Post

More from @SenseReceptor

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Oct 14

"The centerpiece of the Pfizer documents is all about sex and pregnancy and menstruation and human reproduction....the 360-degree ways in which this [COVID] injection damages the human ability to reproduce." (1/12)

DailyClout CEO, author, and professor Dr. Naomi Wolf (@naomirwolf) describes for Del Bigtree (@delbigtree) on a recent episode of The HighWire (@HighWireTalk) how the COVID bioweapon injections (my term) cause immense, all-encompassing damage to the human reproductive system—specifically the female reproductive system.

In fact, Wolf, who's edited a book that analyzes the documents related to the outcome of Pfizer's COVID-injection "clinical trial" and post-authorization data in depth, dubbed The Pfizer Papers, notes that "The centerpiece of the Pfizer documents is all about sex and pregnancy and menstruation and human reproduction... [i.e.] the 360-degree ways in which this [COVID] injection damages the human ability to reproduce."

"All their focus is on reproduction. The centerpiece of their focus is reproduction. And [that's why] I say 360-degree damage, it's [because] they knew, because it's been known for 10 years, that lipid nanoparticles, as I mentioned, traverse every membrane in the human body [and] that includes the placenta."

Wolf goes on to note that "not only are they blocking women's ovaries with this material, but they knew that they were degrading the placenta, that the lipid nanoparticles are compromising placentas and... creating calcifications, making it more difficult for the babies in utero to get nutrients and oxygen."

"I've called this Mengele science and I say that advisedly," The Pfizer Papers editor adds. "[There are] charts that show 15,000 women have two menses a month. Twelve thousand (12,000) women are not bleeding at all. You know, 10,000 women are hemorrhaging agonizingly. Eighty-five-hundred (8,500) are passing tissue. Ten-year-old girls menstruating upon being injected. Eighty-five-year-old women menstruating upon being injected. I mean, [these are charts] showing this complete ruination of women's health at industrial scale."

Partial transcription of clip:

"In the documents. But what really jumps out is that you'd expect that the centerpiece of the Pfizer documents would be concerns about respiratory reactions because this is ostensibly a respiratory infection, COVID. But there's very little about that. And the centerpiece of the Pfizer documents is all about sex and pregnancy and menstruation and human reproduction. Completely centered on that. And the 360-degree ways in which this injection damages the human ability to reproduce.

"All their focus is on reproduction. The centerpiece of their focus is reproduction. And it's when I say 360-degree damage, it's they knew, because it's been known for 10 years, that lipid nanoparticles, as I mentioned,
traverse every membrane in the human body. So that includes the placenta. So not only are they blocking women's ovaries with this material, but they knew that they were degrading the placenta, that the lipid nanoparticles are compromising placentas and making it more creating calcifications, making it more difficult for the babies in utero to get, nutrients and oxygen.

"And so, some of the midwives that we've interviewed and Dr. James Thorp (@jathorpmfm), a fetal maternal medicine specialist, who's one of the few who's spoken out, they are independently confirming that there are nettings of calcifications now in vaccinated women's placentas that keep the baby from growing to term. And also they have to deliver babies early, as a result.

"A midwife named Ellen Jasmer sent me photographs
and independently confirmed by another midwife showing that placentas now vaccinated women are like flat and not well provided with blood vessels as
opposed to the I mean not to get graphic but a baby needs like a cushy well provided with blood vessels
placenta to grow and come to term. And so the placentas are in such terrible shape that, maternal deaths are up 40% because women are hemorrhaging. the placentas are falling apart. Let alone the babies, are suffering as well. Not only that, the lipid nanoparticles,
go into the babies in utero and degrade the membranes around the testes of baby boys in utero if their moms are vaccinated. And that degrades the Sertoli cells
and Leydig cells, which are the factories of masculine development, masculine hormones. So we don't know when those babies turn, you know, become adolescents
and grow up into men. Those are the hormones that turn on like deep voices, broad shoulders, facial hair, the ability to father a child.

"So we don't know if those baby boys will even be able to grow up into normal men who can be fertile. Pfizer knew that they were destroying women's menstrual cycles. You remember that's how the price story started.
Just just people accounts of women's own bodies. Well, it turns out they didn't want women to know that that was true. There's now a 13–20% drop in live births according to government databases in Western Europe and North America. And, in the Pfizer documents, there's something called the Pregnancy and Lactation Report. It's 8 pages long. And it has charts of that Pfizer was keeping.

