WOW! Military whistleblower data shows that 64% of the 941 service members who died of/with COVID in military treatment facilities/other civilian facilities between March 2020 and March 2024 were "treated" with remdesivir. (1/5)
Brad Miller (@BradMiller1010), a former Battalion Commander in the U.S. Army, describes for Michael Nevradakis of Children's Health Defense (@ChildrensHD) some disturbing facts revealed by "The Remdesivir Papers"—a document assembled by an anonymous U.S. military whistleblower (known by the pseudonym Daniel LeMay) and investigative journalist J.M. Phelps (@JMPhelpsLC). The document divulges data derived from the Department of Defense Joint Trauma System (JTS) that's not otherwise not available to the public.
The Remdesivir Papers asks the question: "Are U.S. military treatment facilities and others hiding, or manipulating, the deadly results of clinical trials and more surrounding the controversial drug [remdesivir] purported to be a treatment for COVID-19?"
In this clip, Miller notes that the NIAID—that is, the National Institutes of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (the government agency that Anthony Fauci used to head)—sponsored four trials for remdesivir—an antiviral drug patented by the pharma giant Gilead—which found the drug "resulted in a minimal positive effect on instances of all-cause mortality and serious adverse side events when compared to the administration of a placebo" (quote from The Remdesivir Papers) despite "significant methodological questions that we might ask ourselves about the conduct of the trials" (Miller's wording).
A fifth trial, however, was conducted by Fort Detrick’s U.S. Army Medical Materiel Development Activity (USAMMDA) in conjunction with Gilead.
"Headquartered in Foster City, California, Gilead agreed to provide remdesivir for the treatment of DOD personnel exposed to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), the causative viral pathogen of COVID-19," The Remdesivir Papers notes.
Note that while Miller says that "of those 941 individuals that were administered remdesivir, 601 of them died," The Remdesivir Papers states something slightly different: it evinces data that 64% of the 941 service members who died of/with COVID in military treatment facilities/other civilian facilities between March 2020 and March 2024 were "treated" with remdesivir. Meaning not all 941 service members were administered remdesivir.
Despite this caveat, it is still extraordinary—and extraordinarily disturbing—that of the 941 service members who (supposedly) died of/with COVID between March 2020 and March 2024, 64% were given remdesivir.
Partial transcription of clip:
"Now in addition to those four trials that were sponsored by NIAID, there is a fifth trial that is mentioned in the remdesivir papers, but this one was sponsored by the military, specifically a unit out of Fort Detrick, Maryland that is known as the US Army
Medical Research and Development Command.
It sponsored a trial. We know that that trial was conducted. However, there is no information that
is publicly available about the findings of that clinical trial.
"So we might ask ourselves, why? So we have these
four trials from NIAID. They appear to present remdesivir in at least a minimally positive light, but there seem to be some significant methodological questions that
we might ask ourselves about the conduct of the trials.
So we take those four trials. We then look at them alongside this fifth trial sponsored by a military unit, and yet there's no publicly available data. Why?
"Now in addition to all of that, with these five trials, we
then have information that comes directly from a military whistleblower who presents information that tells us that over a four-year period from March
of 2020 to March of 2024, a significant number
of people in the wider military community were administered remdesivir. And of those 941 individuals
that were administered remdesivir, 601 of them died.
That's a, uh, that's a death rate of 64%.
"So what caused their deaths? Was it the remdesivir directly? Were there other factors? Should we know?
Should we at least be asking questions? And can we trust the fact that the DOD has not been forthcoming with this information?"
@BradMiller1010 Link to the article describing The Remdesivir Papers, written by J.M. Phelps, who assembled the whistleblowing document in conjunction with the anonymous military whistleblower:
@BradMiller1010 Note that there has been robust evidence in the peer-reviewed literature since at least mid-2020 that remdesivir is poisonous. (Really, earlier because remdesivir failed as a drug to treat ebola before failing to treat COVID).
-Celia Farber, "an investigative historian of deep-fake virus agendas, from 'HIV' to 'Covid-19'": "Absolutely." (1/6)
In this clip from an interview with Tina Griffin (@Ctr_CultureMom), Celia Farber (@BarrierTruth), one of the most experienced investigative reporters on the planet in regard to the HIV/AIDS saga, describes how HIV as the cause of AIDS has been a scam. Farber, who has conducted decades of research into this topic, notes that scientists originally thought that a retrovirus as the cause of AIDS was "BS." Farber also notes that Robert Gallo's research assistant "tested the blood sample in question [supposedly linking HIV to AIDS and] found no retroviral activity, no retroviral particles, no cause of AIDS, no AIDS virus, nothing."
