A short🧵1/9 on the Israeli air raids into Iran yesterday. This was more than a precision strike, it was a clear demonstration of capability, intent and will. [This replaces a previous thread that mistakenly reposted a misleading video - thank you to all who rightly corrected me]
2/ The raid demonstrates a level of co-ordination and execution that is way more precise, sophisticated and devastating than the salvo firing of some less-than-successful drones or missiles - which is Iran’s only viable conventional means to strike Israel.
3/ We haven’t seen all the results yet but a select number of key targets linked to Iran’s missile and drone capability appear to be the main target - a restrained but potentially debilitating tit-for-tat response that doesn’t appear to have targeted nuclear or oil facilities.
4/ Some of the more sophisticated air defence sites were “suppressed” along the way, and with no reports of any Israeli losses a combination of this, stealth and standoff weapons has proven highly effective against Iranian air defences.
5/ Iran won’t say it, but it will come as a huge shock to them that they can be targeted with such relative ease. The precision of intelligence and attacks, and ease with which it was conducted, despite plenty of notice, means Iran knows Israel can do this whenever it wants to.
6/ it will have shaken any confidence that Iran had in their so called impenetrable Russian-supplied air defence systems. And in a country the size of Iran you can’t defend everywhere- it now appears they can’t defend anywhere.
7/ So, the strikes may have drawn a line in the conventional “war” between the two, and we are yet to see the impact on Iranian production, although we may see clues in Ukraine first if export supplies are impacted.
8/ But the real damage is the signal Israel has sent of what it is capable of doing, even when Iran is at a state of heightened alert. It also has wider implications, as the results will not have been lost on Russia who knows that their equipment is fallible and vulnerable.
9/ And there is an even wider lesson for those who see a new paradigm in deep strike. Drones and missiles may be a tempting solution for many, but it would appear that “the bomber still can always get through”. Now imagine what Ukraine could do given similar means…..ENDS
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The UK’s Carrier Strike Group is about to conduct a transit of the South China Sea after its time in Japan. It now finds itself having to manage a complex and changing diplomatic context. Is this crunch time for UK strategy & credibility in the region? - a🧵1/8
2/ The S. China Sea is a contested region because of China’s claim of a wider EEZ, demarked by the so-called 9-Dash line, and their “designs” on Taiwan. Their actions around Taiwan, in particular, are increasingly active, hostile and encroaching.
3/ This period is notable for the recent Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) meeting, where the ties between China, Russia & India were clear for all to see. It was followed by China’s biggest ever military parade
A stark appraisal of the state of the RN. But we must be wary of playing victim here and learn lessons as to what a Service must do to thrive . Because the underlying issues identified here are not unique to the RN. Let’s explore where and how it can and does go wrong: 🧵1/18
2/ OVER- AMBITION: is a killer, it’s ok to have a vision or aspiration, but if your plans exceed your budget you have no margin of safety. And the first clue that it’s not going to work is when you start fitting “for and not with”, because you can only afford the former.
3/ IGNORING THE BASICS: Under investing in your core services and capabilities to afford more shiny kit has only one outcome, unless you have a recovery plan and can mitigate the additional costs of that recovery. But it’s a slippery slope that is hard to come back from.
There is a lot of commentary on this rather alarming video of a fly past that very nearly had a tragic ending. Lots of theories out there - here’s mine! I’ll use snapshots from the second video to explain what I think happened. Spoiler alert: I think it was pilot error.🧵1/7
2/ An EF-18 of the Spanish Air Force was performing at the Gijón Air Festival held on Sunday July 27 over San Lorenzo Bay in Asturias, Spain: it’s not clear if it was meant to be a full display or an “enthusiastic” flypast - I suspect the latter. festivalaereogijon.com/#programa
3/ The aircraft approaches from the North and follows the coastline of the grassy promontory (see below). There are a few birds around but I don’t think they are a factor. As the pilot points at the beach they should just reverse the turn to follow the coastline, but they don’t
The lessons from the Israel/Iran“12 Day War” are far more profound and relevant to us in the UK than those learned in Ukraine.🧵1/n warontherocks.com/2025/07/lesson…
2/ “It not only reaffirmed the continuing relevance of conventional capabilities but also underlined the importance of cyber integration, information dominance, strategic precision, and alliance cooperation in 21st-century conflict scenarios.”
3/ “Air superiority remains the cornerstone of operational success, but it ought to be supplemented by cyber dominance, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance integration, and electronic warfare.”
There has been plenty of heat and light surrounding the recent act of sabotage at Brize Norton. Let’s unpick some of the facts and add some thoughts. 🧵1/15telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/06/2…
2/ As usual, everyone focusses on the things they can see. Airfield perimeters are very hard to make impervious, which is why we have defence in layers. I’m not going to discuss those layers here, but it’s possible that some were either not in place or failed at Brize Norton.
3/ The section of fence that the “security experts” at the Telegraph have identified, is what’s known as a frangible fence. It’s a compromise between security and causing an over-running aircraft to crash & erupt in a ball of flame.
Ok, I’m going to say it. This was somewhat over complicated, and looks more like the perfect execution of the plan they would had prepared assuming that it was a US pre-emptive strike and that they were the first ones in.🧵1/8
2/ But, over a week of Israeli strikes has brought the Iranian defence network to its knees, and their Air Force have been able to operate even 4th generation aircraft overhead Iran with impunity. Air supremacy is a tough state to achieve but it has been over Iran.
3/ The deception feint of the Pacific route seems more of a political stunt than a military tactic, especially as it mirrored & signposted the very nature and timing of the attack it was meant to mask. It also used up precious strike power and tankers. But a nice option to have!