And I've called this Mengele a science and I say that advisedly. Charts that show 15,000 women have two menses a month. 12,000 women are not bleeding at all. You know, 10,000 women are hemorrhaging agonizingly. 8,500 are passing tissue. 10-year-old girls menstruating upon being injected. 85-year-old women menstruating upon being injected. I mean, this complete this chart showing this complete ruination of women's health at industrial scale. And I was mocked and mocked and mocked and deplatformed, but now multiple peer reviewed studies have come out conceding that, yes, on average women's menses have changed if they've been vaccinated."

"And so you don't have to be a scientist. All you need is eighth grade biology to know that if women's menstrual cycles are being damaged, their fertility is being damaged. And that's what we're seeing."

(2/12) A study from 2012 showing that lipid nanoparticles accumulate in the ovaries: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…

An animal study from Japan showing that the LNPs from Pfizer's C19 jab go all throughout the body, including the ovaries+testes+uterus: pandemictimeline.com/wp-content/upl…

(3/12) Here is a list of 7 studies that show ample evidence of the mRNA and DNA COVID-19 injections negatively affecting women's menstrual cycles:

sensereceptornews.com/?p=3908

This list also includes a look at how a single study ultimately funded by the NIH and Bill and Melinda Gates—showing relatively minor effects of the injections on menstrual cycles—was able to capture all the attention away from the issue.

Read 11 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Oct 13

REMINDER: Only the HHS Secretary's say-so has been necessary to get the C19 bioweapon jabs made available. The FDA "approval" process was UTTER FRAUD AND THEATER.

NO CLINICAL TRIALS ARE POSSIBLE WITH EUA COUNTERMEASURES (Proof w/ links in next 2 tweets.)

Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for The Tennessee Informer (@TNinformer) how nothing was required to get the COVID bioweapon injections—often falsely and wrongly referred to as "vaccines"—made available to the public (i.e. victims) save for the say-so of the HHS Secretary. As Latypova has told us for years now, the "clinical trials" for the COVID injections, as well as the FDA "approval" for the bioweapons, has been utter fraud and theater.

"[The] only way these products [the C19 jab poisons] go on the market is based on the opinion of one person: the HHS Secretary. The HHS Secretary who says, 'In my opinion, they may be effective,'" Latypova says. "That's it. That's the entire regulatory pathway."

"In the US law [the HHS Secretary] does not have to give any reasons. It's only his opinion. He can consult with whoever he wants to consult," the pharma insider adds. "And by the way, the HHS Secretary is a lawyer. He's not a doctor."

Furthermore, Latypova adds, "the FDA did a bait-and-switch. The FDA and HHS and, you know, everybody involved, did a bait-and-switch. So these products went on the market using this EUA countermeasures pathway where nothing is required."

Note that the HHS Secretary—at the time, it was Alex Azar, under Trump—declared a "public health emergency" when there were only 11 cases of "COVID" in the U.S. and no deaths. It was this "emergency" that ultimately allowed for the rollout of the C19 jab bioweapons.

Partial transcription of clip:

"Only way these products go on the market is based on opinion of one person: the HHS Secretary. HHS Secretary who says, in my opinion, they may be effective. And that's it. That's the entire regulatory pathway.

"So there are ostensible reasons and then, you know, what I think the reasons are, real reasons. But, you know, people will call me conspiracist for it. but this is based on, you know, over over 3 or 4 years of
investigating this and looking into, US law going back for 200 years, to the 1700s and figuring out, you know, all
these vaccine related laws in the US.

"So the ostensible reason for this introduction of this piece of legislation, was, 'Oh, you know, if there is a really dire situation, if we get attacked with a nuclear bomb or we get attacked with, like, some really bad chemical weapons or something, then, we should have an ability for the government to roll out whatever treatments, even if they are not approved and and haven't gone through proper regulatory channels of approval, which is because of the emergency and urgency. We can just roll out anything that we have and give it to people.' And, of course, there is no way to mandate these products. It's also, in the in the law, it says that you can't mandate the use of these products. You can make them available.