Regarding Robert Gallo's now-famous (or infamous...) 1984 media announcement linking HIV to AIDS, Farber says the following:
"The man who stood before hundreds of cameras at a press conference in 1984 was Robert Gallo, wearing tinted dark aviator glasses and saying...that he had found the cause of AIDS in his lab, that it was a great moment for American science and virology. And those scientists who I interviewed over the coming years, one of them, for example, the doctor Harvey Bialy, the editor of Biotechnology, he said, 'I didn't go to that conference. None of us went to that conference. We just said, oh, a retrovirus as if the cause of AIDS, that's just more Robert Gallo BS. We're not [going]...that'll never fly. That's just Robert Gallo being Robert Gallo.' And he [Gallo] was known as a low-ranking, corrupt, and corruptible scientist who was always very ambitious, very domineering and manipulative, who always was trying to attach his laboratory discovered viruses to novel diseases, sometimes as far as away as Japan. [Gallo would say,] 'Oh, this one causes this rare leukemia. This one causes that.' So he was known for that."
(For reference, Robert Gallo is an American biomedical researcher known for his role in the—supposed—discovery of HIV as the cause of AIDS. In 1984, Gallo was a researcher at the National Cancer Institute.)
"The real scientists," Farber notes, "didn't even go to the press conference, never dreamed it [Gallo's retrovirus explanation] would fly. But what was there that day was the cameras, the media, and they had been given the memo, let's call it, [not to] question this. Within, I believe, it was 24 hours, it went from the probable cause of AIDS has been found in The New York Times to the cause of AIDS has been found."
Farber adds, "I would say within 72 hours, you were an evil, homophobic, terrible, crazy person if you wondered, 'Did Gallo prove it? What proof did he have?' He not only had no proof, we had the opposite of proof."
Contrary to what Gallo was espousing at the time, Farber says that "his lab assistant had tested the blood sample in question, found no retroviral activity, no retroviral particles, no cause of AIDS, no AIDS virus, nothing. It was a big nothing-burger, and he said so in his report, but he was scared."
Farber adds:
"You can see that, you can see the documents I'm talking about. Gallo crosses out what his lab assistant wrote, 'nothing here,' and reverses it and says that it's [the blood sample] full of retrovirus, the cause of AIDS, the pathogenic, etcetera. So that fraudulent, reverse-engineered original data by Gallo that he fraudulently drummed into existence went in as the four foundation papers in Science Magazine. And from henceforth, all the hundreds of millions, later billions into the trillions that went into fraudulent deadly AIDS research always reference those four papers. So they just build a floor of fraud and then the rest is history."
(2/6) Note that HIV as the cause of AIDS was completely picked apart and exposed as fraudulent science in the documentary film House of Numbers. (Farber was interviewed in the film.)
(3/6) Also note that Nobel Laureate and discoverer of HIV Luc Montagnier said that "We can be exposed to HIV many times without being chronically infected. Our immune system will get rid of the virus within a few weeks, if you have a good immune system."
DEAR DOGE (@DOGE): If you really want to "ensure [our] tax dollars will be spent wisely," find the $20+ TRILLION the Department of Defense has stolen from American taxpayers. (1/7)
In this clip from a recent interview with Shannon Joy (@ShannonJoyRadio), investment banker, former HUD official, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the) Catherine Austin Fitts notes that if the incoming Trump administration "really wanted to reform the Deep State," it would start with the $21 trillion of missing taxpayer money; $20+ trillion of which has been stolen by the Department of Defense.
Fitts describes a "financial coup" that began in the U.S. in 1998, when the Deep State began disappearing U.S. taxpayer money from the federal government's coffers.
"In fiscal 1998 HUD was missing $59 billion dollars in the first year. And then by 9/11, the federal government, mostly DOD, was missing approximately $4 trillion dollars," the former HUD official says. "Then, when 9/11 happened, the day before 9/11, [Secretary of Defense under the George Bush administration] Donald Rumsfeld got up and confessed that the DOD was missing $2.3 trillion. And then 9/11 happened, and everybody sort of forgot about the missing money."
"I kept saying," Fitts adds, "we've got to pay attention to
the missing money because, essentially, most of this is
being financed out of our pension funds and retirement funds. And if we don't address this, we won't have enough money to meet our obligations under the retirement system unless we lower life expectancy.
And in fact, a lot of the Great Poising started at the same time."
Regarding this Great Poisoning—that is, increasing environmental toxins, injecting people with toxins via "vaccines," and debasing the food supply—Fitts adds:
"If you look at U.S. life expectancy, when the financial coups started, life expectancy started to fall and diverge with the other 19 industrial top industrial countries. And that accelerated with the pandemic. And what we are watching is a systematic lowering of life expectancies,
which is part of dealing with this financial problem.
So if you can't balance the books with full funding, you
balance the books by lowering the drain that the population is taking out of the out of the retirement system."
Furthermore, Fitts notes that "[We] have not seen the
new or the incoming administration talk about the money that's missing from the federal government." The investment banker also says that the quarantine camps that have been built in New York State have nothing to do with quarantining sick people, and, instead, are there to imprison anybody in finance who would dare to speak up about this multi-trillion-dollar theft and fraud by the U.S. government.
Regarding that topic, Fitts says:
"Well, what it's very funny when [New York State attorney] Bobbie Anne Cox told me about her litigation, I said, 'Bobbie, that has nothing to do with health. That has to do with you're the New York Fed, and you need to make sure that every financial person and hedge fund manager does what you tell them to do. And if they don't, you need to be able to kidnap them.'
"That's what that health regulation is about...You can't afford for one hedge fund manager to implode the entire international financial system. Do you really want a hedge fund manager standing up on the Solari show or The Shannon Joy show and talking about how they've just laundered out another trillion through the BIS [Bank of International Settlements] and they're stealing it?"
(2/7) Note that the Pentagon has just failed its 7th audit in a row:
"The Pentagon on Friday failed its seventh audit in a row, with the nation’s largest government agency still unable to fully account for its more than $824 billion budget, though officials stress they are making good progress toward a clean audit in 2028."
@DOGE @ShannonJoyRadio (3/7) Here is the summary report on the findings made by Fitts and Michigan StateUniversity professor Mark Skidmore, which uncovered more than $20 trillion of taxpayer money stolen by the Department of Defense.
"What's frustrating about Calley and Casey Means and...their food group is they will not go on record to talk about the COVID shots...I've had two conversations with [Calley] Means on the phone asking [him to] just to go on record, and he will not." (1/5)
"I've also reached out to Marty Makary, who is a pancreatic surgeon who's talking about this food issue, and I've asked him to go on record [re: the COVID jabs] and can't get that from him. In fact, he had a tweet in 2023 talking about how he recommends the COVID shots for pregnant patients."
Dr. Mary Talley Bowden (@MdBreathe), a physician who is board-certified in both Otolaryngology and Sleep Medicine, describes for Michael Farris (@CoffeeandaMike) how Casey and Calley Means (@CaseyMeansMD)(@calleymeans) and their "food group" refuse to go on record regarding the COVID injections. Casey and Calley Means have become burgeoning stars of the MAHA—Make America Healthy Again—movement, appearing on blockbuster platforms such as Joe Rogan's podcast and the Tucker Carlson Network; yet, for some reason, they largely focus on food as opposed to "vaccines."
"What's frustrating about Calley and Casey Means, and...their food group is they will not go on record to talk about the COVID shots...I've had two conversations with [Calley] Means on the phone asking [him to] just to go on record, and he will not," Bowden tells Farris. The physician says that she has spoken with Calley on the phone twice, yet "he just basically kept talking about food and doesn't understand why...I'm trying to give him some sort of purity test [regarding the COVID injections]."
Bowden notes that she's also DM'd Casey Means here on X multiple times, but hasn't received any response.
"There's a couple options [why they won't speak out about the COVID injections]," Bowden says. "They truly believe that the COVID shots are safe and effective, and they don't think that they should be taken off the market...[or] maybe they are being influenced by...Big Pharma. Maybe Big Pharma has asked them to come in and distract everybody. That's another possibility. But either way, you know, the fact that they can't make any kind of statement about it one way or the other is suspicious."
Furthermore, Bowden says that "Dr." Marty Makary (@MartyMakary), who has also become a MAHA centerpiece, will also not come out on record regarding the COVID injections. In fact, as of August 2023, Makary was still telling *pregnant women* to get the enormously dangerous jabs.
