public.
The Remdesivir Papers asks the question: "Are U.S. military treatment facilities and others hiding, or manipulating, the deadly results of clinical trials and more surrounding the controversial drug [remdesivir] purported to be a treatment for COVID-19?"
In this clip, Miller notes that the NIAID—that is, the National Institutes of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (the government agency that Anthony Fauci used to head)—sponsored four trials for remdesivir—an antiviral drug patented by the pharma giant Gilead—which found the drug "resulted in a minimal positive effect on instances of all-cause mortality and serious adverse side events when compared to the administration of a placebo" (quote from The Remdesivir Papers) despite "significant methodological questions that we might ask ourselves about the conduct of the trials" (Miller's wording).
A fifth trial, however, was conducted by Fort Detrick’s U.S. Army Medical Materiel Development Activity (USAMMDA) in conjunction with Gilead.
"Headquartered in Foster City, California, Gilead agreed to provide remdesivir for the treatment of DOD personnel exposed to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), the causative viral pathogen of COVID-19," The Remdesivir Papers notes.
Note that while Miller says that "of those 941 individuals that were administered remdesivir, 601 of them died," The Remdesivir Papers states something slightly different: it evinces data that 64% of the 941 service members who died of/with COVID in military treatment facilities/other civilian facilities between March 2020 and March 2024 were "treated" with remdesivir. Meaning not all 941 service members were administered remdesivir.
Despite this caveat, it is still extraordinary—and extraordinarily disturbing—that of the 941 service members who (supposedly) died of/with COVID between March 2020 and March 2024, 64% were given remdesivir.
Partial transcription of clip:
"Now in addition to those four trials that were sponsored by NIAID, there is a fifth trial that is mentioned in the remdesivir papers, but this one was sponsored by the military, specifically a unit out of Fort Detrick, Maryland that is known as the US Army
Medical Research and Development Command.
It sponsored a trial. We know that that trial was conducted. However, there is no information that
is publicly available about the findings of that clinical trial.
"So we might ask ourselves, why? So we have these
four trials from NIAID. They appear to present remdesivir in at least a minimally positive light, but there seem to be some significant methodological questions that
we might ask ourselves about the conduct of the trials.
So we take those four trials. We then look at them alongside this fifth trial sponsored by a military unit, and yet there's no publicly available data. Why?
"Now in addition to all of that, with these five trials, we
then have information that comes directly from a military whistleblower who presents information that tells us that over a four-year period from March
of 2020 to March of 2024, a significant number
of people in the wider military community were administered remdesivir. And of those 941 individuals
that were administered remdesivir, 601 of them died.
That's a, uh, that's a death rate of 64%.
"So what caused their deaths? Was it the remdesivir directly? Were there other factors? Should we know?
Should we at least be asking questions? And can we trust the fact that the DOD has not been forthcoming with this information?"
@BradMiller1010 Link to the article describing The Remdesivir Papers, written by J.M. Phelps, who assembled the whistleblowing document in conjunction with the anonymous military whistleblower:
@BradMiller1010 Note that there has been robust evidence in the peer-reviewed literature since at least mid-2020 that remdesivir is poisonous. (Really, earlier because remdesivir failed as a drug to treat ebola before failing to treat COVID).
Hyper-critical point—there was no COVID "pandemic." Excess mortality began *AFTER* the pandemic declarations (1/9)
Former Pfizer VP Michael Yeadon:
"[Our governments] were lying to you...by misusing a test [PCR] that doesn't measure what it says [it does]."
Yeadon, an expert in the area of allergies and respiratory therapeutics who spent more than 23 years in the pharmaceutical industry (including years as a vice president at Pfizer), describes in this clip taken from an interview published to the Oracle Films (@OracleFilmsUK) Rumble channel on July 3, 2025 an UNDENIABLE FACT: there was no COVID "pandemic."
This is not up for debate.
