The British CEO who plotted to k*ll @ElonMusk's 𝕏 has now been caught orchestrating a “BLACK OPS” campaign to silence Robert Kennedy Jr.
What this means is there was a covert order by the UK's CCDH to shut RFK Jr. down by any means necessary because they were “nervous” about his “impact” on “the election.”
Why is the UK's Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) orchestrating a “black ops” operation on a US political figure?
While the mainstream media shouts, “Russia! Russia! Russia!” it seems the real foreign election interference is coming from the UK’s censorship czars.
🧵 THREAD
The man pictured in this image, Imran Ahmed, is the “founder and CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH).”
“He advises politicians around the world on policy and legislation.”
A bombshell report by seasoned journalists Paul D. Thacker and Matt Taibbi revealed that one of CCDH’s “annual priorities” was to “kill Musk’s Twitter” and to drain its revenue stream by shaming and harassing advertisers away from the social media platform.
The story about the “black ops” operation launched against Robert Kennedy Jr. starts with a shocking statement made by Ahmed himself during a meeting on January 8, 2024.
He said, “RFK - black ops being set up to look at RFK. Nervous about the impact of him on the election.”
"Black ops" (short for "black operations") typically refer to covert operations that are carried out in secret, often by military, intelligence, or government agencies.
While black ops can involve a wide range of activities, including intelligence gathering and cyber espionage, they are often associated with violent or aggressive actions, such as assassinations, sabotage, or paramilitary strikes.
The key characteristic of black ops is secrecy and plausible deniability, meaning that even if they are discovered, the entity behind them can deny involvement.
Source: @sayerjigmi
CCDH (Center for Countering Digital Hate) claims to be a non-profit organization that combats “hate,” yet it uses violent undertones in its language, like “black ops,” to target a US political candidate.
The level of aggression and hypocrisy here is off the charts.
The revelations about CCDH’s “black ops” against RFK Jr. raise some serious legal concerns. If this UK-based organization is actively trying to influence U.S. elections, it could be violating key U.S. laws—especially the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA).
This law requires foreign entities involved in U.S. political activities to register as foreign agents, something CCDH has not done.
On top of that, CCDH’s tactics could run afoul of the Federal Election Campaign Act, which bans foreign nationals from making any contributions or engaging in activities that influence U.S. elections.
By running covert operations aimed at shutting down a political candidate like RFK Jr., CCDH may have crossed a line into illegal territory—engaging in what looks a lot like foreign interference in a US election.
Thanks for reading! If you found this revelation as alarming as I did, please do me a quick favor and share this thread before you go.
If you thought “Ozempic face” was bad, wait till you hear what it’s doing inside the body.
A massive study involving 16 million people found GLP-1 users had a 9.09 times greater risk of pancreatitis, 4.22 times greater risk of bowel obstruction, and a 3.67 times greater risk of stomach paralysis.
And if you’ve ever had pancreatitis, it is “quite a painful experience.”
What you’re hearing on the news about Ozempic is still too little, too late.
Here’s the story you’re not getting about Ozempic, the business model behind it, and why a growing number of researchers believe another pharmaceutical disaster is already unfolding in real time. 🧵
In early 2023, JP Morgan hosted its annual healthcare conference—a private, invitation-only event it describes as “the industry’s biggest gathering.”
The keynote speakers included the chairman of JPMorgan Chase, the CEO of Eli Lilly, and several managing directors of major healthcare venture capital firms.
The fourth keynote was Dr. Robert Califf.
His day job at the time: Commissioner of Food and Drugs for the United States Food and Drug Administration.
Hmm…
This wasn’t a public health symposium. It wasn’t an academic conference.
It was specifically designed for large investors, and its explicit purpose was to set the pharmaceutical industry’s financial priorities for the year ahead.
A pharmaceutical safety advocate named Kim Witczak obtained what she could from the conference’s public-facing website.
The world’s second most published critical care doctor says they’ve been lying to you about the sun for decades.
Dr. Paul Marik says there’s no reason to fear the sun; you should embrace it.