Partial transcription of clip:
"I mean, COVID is a big litmus test. And if you are
quiet on it, that's all I need to know. I mean, even that's what's frustrating about the Calley and Casey Means,
and their little group. Their food group is they will not go on record to talk about the COVID shots.
"And I have pushed I've had two conversations with [Calley] Means on the phone asking them just to go on record, and and he will not. And I don't understand
that because it's there's, you know, there'll be a lot
of support for that. And I told him, I said, we support your message. We just want you to support ours in kind.
And and why he can't or they can't do that is bizarre.
"I've also reached out to Marty Makary, who is a pancreatic surgeon who's talking about this food issue, and I've asked him to go on record and can't get that from him. In fact, he had a tweet in 2023 talking
about how he recommends the COVID shots for pregnant patients. And he seems to have the ear of Trump and Kennedy, which is concerning.
"There's a couple options [why they won't speak out about the COVID injections]. They truly believe that COVID shots are safe and effective, and they don't think that they should be taken off the market. That's that's how you would that's sort of interpreting that on the surface. Maybe they are being influenced by, you know, Big Pharma. Maybe their their Big Pharma has asked them to come in and distract everybody. That that's another possibility. But either way, you know, the fact that they can't make any kind of statement about it one way or the other is suspicious.
"I DM'd her. She's an ENT. She went to Stanford,
which I did too. And I reached out to her several times, friendly. You know, saying, hey. You know, I said I love your book. I I'd love to connect. Zero response. Sent her a couple other messages. No response, which is odd...
And then I yeah. And I had phone conversations with
her brother because her her brother didn't like me calling out the the fact that they weren't talking about COVID. So he wanted to have a phone conversation with me, but I still can't get him to talk about COVID.
"Well, the first one [phone call] was very heated.
It was... I don't think it was very productive. And the second one was calmer. But it was a lot of it just didn't have I wanted you know, he could have said what I was hoping he would say was, "Okay. We are we are pushing food because we're trying to get Trump in office, and we feel like this is a way to do that more effectively. And if we talk about the vaccines and we're we're scared we're gonna, you know, push off voters.' Right? That's what I was hoping he would say. He didn't say that. I mean, he just he just basically kept talking about food and doesn't understand why he, you know, thinks that I'm trying
to give him some sort of purity test and he's not going to do that. And I just said, you know, this the analogy is, you know, my my primary message is about COVID and the pandemic, but I talk about other things like the trans movement. I talk about other things, you know, abortion. I talk about other things I authentically feel like, you know, that I authentically believe in even if
it's not directly related to COVID. And I said, that's what
I don't understand with you. If you authentically believe
in COVID or against the COVID shots, then why can't you just state that?
"And and if you do that on Twitter, that's all you need to do. I mean, even, you know, a few things. It doesn't have to be, you know, your whole message at all. It's just it's just indicative if you say nothing about it, that there's a
there's a reason behind that."
(2/5) Note that Dr. Bowden's concerns regarding Casey and Calley Means—and their MAHA "food group"—seem to echo the same concerns Dr. Peter McCullough has described previously:
(3/5) Marty Makary, who is clearly a putrid goblin (**my term**), did indeed recommend *pregnant women* take a poison COVID jab (**my term**) as late as August 2023.
Makary should undoubtedly be tried for crimes against humanity. (**My opinion.**)
"I've always suspected that the mysterious ingredients [in the COVID jabs] have something to do with loading the equivalent of an operating system in your body... they're literally trying to get components into our body to hook us up to the cloud and the internet." (1/5)
Investment banker, former HUD official, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the) Catherine Austin Fitts describes for Greg Hunter (@USAWatchdog) how she believes that the COVID bioweapon injections (my term) can only serve one (or both) of two purposes: to either poison people or inject into their bodies "mysterious ingredients."
These "mysterious ingredients," Fitts notes, she believes are likely to be the components required to hook people's bodies up to the cloud and the internet—in effect, creating "an operating system" in people's bodies.
"There are only two reasons that I know of that anybody would wanna give you an mRNA shot, including the COVID-19 [shot]," Fitts tells Hunter. "That's because they wanna get mysterious ingredients in your body. You know, there's lots of questions about the mysterious ingredients. For the other, it's because they wanna poison you."