"In the in the US law, no. He does not have to give any reasons. It's only his opinion. He can consult with, whoever he wants to consult. And by the way, the HHS Secretary is a lawyer. He's not a doctor. But his opinion
is enough for every man, woman, and child to be injected with these monstrosities, with these poisons.
but, anyway so, like, I'm telling you the ostensible reason was because if it's if there is a dire emergency, end of the world, we get nuclear bomb, well, you
know, we you can't require that every treatment that we were gonna offer is going to go through the clinical trials.
But you have to tell the people. Right? And you can't mandate these these things. So now you see, the FDA
did a bait and switch. FDA and HHS and, you know, everybody involved, did a bait-and-switch. So these products went on the market using this EUA countermeasures pathway where nothing is required.

"So, here, on this slide, this is the slide, by the way, from FDA. It's not I didn't make this. This is from this comes from the FDA. This is their own flowchart of how these products go on the market. I only put the yellow
box as a notation. And, you can see that what I just said that, the this is the entire regulatory pathway of how
these products get on the market. first, you need the emergency declaration. An emergency declaration can be issued by the DOD, DHS, HHS, so they can declare some sort of emergency. In this case, we had, we had
HHS declare a public health emergency.

"And then, the HHS Secretary writes the declaration
saying that in my opinion, circumstances exist that
justify having a national public health emergency.
this declaration for COVID was made when we had maybe 11 cases in the US and no deaths. But that declaration was made based on nothing. Absolutely nothing. He said it's the end of the world. We have to and and public health emergency declaration is equivalent to declaring war on US territory legally.

Slide **FROM THE FDA** showing nothing was required to get the C19 jab bioweapons made available to the public save for the HHS Secretary's say-so.

No evidence. No trials. No proof they save lives or prevent hospitalizations. Nothing.

public4.pagefreezer.com/browse/FDA/15-…

Under a PHE “[the] use of [EUA-covered medical countermeasures] shall not be considered to constitute a clinical investigation.”

NO CLINICAL TRIALS FOR THE COVID POISON JABS WERE EVER DONE. ONLY FRAUD, FRAUD, FRAUD.

PFIZER ADMITTED THIS when it dismissed whistleblower Brook Jackson's False Claims Act case against them.

"The [scope of work] describes a 'large scale vaccine manufacturing demonstration' that imposes no requirements relating to Good Clinical Practices (“GCP”) or related FDA regulations."

Link: iambrookjackson.com/_files/ugd/9df…

Link: law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21…

Read 4 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Oct 11

"Americans believe...'I'm important. I'm needed as a consumer and customer.' No. They've changed the model. They have a model where a shrinking population generates economic growth...And [BlackRock CEO Larry] Fink absolutely describes it." (1/6)

Investment banker, former HUD official, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the) Catherine Austin Fitts describes on a recent episode of the @ChildrensHD series Financial Rebellion how Mr. Global (i.e. the controllers of the world's financial, political, and military systems) have "changed the [economic] model" so that "a shrinking population generates economic growth." Fitts proceeds to show a—now infamous—clip of BlackRock CEO Larry Fink telling a World Economic Forum (WEF) audience that "AI and technology...will...be able to elevate the standard of living of countries, the standard of living of individuals, even with shrinking populations."

Fitts describes how there has been an ongoing "financial coup" in the U.S. since the mid '90s, and she has, elsewhere, outlined how the Department of Defense (DOD) has stolen $20 trillion of taxpayer money. (See tweet 2.)

Using a portion of this money, the DOD has executed on a plan to lower life expectancy in the U.S. using, in large part, the injectable bioweapons known as "COVID vaccines." (See tweet 3.)

Not only has the DOD lowered life expectancy in the U.S. by murdering lots of people with the COVID bioweapon injections, but it has also managed to lower birthrates—an effort that Fitts traces back decades, when the mass-scale robbery of the U.S. taxpayers by the DOD began. This effort to crush birthrates has been highlighted with the COVID bioweapon injections, which have horrendous effects on women's reproductive systems and their fertility. (See tweets 4, 5, and 6.)