Because when you get adequate levels of vitamin D, your risk of cancer goes down, depression symptoms alleviate, and your immune system functions far better.
What about sunscreens? Dr. Marik advises against it because “it defeats the purpose.”
“There’s some data that sunscreens increase your risk of melanoma — paradoxically.”
Similar to how Big Pharma doesn’t like the “I drug” (Ivermectin) for treating COVID-19, Dr. Marik explained they also don’t like Vitamin D for general health and well-being.
Why? Because if you are in good health and devoid of chronic disease, there’s less money to be made.
Big Pharma played us. They propagandized the masses into fearing an essential component of human life.
Here’s what they don’t want you to know about the sun vs. artificial light—and what happens when your body is cut off from natural light. 🧵
The further north humans migrated away from the equator—and away from the sun—the lighter their skin became.
That’s not cosmetic. It’s a survival adaptation.
The human body, recognizing it wasn’t capturing enough light, made itself more transparent to capture whatever remained.
We evolved to need light the way we need food.
But in our modern lives, we commute in sealed cars, work 8 hour shifts under fluorescent lights, and go home to screens in the comfort of our artificially lit homes.
And we wonder why we’re sick.
In a 20-year study following 29,518 women, researchers found that those who avoided the sun were 60% more likely to die—with heart disease showing the greatest mortality difference.
A separate large study found that high solar UVB exposure halved one’s risk of both breast and prostate cancer.
The data is there. And it’s been available for decades. But almost no one talks about it.
This teacher-turned-cognitive scientist shared a disturbing reality that left the room stunned.
“Our kids are LESS cognitively capable than we were at their age.”
Every previous generation outperformed its parents since we began recording in the late 1800s.
So, what happened?
Screens.
Dr. Jared Horvath explained:
“Gen Z is the first generation in modern history to underperform us on basically every cognitive measure we have, from basic attention to memory, to literacy, to numeracy, to executive functioning, to EVEN GENERAL IQ, even though they go to more school than we did.”
“So why? … The answer appears to be the tools we are using within schools to drive that learning (screens).”
“If you look at the data, once countries adopt digital technology widely in schools, performance goes down significantly, to the point where kids who use computers about five hours per day in school for learning purposes will score over two-thirds of a standard deviation LESS than kids who rarely or never touch tech at school. And that’s across 80 countries.”
But screens aren’t just decimating learning and making new generations less intelligent than the ones before them.
They’re doing something far worse. And when you take a closer look, it isn’t pretty.
This isn’t a glitch.
Engagement-driven algorithms don’t understand meaning, context, or childhood development. They only understand clicks and watch time driven by dopamine spikes.
So when AI is tasked with churning out videos at scale, it doesn’t filter for innocence—it optimizes for stimulation.
Cartoon imagery masking adult themes, fear cues, violence, and psychological distress is being served to toddlers. Bright colors on the surface. Something very, very wrong underneath.
This content has zero educational or developmental value. No story. No moral arc. No learning. Just rapid-fire novelty engineered to hold attention at all costs—even if that cost is literally the viewer’s brain and nervous system development.
Dopamine-optimized media and AI-generated slop are conditioning our children for addiction, emotional dysregulation, and long-term neurological harm.
We have to stop this before it starts—and before Big Pharma steps in with the “solution.”
Something unprecedented and highly concerning is happening to children’s brains.
Toddlers aren’t just watching screens—they’re being neurologically conditioned by them.
Rapid cuts, flashing colors, constant novelty.
And none of it is by accident. It is all by design.
What looks like “kid’s content” is often dopamine engineering aimed at maximizing engagement, not healthy development, no matter the damage it does.
RFK Jr. told Tucker Carlson the CDC buried its own internal study showing a 1135% INCREASE in autism risk from hepatitis B vaccination.
The researchers were shocked.
So they covered it up.
How?
“They got rid of all the older children essentially and just had younger children who are TOO YOUNG TO BE DIAGNOSED [with autism],” Kennedy explained.
Imagine discovering evidence of catastrophic harm and making sure no one ever found out.