As Yeadon notes, the "pandemic" was declared *AND THEN* the excess deaths started. As the pharma insider notes, this is not how emergencies work. One does not declare a building is on fire, and then the building catches fire.
THIS. IS. MADNESS. See supporting evidence there was no COVID "pandemic" in the following 8 tweets.
---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------
"In order for an emergency to be declared, like a fire or like a shark approaching a public beach, a holiday beach, would you agree with me, ladies and gentlemen, that before you would call out the fire engines, you'd probably be smelling smoke somewhere. Someone would be, or a smoke alarm will go off. Before you would call shark alerts and get everybody off the beach, you'd think someone would have seen a fin. Yeah. Or someone in a helicopter said, hey, I can see some sharks approaching the beach.
"What I'm telling you is before an emergency is called, there is already an event at some level that someone is able to see, to detect and warn you about. And you think, oh, that was really good that they warned us in the case of the pandemic. That nice man at the WHO, Tedros, clever he may be, but he's not a fortune teller. He doesn't have foresight, he hasn't got long range binoculars, he's not got a time machine.
"In order to declare a pandemic, which I think he did in 2020 March, whatever it was, he has to have some evidence of that. There's a little problem, ladies and gentlemen. Not just me, but Denis Rancourt, Denis Rancourt in Canada and many other researchers have looked for signs of illness, respiratory illness, which surely would be growing somewhere in a small way, in order that the who, from their esteem's exhaustive position, could aggregate all that data and go, oh, my word, it looks like there's something like a pandemic beginning.
"There is nowhere in the world that you can find increased frequency of respiratory illness and respiratory deaths anywhere until after the WHO called a pandemic, ladies and gentlemen, they called a pandemic with no evidence of a pandemic. Because they were lying to you. They were lying to you. Then they created the. We, all our governments, created the impression of a pandemic, by using misusing a test that doesn't measure what it says, PCR. There's literally. What we had is a pandemic a rollout of the test. It's as simple as that.
"Increased number of cases, everywhere was a pandemic of a rollout of a rubbish test. It's not a mistake. They knew it was rubbish. They designed it to be rubbish. They designed it to produce positives where there was no illness. And then when people died, they said, oh, they had Covid. They literally did that. And then, I'm afraid, medical procedures in care homes and hospitals led to people being killed.
"But this is old news. You've heard all this before, but I just wanted to tell you, you can't have an emergency without some sign of that emergency emerging somewhere. You need that information as a leader to say. I'm afraid, folks, I've got bad news. There's an emergency coming. Batten down the hatches for these pandemics. They just lied to you. Nothing was happening. If you go and look for it, you'll not find the evidence. They called the pandemic. And then the data started arriving which was fraudulent. So it's as simple as that."
(2/9) In the U.S., the Public Health Emergency for COVID was declared on January 31, 2020.
The National Emergency, on March 13, 2020.
Per the CDC's all-cause mortality tracker, ***THERE WAS NO EXCESS DEATH UNTIL MARCH 28, 2020.***
(3/9) As Yeadon notes, the PCR "test" was utterly fraudulent. IN FACT, ***SARS-CoV-2 WAS NEVER ISOLATED FOR THE SO-CALLED TEST.***
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, May, 2025: "The incidence of [colorectal] cancer [has been] increasing the last several years *significantly,* particularly among younger people."
What Bourla does not say is that mRNA jabs, including Pfizer's, cause colorectal cancer—see tweets 2 & 3.
This clip is of Bourla touting Braftovi (encorafenib), a targeted cancer drug used to treat colorectal cancer.
So Pfizer has helped to create the "significant" rise in colorectal cancers, particularly among younger people, and now it's going to profit off the harm with more "treatment."