"All throughout the financial coup, I kept saying, 'Look, if we don't deal with this and balance the books, they're gonna have to essentially lower life expectancy.' And what I described in Musings on the Department of Defense, is, in fact, fertility rates in the United States are crashing. Our life expectancy is crashing relative to the other 19 top industrialized countries."

Fitts goes on to show a clip of BlackRock CEO Larry Fink describing for a WEF audience that:

"These countries [with shrinking populations] will rapidly develop robotics and AI and technology. And it's a promise, I didn't say it's going to happen, but as a promise of all that, [it] transforms productivity...we'll be able to elevate the standard of living of countries, the standard of living of individuals, even with shrinking populations."

Fink adds: "So the paradigm of negative population growth is going to be changing. And the social problems that one will have in substituting humans for machines is going to be far easier in those countries that have declining populations."

Partial transcription of clip:

"We have had a financial coup since the mid '90s.
We've described it on Financial Rebellion many, many times, and I encourage you to watch some of those those shows that Carolyn and Polly and I have done
on what's happening in the financial coup. But all throughout the financial coup, I kept saying, look.
If we don't deal with this and balance the books, they're gonna have to essentially lower life expectancy. And what I described in Musings on the Department of Defense, is, in fact, fertility rates in the United States are crashing. Our life expectancy is crashing relative to
the other 19 top industrialized countries.

"Look at that bottom black line. That, you know, it started to diverge from the so this is the top 20 industrialized countries. The US started to diverge from the other 19 when the coup started and then, of course, dropping even more dramatically since the pandemic.
And then on the right, we see the falling birth rates.
The only one who's who's fallen, lower than the United States is China, which had the [one child] policy for many, many years. They've just reversed it. But what you see and and we have a video of Larry Fink, chairman of BlackRock, describing on how the model has changed. So many Americans believe, look. I'm important. I'm needed as a consumer and customer. No. They've changed the model. They have a model where a shrinking population generates economic growth. And so the model's changed, and Fink absolutely describes it.

Fink: "That's something that most people never talked about. We always used to think shrinking population
is a cause for negative growth. But in my conversations with the leadership of these large developed countries
that have xenophobic immigration policies, they don't allow anybody to come in, Shrinking unemployment
excuse me, shrinking demographics. These countries
will rapidly develop robotics and AI and technology.
And it's a promise I didn't say it's going to happen, but as a promise of all that transforms productivity,
which most of us think it will, we'll be able to elevate
the standard of living of countries, the standard of living of individuals, even with shrinking populations.

"And so the paradigm of negative population growth is going to be changing. And the social problems that one will have in substituting humans for machines is
going to be far easier in those countries that have declining populations. And so for those countries that
have rising populations, the answer will be education and so rapidly developing. For those countries that do not have a foundation of rule of law or education, they're gonna be left that's where divides gonna get more and more extreme.

Fitts: "So I've been working for years to try and understand why they're destroying education in the United States. And I after looking at that, I thought, oh, that's why."

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1800218408270626929

Fitts describes how the Department of Defense has stolen $20 trillion of taxpayer money. In part so it can slaughter Americans en masse and lower life expectancy. (2/6)

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1800218408270626929

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1826779709989908922

Fitts describes how the DOD has unleashed the injectable bioweapons known as "COVID vaccines" on the American population in order to lower life expectancy and "balance the books." (3/6)

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1826779709989908922

Read 7 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Oct 9

REMINDER: The U.S. military-industrial complex is behind the lethal poisons known as "COVID vaccines" that have maimed and slaughtered tens of millions of people (at least) around the globe. (1/6)

While MAHA clowns continue to focus on Froot Loops and pesticides as the bane of America's health, the adults in the room like retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) focus not only on the true existential threat to Americans' health—the COVID injections and all other "vaccines"—but also one of the key perpetrators of the COVID crime—the biggest crime in human history—the U.S. military-industrial complex.

In this clip from Ask Dr. Drew (@drdrew), Latypova explains how pharmaceutical companies all selected the spike protein for their COVID "vaccines"—and the mRNA platform in the case Moderna and Pfizer—because they are all, in essence (in this context, at least), fronts for the U.S. military-industrial complex.

"The choice of the mRNA platform was driven by the U.S. government because...Moderna is a U.S...military company," Latypova says. "It was funded by DARPA, by BARDA, and by the Department of Defense. And they've thrown huge amounts of money behind it, both from the formation of the company in, around 2010, 2011 up until COVID when they gave them these huge contracts without the company ever producing any product before."