Then, telling everyone it’s “safe.”
If health authorities are willing to keep a signal this alarming hidden from you, what else are they not telling you about vaccines?
Is it possible that your child’s allergies or chronic immune issues didn’t appear organically, but were triggered by vaccination instead? 🧵
The vaccine-autism fight is usually framed as one bad paper versus settled science.
Hands down. No questions.
That framing is emotionally powerful and far too small.
The question is not whether a single case series proved causation. It’s whether modern medicine has built a system that can even detect rare, subgroup-specific neurological injury.
And if it can detect it, is the system even capable of admitting it?
Before digging into the evidence, one thing has to be understood:
The official public-health position is that vaccines have not been shown to cause autism.
But that doesn’t end the discussion. Not even close.
It actually narrows the real question: are there vulnerable subgroups, injury patterns, or mechanisms that broad population studies are just not designed to see?
If your studies are designed to not see something, can you ever expect to see it?
RED ALERT: Former COVID Task Force coordinator Deborah Birx is now calling for “widely available” PCR testing for Hantavirus, including in schools, and many people are noticing the exact same pandemic playbook that preceded the chaos of 2020.
The real red flag is not the virus itself. It’s watching the same fear infrastructure suddenly reactivate in real time—PCR testing, asymptomatic spread warnings, quarantine language, hazmat imagery, and nonstop media coverage telling the public not to panic.
Birx openly argued that viruses should be tracked through PCR testing instead of symptoms, the same testing system that used to inflate COVID case counts and justify lockdowns across the world.
At the exact same time, Fox News is now airing “deadly outbreak” coverage featuring quarantine centers, hazmat suits, and warnings about possible spread, while officials simultaneously insist there is “nothing to worry about.”
Watch @zeeemedia's report before this escalates any further.
Health insurance in America is broken. But it doesn't have to be that way.
Over 200,000 Americans go bankrupt because of medical bills every year—and many of them already had insurance. On average, 20% of claims are denied, leaving families stuck paying massive out-of-pocket costs after spending thousands on premiums.
Nearly 20% of the world’s population is being urged to return to COVID-style lockdowns, this time because of the global oil crisis tied to the Iran war.
Critics say this is how the next phase begins, not with force at first, but with emotional appeals about “patriotism,” sacrifice, and doing your part for the collective good before harsher measures eventually follow.
In a passionate national address, India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi called on citizens to work from home, return to virtual meetings, avoid driving whenever possible, and use electric rail systems instead.
For many people, the messaging feels disturbingly familiar. During COVID, governments first framed compliance as a moral responsibility “for the common good.” Not long after came fines, surveillance, movement restrictions, and aggressive enforcement across much of the world.
Now, a growing number of critics are asking what happens when every major crisis, from pandemics to oil shortages to climate emergencies, becomes justification for the same systems of control.
The full report reveals why many people believe COVID was never the end of this agenda, only the beginning.
In 1982, an NBC affiliate station in Washington, D.C., produced a documentary called “DPT: Vaccine Roulette.”
It got such a huge reaction, the station re-aired it twice. The big NBC promoted it. It even won an Emmy.
All because it asked one vital question: Is the DPT vaccine more dangerous than the disease itself?
44 years later, a film like this would never win an Emmy, never be funded by mainstream television, nor receive positive media coverage. You can’t even watch the film on YouTube anymore.
The question we have to ask is: why?
Did the evidence change… or something else? 🧵
There was a time when vaccine injury wasn’t treated as a forbidden topic.
It was treated as news.
NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, Fox, CNBC, local stations, talk shows, and even European broadcasters aired lengthy segments about paralyzed children, neurological injury, conflicts of interest, hot lots, mandates, regulatory failure, and more.
Most people forgot about it or don’t even know that used to be the norm.
Today, a single skeptical segment about vaccine safety can be framed as reckless and even deadly misinformation.
But for decades, mainstream TV interviewed injured families, challenged officials, and aired data the agencies did not want discussed.
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc
For all the sources and details, read the full report below: