Jeremy Clarkson, James Dyson, the Earl of Derby – they’re up in arms about paying tax on the vast areas of land they own.
Small farmers are worried that changes to Agricultural Property Relief (APR) will affect them. But who are the big landowners complaining the loudest?... 1/
2/ First up, Jeremy Clarkson, who owns a 1,000-acre farm in the Cotswolds. When he bought it he said: “Land is a better investment than any bank can offer. The government doesn’t get any of my money when I die” -
Now he doesn’t want to pay the #ClarksonTax topgear.com/car-news/jerem…
3/ Clarkson has attacked the government for thinking that “most of the countryside is owned by the Duke of Marlborough” (his near neighbour):
This is the same Dyson who’s hoovered up 33,000 acres of farmland & got £1.8m in farm payments in 2023, but wants the UK to be more like low-tax Singapore: whoownsengland.org/2017/09/19/why…
5/ Next, the Earl of Derby thinks having to pay some more tax is “shockingly awful”:
The 19th Earl owns a grouse moor in the Peak District, a racehorse stud, and a gigantic stately house, Knowsley Hall, pictured below: ft.com/content/f62a41…
6/ Minette Batters, ex-NFU head, attacked changes to APR in this piece, referring to “a typical 500-acre mixed-use farm”.
But 500 acres isn’t typical: in fact, it’s bigger than 90% of English farms. 59% of all farms in England are smaller than 123 acres: gov.uk/government/sta…
7/ The Country Land & Business Association was set up in 1907 to oppose Lloyd George’s land value tax, & now opposes APR changes.
Today its members own a third of the land in England & Wales. Its current president, Lady Victoria Vyvyan, owns a 1,000 acre estate:
8/ The farmer Guy Singh-Watson, who founded Riverford Organics, welcomes changes to APR, because, as he says, he’s “glad to see tax loopholes closing for cynical investor landowners”: theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
9/ Meanwhile, separate to APR, 355 aristocratic estates are claiming another tax break - the 'tax-exempt heritage assets' scheme - & using it to prop up ecologically damaging grouse moors & pheasant shoots.
10/ Small farmers deserve all our support. But they’re not well-served by wealthy landowners dodging taxes, pushing up land prices & making it harder for small farmers to buy farmland.
We need a #ClarksonTax on wealthy landowners [ENDS]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ These 355 landowners benefit from a loophole called the “tax-exempt heritage assets scheme”, under which they can register land and property as heritage assets and make them exempt from inheritance tax.
3/ This year's the 75th anniversary of the creation of national parks by Attlee's Labour government. But though some of the founders of Britain’s national parks dreamed of them being “owned or controlled by the nation” (Ramsay Report, 1945), things have not turned out that way.
I’m shocked, shocked to hear that the ‘net zero aspiration’ for farming trumpeted by the National Farmers Union in 2019 is now ‘in doubt’
The NFU’s plan refused to consider significant land use change or dietary shift & favoured bioenergy crops instead 1/ bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
2/ The NFU’s now blaming the last Govt for not including enough ‘climate-friendly measures’ in ELMS. Look, we can all hate on the Tories. But it was the NFU that lobbied vociferously to water down ELMS - leaving the most ambitious tier, Landscape Recovery, with 5% of the budget
3/ Where I agree with the NFU is in increasing the budget for ELMS to pay for more nature restoration - rather than cut it as Treasury are rumoured to want.
But we also need far greater accountability for landowners to actually deliver nature recovery & value for money.
REVEALED: Tory Environment Secretary @SteveBarclay rejected expert advice for review of climate impacts on soil fertility
Officials warned him govt's Agricultural Land Classification system is 'decades old' & will be obsolete by 2030
Story in today's Times; FOI'd docs below 1/
2/ The Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) system was drawn up after WW2 and grades land according to its ability to produce food - soil fertility, rainfall, climate
It was last updated in *1988* - before climate change had even registered as a political issue in the UK
3/ ALC maps are used in the planning system to try to protect 'best and most versatile land' (grades 1-3a) from development. The maps are also important for showing how we prioritise highly fertile land for food & can spare other land for nature (e.g. upland areas)
So @TheGreenParty manifesto is now out - here's my take on their nature policies.
Most significantly, I think, is their pledge for a new Rights of Nature Act - "giving rights to nature itself".
This would be a transformative shift in how we relate to the rest of nature. 1/
2/ Lawyers like @LawForNature @paulpowlesland have been calling for nature to be granted rights for years, to better defend habitats and species from destruction.
A Rights of Nature Act would transform how we currently relate to nature as mere 'property' or a 'resource'.
@LawForNature @paulpowlesland 3/ The Greens are also pledging a new Clean Air Act (something the Lib Dems have also pledged); to end the emergency authorisation of neonic pesticides (which Labour recently also pledged to do); and to meet 30x30 (a goal that is shared by the Tories, Labour & Lib Dems)
The Tory manifesto is now out - here's my take on its nature policies.
First off, the Tories attack Natural England & the Environment Agency: "we will improve their accountability & give them clearer objectives"
Sounds like they want to gut our environmental regulators 1/
2/ Earlier this year I heard a rumour that the Tories were mulling a manifesto pledge to abolish Natural England.
This clearly falls short of that, but it's part of a vicious war that the Tories have waged on NE for years - simply for trying to do its job.
3/ For eg, back in March, a group of Tory MPs proposed a Bill that would gut Natural England's powers to designate nature reserves (SSSIs). They even wrote to the Environment Secretary urging him to back it. Fortunately the election put paid to their plans