But, Latypova notes, Moderna doesn't even manufacture its own "vaccines." In fact, a company most people have never heard of is responsible for the manufacturing: National Resilience.

"It [all] comes back to who owns the mRNA platform; who is going to benefit from it," the pharma insider says. "And we now have a whole company [who will benefit]. It's also a U.S. government company. It's backed by the CIA, Scott Gottlieb [is even] on the board of directors: It's called National Resilience, [and it is] the manufacturer of these juices for everyone."

"This National Resilience behemoth, which bought up a whole bunch of biological manufacturing facilities from pharma companies, [which crank] out these shots, [owns] their IP, [and is getting] their royalties, getting the profits," Latypova says. It is, in fact, National Resilience that is sending the COVID "vaccines" to companies such as Pfizer and Moderna who then "rebadge" them as "vaccines" for "Omicron, Delta, whatever."

"The interests are held by those people, so they need to be questioned," the pharma insider notes. "We need to question those members of the board of director of National Resilience, of Moderna, of Pfizer, you know, about their interest and who are they tied to. And you will see very quickly that it all comes back...to the CIA, the DOD, and the U.S. government, who is pushing this."

Partial transcription of clip:

"Well, so it's a very interesting question. Why everyone went that way even for the IP reasons. Different pharma companies wanted to compete with each other. The intellectual property situations typically drive them
to use different mechanisms, not the same. The choice of mRNA platform was driven by the US government because mRNA, Moderna is a US government, specifically military company. It was funded by DARPA, by BARDA, and by the Department of Defense. And they've thrown huge amounts of money behind it, both from the formation of the company in, around 2010, 2011 up until COVID when they gave them these huge contracts without the company ever producing any product before....

"As I said, it comes back to who owns that platform, who owns the mRNA platform, who is going to benefit from it. And we now have, a whole company. It's also a US government company. It's backed by the CIA, Scott Gottlieb on the, on the board of directors. It's called National Resilience, who is the manufacturer of of these juices for everyone. So they get cooked up in this National Resilience behemoth, which bought up a whole bunch of biological, manufacturing facilities from pharma companies, cranking out these shots, owning their IP, getting their getting their royalties, getting the profits, sending this to everyone who then, you know, rebadges it into Pfizer, Moderna, Omicron, Delta, whatever.

"But the interests are held by those people, so they need to be questioned. We need to question those members of the board of director of National Resilience, of Moderna, of Pfizer, you know, about their interest and who are they tied to. And you will see very quickly that it all comes back...to the CIA, the DOD, the the U.S. government who is pushing this. Otherwise, there is no explanation."

In this WaPo article from July 2020, dubbed "How a secretive Pentagon agency seeded the ground for a rapid coronavirus cure," it's explained how DARPA—or the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which is a U.S. government agency responsible for the development of new technologies for use by the military—has quietly been seeding the ground for the United States to produce a rapid cure for a pathogen like covid-19 FOR YEARS." (emph added)

"Established years before the current pandemic, the program was halfway done when the first case of the novel coronavirus arrived in the United States early this year," the article says.

"'Being at DARPA at this time ... is exciting in some ways because we get to see THE RESEARCH WORK THAT WAS FUNDED THAT WAS DONE TEN TO FIFTEEN YEARS AGO now really starting to pay off,' acting director Peter Highnam said in a discussion with reporters on Thursday." (emph added)

Read 9 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Oct 1

🔥MIND-BLOWING REVELATION🔥 Please stop and think about the implications of what's explained here. (1/3)

THIS is why it's IMPOSSIBLE to "vaccinate" against anything.

THIS is why "vaccines" are the PERFECT POISONS.

THIS is why eugenicists like Bill Gates love "vaccines."

Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for James Delingpole (@JMCDelingpole) how "vaccines," essentially, work in the exact opposite way as we're told they do—meaning it's literally impossible to make a vaccine that does anything but poison somebody.