(2/3) Dr. James Royle describes how colorectal cancers have taken off since the COVID-injection rollout:
"Middle aged & elderly people are presenting w/ out-of-the-blue aggressive stage 4 colorectal cancer who are incurable & die within weeks or months"
(3/3) A mega-thread that shows the overwhelming evidence that the COVID injections cause aggressive (turbo) cancer en masse, including colorectal cancers:
Bob Malone is now pushing Flublok—a "vaccine" made using cells from the fall armyworm, a moth species 🤢🤢🤢🤮🤮🤮
"This is truly an innovative technology. It involves the use of insect cells to rapidly manufacture the product."
-----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------
"Regarding the Flublok product, this is truly an innovative technology. It involves the use of insect cells to rapidly manufacture the product. This is a cell-based influenza vaccine that represents, really a, great example of innovative biotechnology, in my opinion. This, this technology offers key advantages relative to historic influenza vaccine products, in that egg- and other cell-based products require adaptation of influenza strains and their antigens to the cell culture or egg culture environment.
"So you end up with a vaccine product that is, in some cases, potentially clinically significantly different from the actual circulating antigen. Whereas with the Flublok technology, with baculovirus technology in general, they're able to go straight from sequence to manufactured protein in a much shorter time frame without the need for adaptation. This is a key advantage."
Flublok's webpage features a wolf in sheep's clothing—can't make this crap up...
And, of course, no "gold-standard" science here. Flublok was tested against Fluarix (a quadrivalent standard-dose vaccine), not any kind of placebo....
Shoutout to Angela Rhoten (@CheweyLife) for highlighting this portion of the ACIP meeting
"If you lived in [rural areas], your [COVID] death rate was 3 to 4 times [higher]...[because] they didn't have... remdesivir...you wonder why they used ivermectin—because there wasn't a doctor there. There was only a vet." (1/5)
This clip of retired Army colonel Deborah Birx, who was parachuted in to run the Coronavirus Task Force under Trump 1.0 by the National Security Council (see tweet 4) says that Americans living in rural areas died at rates three to four times higher than Americans living in urban areas because they lacked access to testing and remdesivir. Furthermore, she notes that they turned to ivermectin because they didn't have doctors; they had veterinarians.
Note that remdesivir is enormously deadly, and it's always been known as enormously deadly (see tweet 2 and 3). In large part because the "antiviral" destroys the liver.
Furthermore, note that ivermectin is a Nobel Prize–winning drug that has been administered to *billions* of people over the last couple of decades. (Per sources summoned by Grok—check for yourself.)
----------------Partial transcription of clip---------------
"And when I got pulled back for Covid, I was devastated to see what happened. Long before there was a vaccine, people were dying at higher rates in rural, areas than any other counties in the United States. If you lived in the central valley of California, your death rate was three to four times what the urbans were. And that's because they didn't have the same resources. They didn't have testing, they didn't have remdesivir. Everything that you had in the cities, they didn't have in rural areas.
"And I went rural community by rural community. And then you wonder why they used Ivermectin. Because there wasn't a doctor there. There was only a vet. And these. That's how things happen. And we just. And then we're like, oh, my God. And I'm like, yeah, oh, my God. This is on us. This is on us. For the last 40 years, watching this stuff just go away."
(2/5) Remdesivir was a key tool used in the COVID "hospital homicide" protocols that slaughtered hundreds of thousands of Americans:
(3/5) A list of studies showing remdesivir is enormously dangerous and deadly:
Recall that even the WHO advised against the use of remdesivir for COVID up until Nov. 2020. It changed its recommendation based on no evidence that I could find... sensereceptornews.com/?p=4565
Here's how Palantir's "KILL CHAIN" programs were used to target and "EXECUTE" American citizens with COVID jabs/remdesivir/ventilators.
"They identified different hospitals or different individual patients based on [their 'threat risk score'] and [that's how they] determined [who]...to execute...with their AI kill-chain Gotham program."
This clip of author, former medical coder, and whistleblower Zowe Smith (@Zowe_TKMC) is taken from an interview with James Corbett posted to Rumble on June 17, 2025.