"We're just about to come out with, in the beginning of November, a new big publication by David Hughes [author of “Covid-19,” Psychological Operations and The War for Technocracy, Volume 1] called Omniwar," Fitts says. "And in it, David goes, through all the DARPA and NASA and Harvard sort of technology and patents and research on how to integrate our bodies into the Internet of Things. So they're literally trying to get components into our body to hook us up to the cloud and the Internet."
Fitts adds: "It's quite gruesome, but you need to understand that that is the level of control these guys want. I mean, think about it. Bill Gates made a fortune loading an operating system into your computer and then making you update it constantly because of viruses. It's the same model. Right?...And you have to understand that the way the globalists intend to centralize control is not by collapsing countries, but if they can literally get control of each person, one person at a time and use AI and software to control them, you know, forget the sovereign governments. This is how you take control."
Partial transcription of clip:
"There are only two reasons that I know of that anybody would wanna give you an mRNA shot, including the COVID-19 [shot]. That's because they wanna get
mysterious ingredients in your body. You know, there's lots of questions about the mysterious ingredients.
For the other, it's because they wanna poison you.
"Those are the only two reasons for giving anybody a COVID-19 shot or any mRNA shot. So, you know, I've always suspected that the mysterious ingredients
have something to do with loading the equivalent of an
operating system in your body.
"We're just about to come out with a, in the beginning of November, a new big publication by David Hughes called Omniwar. And in it, David goes, through all the DARPA and NASA and Harvard sort of technology and patents and research on how to integrate our bodies into the Internet of things. So they're literally trying to get components into our body to hook us up to the cloud and the Internet.
"It's quite, I mean, it's quite gruesome, but you need to understand that that is the level of control these guys want. I mean, think about it. Bill Gates made a fortune loading an operating system into your computer and then making you update it constantly because of viruses. It's the same model. Right?
"This is omniwar is World War 3. We are in a war.
And you have to understand that the way the globalists intend to centralize control is not by collapsing countries, but if they can literally get control of each
person, one person at a time and use AI and
software to control them, you know, forget the sovereign governments. This is how you take control.
If they can essentially create money that runs the fiscal side of the house and can manage people at a one-on-one level, then you can control the entire globe one person at a time. That's what they're up to. You have to read Omniwar. It's great."
(2/5) NOW, plenty of people think the nanotech-in-the-jabs thing is bogus. HOWEVER, there are some very odd videos that need splainin'.
Like this one from physician Dr. David Nixon showing "robot arms" assembling "organized chip structures" in the contents of Pfizer's jab.
(3/5) Using an electron microscope, physician Dr. Daniel Nagase also observed “what looks like a computer chip” in a Moderna COVID injection sample.
This actually looks like a chip and antenna to me. Although I'm a layperson with no quals/expertise 🤷♂️
"The centerpiece of the Pfizer documents is all about sex and pregnancy and menstruation and human reproduction....the 360-degree ways in which this [COVID] injection damages the human ability to reproduce." (1/12)
DailyClout CEO, author, and professor Dr. Naomi Wolf (@naomirwolf) describes for Del Bigtree (@delbigtree) on a recent episode of The HighWire (@HighWireTalk) how the COVID bioweapon injections (my term) cause immense, all-encompassing damage to the human reproductive system—specifically the female reproductive system.
In fact, Wolf, who's edited a book that analyzes the documents related to the outcome of Pfizer's COVID-injection "clinical trial" and post-authorization data in depth, dubbed The Pfizer Papers, notes that "The centerpiece of the Pfizer documents is all about sex and pregnancy and menstruation and human reproduction... [i.e.] the 360-degree ways in which this [COVID] injection damages the human ability to reproduce."
"All their focus is on reproduction. The centerpiece of their focus is reproduction. And [that's why] I say 360-degree damage, it's [because] they knew, because it's been known for 10 years, that lipid nanoparticles, as I mentioned, traverse every membrane in the human body [and] that includes the placenta."
Wolf goes on to note that "not only are they blocking women's ovaries with this material, but they knew that they were degrading the placenta, that the lipid nanoparticles are compromising placentas and... creating calcifications, making it more difficult for the babies in utero to get nutrients and oxygen."
"I've called this Mengele science and I say that advisedly," The Pfizer Papers editor adds. "[There are] charts that show 15,000 women have two menses a month. Twelve thousand (12,000) women are not bleeding at all. You know, 10,000 women are hemorrhaging agonizingly. Eighty-five-hundred (8,500) are passing tissue. Ten-year-old girls menstruating upon being injected. Eighty-five-year-old women menstruating upon being injected. I mean, [these are charts] showing this complete ruination of women's health at industrial scale."