While we're told that "vaccines" work by giving us a small amount of a toxic substance—e.g. a bacteria or virus— in turn allowing us to create immunity against future infections, what the injections actually do is make us vulnerable to said toxins. Furthermore, "vaccines" prime our bodies to react badly to *anything* that's injected into us, including benign substances like milk or egg proteins. Hence the proliferation of allergies, such as allergies to milk, eggs, wheat, peanuts, etc.

Incredibly, Latypova explains how this has been known since 1913, when Charles Richet—a French physiologist and self-proclaimed eugenicist—won a Nobel Prize for figuring out that injecting animals with toxins primes them for harmful or deadly reactions if they encounter the same toxins in the environment, even in small amounts. He called these reactions "anaphylactic" reactions, but said that these reactions also included allergies.

After researching this topic and analyzing Richet's work, Latypova says she's come to the conclusion that "everybody who is...closely familiar with this history and work cannot think that it's possible to vaccinate." The pharma insider adds, "It's impossible to vaccinate for anything. And Richet has demonstrated it conclusively and was given Nobel Prize for it...because he figured out how to poison everyone by sensitizing them to the most commonly occurring things in their environment."

"It's the most ingenious way of poisoning," Latypova says.

"The eugenicists never went away. They all still think that way. They all still think that they should poison us and limit our reproduction because, you know, we're polluting the earth now. We're causing climate change," Latypova adds. "They're brainwashing themselves and their followers into thinking that this is actually acceptable. It's acceptable to poison people. It's acceptable to sterilize people. It's acceptable to lie to people because it's for the greater good. So what started with Richet continues today."

Partial transcription of clip:

"One of the historical examples, Katherine [Watt] and I
ran into, and and this became a huge, epiphany for me is, Charles Richet, who was a French researcher in that in that time. So he worked in early 1900s. In 1913, he was given Nobel Prize for this work, and he is credited with the work on anaphylaxis, although he wasn't the only one, but so he received the Nobel Prize. And so that that to me, you know, opened so much kind of I was like, of course. You know, why didn't I see this before? But, basically, you know, when you look at this work and then when you look what preceded and what went after,
you kind of understand a few things.

"First of all, everybody who is, let's say, closely familiar with this history and work cannot think that it's possible to vaccinate. It's impossible to vaccinate for anything.
And Richet has demonstrated it conclusively and was given Nobel Prize for it...because he figured out how to
poison everyone by sensitizing them to the most commonly occurring things in their environment. It's the most ingenious way of poisoning.

"He was a committed eugenicist. And at that time, you
know, everyone should realize, eugenicism was a fashionable society attitude. So, you know, all the well-to-do classes were subscribing to it. The web the the good breeding was always, you know, promoted. And, at the time, the sentiment was, well, how can we help the poor being less dirty and less numerous? Make them less humorous. And AKA kill them. Because this side of them is so offensive to us when we ride our horses through the park and, you know, and then there's like them. What can we do about it? And what can we do about it became into let's figure out how to control
their, overbreeding because they tend to reproduce
reproduce too much, and they tend to live in crowded conditions, and they tend to have poor hygiene and no sanitation.

"So instead of working on those issues, they will decide, oh, let's vaccinate them. And, actually, the same same thing continues with Bill Gates in Africa and India for the same reason. And, you know, but but all of these
thoughts extended now to us, to normal people.

"Now all of the globalist and this, you know, elites, I don't call them elites, but they all think of us that way. That's, you know, that's what people need to understand. The eugenicists never went away. They all still think that way. They all still think that they should poison us and and limit our reproduction because,
you know, we're polluting the earth now. We're causing the climate change. Whatever those ideas are, but they're brainwashing themselves and their followers into thinking that this is actually acceptable.
It's acceptable to poison people. It's acceptable to sterilize people. It's acceptable to lie to people,
because it's for the greater good. You know? So what what started with Richet continues today."

"Through studies involving dogs... Richet demonstrated an opposite effect in 1902. After an initial low dose of a substance, a new dose some weeks later could produce a severe reaction."

"In 1913, [Richet] was awarded the Nobel Prize for his researches on anaphylaxis. He invented this word to designate the sensitivity developed by an organism after it had been given a parenteral injection of a colloid or protein substance or a toxin (1902)." (Parenteral drug administration is drug administration by intravenous, intramuscular, or subcutaneous injection.)

