A short🧵1/9 on the Israeli air raids into Iran yesterday. This was more than a precision strike, it was a clear demonstration of capability, intent and will. [This replaces a previous thread that mistakenly reposted a misleading video - thank you to all who rightly corrected me]
2/ The raid demonstrates a level of co-ordination and execution that is way more precise, sophisticated and devastating than the salvo firing of some less-than-successful drones or missiles - which is Iran’s only viable conventional means to strike Israel.
3/ We haven’t seen all the results yet but a select number of key targets linked to Iran’s missile and drone capability appear to be the main target - a restrained but potentially debilitating tit-for-tat response that doesn’t appear to have targeted nuclear or oil facilities.
4/ Some of the more sophisticated air defence sites were “suppressed” along the way, and with no reports of any Israeli losses a combination of this, stealth and standoff weapons has proven highly effective against Iranian air defences.
5/ Iran won’t say it, but it will come as a huge shock to them that they can be targeted with such relative ease. The precision of intelligence and attacks, and ease with which it was conducted, despite plenty of notice, means Iran knows Israel can do this whenever it wants to.
6/ it will have shaken any confidence that Iran had in their so called impenetrable Russian-supplied air defence systems. And in a country the size of Iran you can’t defend everywhere- it now appears they can’t defend anywhere.
7/ So, the strikes may have drawn a line in the conventional “war” between the two, and we are yet to see the impact on Iranian production, although we may see clues in Ukraine first if export supplies are impacted.
8/ But the real damage is the signal Israel has sent of what it is capable of doing, even when Iran is at a state of heightened alert. It also has wider implications, as the results will not have been lost on Russia who knows that their equipment is fallible and vulnerable.
9/ And there is an even wider lesson for those who see a new paradigm in deep strike. Drones and missiles may be a tempting solution for many, but it would appear that “the bomber still can always get through”. Now imagine what Ukraine could do given similar means…..ENDS
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There has been plenty of heat and light surrounding the recent act of sabotage at Brize Norton. Let’s unpick some of the facts and add some thoughts. 🧵1/15telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/06/2…
2/ As usual, everyone focusses on the things they can see. Airfield perimeters are very hard to make impervious, which is why we have defence in layers. I’m not going to discuss those layers here, but it’s possible that some were either not in place or failed at Brize Norton.
3/ The section of fence that the “security experts” at the Telegraph have identified, is what’s known as a frangible fence. It’s a compromise between security and causing an over-running aircraft to crash & erupt in a ball of flame.
Ok, I’m going to say it. This was somewhat over complicated, and looks more like the perfect execution of the plan they would had prepared assuming that it was a US pre-emptive strike and that they were the first ones in.🧵1/8
2/ But, over a week of Israeli strikes has brought the Iranian defence network to its knees, and their Air Force have been able to operate even 4th generation aircraft overhead Iran with impunity. Air supremacy is a tough state to achieve but it has been over Iran.
3/ The deception feint of the Pacific route seems more of a political stunt than a military tactic, especially as it mirrored & signposted the very nature and timing of the attack it was meant to mask. It also used up precious strike power and tankers. But a nice option to have!
A very complex and fatiguing mission that resulted in 7 x B2s dropping 2 x GBU-57 MOP bombs each on the two primary nuclear sites of Fordo and Natanz, with Isfahan being struck by at least 24 submarine launched TLAMs (Tomahawk missiles).🧵1/7
2/ The B2s launched overtly into the Pacific yesterday were a deception (but it is not clear what that achieved, other than reducing the size of the actual bomber force). The real strike package flew across the Atlantic, and joined up with fighter aircraft already in the region.
3/ The B2s released their weapons on the two primary sites, protected and proceeded by a package of 4th and 5th generation fighters as a screen and decoy. These would have been used to suppress any potential threat - but no missile intercepts were observed.
A few guesses (leaks?) ahead of next weeks’ release of the long awaited UK Defence Review👇. So what can we expect and what should we look out for? 🧵1/18
2/ The budget is set: 2.5% rising to 3% by next Parliament (Healey says 2034). And there are rumours of a future 3.5% target for NATO nations. Whilst 2.5% will probably only paper over the cracks, the higher %s will depend on National economic performance and HMT good will.
3/ Those hoping for a shopping list may be disappointed - the detail may come later. But how it frames the threats of Russia & China will signpost where the primary focus will be. I expect Russia to be that now, but with China seen as the critical pace setter on future threats.
Does the UK have a Defence Strategy problem? All we ever hear these days is that our Defence is underfunded, overspent, gapped & overstretched. So what can the 2025 review do to fix it, because we already know what the budget is. 🧵1/20
2/ The fundamental truth is that over the last few decades we have spent less & delivered even less, yet our ambition of global reach and influence has hardly wavered. Previous reviews have singularly failed to bridge this gap, whilst many plead for money we just don’t have.
3/ The UK, of course, is not alone in seeking a post Cold War peace dividend, and on some of the key numbers we still compare favourably with allies, and we remain one of NATO’s highest spenders in % GDP terms and real terms.
The @RoyalAirForce presents its first Autonomous Collaborative Platform (ACP) - “Stormshroud”. 🧵1/7raf.mod.uk/news/articles/…
2/ Also known as Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) or Loyal Wingmen, this is a combination of the Tekever AR3 drone tekever.com/models/ar3/ and Leonardo’s Britestorm electronic warfare payload uk.leonardo.com/en/britestorm
3/ It provides a “stand in” jammer to blind/decoy enemy air defence systems, allowing other aircraft/weapons to penetrate hostile airspace un-targeted and unhindered. Previously this would have been a role for dedicated aircraft such as the EA-18G Growler. boeing.com/defense/ea-18g…