Partial transcription of clip:
"In the documents. But what really jumps out is that you'd expect that the centerpiece of the Pfizer documents would be concerns about respiratory reactions because this is ostensibly a respiratory infection, COVID. But there's very little about that. And the centerpiece of the Pfizer documents is all about sex and pregnancy and menstruation and human reproduction. Completely centered on that. And the 360-degree ways in which this injection damages the human ability to reproduce.
"All their focus is on reproduction. The centerpiece of their focus is reproduction. And it's when I say 360-degree damage, it's they knew, because it's been known for 10 years, that lipid nanoparticles, as I mentioned,
traverse every membrane in the human body. So that includes the placenta. So not only are they blocking women's ovaries with this material, but they knew that they were degrading the placenta, that the lipid nanoparticles are compromising placentas and making it more creating calcifications, making it more difficult for the babies in utero to get, nutrients and oxygen.
"And so, some of the midwives that we've interviewed and Dr. James Thorp (@jathorpmfm), a fetal maternal medicine specialist, who's one of the few who's spoken out, they are independently confirming that there are nettings of calcifications now in vaccinated women's placentas that keep the baby from growing to term. And also they have to deliver babies early, as a result.
"A midwife named Ellen Jasmer sent me photographs
and independently confirmed by another midwife showing that placentas now vaccinated women are like flat and not well provided with blood vessels as
opposed to the I mean not to get graphic but a baby needs like a cushy well provided with blood vessels
placenta to grow and come to term. And so the placentas are in such terrible shape that, maternal deaths are up 40% because women are hemorrhaging. the placentas are falling apart. Let alone the babies, are suffering as well. Not only that, the lipid nanoparticles,
go into the babies in utero and degrade the membranes around the testes of baby boys in utero if their moms are vaccinated. And that degrades the Sertoli cells
and Leydig cells, which are the factories of masculine development, masculine hormones. So we don't know when those babies turn, you know, become adolescents
and grow up into men. Those are the hormones that turn on like deep voices, broad shoulders, facial hair, the ability to father a child.
"So we don't know if those baby boys will even be able to grow up into normal men who can be fertile. Pfizer knew that they were destroying women's menstrual cycles. You remember that's how the price story started.
Just just people accounts of women's own bodies. Well, it turns out they didn't want women to know that that was true. There's now a 13–20% drop in live births according to government databases in Western Europe and North America. And, in the Pfizer documents, there's something called the Pregnancy and Lactation Report. It's 8 pages long. And it has charts of that Pfizer was keeping.
And I've called this Mengele a science and I say that advisedly. Charts that show 15,000 women have two menses a month. 12,000 women are not bleeding at all. You know, 10,000 women are hemorrhaging agonizingly. 8,500 are passing tissue. 10-year-old girls menstruating upon being injected. 85-year-old women menstruating upon being injected. I mean, this complete this chart showing this complete ruination of women's health at industrial scale. And I was mocked and mocked and mocked and deplatformed, but now multiple peer reviewed studies have come out conceding that, yes, on average women's menses have changed if they've been vaccinated."
"And so you don't have to be a scientist. All you need is eighth grade biology to know that if women's menstrual cycles are being damaged, their fertility is being damaged. And that's what we're seeing."
An animal study from Japan showing that the LNPs from Pfizer's C19 jab go all throughout the body, including the ovaries+testes+uterus: pandemictimeline.com/wp-content/upl…
(3/12) Here is a list of 7 studies that show ample evidence of the mRNA and DNA COVID-19 injections negatively affecting women's menstrual cycles:
This list also includes a look at how a single study ultimately funded by the NIH and Bill and Melinda Gates—showing relatively minor effects of the injections on menstrual cycles—was able to capture all the attention away from the issue.
REMINDER: Only the HHS Secretary's say-so has been necessary to get the C19 bioweapon jabs made available. The FDA "approval" process was UTTER FRAUD AND THEATER.
NO CLINICAL TRIALS ARE POSSIBLE WITH EUA COUNTERMEASURES (Proof w/ links in next 2 tweets.)
Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for The Tennessee Informer (@TNinformer) how nothing was required to get the COVID bioweapon injections—often falsely and wrongly referred to as "vaccines"—made available to the public (i.e. victims) save for the say-so of the HHS Secretary. As Latypova has told us for years now, the "clinical trials" for the COVID injections, as well as the FDA "approval" for the bioweapons, has been utter fraud and theater.