Source:

Source: nobelprize.org/prizes/medicin…
nobelprize.org/prizes/medicin…

"[Richet] believed in the inferiority of black people, was a proponent of eugenics, and presided over the French Eugenics Society towards the end of his life."

"Richet was a proponent of eugenics, advocating sterilization and marriage prohibition for those with mental disabilities. He expressed his eugenist ideas in his 1919 book La Sélection Humaine. From 1920 to 1926 he presided over the French Eugenics Society."

Read 4 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Sep 23

"I wanted to believe for the longest time that it [the COVID injections] wasn't a depopulation agenda, but ultimately the evidence persuaded me within the Pfizer documents that that's exactly what it is."

DailyClout CEO, author, and professor Dr. Naomi Wolf (@naomirwolf) describes how the Pfizer documents related to primary source COVID-injection "clinical trial" data released under court order, as well as related medical literature, evince an effort to execute a "depopulation agenda" with the jabs. Wolf, who's edited a book that analyzes these documents in depth, dubbed The Pfizer Papers, says that the COVID injections stand as "the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history."

"The Pfizer papers...have a specific focus on destroying reproduction," Wolf says. "I wanted to believe for the longest time that it wasn't a depopulation agenda, but ultimately the evidence persuaded me within the Pfizer documents that that's exactly what it is."

"They knew they were blocking women's ovaries with lipid nanoparticles," Wolf adds. "They knew the lipid nanoparticles traversed the placenta. They determined that the deaths of fetuses were due to maternal exposure, quote unquote, to the vaccine."

The author and CEO adds that "vaccinated women who were nursing their babies were making the babies sick," and she refers to this experiment as "Mengele science."

Partial transcription of clip:

"I haven't gone into detail about the headlines from the Pfizer documents, but I guess people can read the book for that, you know, except to say that it is the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history, unfortunately. And the Pfizer papers do have a specific focus on destroying reproduction. So that's why I wanted to believe for the longest time that it wasn't a depopulation agenda, but ultimately the evidence persuaded me within the Pfizer documents that that's exactly what it is. They knew they were blocking women's ovaries with lipid nanoparticles.
They knew the lipid nanoparticles traversed the placenta. They determined that the deaths of
fetuses were due to maternal exposure, quote unquote, to the vaccine.

"They knew that, vaccinated women who were nursing
their babies were making the babies sick. There are charts. This is why I say Mengele science. They're just charts showing this many thousands of babies are vomiting. This many thousands of babies have edema, which is swollen flesh. This many thousands of babies have convulsions. You know, one baby died of multi-organ system failure. from nursing vaccinated moms and to this day, I'm sure in the Netherlands, all over Europe, all over the world, no one's telling vaccinated moms that they can risk their babies' lives by nursing them. But Pfizer knew.

"Pfizer, knew in one section of the Pfizer documents there's an over 80% percent spontaneous abortion or miscarriage rate. Pfizer knows there's something in the semen of vaccinated men that is possibly dangerous to women or fetuses because they warn vaccinated men not to have intercourse with childbearing age women. And if they do, they use two reliable forms of contraception. They knew that the injection doesn't stay in the injection site, but it travels all over the body within 48 hours. Accumulating in the adrenals, the spleen, the lymphatic system, the liver, crosses the blood brain barrier, which causes a lot of brain damage type reactions you're seeing and accumulates in the ovaries.
they knew that it was damaging the hearts of minors and our lawyer's FOIA, meaning Freedom of Information Act, documents from the White House showing a scramble in April of 2021 to cover this up. But they just kept going that summer and into the next year, propagandizing parents to vaccinate their minors, knowing they were injuring or killing them."

@naomirwolf Here are three studies that support Wolf's claims about the COVID-injection contents biodistributing throughout the body. (And, specifically, the ovaries.)

Study one:

Study two:

Study three: pandemictimeline.com/wp-content/upl…
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30587973/
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…

@naomirwolf Link to Pfizer's post-authorization report, which shows the injections caused "spontaneous abortions," "fetal deaths," and "breast feeding baby cases":

canadahealthalliance.org/wp-content/upl…

Read 4 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Sense Receptor

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @SenseReceptor

Sense Receptor

Sense Receptor

Sense Receptor

Sense Receptor

Sense Receptor

Sense Receptor

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!