----------------Partial transcription of clip---------------
"So there was a program called HHS Protect during Operation Warp Speed, was part of Operation Warp Speed. That's where I think most of the public-facing infrastructure began. Although I was looking into Operation Stargate, and I'm seeing documentation on CIA databases that say it's more than 10 years in the making. So, definitely it's, it's a planned thing. It didn't just come out with day two, Trump administration.
"But, so this HHS Protect program is really interesting because what it did, it used two different Palantir programs. So the AMA, HHS, the CDC specifically, all partnered with Palantir. And then Palantir developed a program for Operation Warp Speed. And that program, what it did was it assigned people a Threat Risk Score. And then that was a program called Tiberius, which they also use for other purposes.
"So I want to make this point about AI, because when I was a medical coder, I was using a program which is a partner of Palantir, both 3M and Epic, and those are two different programs that I use that both have AI built into them that are partners of Palantir. And so all of these AI databases talk to each other as a condition of working with each other. So this has been going on for a very long time. But within Epic there are programs and you can rename them whatever you want, but it's the same program at any hospital across the country. So, like your program, Epic, might not be named Epic at Johns Hopkins or Mayo, it might have a different name at Johns Hopkins or Mayo, but it's still the same program.
"So this program from Palantir called Tiberius, they can rename that whatever they want, but the program will still do what it was programmed to do. It's, it's just a function really. And HHS had two programs built in. Tiberius was the thing that assigned you a Threat Risk score. And that was if you were following lockdown criteria, if you were actually distancing from people, if you had been vaccinated, if you were masking, you know, how obedient were you, that was your threat risk score. They also could determine down to the zip code where you were and how compliant areas were.
"And so, as Whitney Webb covers from the Unlimited Hangout, she wrote a article covering this program, HHS Protect, and highlights how this was used to target ethnic groups. So this threat risk score also incorporated your ethnicity and they thought, you know, you're higher risk if you're certain ethnic groups. So of course that was part of the risk score. And then Gotham is the AI kill chain program created by Palantir and that was used within HHS Protect to execute.
"So the Gotham program, it takes the threat risk score from Tiberius and then it executes the threat or tells, does an AI decision making process and decides when and how and where to deploy the countermeasures. Which was your vaccine, your remdesivir and your ventilator. That is why HHS Protect was created so that they could monitor all of this. And that is how they identified different hospitals or different individual patients based on some algorithm and determined that's how we're going to execute people with their AI kill chain Gotham program."
Recall that Operation Warp Speed Chief Operating Officer Army General Gus Perna said that "Palantir...[was] such a great teammate...[because it gave him] access to all the information [he] might need."
Recall that retired Army Colonel Deborah Birx (evil scarf lady), who was the National Security Council's plant on the COVID Task Force and its de facto leader, is now on the board of directors of Palantir...
"I worked for several years... to understand what was happening with the injections... they were trying to install operating systems in people's bodies... [Like]... tagging livestock... if you get... nanoparticles into the... body, you're creating... an organic barcode." (1/3)
Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the), describes for Danny Jones (@KONCRETE) how she believes that the mRNA injections serve as a platform for installing "operating systems" in people's bodies in order to build out the so-called "Internet of Bodies" by "basically [make it] easier [for people's bodies] to interact with telecommunications and digital technology."
Fitts notes that she's been working for "several years" with "a group of doctors and scientists" trying to understand "what was happening with the injections" and has arrived at this purpose as one of the central reasons they were rolled out.
Fitts likens these operating systems to "organic barcodes."
"It's not sci-fi at all," Fitts says. "It's...like...they're tagging livestock... if you've ever studied livestock management, a lot of this makes a lot more sense: They are tagging all the livestock... if you get a lot of these nanoparticles into the human body, you're creating the equivalent of an organic barcode."
Furthermore, Fitts notes that Moncef Slaoui, the former head of the vaccines department at GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) who served as the head of Operation Warp Speed (OWS) under President Donald Trump from 2020 to 2021 "was a brain-machine interface expert."