"[The] only way these products [the C19 jab poisons] go on the market is based on the opinion of one person: the HHS Secretary. The HHS Secretary who says, 'In my opinion, they may be effective,'" Latypova says. "That's it. That's the entire regulatory pathway."
"In the US law [the HHS Secretary] does not have to give any reasons. It's only his opinion. He can consult with whoever he wants to consult," the pharma insider adds. "And by the way, the HHS Secretary is a lawyer. He's not a doctor."
Furthermore, Latypova adds, "the FDA did a bait-and-switch. The FDA and HHS and, you know, everybody involved, did a bait-and-switch. So these products went on the market using this EUA countermeasures pathway where nothing is required."
Note that the HHS Secretary—at the time, it was Alex Azar, under Trump—declared a "public health emergency" when there were only 11 cases of "COVID" in the U.S. and no deaths. It was this "emergency" that ultimately allowed for the rollout of the C19 jab bioweapons.
Partial transcription of clip:
"Only way these products go on the market is based on opinion of one person: the HHS Secretary. HHS Secretary who says, in my opinion, they may be effective. And that's it. That's the entire regulatory pathway.
"So there are ostensible reasons and then, you know, what I think the reasons are, real reasons. But, you know, people will call me conspiracist for it. but this is based on, you know, over over 3 or 4 years of
investigating this and looking into, US law going back for 200 years, to the 1700s and figuring out, you know, all
these vaccine related laws in the US.
"So the ostensible reason for this introduction of this piece of legislation, was, 'Oh, you know, if there is a really dire situation, if we get attacked with a nuclear bomb or we get attacked with, like, some really bad chemical weapons or something, then, we should have an ability for the government to roll out whatever treatments, even if they are not approved and and haven't gone through proper regulatory channels of approval, which is because of the emergency and urgency. We can just roll out anything that we have and give it to people.' And, of course, there is no way to mandate these products. It's also, in the in the law, it says that you can't mandate the use of these products. You can make them available.
"In the in the US law, no. He does not have to give any reasons. It's only his opinion. He can consult with, whoever he wants to consult. And by the way, the HHS Secretary is a lawyer. He's not a doctor. But his opinion
is enough for every man, woman, and child to be injected with these monstrosities, with these poisons.
but, anyway so, like, I'm telling you the ostensible reason was because if it's if there is a dire emergency, end of the world, we get nuclear bomb, well, you
know, we you can't require that every treatment that we were gonna offer is going to go through the clinical trials.
But you have to tell the people. Right? And you can't mandate these these things. So now you see, the FDA
did a bait and switch. FDA and HHS and, you know, everybody involved, did a bait-and-switch. So these products went on the market using this EUA countermeasures pathway where nothing is required.
"So, here, on this slide, this is the slide, by the way, from FDA. It's not I didn't make this. This is from this comes from the FDA. This is their own flowchart of how these products go on the market. I only put the yellow
box as a notation. And, you can see that what I just said that, the this is the entire regulatory pathway of how
these products get on the market. first, you need the emergency declaration. An emergency declaration can be issued by the DOD, DHS, HHS, so they can declare some sort of emergency. In this case, we had, we had
HHS declare a public health emergency.
"And then, the HHS Secretary writes the declaration
saying that in my opinion, circumstances exist that
justify having a national public health emergency.
this declaration for COVID was made when we had maybe 11 cases in the US and no deaths. But that declaration was made based on nothing. Absolutely nothing. He said it's the end of the world. We have to and and public health emergency declaration is equivalent to declaring war on US territory legally.
Slide **FROM THE FDA** showing nothing was required to get the C19 jab bioweapons made available to the public save for the HHS Secretary's say-so.
No evidence. No trials. No proof they save lives or prevent hospitalizations. Nothing.
Under a PHE “[the] use of [EUA-covered medical countermeasures] shall not be considered to constitute a clinical investigation.”
NO CLINICAL TRIALS FOR THE COVID POISON JABS WERE EVER DONE. ONLY FRAUD, FRAUD, FRAUD.
PFIZER ADMITTED THIS when it dismissed whistleblower Brook Jackson's False Claims Act case against them.
"The [scope of work] describes a 'large scale vaccine manufacturing demonstration' that imposes no requirements relating to Good Clinical Practices (“GCP”) or related FDA regulations."