Indeed, in tweet 2/3 you'll hear Slaoui discuss "microchips or nanochips" that can be implanted in the body that would allow for the "understand[ing] [and] read[ing] [of] the electrical language that nerves" use to talk to organs.
----------------Partial transcription of clip---------------
"My guess is, because I worked for several years with a group of doctors and scientists trying to understand what was happening with the injections. And I absolutely believe that they were trying to install operating systems in people's bodies. Operating systems?
"If you listen, there's a great clip from right at the beginning of the pandemic when the chief scientist officer at Moderna says, we're installing an operating system in people's bodies. And he's describing something that can be used plug and play for future vaccines. But if you look at all the material on the Internet of Bodies, you're talking about putting materials in people's bodies that make them basically easier to interact with, with telecommunications and digital technology.
"It's not sci-fi at all. It's not just like they're. They're tagging livestock. I mean, if one of the things that really helps you to understand what this looks like. I live in a farming community in the United States. And if you've ever studied livestock management. A lot of this makes a lot more sense.
"They are tagging all the livestock, but this is simply a way of, you know, if you, if you get a lot of these nanoparticles into the human body, you're creating the equivalent of an organic barcode.
"I strongly recommend you. We just published, Patrick Wood at Technocracy News. I was the moderator. We just published, the second, symposium called omniwar, and this one is called the Battle for the Brain, and it gets into the Internet of Bodies. Here's what I believe, and I'm not a scientist, so don't ask me to explain this at all, but, if you look at all the patents and research and other work done on the Internet of Bodies, you know, it is clear that there are mysterious ingredients in the food, there are mysterious ingredients in the spray, there are mysterious ingredients in the injections. And the question is, what are those for? And I think it's very intentional. I don't think it's an accident.
"And I think one of the goals is, as the chief scientist officer at Moderna said, is to Is to install an operating system in your body. That's pretty dark. Yes, it's very dark. So go to the Purdue. Go to the Purdue Engineering website to the Internet of Bodies and look at the whole Internet of bodies.
"And then so they authorized Operation Warp Speed, which, remember, it's a military program. And who did they put in charge of it? But they put the former head of research at GSK, who is what, a brain-machine interface expert. The guy who ran Operation Warp Speed that Trump appointed was a brain-machine interface expert."
(2/3) Head of Operation Warp Speed and former vax head at GSK Moncef Slaoui in 2015:
"Our body uses...electric signals...traveling to our nerves...[and] our concept let's us understand, read, [that]...through microchips or nanochips that we would implant..."
Moncef Mohamed Slaoui, a Moroccan-born Belgian-American researcher who served as the head of Operation Warp Speed (OWS) under President Donald Trump from 2020 to 2021, tells an audience at the Aspen Institute in 2015 that he and his colleagues were working on "microchips" or "nanochips" that could be implanted into people's bodies. Once implanted, the nanochips would be able to "read" and "understand" the "language" of the nervous system.
"[T]he concept [is one] of hijacking this [nervous system] language, which, in fact, exists in our biology, and not only the language, but the conduit of the language, which is the nerve, and now taking the nerve, and helping the nerve write a different language; a different message to the organ they're controlling," Slaoui tells the audience. "All our organs, which are mostly involved in our chronic diseases, are controlled by peripheral nerves, and so...our concept let's us understand, read, the electrical language that nerves—just as they come to the spleen, or... the pancreas, or G.I. tract, get to that nerve—read what they're telling our organ, and if you read that something is wrong, correct it."
Slaoui goes on to say that the way he and his colleagues are doing that is "through microchips or nanochips" that would be "implanted" on nerves, so that they may be "very close to [their target] organ."
Slauoi adds, "there would be no compliance issue because they [the implants] would be there with the patients all the time."
(3/3) Here's the video I believe Fitts references. Tal Zaks, who was the CMO at Moderna until '21, notes in a TED talk that biology/the cell is "like an operating system." He goes on to discuss changing "the code" in the system with mRNA injections: